Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.56(12) > 1010185

Kim, Kang, Choi, Yang, and Chung: Laser Refractive Surgery Using an Active Eye-Tracking System in Congenital Nystagmus

Abstract

Purpose

Nystagmus is not considered a good indication for laser refractive surgery. However, we report 2 cases with congenital nystagmus that underwent a safe procedure due to improvement of laser firing rate and eye tracker.

Case summary

Two myopic patients with congenital nystagmus underwent transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy with the Schwind Amaris laser platform using an eye tracker. The laser ablations were performed under topical anesthesia without any mechanical eyeball fixation. A 30-year-old man with a history of muscle surgery at 11 years of age had a conjugate, 4 Hz right beating jerk nystagmus. His preoperative refractive error was -8.50 D sph = –0.50 D cyl x 160˚ x 20/30) in the right eye, and –6.00 D sph = –0.75 D cyl x 30˚ x 20/25) in the left eye. A 19-year-old man had a conjugate, 3 Hz pendular nystagmus. His refractive error was –5.25 D sph = –2.50 cyl x 175˚ x 20/30) in the right eye, and –4.25 D sph = –2.50 D cyl x 180˚ x 20/30) in the left eye. Both patients underwent a well-centered laser ablation without any problems. Six months after surgery, uncorrected visual acuity was 20/25 or better, and refractive error was within ±0.50 D in all 4 eyes. In addition, the 19-year-old man showed decreased nystagmus amplitude.

Conclusions

In some patients with congenital nystagmus, laser refractive surgery may be safely and accurately performed un-der topical anesthesia using an active tracking system. The best uncorrected visual acuity may improve in certain patients postoperatively.

References

1. Hertle RW, Dell’Osso LF. Clinical and ocular motor analysis of congenital nystagmus in infancy. J AAPOS. 1999; 3:70–9.
crossref
2. Hertle RW. Nystagmus in infancy and childhood. Semin Ophthalmol. 2008; 23:307–17.
crossref
3. von Noorden GK, Campos EC. Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility: Theory and Management of Strabismus. 6th. St. Louis: Mosby;2002. p. 508–16.
4. Park JH, Park SC. Clinical characteristics of infantile nystagmus. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1996; 37:502–10.
5. Hertle RW. Examination and refractive management of patients with nystagmus. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000; 45:215–22.
crossref
6. Chang JH, Lee JB, Kim SC, Han SH. Relationship between visual acuity and foveation window in infantile nystagmus by analyzing nystagmus waveforms. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2010; 51:875–80.
crossref
7. Siganos DS, Evangelatou KA, Papadaki TG. . Photorefractive keratectomy in eyes with congenital nystagmus. J Refract Surg. 1998; 14:649–52.
crossref
8. Konuk O, Bilgihan K, Hasanreisoğ lu B. Laser in situ keratomi-leusis in an eye with congenital nystagmus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001; 27:636–8.
crossref
9. Soloway BD, Roth RE. Laser in situ keratomileusis in a patient with congenital nystagmus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002; 28:544–6.
crossref
10. Mahler O, Hirsh A, Kremer I. . Laser in situ keratomileusis in myopic patients with congenital nystagmus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:464–7.
crossref
11. Barbara A, Shehadeh-Masha'our R, Garzozi HJ. Laser ablation in eyes with congenital nystagmus. J Refract Surg. 2007; 23:623–5.
crossref
12. Allen ED, Davies PD. Role of contact lenses in the management of congenital nystagmus. Br J Ophthalmol. 1983; 67:834–6.
crossref
13. Rutner D, Ciuffreda K. Soft contact lenses to improve motor and sensory function in congenital nystagmus. J Behav Optom. 2005; 16:17–20.
14. DellOsso LF, Traccis S, Abel LA, Erzurum SI. Contact-lenses and congenital nystagmus. Clin Vis Sci. 1988; 3:229–32.
15. Arba-Mosquera S, Aslanides IM. Analysis of the effects of Eye- Tracker performance on the pulse positioning errors during re-fractive surgery. J Optom. 2012; 5:31–7.

Figure 1.
Case 1. (A) Fundus photography showing myopic tilted disc in both eyes (left upper column) and pre-operative corneal topography (left lower column). Optical coherence tomography for analysis of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness showing horizontal distortion and noise due to horizontal nystagmus (right column). (B) Intraoperative eye tracking on the treatment printout showing large magnitude of horizontal movement in the both eyes. (C) Corneal topography showing well-centered ablation 2 months after surgery. T = temporal aspect; N = nasal aspect.
jkos-56-1991f1.tif
Figure 2.
Case 2. (A) Fundus photography showing myopic disc in both eyes (left upper column) and pre-operative corneal top-ography (left lower column). Optical coherence tomography for analysis of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness showing horizontal distortion and noise due to horizontal nystagmus (right column). (B) Intraoperative eye tracking on the treatment printout showing horizontal and some vertical movement in both eyes. (C) Corneal topography showing well-centered ablation 2 months after surgery. T = temporal aspect; N = nasal aspect.
jkos-56-1991f2.tif
Table 1.
The comparison of characteristics in previously reported cases
Author No. of cases (eyes) Type of laser Suction ring Eye-tracker
Siganos et al7 2 (2) 1 PRK, 1 T-PRK All used 1 used
Aesculap Meditec MEL 60 excimer laser,
Autonomous Technologies T-PRK flying spot and tracking excimer laser
Konuk et al8 1 (2) 2 LASIK All used (+semicircular -
Aesculap Meditec excimer laser suction groove)
Soloway and Roth9* 1 (2) 2 LASIK - All used
LADARVision excimer laser
Mahler et al10* 8 (16) 8 LASIK, 8 intraLASIK 1 used All used
Technolas 217 Hz excimer laser 5 forceps (120 Hz tracker)
Barbara et al11 5 (9) 1 PRK, 9 LASIK 1 used -
VISX 20/20 excimer laser
VISX STAR 2 excimer laser

PRK = photorefractive keratectomy; T-PRK = tracking-photorefractive keratectomy; LASIK = laser in situ keratomileusis.* Cases in which enhancement procedure was performed after initial treatment: both eyes in report by Soloway and Roth9, and two eyes (12.5%) in report by Mahler et al.10

TOOLS
Similar articles