Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.56(5) > 1010280

Jeon, Yang, Kim, and Kim: Refractive Accommodative Esotropia: Duration between Wearing Hyperopic Glasses and Control of Esotropia within 8 PD

초록

Purpose:

To report clinical aspects of children diagnosed with refractive accommodative esotropia after wearing their first glasses to correct hyperopia accompanied with esodeviation.

Methods:

The present study included 75 children followed up for at least 24 months. Age, spherical equivalent of refractive error, angle of deviation and presence of amblyopia were analyzed according to the duration between first wearing glasses and control of esotropia within 8 PD (≤2 months vs. >2 months).

Results:

The mean age was 4.48 ± 2.08 years and mean follow-up was 50.17 months. Initial deviation angle without glasses was 25.43 ± 10.07 PD at far, 27.72 ± 11.45 PD at near, spherical equivalent was +4.86 ± 2.41 D in right eyes, +5.05 ± 1.06 D in left eyes and 8 of 75 patients (10.67%) had ≤2 D of hyperopia. Esotropia was controlled within 8 PD with hyperopic glasses in 61 of 75 children (81.3%) within 2 months, 6 (8%) within 3-6 months, 4 (5.3%) within 6-12 months and 4 (5.3%) after 12 months. In comparison, esotropia was controlled ≤2 months in 61 of 75 children (81.3%); 14 of 75 children (18.7%) requiring >2 months had less hyperopia (+4.02 D vs. 5.17 D), more severe esodeviation both at far (30.79 ± 10.79 PD vs. 24.17 ± 9.56 PD, p = 0.03) and at near distance (34.00 ± 14.20 PD vs. 26.25 ± 10.31 PD, p = 0.02) and higher initial amblyopia prevalence rates (71.5% vs. 47.5%).

Conclusions:

Several patients needed longer follow-up until esotropia was controlled within 8 PD after wearing hyperopic glasses considering the amount of hyperopia and angle of esodeviation.

References

1. Von Noorden GK. Binocular vision and ocular motility. 6th ed.St. Louis: Mosby;2002. p. 311–55.
2. Wright KW, Spiegle PH. Esodeviations. Wright KW, editor. Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 2nd ed.New York: Springer;2003. chap. 13.
crossref
3. The Korean Strabismus and Pediatric Ophthalmology Society. Esodeviation I. Lee JB, editor. Current Concepts in Strabismus. 1st ed.Seoul: Naewaehaksul;2004. chap. 7.
4. Kim C, Hwang JM. The clinical course of esotropia associated with hypermetropia after initial wearing of glasses. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2003; 44:134–43.
5. Santiago AP, Ing MR, Kushner BJ, Rosenbaum AL. Clinical strabismus management: principles and surgical techniques. 1st ed.Philadelphia: WB Saunders company;1999. p. 491–505.
6. Pollard ZF. Accommodative esotropia during the first year of life. Arch Ophthalmol. 1976; 94:1912–3.
crossref
7. Baker JD, Parks MM. Early-onset accommodative esotropia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980; 90:11–8.
crossref
8. Parks MM. Abnormal accommodative convergence in squint. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1958; 59:364–80.
crossref
9. Sohn HJ, Paik HJ. Clinical features of refractive accommodative esotropia according to the age of onset. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2006; 47:941–6.
10. Haynes H, White BL, Held R. Visual accommodation in human infants. Science. 1965; 148:528–30.
crossref
11. Pollard ZF, Greenberg MF. 20 unusual presentations of accommodative esotropia. J AAPOS. 2002; 6:33–9.
crossref
12. Coats DK, Avilla CW, Paysse EA, et al. Early-onset refractive accommodative esotropia. J AAPOS. 1998; 2:275–8.
crossref
13. Manley DR. Strabismus. Harley RD, editor. Pediatric Ophthalmology. 3rd ed.Philadelphia: WB Saunders;1991. p. 139.
14. Kwon JY, Lee DE, Song HC. Clinical studies on accormmodative esotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1997; 38:687–91.
15. Lim SJ, Lee SY, Lee YC. Change of refractive error in patients with refractive accommodative esotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2007; 48:822–7.
16. Jun JH, Lee YC, Lee SY. Clinical features of refractive accommodative esotropia according to degree of hypermetropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2008; 49:617–22.
crossref
17. Gatzonis SD, Follidi VP. The influence of compliance with the use of refractive correction in hyperopic children on accommodation. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2013; 23:876–80. [Epub ahead of print].
crossref

