Abstract
Purpose
We report a case of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®; Allergan, Inc.) fragmentation during the in-jection procedure in macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion.
Case summary
A 57-year-old man visited our hospital for visual disturbance in his right eye. The patient’s best-corrected visual acuity was 0.02 in the right eye and 1.2 in the left eye. After fundus examination, the patient was diagnosed with cen-tral retinal vein occlusion with macular edema, thus bevacizumab was injected in the right eye. However, the macular ede-ma did not improve, and a dexamethasone intravitreal implant was injected in the right eye. Immediately after the dex-amethasone intravitreal implant injection, on fundus exam, the drug was observed to be fragmented into 3 pieces without any additional treatment. After 2 months, the patient’s best-corrected visual acuity was 0.4 in the right eye and 1.2 in the left eye. Macular edema decreased according to optical coherence tomography.
Go to : 

References
1. Chan A, Leung LS, Blumenkranz MS. Critical appraisal of the clinical utility of the dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex) for the treatment of macular edema related to branch ret-inal vein occlusion or central retinal vein occlusion. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011; 5:1043–9.
2. Gan IM, Ugahary LC, van Dissel JT, van Meurs JC. Effect of intra-vitreal dexamethasone on vitreous vancomycin concentrations in patients with suspected postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005; 243:1186–9.


3. Pardo-López D, Francés-Muñoz E, Gallego-Pinazo R, Díaz-Llopis M. Anterior chamber migration of dexametasone intravitreal im-plant (Ozurdex®). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012; 250:1703–4.
4. Haller JA, Bandello F, Belfort R Jr. . Randomized, sham-con-trolled trial of dexamethasone intravitreal implant in patients with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117:1134–46.


5. Rishi P, Mathur G, Rishi E. Fractured Ozurdex™ implant in the vitreous cavity. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012; 60:337–8.
6. Chang-Lin JE, Attar M, Acheampong AA. . Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a sustained-release dexamethasone in-travitreal implant. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52:80–6.


7. Bansal R, Bansal P, Kulkarni P. . Wandering Ozurdex® implant. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2012; 2:1–5.


8. Haller JA, Dugel P, Weinberg DV. . Evaluation of the safety and performance of an applicator for a novel intravitreal dex-amethasone drug delivery system for the treatment of macular edema. Retina. 2009; 29:46–51.


9. Meyer CH, Klein A, Alten F. . Release and velocity of micron-ized dexamethasone implants with an intravitreal drug delivery system: kinematic analysis with a high-speed camera. Retina. 2012; 32:2133–40.
Go to : 

![]() | Figure 1.Patient’s fundus photographs and optical coherence tomography: (A, B) At initial presentation, fundus revealed flame-shaped retinal hemorrhage, retinal vein engorgement and papilledema. A Severe macular edema is seen on OCT. Patient’s visual acuity was 0.02. (C, D) Two month later, fundus revealed resolving retinal hemorrhage and papilledema. A significant de-crease in macular edema is seen on OCT. Patient’s visual acuity was 0.4. |
![]() | Figure 2.(A) Photographs immediately after dexamethasone intravitreal implant injection shows that drug is fragmented to 3 pieces. Slit lamp photographs using contact ocular lens. The fragmented dexamethasone intravitreal implant is seen in the inferior fundus area. (B) Next day, (C) Two months later. |