Long-Term Effect and Safety of Contact Lenses for Keratoconus

Jong Heon Lee; Young Min Park; Young Kee Park; Jong Su Lee; Ji Eun Lee

doi:10.3341/jkos.2015.56.7.1006

Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.56(7) > 1010018

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Lee, Park, Park, Lee, and Lee: Long-Term Effect and Safety of Contact Lenses for Keratoconus

Original Article

J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2015;56(7):1006-1011.

Published online: 27 August 2015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2015.56.7.1006

Long-Term Effect and Safety of Contact Lenses for Keratoconus

Jong Heon Lee, M.D.¹, Young Min Park, MD¹, Young Kee Park, MD, PhD², Jong Su Lee, MD, PhD¹, Ji Eun Lee, MD, PhD^1,^3,

¹Department of Ophthalmology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea

²YK Eye Clinic, Seoul, Korea

³Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea

Address reprint requests to Ji Eun Ji MD, PhD Department of Ophthalmology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, #20 Geumo-ro, Mulgeum-eup, Yangsan 626-770, Korea Tel: 82-55-360-2590, Fax: 82-55-360-2161 E-mail: Jiel75@hanmail.net

Received 19 December 201430 January 2015 Accepted 4 June 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose:

To evaluate the long-term clinical effect and safety of YK-KC lens^® (LucidKorea Ltd., Seoul, Korea) for keratoconus. Methods: In this study we investigated 152 keratoconic eyes fitted with YK-KC lens^® and followed up for at least 5 years. We as-sessed retrospectively self-reported patient comfort, best corrected visual acuity, corneal topographic indices before and after contact lens fitting and complications during contact lens wearing.

Results:

The study included 57 male and 40 female patients with a mean age of 28.6 ± 8.5 years. The mean follow-up was 8.0 ± 2.9 years. Regarding lens comfort, 126 eyes (82.9%) showed self-reported comfort for YK-KC lenses^®. The mean best cor-rected visual acuity (log MAR) improved from 0.49 ± 0.42 before lens fitting to 0.19 ± 0.27 after lens wearing, which was statisti-cally significant ( p < 0.001). Based on the keratometric values, after contact lens fitting both Simulated keratometry (Sim K) max and Sim K min tended to be steeper, but these differences were not statistically significant ( p = 0.66 and 0.11, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences between the values before and after fitting with respect to the astigmatic pow-ers ( p = 0.22). Complications observed included punctate or coalesced epithelial corneal staining in 24 eyes (16%), however, persistent full-thickness epithelial defect was not observed.

Conclusions:

The YK-KC lens^® in patients with keratoconus can provide excellent visual improvement and comfort without any significant influence on the progression of keratoconus or corneal complications during a long-term follow-up period.

Keywords: Contact lens, Keratoconus, YK-KC lens^®

References

1. Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998; 42:297–319.

2. Krachmer JH, Feder RS, Belin MW. Keratoconus and related non-inflammatory corneal thinning disorders. Surv Ophthalmol. 1984; 28:293–322.

3. Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 135:620–7.

4. Choi SW, Choae WS, Her J. Intrastromal corneal ring segments (Keraring[R]) implantation for the correction of keratoconus. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2011; 52:277–84.

5. Kim MK, Lee JH. Long-term outcome of graft rejection after pene-trating keratoplasty. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1997; 38:1553–60.

6. Kim KH, Ahn K, Chung ES, Chung TY. Comparison of deep ante-rior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2008; 49:222–9.

7. Kwak NH, Kim MS, Kim JH. Clinical evaluation of keratoconus. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1989; 30:351–6.

8. Kang YS, Park YK, Lee JS. . The effect of the YK lens in keratoconus. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010; 30:267–73.

9. Yang KM, Kim MK, Lee JL, Kim CS. Effect of the spheric mul-ti-curve lens on changes of corneal topography and endothelial cell in keratoconus. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2004; 45:1427–37.

10. Lee JL, Kim MK. The analysis of management of keratoconus us-ing contact Lens in Koreans. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2004; 45:725–31.

11. Wagner H, Barr JT, Zadnik K. Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study: methods and findings to date. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2007; 30:223–32.

