Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.54(6) > 1009717

Youn, Park, Lee, Lim, and Yun: A Case of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant Fragmentation During the Injection Procedure in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion

Abstract

Purpose

We report a case of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®; Allergan, Inc.) fragmentation during the in-jection procedure in macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion.

Case summary

A 57-year-old man visited our hospital for visual disturbance in his right eye. The patient’s best-corrected visual acuity was 0.02 in the right eye and 1.2 in the left eye. After fundus examination, the patient was diagnosed with cen-tral retinal vein occlusion with macular edema, thus bevacizumab was injected in the right eye. However, the macular ede-ma did not improve, and a dexamethasone intravitreal implant was injected in the right eye. Immediately after the dex-amethasone intravitreal implant injection, on fundus exam, the drug was observed to be fragmented into 3 pieces without any additional treatment. After 2 months, the patient’s best-corrected visual acuity was 0.4 in the right eye and 1.2 in the left eye. Macular edema decreased according to optical coherence tomography.

Conclusions

A case of dexamethasone intravitreal implant fragmentation during an injection procedure has not been pre-viously reported in Korea. Although the drug fragmented, the treatment was effective without complications.

References

1. Chan A, Leung LS, Blumenkranz MS. Critical appraisal of the clinical utility of the dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex) for the treatment of macular edema related to branch ret-inal vein occlusion or central retinal vein occlusion. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011; 5:1043–9.
2. Gan IM, Ugahary LC, van Dissel JT, van Meurs JC. Effect of intra-vitreal dexamethasone on vitreous vancomycin concentrations in patients with suspected postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005; 243:1186–9.
crossref
3. Pardo-López D, Francés-Muñoz E, Gallego-Pinazo R, Díaz-Llopis M. Anterior chamber migration of dexametasone intravitreal im-plant (Ozurdex®). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012; 250:1703–4.
4. Haller JA, Bandello F, Belfort R Jr. . Randomized, sham-con-trolled trial of dexamethasone intravitreal implant in patients with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117:1134–46.
crossref
5. Rishi P, Mathur G, Rishi E. Fractured Ozurdex™ implant in the vitreous cavity. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012; 60:337–8.
6. Chang-Lin JE, Attar M, Acheampong AA. . Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a sustained-release dexamethasone in-travitreal implant. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52:80–6.
crossref
7. Bansal R, Bansal P, Kulkarni P. . Wandering Ozurdex® implant. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2012; 2:1–5.
crossref
8. Haller JA, Dugel P, Weinberg DV. . Evaluation of the safety and performance of an applicator for a novel intravitreal dex-amethasone drug delivery system for the treatment of macular edema. Retina. 2009; 29:46–51.
crossref
9. Meyer CH, Klein A, Alten F. . Release and velocity of micron-ized dexamethasone implants with an intravitreal drug delivery system: kinematic analysis with a high-speed camera. Retina. 2012; 32:2133–40.

Figure 1.
Patient’s fundus photographs and optical coherence tomography: (A, B) At initial presentation, fundus revealed flame-shaped retinal hemorrhage, retinal vein engorgement and papilledema. A Severe macular edema is seen on OCT. Patient’s visual acuity was 0.02. (C, D) Two month later, fundus revealed resolving retinal hemorrhage and papilledema. A significant de-crease in macular edema is seen on OCT. Patient’s visual acuity was 0.4.
jkos-54-982f1.tif
Figure 2.
(A) Photographs immediately after dexamethasone intravitreal implant injection shows that drug is fragmented to 3 pieces. Slit lamp photographs using contact ocular lens. The fragmented dexamethasone intravitreal implant is seen in the inferior fundus area. (B) Next day, (C) Two months later.
jkos-54-982f2.tif
TOOLS
Similar articles