Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.56(7) > 1010318

Kim, Cho, Kim, and Kim: The Incidence of Increased Intraocular Pressure when Using 0.1% Fluorometholone after Photorefractive Keratectomy

Abstract

Purpose:

To analyze the time and incidence of increased intraocular pressure (IOP) induced by 0.1% fluorometholone used to prevent corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

Methods:

The present study included 826 patients (826 eyes) who underwent PRK between November 2012 and October 2013 and were followed up for more than 6 months. After surgery the patients were treated with 0.1% fluorometholone for 3-6 months according to their corneal conditions. The time and incidence was analyzed with the time and incidence when anti-glaucoma eye drops were used.

Results:

Anti-glaucoma eye drops were used in 312 eyes (38%). The anti-glaucoma eye drops were started before 4 weeks postoperatively in 105 eyes (13%) and postoperatively at 5-8 weeks in 86 eyes (10%), at 9-12 weeks in 83 eyes (10%), at 13-16 weeks in 25 eyes (3%) and after 17 weeks in 13 eyes (2%).

Conclusions:

The overall incidence of increased IOP when treated with 0.1% fluorometholone for 3-6 months after PRK was ap-proximately 38%. The incidence of increased IOP in each month for the first 3 months was almost identical implying that the lon-ger 0.1 fluorometholone was used, the higher incidence of increased IOP occurred. These results can be helpful in educating pa-tients regarding the risk of increased IOP and determining the follow-up period after PRK.

References

1. O'Brart DP, Shalchi Z, McDonald RJ. . Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized prospective clinical trial of excimer laser photo-refractive keratectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014; 158:651–63.
2. Yuksel N, Bilgihan K, Hondur AM. . Long term results of Epi-LASIK and LASEK for myopia. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014; 37:132–5.
crossref
3. Sia RK, Ryan DS, Edwards JD. . The US. army surface abla-tion study: comparison of PRK, MMC-PRK, and LASEK in mod-erate to high myopia. J Refract Surg. 2014; 30:256–64.
crossref
4. Hofmeister EM, Bishop FM, Kaupp SE, Schallhorn SC. Randomized dose-response analysis of mitomycin-C to prevent haze after photorefractive keratectomy for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013; 39:1358–65.
crossref
5. Corbett MC, O'Brart DP, Warburton FG, Marshall J. Biologic and environmental risk factors for regression after photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology. 1996; 103:1381–91.
crossref
6. Baek SH, Choi SY, Chang JH. . Short-term effects of flurbipro-fen and diclofenac on refractive outcome and corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997; 23:1317–23.
crossref
7. Kim SI, Oh TH. Effects of topical tranilast on corneal haze with the Pentacam(R) after photorefractive keratectomy. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2014; 55:1277–83.
8. Deng Y, Wnag L, Liu C, Cai R. Effects of Dexamethasone, Fluorometholone and Florex on intraocular pressure after photo-refractive keratectomy. Hua Xi Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 1999; 30:205–7.
9. Vetrugno M, Quaranta GM, Maino A, Cardia L. A, comparative study of fluorometholone 0.2% and fluorometholone 0.1% acetate after photorefractive keratectomy. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2000; 10:39–45.
10. Machat JJ. Double-blind corticosteroid trial in identical twins fol-lowing photorefractive keratectomy. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993; 9((2 Suppl)):S105–7.
crossref
11. Levy Y, Hefetz L, Zadok D. . Refractory intraocular pressure increase after photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997; 23:593–4.
crossref
12. Yamaguchi T, Murat D, Kimura I. . Diagnosis of steroid-in-duced glaucoma after photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg. 2008; 24:413–5.
crossref
13. Morales J, Good D. Permanent glaucomatous visual loss after pho-torefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998; 24:715–8.
crossref
14. Razeghinejad MR, Katz LJ. Steroid-induced iatrogenic glaucoma. Ophthalmic Res. 2012; 47:66–80.
crossref
15. Morrison E, Archer DB. Effect of fluorometholone (FML) on the intraocular pressure of corticosteroid responders. Br J Ophthalmol. 1984; 68:581–4.
crossref
16. Javadi MA, Mirbabaei-Ghafghazi F, Mirzade M. . Steroid in duced ocular hypertension following myopic photorefractive keratectomy. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2008; 3:42–6.
17. Lee KM, Kim MK, Wee WR, Lee JH. Risk factors of the steroid in-duced ocular hypertension after corneal refractive surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2010; 51:1333–7.
crossref
18. Hashemi H, Miraftab M, Asgari S. Comparison of the visual out-comes between PRK-MMC and phakic IOL implantation in high myopic patients. Eye (Lond). 2014; 28:1113–8.
crossref
19. Kang H, Choe CM, Choi TH, Kim SK. Comparison of clinical re-sults between transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and brush photorefractive keratectomy. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2014; 55:1284–90.
crossref
20. Kuo IC, Lee SM, Hwang DG. Late-onset corneal haze and myopic regression after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Cornea. 2004; 23:350–5.
crossref
21. Kim WK, Cho EY, Kim HS. . Analysis of postoperative intra-ocular pressure underestimation measured with non contact ton-ometry after corneal refractive surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2014; 55:167–72.
crossref
22. Nagy ZZ, Szabó A, Krueger RR, Süveges I. Treatment of intra-ocular pressure elevation after photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001; 27:1018–24.
crossref
23. Park HS, Choi CY, Bae JH, Kim JM. The effect of fixed combina-tion of brinzolamide 1% and timolol 0.5% in normal-tension glaucoma. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2014; 55:1056–63.
crossref
24. Jang SR, Lee MV, Ahn JH. Comparison of dorzolamide-timolol fixed combination and latanoprost, effects on intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2014; 55:854–9.
crossref
25. Pleyer U, Ursell PG, Rama P. Intraocular pressure effects of com-mon topical steroids for post-cataract inflammation: are they all the same? Ophthalmol Ther. 2013; 2:55–72.
crossref