12. Piñero DP, Alió JL, Alesón A. . Corneal volume, pachymetry, and correlation of anterior and posterior corneal shape in sub-clinical and different stages of clinical keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010; 36:814–25.

13. Edrington TB, Szczotka LB, Begley CG. . Repeatability and agreement of two corneal-curvature assessments in keratoconus: keratometry and the first definite apical clearance lens (FDACL) CLEK Study Group. Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus. Cornea. 1998; 17:267–77.

14. Buxton JN, Keates RH, Hoefle FB. The contact lens correction of keratoconus. Dabezies O, editor. Contact lenses: The CLAO guide to basic science and clinical practice: update 1. 1st ed. Orlando: Grune & Stratton;1986. p. 1–55.

15. Choi JA, Kim MS. Progression of keratoconus by longitudinal as-sessment with corneal topography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53:927–35.

16. Edrington TB, Gundel RE, Libassi DP. . Variables affecting rigid contact lens comfort in the collaborative longitudinal evalua-tion of keratoconus (CLEK) study. Optom Vis Sci. 2004; 81:182–8.

17. Barr JT, Gordon MO, Zadnik K. . Photodocumentation of cor-neal scarring Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus Study Group. J Refract Surg. 1996; 12:492–500.

18. Caroline PJ, McGuire JR, Doughman DJ. Preliminary report on a new contact lens design for keratoconus. Contact Intraocul Lens. 1978; 4:69–73.

19. Gupta R, Sinha R, Singh P. . Rose-K versus Soper contact lens in keratoconus: a randomized comparative trial. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2014; 21:50–5.

20. Betts AM, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K. Visual performance and com-fort with the Rose K lens for keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2002; 79:493–501.

21. Patrick JC, Craig WN, Mark PA. The latest lens design for keratoconus. Spectrum. 1997; 8:36–41.

22. Romero-Jiménez M, Santodomingo-Rubido J, González-Méijome JM. An assessment of the optimal lens fit rate in keratoconus sub-jects using three-point-touch and apical touch fitting approaches with the rose K2 lens. Eye Contact Lens. 2013; 39:269–72.

23. McMonnies CW. The biomechanics of keratoconus and rigid con-tact lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2005; 31:80–92.

24. Wilson SE, Kim WJ. Keratocyte apoptosis: implications on cor-neal wound healing, tissue organization and disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998; 39:220–6.

25. Shin DB, Han NS, Kim MK. . Effect of the aspheric RGP lens on corneal topography and endothelial cell in keratoconus. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2004; 45:396–404.

26. Barnett M, Mannis MJ. Contact lenses in the management of keratoconus. Cornea. 2011; 30:1510–6.

27. Smolek MK, Klyce SD. Is keratoconus a true ectasia? An evalua-tion of corneal surface area. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000; 118:1179–86.

28. Jain AK, Sukhija J. Rose-K contact lens for keratoconus. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2007; 55:121–5.

Figure 1.

Distribution of self-reported assessment of contact lens comfort.

Figure 2.

Change in best-corrected visual activity (BCVA) be-tween spectacles and YK-KC lenses®. Points lying above the solid 45° line correspond to eyes with improved vision with YK-KC lenses®.

Figure 3.

Distribution of visual acuity when wearing YK-KC lens®, plotted against the base curve radius of the lens. Better visual acuity was achieved when contact lenses with flatter base curve radii were fitted.

Figure 4.

Correlations between topographic indices and contact lens base curve radius (BCR). 'r' means Pearson's correlation co-efficient between Sim K min and BCR (A), between average of Sim K and BCR (B), between Sim K max and BCR (C), and a rela-tionship is considered to be statistically significant if p < 0.05. Sim K = simulated keratometry; min = minimum.

Table 1.

The shape and location of the cones

Shape of cones	Location of cones	Number of eyes (%)
Nipple	Center	51 (33.6)
	Inferior paracenter	76 (50.0)
	Superior paracenter	5 (3.3)
Oval	Inferonasal	4 (2.6)
	Inferiotemporal	2 (1.3)
	Superior	1 (0.7)
Globus	Center	13 (8.6)
	Inferior	0 (0)

TOOLS

Similar articles