Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.56(3) > 1010206

Lee, Lee, and Lee: Analysis of the Cause of Failure in the Correction of Childhood Myopia Using Orthokeratologic Lenses

초록

Purpose:

To investigate the cause of failure in the correction of childhood myopia using orthokeratologic (Ortho-K) lenses.

Methods:

The failure group was 29 patients who stopped wearing the lenses for various reasons, while the success group was 29 patients who bought lenses more than twiceand wore them for two years and more. Statistical analyses were performed to identify significant differences between the groups.

Results:

Among the failure group, failure to continuously wear the Ortho-K lenses was attributed to undercorrection (19 patients), corneal erosion (2 patients), and sleep disorders (1 patient). Initial spherical diopter and initial spherical equivalent diopter showed statistical diffence between the success group and failure group. Of these two factors, as the initial spherical equivalent diopter increased, the chance of failure to use Ortho-K lens increased. According to a logistic multiple regression analysis, the odds of failure of using Ortho-K lens increased by 1.59 when the initial spherical diopter increased by 1. If the absolute value of the initial spherical diopter was over 6.24, the chance of failure increased by 80%.

Conclusions:

The failure of continuously wearing Ortho-K lenses due to undercorrection was found to be the major cause of failure in the correction of childhood myopia. The initial spherical diopter and initial spherical equivalent diopter were significant factors influencing the undercorrection. From these results, we predict that the odds of failure of continuously wearing Ortho-K lenses increases along with increases in the initial spherical diopter. In conclusion, clinicians should be warned concerning the odds of failure due to low initial spherical diopter.

References

1. Chang DJ, Joo CK. Current and future options for myopia correction. J Korean Med Assoc. 2012; 55:362–70.
crossref
2. Wie H, Lee D, Kim JM. The efficacy and safety of dream lens (TM) in school children. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2004; 45:913–9.
3. Balley IL, Carney LG. A survery of corneal changes from contact lens wear. Contact Lens J. 1977; 6:3–13.
4. Perrigin J, Perrigin D, Quintero S, Grosvenor T. Silicone-acrylate contact lenses for myopia control: 3-year results. Optom Vis Sci. 1990; 67:764–9.
crossref
5. Lin LL, Shih YF, Hsiao CK, et al. Epidemiologic study of the prevalence and severity of myopia among schoolchildren in Taiwan in 2000. J Formos Med Assoc. 2001; 100:684–91.
6. Kim JR, Chung TY, Lim DH, Bae JH. Effect of orthokeratologic lenses on myopic progression in childhood. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2013; 54:401–7.
crossref
7. Tan DT, Lam DS, Chua WH, et al. One-year multicenter, dou-ble-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel safety and efficacy study of 2% pirenzepine ophthalmic gel in children with myopia. Ophthalmology. 2005; 112:84–91.
crossref
8. Schwartz JT. Results of a monozygotic cotwin control study on a treatment for myopia. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1981; 69(Pt C):249–58.
9. Shih YF, Hsiao CK, Chen CJ, et al. An intervention trial on efficacy of atropine and multifocal glasses in controlling myopic progression. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2001; 79:233–6.
crossref
10. Cheung SW, Cho P. Subjective and objective assessments of the effect of orthokeratology--a cross-sectional study. Curr Eye Res. 2004; 28:121–7.
11. Cho P, Cheung SW, Edwards M. The longitudinal orthokeratology research in children (LORIC) in Hong Kong: a pilot study on refractive changes and myopic control. Curr Eye Res. 2005; 30:71–80.
crossref
12. Lee WH, Park YK, Seo JM, Shin JH. The inhibitory effect of myopic and astigmatic progression by orthokeratology lens. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2011; 52:1269–74.
crossref
13. Chan B, Cho P, Cheung SW. Orthokeratology practice in children in a university clinic in Hong Kong. Clin Exp Optom. 2008; 91:453–60.
crossref
14. Mountford J, Pesudovs K. An analysis of the astigmatic changes induced by accelerated orthokeratology. Clin Exp Optom. 2002; 85:284–93.
crossref
15. Yun YM, Kim MK, Lee JL. Change of corneal parameters after re-moving reverse geometry lens in moderate degree myopia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2005; 46:1478–85.
16. Kakita T, Hiraoka T, Oshika T. Influence of overnight orthokeratology on axial elongation in childhood myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52:2170–4.
crossref
17. Chang JW, Choi TH, Lee HB. The efficacy and safety of reverse geometry lenses. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2004; 45:908–12.
18. Shin DB, Yang KM, Lee SB, et al. Effect of reverse geometry lens on correction of moderate-degree myopia and cornea. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2003; 44:1748–56.
19. Jee DH, Hong ME, Kim MS. The efficacy and safety of Ortho-K LK (TM) lens. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2003; 44:706–11.

Figure 1.
Causes of failure on corneal topography within 3 months. (A), (B), and (C) show an example of corneal topologies for the patients of failure group with decentration, central island, and incomplete corneal reshaping, respectively. The left column in the figure is for before wearing Ortho-K lens, and the right one is for after wearing lens. Ortho-K = orthokeratologic.
jkos-56-317f1.tif
Table 1.
Demographic data of success and failure groups
  Success group Failure group p-value
Sex (M:F) 11:18 7:15 0.685
Age (years) 9.72 ± 2.43 9.00 ± 2.27 0.416§
log VA* -0.92 ± 0.22 -0.99 ± 0.40 0.433§

Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.

log VA = logarithmic visual acuity.

* Uncorrected visual acuity of success and failure group measured before using orthokeratologic lens;

In wearing Ortho-K lenses continuously;

Chi-square test;

§ Unpaired t-test.

Table 2.
Comparison between success group and failure group* in wearing Ortho-K lenses continuously
  Success group Failure group* p-value
Initial spherical diopter -2.65 ± 0.99 -3.48 ± 1.78 <0.001
Initial cylindrical diopter -0.46 ± 0.31 -0.65 ± 0.37 0.298
Initial spherical equivalent diopter -2.88 ± 0.99 -3.80 ± 1.86 <0.001
Pachymetry (µm) 532.76 ± 27.72 532.05 ± 40.29 0.127
K min (diopter) 43.11 ± 1.18 42.65 ± 1.10 0.994
K max (diopter) 44.13 ± 1.25 44.02 ± 1.14 0.704
Increment of spherical diopter 2.12 ± 0.83 0.82 ± 1.88 0.006
Increment of spherical equivalent diopter 2.11 ± 0.83 0.67 ± 0.45 0.005
Increment of log VA 0.90 ± 0.21 0.63 ± 0.42 <0.001

Values are presented as mean ± SD; All component of success and failure group was compared to each other before using orthokeratologic lens; Increment of spherical diopter, spherical equivalent diopter and logarithmic visual acuity is difference between initial values and final measured values.

Ortho-K = orthokeratologic; Kmin = minimum simulated keratometry value; Kmax = maximum simulated keratometry value; log VA = logarithmic visual acuity.

* In wearing Ortho-K lenses continuously.

TOOLS
Similar articles