Short-Term Results of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Patients with Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema

Seung Hee Lee; Si Yeol Kim; Han Sang Park

doi:10.3341/jkos.2018.56.8.1201

Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.56(8) > 1010049

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Lee, Kim, and Park: Short-Term Results of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Patients with Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema

Original Article

J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2018;56(8):1201-1207.

Published online: 29 August 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2018.56.8.1201

Short-Term Results of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Patients with Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema

Seung Hee Lee, M.D., Si Yeol Kim, M.D., PhD, Han Sang Park, M.D., PhD

Nune Eye Hospital, Daegu, Korea

Address reprint requests to Han Sang Park, MD, PhD Nune Eye Hospital, #2397 Dalgubeol-daero, Suseong-gu, Daegu 706-817, Korea Tel: 82-53-715-3301, Fax: 82-53-715-3440 E-mail: fhak02@naver.com

Received 16 January 20158 April 2015 Accepted 25 June 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the effectiveness of a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex^®) in the treatment of diabetic macular edema refractory to combined treatment of bevacizumab and triamcinolone.

Methods

We reviewed 9 eyes of 9 patients with diabetic macular edema treated with dexamethasone intravitreal implant. The patients were included in the study if presenting with refractory diabetic macular edema of more than 3 months despite combined treatment of intravitreal bevacizumab injection with posterior subtenon triamcinolone injection or intravitreal triamcinolone injection. We assessed the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) using optical coherence to-mography at initial visit and 1, 3 and 4 months.

Results

The mean follow-up was 6.7 ± 2.2 months. The baseline mean BCVA was 0.81 ± 0.47 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (log MAR), which improved to 0.61 ± 0.37 log MAR ( p = 0.017), 0.57 ± 0.38 log MAR ( p = 0.011) and 0.62 ± 0.36 log MAR ( p = 0.027) at 1 month, 3 months and 4 months, respectively. The baseline mean CMT was 558.0 ± 110.32 μ m and de-creased to 325 ± 64.21 μ m ( p = 0.008) and 300.22 ± 59.46 μ m ( p = 0.008) at 1 month and 3 months, respectively, then increased to 468.44 ± 150.85 μ m ( p = 0.058) at 4 months after injection.

Conclusions

Dexamethasone intravitreal implant showed short-term efficacy in the treatment of diabetic macular edema re-fractory to combined treatment of bevacizumab and triamcinolone and produced significant improvements in BCVA and CMT until 3 months after injection. The CMT then increased, but BCVA was sustained until the fourth month.

Keywords: Dexamethasone implant, Diabetic macular edema, Intravitreal injection

References

1. Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report number 1. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study research group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985; 103:1796–806.

2. Antcliff RJ, Marshall J. The pathogenesis of edema in diabetic maculopathy. Semin Ophthalmol. 1999; 14:223–32.

3. Nguyen QD, Shah SM, Khwaja AA. . Two-year outcomes of the ranibizumab for edema of the mAcula in diabetes (READ-2) study. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117:2146–51.

4. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Scott IU, Edwards AR. . A phase II randomized clinical trial of intra-vitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114:1860–7.

5. Haritoglou C, Kook D, Neubauer A. . Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) therapy for persistent diffuse diabetic macular edema. Retina. 2006; 26:999–1005.

6. Massin P, Audren F, Haouchine B. . Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for diabeitc diffuse macular edema: preliminary results of a prospective controlled trial. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111:218–24. discussion 224-5.

7. Jung JW, Nam DH, Shyn KH. The complications after intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2007; 48:55–62.

8. Kuppermann BD, Blumenkranz MS, Haller JA. . Dexamethasone DDS Phase II Study Group: randomized controlled study of an in-travitreous dexamethasone drug delivery system in patients with persistent macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007; 125:309–17.

9. Haller JA, Bandello F, Belfort R Jr. . Randomized, sham-con-trolled trial of dexamethasone intravitreal implant in patients with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117:1134–46.

10. Zarranz-Ventura J, Carreño E, Johnston RL. . Multicenter study of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in noninfectious uvei-tis: indications, outcomes, and reinjection frequency. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014; 158:1136–45.e5.

11. Gillies MC, Lim LL, Campain A. . A randomized clinical trial of intravitreal bevacizumab versusi dexamethasone for diabetic macular edema: the BEVORDEX study. Ophthalmology. 2014; 121:2473–81.