Figure 1.
Cumulative distribution of successful outcomes (correction within 8 PD after wearing glasses). PD = prism diopter.
jkos-56-764f1.tif
Table 1.
Clinical features of children diagnosed with refractive accommodative esotropia
Sex (M:F) 29 (38.7):46 (61.3)
Age of wearing glasses (years) 4.74 ± 2.34
Duration of follow-up (months) 50.71 ± 14.18
MRSE at initial visit (diopter)  
  OD +3.53 ± 2.59
  OS +3.67 ± 2.49
CRSE at initial visit (diopter)  
  OD +4.86 ± 2.41
  OS +5.05 ± 2.38
CRSE-MRSE at initial visit (diopter)  
  OD +1.32 ± 1.02
  OS +1.39 ± 1.06
Angle of deviation without glasses (esodeviation, PD)  
  Far 25.42 ± 10.07
  Near 27.72 ± 11.45

Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.

MRSE = manifest refractive error of spherical equivalent; OD = oculus dexter; OS = oculus sinister; CRSE = cycloplegic refractive error of spherical equivalent; PD = prism diopter.

Table 2.
Baseline spherical equivalent (SE) distribution (n = 75)
SE Manifest refraction (n, %)
Cycloplegic refraction (n, %)
OD OS OD OS
≤2 D 28 (37.33) 22 (29.33) 9 (12) 10 (13.33)
2< SE ≤4 D 17 (22.67) 22 (29.33) 21 (28) 17 (22.67)
4< SE ≤6 D 17 (22.67) 22 (29.33) 25 (33.33) 20 (26.67)
6< SE ≤8 D 9 (12) 5 (6.67) 11 (14.67) 22 (29.33)
>8 D 4 (5.33) 4 (5.33) 9 (12) 6 (8)

OD = oculus dexter; OS = oculus sinister; D= diopter.

Table 3.
Distribution of angle of deviation (n = 75)
Angle of esotropia without correction (prism diopter) No. of patients (%)
At far At near
10-19 27 (36) 19 (25.3)
20-29 17 (22.7) 19 (25.3)
30-39 25 (33.3) 24 (32.0)
40-49 3 (4.0) 10 (13.3)
50-59 3 (4.0) 2 (2.7)
60-69 0 (0) 0 (0)
70-79 0 (0) 1 (1.3)
Table 4.
Distribution of successful outcomes (correction with-in 8 PD after wearing glasses) (n = 75)
Duration between wearing glasses and successful outcomes within 8 PD No. of patients (%)
≤1 month 49 (65.3)
<1-≤2 months 12 (16.0)
<2-≤3 months 3 (4.0)
<3-≤6 months 3 (4.0)
<6-≤12 months 4 (5.3)
<12-≤24 months 3 (4.0)
31 months 1 (1.3)

PD = prism diopter.

Table 5.
Comparison according to the duration between wearing glasses and correction of esotropia within 8 PD
  ≤2 months >2 months p-value
No. of patients (%) 61 (81.3) 14 (18.7)  
Age of wearing glasses (years) 4.63 ± 2.32 5.10 ± 2.43 0.50
Refractive error (diopter) +5.17 ± 2.34 +4.02 ± 2.42 0.02
Angle of deviation without correction at (PD)      
  Far 24.17 ± 9.56 30.79 ± 10.79 0.03
  Near 26.25 ± 10.31 34.00 ± 14.20 0.02
CRSE at initial visit - MRSE at initial visit (diopter) 1.36 ± 1.11 1.29 ± 0.70 0.78
CRSE at initial visit - MRSE at 2 months (diopter) 0.25 ± 0.40 0.35 ± 0.38 0.24

Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.

PD = prism diopter; CRSE = cycloplegic refractive error of spherical equivalent; MRSE = manifest refractive error of spherical equivalent.

Table 6.
Clinical features of anisometropia group
  Anisometropia Isometropia p-value
Number of patients (%) 14 (18.67) 61 (81.33)  
Age of onset (years) 5.46 ± 2.47 4.55 ± 2.29 0.190
Angle of deviation without correction (esodeviation, PD)      
  Far 23.43 ± 8.23 25.88 ± 10.46 0.415
  Near 24.86 ± 8.92 28.38 ± 11.93 0.303
Duration between wearing glasses and successful outcomes within 8 PD (months) 1.74 ± 2.58 3.03 ± 5.61 0.403

Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.

PD = prism diopter.

TOOLS
Similar articles