Abstract
Purpose
To assess clinical features of sensory exotropia with distant-near disparity, surgical outcome, and compare according to amount of medical rectus resection.
Methods
Authors retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients of sensory exotropia with follow-up over 6 months. We defined patients with over 10 prism diopter (PD) disparity as distant-near disparity sensory exotropia (DND-XT) and without dis-parity as basic sensory exotropia (B-XT). First, we analyzed and compared data of visual acuity, cause and age of visual loss, amount of deviation. Second, Surgical failure was analyzed with dividing DND-XT into conventional surgery group as Parks’ for-mula and reduced medial rectus resection group in accordance with disparity. Surgical success was defined as less than 10 PD deviation in distant, near fixation.
Results
B-XT consisted of 58 patients (40 males) and DND-XT of 33 patient (13 males). There was no significant difference be-tween 2 groups in onset and cause of visual loss, deviation at distant fixation. But, log MAR visual acuity of worse eye was better in DND-XT than B-XT (1.74 ± 0.78, vs. 2.10 ± 0.74, p = 0.039). Average deviation in distant fixation in DND-XT was 46.55 ± 16.59 PD in distant and 14.93 ± 8.91 PD in near fixation. All patients underwent surgery of medial rectus resection and lateral rectus re-cession and average deviation was 6.83 ± 7.71 PD at distant fixation, 3.02 ± 0.69 PD at near fixation at last follow-up. Among 33 patients, 16 patients underwent conventional amount of surgery and 17 patients with reduced medial rectus resection. In patient with conventional surgery, 9 patients were surgical failure (8 patients of over-, 1 patient of under-correction) but in patient with re-duced amount of resection, only 1 patient was under-correction.
References
1. Havertape SA, Cruz OA, Chu FC. Sensory strabismus-eso or exo? J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2001; 38:327–30. quiz 354-5.
2. Ciftci S, Simsek A, Dogan E, Ciftci L. Sensory exotropia due to keratoconus and review of the literature. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013; 7:2069–72.
3. Lou DH, Xu YS, Li YM. Sensory exotropia subsequent to senile cataract. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2005; 6:1220–2.
4. Fujikado T, Ohmi G, Ikeda T. . Exotropia secondary to vitreous hemorrhage. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1997; 235:143–8.
5. Kim IG, Park JM, Lee SJ. Factors associated with the direction of ocular deviation in sensory horizontal strabismus and unilateral or-ganic ocular problems. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2012; 26:199–202.
6. Gnanaraj L, Rao VJ. Corneal birth trauma: a cause for sensory exotropia. Eye (Lond). 2000; 14:Pt 5. 791–2.
7. Park BG, Kim JL, Lee SG. Clinical features associated with the di-rection of deviation in sensory strabismus. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2012; 53:1138–42.
8. Kim KS, Park SC. The clinical consideration of sensory strabismus. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2005; 46:316–22.
9. Choi MY, Hwang JM. Clinical analysis of sensory strabismus with organic amblyopia in children. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2005; 46:1374–81.
10. Brown SM. Fresnel prism treatment of sensory exotropia with re-storation of sensory and motor fusion. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999; 25:441–3.
11. Merino P, Mateos C, Gómez De. Liaño P. . Horizontal sensory strabismus: characteristics and treatment results. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2011; 86:358–62.
12. Park YC, Chun BY, Kwon JY. Comparison of the stability of post-operative alignment in sensory exotropia: adjustable versusnonadjustable surgery. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2009; 23:277–80.
13. Chang JH, Kim HD, Lee JB, Han SH. Supermaximal recession and resection in large-angle sensory exotropia. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2011; 25:139–41.
14. Hopker LM, Weakley DR. Surgical results after one-muscle re-cession for correction of horizontal sensory strabismus in children. J AAPOS. 2013; 17:174–6.
15. Gusek-Schneider G, Boss A. Results following eye muscle surgery for secondary sensory strabismus. Strabismus. 2010; 18:24–31.
16. Schulz E. Surgical indication and results in exotropia with di-vergence excess. Ophthalmologica. 1983; 187:1–7.
17. Kushner BJ. Selective surgery for intermittent exotropia based on distance/near differences. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998; 116:324–8.
18. Mohan K, Sharma A. A comparison of ocular alignment success of hang-back versus conventional bilateral lateral rectus muscle re-cession for true divergence excess intermittent exotropia. J AAPOS. 2013; 17:29–33.
19. Hertle RW, Granet DB, Schaffer MA, Wilson MC. Adjustable hori-zontal rectus recession surgery for disparate distance-near oscular deviations. Stabismus. 1997; 5:109–15.
20. Choi HY, Jung JH. Bilateral lateral rectus muscle recession with medial rectus pulley fixation for divergence excess intermittent ex-tropia with high AC/A ratio. J AAPOS. 2013; 17:266–8.
21. Celebi S, Kükner AS. Large bilateral lateral rectus recession in large angle divergence excess exotropia. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2001; 11:6–8.
22. Parks MM. Ocular Motility and Strabismus, 1st ed. Hagerstown: Harper & Row,. 1975; 113–22.
23. Nuzzi G, Mariani A, Barziza G, Andreozzi M. Proximal and ac-commodative convergence and age. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1982; 218:110–2.
24. Bagolini B. Research on the behavior of “proximal convergence” in strabic and normal subjects (observations by means of determi-nations with the synotophore and with prisms). Boll Ocul. 1961; 40:461–70.
Table 1.
Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated. Basic-XT = basic sensory exotropia; DND-XT = sensory exotropia with distant-near disparity; V/A = visual acuity; log MAR = logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; LP = light perception; NLP = non-light perception; XT = exotropia; PD = prism diopter.
Table 2.
Table 3.
Pre-op. (PD) Po | ost-op. final F/U (PD) | |
---|---|---|
At distance fixation | 46.55 ± 16.59 | 6.83 ± 7.71 |
At near fixation | 14.93 ± 8.91 | 3.02 ± 0.69 |
Difference (D-N) | 29.83 ± 19.25 | 3.44 ± 8.31 |