Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.57(9) > 1010385

Jeong, Sohn, and Ahn: Surgical Outcome of Minimal Resection with Full Thickness Rotating Suture Technique for Lower Lid Epiblepharon

Abstract

Purpose

To introduce the minimal skin and orbicularis oculi muscle resection with the full thickness rotating suture technique for lower lid epiblepharon and to assess its surgical outcome.

Methods

A retrospective review of medical records was performed on lower lid epiblepharon patients who were followed for more than 6 months after surgical correction performed between January 2004 and December 2015. All surgeries were performed by one surgeon using minimal skin and orbicularis oculi muscle resection and the full thickness rotating suture technique for lower lid epiblepharon correction.

Results

A total of 943 lower lid epiblepharon patients (403 male, 540 female) were included in the analysis. The mean patient age was 6.7 ± 2.4 years, and the mean postoperative follow-up was 12.9 ± 7.2 months. Eyelid shape and function were well maintained in 904 patients (95.9%), with no recurrence during follow-up. Among the recurrent cases (39 patients [4.1%]), 19 patients (2%) underwent a second correction surgery.

Conclusions

Minimal skin and orbicularis oculi muscle resection with the full thickness rotating suture technique for lower lid epiblepharon showed good surgical outcome with few complications and high success rate.

References

1. Levitt JM. Epiblepharon and congenital entropion. Am J Ophthalmol. 1957; 44:112–3.
crossref
2. Johnson CC. Epiblepharon. Am J Ophthalmol. 1968; 66:1172–5.
crossref
3. Johnson CC. Epicanthus and epiblepharon. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978; 96:1030–3.
crossref
4. Karlin DB. Congeital entropion, epiblepharon, and antimongoloid obiliquity of the palperbral fissure. Am J Ophthalmol. 1960; 50:487–93.
5. Quickert MH, Wilkes DI, Dryden RM. Nonincisional correction of epiblepharon and congenital entropion. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983; 101:778–81.
crossref
6. Millman AL, Mannor GF, Putterman AM. Lid crease and capsu-lopalpebral fascia repair in congenital entropion and epiblepharon. Ophthalmic Surg. 1994; 25:162–5.
crossref
7. Kim JS, Jin SW, Hur MC, et al. The clinical characteristics and abdominal outcomes of epiblepharon in Korean children: a 9-year experience. J Ophthalmol. 2014; 2014:156501.
8. Hotz FC. A new operation for entropion and trichiasis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1879; 8:249–63.
9. Hotz FC. Remarks on 177 operations for entropion and trichiasis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1882; 11:442–50.
10. Woo KI, Yi K, Kim YD. Surgical correction for lower lid epiblepharon in Asians. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000; 84:1407–10.
crossref
11. Yi K, Ku HJ, Kim TW, Kim YD. Surgical correction fo epiblepharon. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1998; 39:11–6.
12. Noda S, Hayasaka S, Setogawa T. Epiblepharon with inverted eyelashes in Japanese children. I. Incidence and symptoms. Br J Ophthalmol. 1989; 73:126–7.
crossref
13. Hwang JM, Lee JH. Clinical evaluation of epiblepharon. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1988; 29:1–5.
14. Hayasaka S, Noda S, Setogawa T. Epiblepharon with inverted eyelashes in Japanese children. Ⅱ. Surgical repairs. Br J Ophthalmol. 1989; 73:128–30.
15. Kim SY, Moon IA, Kang YK, Yang SW. Clinical evaluation of epiblepharon and congenital entropion. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1999; 40:646–51.
16. Sohn SW, Woo KI, Chang HR. Astigmatism in children with epiblepharon. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2002; 43:1827–32.
17. Sundar G, Young SM, Tara S, et al. Epiblepharon in East Asian abdominals: the Singapore experience. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117:184–9.
18. Choo C. Correction of oriental epiblepharon by anterior lamellar reposition. Eye (Lond). 1996; 10(Pt 5):545–7.
crossref
19. Kim MS, Sa HS, Lee JY. Surgical correction of epiblepharon using an epicanthal weakening procedure with lash rotating sutures. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014; 98:120–3.
crossref
20. Khwarg SI, Choung HK. Epiblepharon of the lower eyelid: technique of surgical repair and quantification of excision according to the skin fold height. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2002; 33:280–7.
crossref
21. Ni J, Shao C, Wang K, et al. Modified Hotz procedure combined with modified Z-epicanthoplasty versus modified Hotz procedure alone for epiblepharon repair. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Mar 4. [Epub ahead of print].
crossref
22. Fujiwara T, Maeda M, Kuwae K, Nishino K. Modified split V-W plasty for entropion with an epicanthal fold in Asian eyelids. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 118:635–42.
crossref
23. Asamura S, Nakao H, Kakizaki H, Isogai N. Is it truly necessary to add epicanthoplasty for correction of the epiblepharon? J Craniofac Surg. 2013; 24:1137–40.
crossref

Figure 1.
Minimal resection of skin & orbicularis oculi muscle. Marking a skin incision line with the aid of Bishop forceps (medial side is wide and tapered laterally, like tadpole shape) (A). Skin and subcutaneous tissue resection was performed with Stevens scissors (B).
jkos-57-1348f1.tif
Figure 2.
Photography describing full thickness rotating suture. After exposing the tarsal plate, simple interrupted buried suture is performed (A, B). Cross section view of the lower eyelid with full thickness rotating suture (C).
jkos-57-1348f2.tif
Figure 3.
Photography showing preoperative & postoperative view. Preoperative view (A). Postoperative 6 month view (B). Lower eyelid margin is well everted and the cornea is not touched by cilia anymore.
jkos-57-1348f3.tif
Figure 4.
Photography showing hypertrophic scar at post-operative 3 months. The scar was formed along the skin incision line which creates mechanical tension.
jkos-57-1348f4.tif
Table 1.
Demographic characteristics of patients
Characteristics Values
Male:Female (n, %) 403 (42.7%):540 (57.3%)
Mean age (years) 6.7 ± 2.4
Lower cilia touched lesion  
 Nasal 548 (58.1%)
 Center 367 (38.9%)
 Temporal 28 (3.0%)
Mean follow up time (months) 12.9 ± 7.2

Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.

Table 2.
Postoperative results
  Patient (n, %)
Well–corrected 904 (95.9)
Recurrence 39 (4.1)
 Reoperation 19 (2.0)
 Improved without reoperation 20 (2.1)
Postoperative complications  
 Hypertrophic scar 4 (0.4)
 Lid retraction 0
 Ectropion 0

Values are presented as n (%) unless otherwise indicated.

Table 3.
Distribution of surgical outcome according to lower cilia touched lesion
Lower cilia touched lesion Patient (%)
Success Recurrence
Total
Reoperation Observation
Nasal 513 (93.6%) 17 (3.0%) 18 (3.3%) 548
Center 363 (98.9%) 2 (0.5%) 2 (0.5%) 367
Temporal 28 (100.0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 28
p-value 0.002* 0.028

Values are presented as n (%) unless otherwise indicated.

* p-value of Pearson chi square test (linear-by-linear association) between recurrence and lower cilia touched lesion

p-value of Pearson chi square test (linear-by-linear association) between reoperation and lower cilia touched lesion.

TOOLS
Similar articles