12. Lazic R, Lukic M, Boras I. . Treatment of anti-vascular endo-thelial growth factor-resistant diabetic macular edema with dex-amethasone intravitreal implant. Retina. 2014; 34:719–24.

13. Pacella E, Vestri AR, Muscella R. . Preliminary results of an in-travitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex[R]) in patients with persistent diabetic macular edema. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013; 7:1423–8.

14. Zalewski D, Raczyń ska D, Raczyń ska K. Five-month observation of persistent diabetic macular edema after intravitreal injection of Ozurdex implant. Mediators Inflamm. 2014; 2014:364143.

15. Dutra Medeiros M, Postorino M, Navarro R. . Dexamethasone intravitreal implant for treatment of patients with persistent dia-betic macular edema. Ophthalmologica. 2014; 231:141–6.

16. Zucchiatti I, Lattanzio R, Querques G. . Intravitreal dex-amethasone implant in patients with persistent diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmologica. 2012; 228:117–22.

17. Rishi P, Rishi E, Kuniyal L, Mathur G. Short-term results of intra-vitreal dexamethasone implant (OZURDEX [R]) in treatment of recalcitrant diabetic macular edema: a case series. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2012; 5:79–82.

18. Funatsu H, Noma H, Mimura T. . Association of vitreous in-flammatory factors with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116:73–9.

19. Lavinsky D, Cardillo JA, Melo LA Jr. . Randomized clinical trial evaluating mETDRS versus normal or high-density micro-pulse photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52:4314–23.

20. Writing Committee for the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Fong DS, Strauber SF. . Comparison of the modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study and mild macular grid laser photocoagulation strategies for diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007; 125:469–80.

21. Guyer DR, D’Amico DJ, Smith CW. Subretinal fibrosis after laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992; 113:652–6.

22. Schatz H, Madeira D, McDonald HR, Johnson RN. Progressive en-largement of laser scars following grid laser photocoagulation for diffuse diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991; 109:1549–51.

23. Lewis H, Schachat AP, Haimann MH. . Choroidal neo-vascularization after laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 1990; 97:503–10.

24. Morgan CM, Schatz H. Atrophic creep of the retinal pigment epi-thelium after focal macular photocoagulation. Ophthalmology. 1989; 96:96–103.

25. Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor: basic science and clinical progress. Endocr Rev. 2004; 25:581–611.

26. Funatsu H, Yamashita H, Ikeda T. . Vitreous levels of inter-leukin-6 and vascular endothelial growth factor are related to dia-betic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110:1690–6.

27. Haritoglou C, Kook D, Neubauer A. . Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) therapy for persistent diffuse diabetic macular edema. Retina. 2006; 26:999–1005.

28. Fischer S, Renz D, Schaper W, Karliczek GF. In vitro effects of dexamethasone on hypoxia-induced hyperpermeability and ex-pression of vascular endothelial growth factor. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001; 411:231–43.

29. Bandi N, Kompella UB. Budesonide reduces vascular endothelial growth factor secretion and expression in airway (Calu-1) and al-veolar (A549) epithelial cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001; 425:109–16.

30. Gillies MC, Sutter FK, Simpson JM. . Intravitreal tri-amcinolone for refractory diabetic macular edema: two-year re-sults of a double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2006; 113:1533–8.

31. Shimura M, Nakazawa T, Yasuda K. . Comparative therapy evaluation of intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone aceto-nide on persistent diffuse diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008; 145:854–61.

32. Paccola L, Costa RA, Folgosa MS. . Intravitreal triamcinolone versus bevacizumab for treatment of refractory diabetic macular oedema (IBEME study). Br J Ophthalmol. 2008; 92:76–80.

33. Ahmadieh H, Ramezani A, Shoeibi N. . Intravitreal bev-acizumab with or without triamcinolone for refractory diabetic macular edema: a placebocontrolled, randomized clinical trial. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008; 246:483–9.

34. Yolcu U, Sobaci G. The effect of combined treatment of bev-acizumab and triamcinolone for diabetic macular edema refractory to previous intravitreal mono-injections. Int Ophthalmol. 2014; Nov. [Epub ahead of print].

35. Kim HD, Kang KD, Choi KS. . Combined therapy with intra-vitreal bevacizumab and posterior subtenon triamcinolone aceto-nide injection in diabetic macular oedema. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014; 92:e589–90.

