Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.55(9) > 1009768

Lee, Lee, Chang, Baek, and Lee: Orbital Morphology for Decompression Surgery in Thyroid Eye Disease Using 2-D Orbital CT and 4 Parameters

Abstract

Purpose

To present easily measurable 2D orbit computed tomography (CT) reference data that can be used in a preoperative study for orbital decompression and classification of individual orbital morphologies.

Methods

The study sample was composed of 77 patients with orbital contusion (42 Asian males + 35 Asian females = 154 orbits) who visited the emergency room of the Korea University Guro Hospital from September 2012 to June 2013. Patients with orbital wall fracture, retrobulbar hemorrhage, or eyeball rupture were excluded. Medical records including 2D orbit or facial bone CT were retrospectively reviewed and 4 orbital parameters (orbital length, OL; globe length, GL; GL/OL ratio and 2D cone angle) were measured.

Results

The average OL was 42.53 ± 2.46 mm (35.63-49.09 mm) and average GL was 24.83 ± 1.09 mm (22.75-28.13 mm). The average GL/OL ratio using these 2 parameters was 0.59 ± 0.04 (0.50-0.68). The posterior cone angle was on average, 45.96 ± 5.91° (29.35-60.04°).

Conclusions

Simple measurement of 4 parameters using 2D orbit CT and classification of Asian individual orbital morphology may help in the choice of the most effective surgical technique for decompression surgery in thyroid eye disease patients.

References

1. Bartalena L, Pinchera A, Marcocci C. Management of Graves' ophthalmopathy: reality and perspectives. Endocr Rev. 2000; 21:168–99.
crossref
2. Bahn RS. Graves' ophthalmopathy. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362:726–38.
crossref
3. Borumandi F, Hammer B, Kamer L, von Arx G. How predictable is exophthalmos reduction in Graves' orbitopathy? A review of the literature. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011; 95:1625–30.
crossref
4. Borumandi F, Hammer B, Noser H, Kamer L. Classification of orbital morphology for decompression surgery in Graves' orbitopathy: two-dimensional versus three-dimensional orbital parameters. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013; 97:659–62.
crossref
5. McKeag D, Lane C, Lazarus JH, et al. Clinical features of dysthyroid optic neuropathy: a European Group on Graves' Orbitopathy (EUGOGO) survey. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007; 91:455–8.
crossref
6. Mourits MP, Bijl H, Altea MA, et al. Outcome of orbital decompression for disfiguring proptosis in patients with Graves' orbitopathy using various surgical procedures. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009; 93:1518–23.
7. Baujat B, Krastinova D, Bach CA, et al. Orbital morphology in exophthalmos and exorbitism. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 117:542–50.
crossref
8. Campi I, Vannucchi GM, Minetti AM, et al. A quantitative method for assessing the degree of axial proptosis in relation to orbital tissue involvement in Graves' orbitopathy. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120:1092–8.
crossref
9. Dickinson AJ, Perros P. Controversies in the clinical evaluation of active thyroid-associated orbitopathy: use of a detailed protocol with comparative photographs for objective assessment. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2001; 55:283–303.
crossref
10. Vardizer Y, Berendschot TT, Mourits MP. Effect of exophthalmometer design on its accuracy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 21:427–30.
crossref

Figure 1.
Globe length: antero-posterior globe length measured at the optical lens level.
jkos-55-1267f1.tif
Figure 2.
Orbital length: antero-posterior orbital length defined by the distance between orbital apex and the middle of the anterior orbital boundary line. The measurement was performed at the level of the inferior end of the superior orbital fissure.
jkos-55-1267f2.tif
Figure 3.
Cone angle: cone angle, defined by the angle between the medial and lateral orbital wall. The measurement was performed at the level of the optic canal.
jkos-55-1267f3.tif
Figure 4.
Distribution of orbital length.
jkos-55-1267f4.tif
Table 1.
2D orbital reference parameters measured in 154 Asian orbits
Parameters Values (range)
Orbital length (OL) 42.53 mm ± 2.46 (35.63-49.09 mm)
Globe length (GL) 24.83 mm ± 1.09 (22.75-28.13 mm)
GL/OL ratio 0.59 ± 0.04 (0.50-0.68)
Cone angle (CA) 45.96° ± 5.91 (29.35-60.04°)

Values are presented as mean ± SD.

Table 2.
Distribution of orbital length
Orbital length Distribution (n, %)
≤40 mm 22 (14)
>40 mm, <45 mm 114 (75)
≥45 mm 18 (12)
TOOLS
Similar articles