Figure 1.
The graph shows the time when the patients started to use anti glaucoma medication during 0.1% fluorometholone treatment after photorefractive keratectomy.
jkos-56-985f1.tif
Table 1.
General characteristics of 826 eyes of 826 patients who received photorefractive keratectomy
Characteristics Values
Age at operation (years) 28.6 ± 5.0
Male:female (No. of patients) 251:575
Preoperative myopia (diopters) -4.27 ± 1.81
Preoperative astigmatism (diopters) -1.04 ± 0.76
Preoperative BCVA (log MAR) -0.02 ± 0.04
Preoperative IOP (mm Hg) 14.87 ± 2.70
Preoperative central cornea thickness (μ m) 526.8 ± 29.2
Postoperative UCVA (log MAR) -0.09 ± 0.03
Postoperative IOP (mm Hg) 10.4 ± 2.0

Values are presented as mean ± SD.

BCVA = best corrected visual acuity; IOP = intraocular pressure; UCVA = uncorrected visual acuity.

Table 2.
The analysis of the time when the anti-glaucoma medication started to use for lowering intraocular pressure
Time - 4 weeks 5-8 weeks 9-12 weeks 13-16 weeks 17-20 weeks 20-24 weeks Total
Number of patients 105 (13) 86 (10) 83 (10) 25 (3) 10 (1) 3 (0) 312 (38)
Accumulative number of patients 105 (13) 191 (23) 274 (33) 299 (36) 309 (37) 312 (38) 312 (38)

The increased intraocular pressure was induced by 0.1% fluorometholone after photorefractive keratectomy. Values are presented as n (%).

Table 3.
The comparison of IOP increased group and IOP normal group after LASEK
IOP increased (312 eyes) IOP normal (514 eyes) p-value
Age at operation (years) 28.1 ± 4.9 28.9 ± 5.0 0.58
Preoperative myopia (diopters) -4.71 ± 1.84 -3.99 ± 1.75 0.31
Preoperative astigmatism (diopters) -0.98 ± 0.84 -0.83 ± 0.76 0.06
Ablation depth (μ m) 81.2 ± 22.3 71.7 ± 22.8 0.66
Preoperative central cornea thickness (μ m) 525.8 ± 29.2 527.4 ± 29.3 0.98
Residual corneal thickness (μ m) 444.5 ± 35.0 455.5 ± 34.9 0.96
Preoperative IOP (mm Hg) 15.2 ± 2.8 14.7 ± 2.6 0.23
Preoperative pupil size (mm) 6.7 ± 0.7 6.7 ± 0.7 0.92
Preoperative white to white (mm) 11.7 ± 0.4 11.7 ± 0.4 0.94
Preoperative visual acuity (log MAR) -0.12 ± 0.04 -0.02 ± 0.04 0.61
Postoperative visual acuity (log MAR) -0.09 ± 0.04 -0.09 ± 0.03 0.85
Duration of usage of fluorometholone (weeks) 19.2 ± 3.8 17.7 ± 3.7 0.54

The patients in IOP increased group need to use anti g IOP = intraocular pressure; LASEK = laser-assisted

Student’s t-test was done.

Table 4.
The analysis of durations for while the anti-glaucoma medication was used to lower the intraocular pressure elevated by 0.1% fluorometholone
- 4 weeks 5-8 weeks 9-12 weeks 13-16 weeks 17-20 weeks >21 weeks Total
No. of patients 41 (13) 73 (23) 89 (29) 75 (24) 30 (10) 4 (1) 312 (100)

Values are presented as n (%).

Table 5.
The analysis about which anti-glaucoma eye drops were used initially and to which the initial eye drops changed if it hap-pened
Anti-glaucoma eye drops Number of patients
Timolol 0.5% only 82 (26)
DTFC/BTFC only 196 (63)
Timolol 0.5% → DTFC/BTFC 26 (8)
DTFC/BTFC → DTFC/BTFC + Brimonidine 0.15% 5 (2)
DTFC/BTFC + Brimonidine 0.15% → DTFC/BTFC or Brimonidine 0.15% 2 (1)
DTFC/BTFC → Timoptic XE 1 (0)

Values are presented as n (%).

DTFC = dorzolamide-timolol fixed combination; BTFC = brinzolamide-timolol fixed combination.

One of DTFC or BTFC;

‘→’ means initial anti-glaucoma eye drops changed during treatment.

TOOLS
Similar articles