36. Edelman JL. Differentiating intraocular glucocorticoids. Ophthal- mologica. 2010; 224Suppl 1. 25–30.

37. Chang-Lin JE, Attar M, Acheampong AA. . Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a sustained-release dexamethasone in-travitreal implant. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52:80–6.

38. Boyer DS, Yoon YH, Belfort R Jr. . Three-year, randomized, sham-controlled trial of dexamethasone intravitreal implant in pa-tients with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmol. 2014; 121:1904–14.

39. Jonas JB, Spandau UH, Schlichtenbrede F. Short-term complica-tions of intravitreal injections of triamcinolone and bevacizumab. Eye (Lond). 2008; 22:590–1.

Figure 3.

Optical coherence tomography images of 2 patients with persistent diabetic macular edema nonresponsive to pre-vious combined treatment of bevacizumab and triamcinolone, before combined treatment (A, F), at baseline (B, G) and after treatment (C-E, H-J) with dexamethasone intravitreal implant. Patient 1 shows complete resolution of the macular edema, Patient 2 shows nearly complete resolution of the macular edema.

Figure 1.

A change in the visual acuity (log MAR) after dex-amethasone intravitreal implant injection. Mean visual acuity prior to injection was 0.81 ± 0.47. Visual acuity improved to 0.61 ± 0.37, 0.57 ± 0.38, 0.62 ± 0.36 in 1, 3 and 4 months after injection.

Figure 2.

A change in the central macular thickness after dex-amethasone intravitreal implant injection. Mean central mac-ular thickness prior to injection was 558.0 ± 110.32 μ m. Central macular thickness decreased to 325 ± 64.21 μ m and 300.22 ± 59.46 μ m, 1 and 3 months after injection. Then it in-creased to 468.44 ± 150.85 μ m in 4 months after injection.

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of the patients

Variable	Value
Patients (eyes)	9 (9)
Age (years)	63.4 ± 9.51
Male:female	5:4
Follow-up time (months)	6.7 ± 2.2
Baseline visual acuity (log MAR)	0.81 ± 0.47
Baseline CMT (μ m)	558.0 ± 110.32

Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated. log MAR = logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; CMT = central macular thickness.

Table 2.

Previous medical history of the patients

Patient No.	Focal laser	Number of IVB	Number of IVB + PST	Number of IVB + IVT
1	Yes	3	2	0
2	Yes	5	2	0
3	Yes	2	1	2
4	Yes	2	1	2
5	Yes	8	2	0
6	Yes	2	1	1
7	Yes	2	2	2
8	Yes	2	0	1
9	Yes	8	0	1

IVB = intravitreal bevacizumab injection; PST = posterior sub-tenon triamcinolone injection; IVT = iIntravitreal triamcinolone injection.

Table 3.

Mean changes in visual acuity and central macular thickness after dexamethasone intravitreal implant injection

	BCVA (log MAR)	CMT (μ m)
Baseline	0.81 ± 0.47	558.0 ± 110.32
1 month	0.61 ± 0.37 ( p = 0.017)	325 ± 64.21 ( p = 0.008)
3 months	0.57 ± 0.39 ( p = 0.011)	300.22 ± 59.46 ( p = 0.008)
4 months	0.62 ± 0.36 ( p = 0.027)	468.44 ± 150.85 ( p = 0.058)

Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.

BCVA = best corrected visual acuity; log MAR = logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; CMT = central macular thickness.

TOOLS

Similar articles

Patient No.	Focal laser	Number of IVB	Number of IVB + PST	Number of IVB + IVT
1	Yes	3	2	0
2	Yes	5	2	0
3	Yes	2	1	2
4	Yes	2	1	2
5	Yes	8	2	0
6	Yes	2	1	1
7	Yes	2	2	2
8	Yes	2	0	1
9	Yes	8	0	1

Patient No.	Focal laser	Number of IVB	Number of IVB + PST	Number of IVB + IVT
1	Yes	3	2	0
2	Yes	5	2	0
3	Yes	2	1	2
4	Yes	2	1	2
5	Yes	8	2	0
6	Yes	2	1	1
7	Yes	2	2	2
8	Yes	2	0	1
9	Yes	8	0	1

Patient No.	Focal laser	Number of IVB	Number of IVB + PST	Number of IVB + IVT
1	Yes	3	2	0
2	Yes	5	2	0
3	Yes	2	1	2
4	Yes	2	1	2
5	Yes	8	2	0
6	Yes	2	1	1
7	Yes	2	2	2
8	Yes	2	0	1
9	Yes	8	0	1