Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.54(6) > 1009697

Lee, Hwang, and Kim: Influence of Endothelial Cell Loss During Preservation on Graft Survival in Imported Donor Cornea

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the influence of preoperative endothelial cell loss on the outcome of keratoplasty for keratoconus in imported donor corneas.

Methods

Eighteen imported corneas used in keratoplasty for keratoconus patients were evaluated. Corneal endothelial cell density at the moment of preservation was obtained from the medical records and was measured immediately before the keratoplasty. Correlation of the endothelial cell loss count before and after keratoplasty was analyzed and post-operative endothelial cell loss count according to the range of preoperative endothelial cell loss was evaluated.

Results

Mean endothelial cell loss before and after keratoplasty was 258.94 ± 128.58 cells/mm2 and 355.44 ± 371.83 cells/mm2, respectively. There was a positive correlation between preoperative and postoperative endothelial cell loss count (r = 0.431, p = 0.074). The results showed statistically significant higher endothelial cell loss count after keratoplasty in the range above 250 cells/mm2 rather than below 250 cells/mm2 of preoperative endothelial cell loss count (p = 0.033).

Conclusions

The preoperative decrease in endothelial cell density affected the endothelial cell loss after keratoplasty for keratoconus in imported donor corneas.

References

1. Kim TK, Byun YS, Kim MS. Analysis of factors affecting corneal endothelial cell loss after penetrating keratoplasty. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2011; 52:807–15.
crossref
2. Cho EY, Kim MS. Penetrating keratoplasty before and after estab-lishment of Korean network for organ sharing. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2006; 47:525–30.
3. Park SH, Kim JH, Joo CK. The clinical evaluations of the penetrating keratoplasty with imported donor corneas. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2005; 46:28–34.
4. Kong SJ, Cho K, Kim MS. Analysis of factors affecting the endo-thelial cell density in imported donor corneas. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2012; 53:20–6.
5. Williams KA, Roder D, Esterman A. . Factors predictive of corneal graft survival. Report from the Australian Corneal Graft Registry. Ophthalmology. 1992; 99:403–14.
crossref
6. Kim MK, Lee JH. Long-term outcome of graft rejection after pene-trating keratoplasty. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1997; 38:1553–60.
7. Ha DW, Kim CK, Lee SE. . Penetrating keratoplasty results in 275 cases. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2001; 42:20–9.
8. Boruchoffe SA, Jensen AD, Dohlman CH. Comparison of suturing technique in keratoplasty for keratoconus. Ann Ophthalmol. 1975; 7:433–6.
9. Buxton JN, Apisson JG, Hoefle FB. Corticosteroids in 100 keratoplasties. Am J Ophthalmol. 1969; 67:46–51.
crossref
10. Lee HS, Kim MS. Influential factors on the survival of endothelial cells after penetrating keratoplasty. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009; 19:930–5.
crossref
11. Langenbucher A, Seitz B, Nguyen NX, Naumann GO. Corneal en-dothelial cell loss after nonmechanical penetrating keratoplasty de-pends on diagnosis: a regression analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002; 240:387–92.
crossref
12. Kim SH, Ahn BC, Chung YT. Endothelial cell changes after pene-trating keratoplasty. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2000; 41:1124–31.
13. Means TL, Geroski DH, Hernault N. . The corneal epi-thelium after optisol-GS storage. Cornea. 1996; 15:599–605.
crossref
14. Means TL, Geroski DH, Hardley A. . Viability of human cor-neal endothelium following optisol-GS storage. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995; 113:805–9.
crossref
15. Wang IJ, Hu FR. Effect of shaking of corneal endothelial preservation. Curr Eye Res. 1997; 16:1111–8.
16. Na YS, Woo SW, Kang JH, Joo MJ. Microbiologic study of im-ported donor corneas and preserved solutions. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2005; 46:1974–7.
17. Hu FR, Tsai AC, Wang IJ, Chang SW. Outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty with imported donor corneas. Cornea. 1999; 18:182–7.
crossref
18. Culberston WW, Abbott RL, Forster RK. Endothelial cell loss in penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmol. 1982; 89:600–4.
19. Bourne WM, O'Fallon WM. Endothelial cell loss during penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1978; 85:760–6.
crossref
20. Obata H, Ishida K, Murao M. . Corneal endothelial cell damage in penetrating keratoplasty. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1991; 35:411–6.
21. Bourne WM. Penetrating keratoplasty with fresh and cryopreserved corneas. Donor endothelial cell survival in primates. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978; 96:1073–4.
crossref
22. Musch DC, Meyer RF, Sugar A. Predictive factors for endothelial cell loss after penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993; 111:80–3.
crossref
23. Böhringer D, Reinhard T, Spelsberg H, Sundmacher R. Influencing factors on chronic endothelial cell loss characterised in a homoge-neous group of patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002; 86:35–8.
24. Shimazaki J, Shinozaki N, Shimmura S. . Efficacy and safety of international donor sharing: a single-center, case-controlled study on corneal transplantation. Transplantation. 2004; 78:216–20.
crossref

Figure 1.
Eye Bank Kerato Analyzer, Konan Medical Inc., Hyogo, Japan.
jkos-54-862f1.tif
Figure 2.
Correlation between prePPKP△ CD and postPPKP△ CD (r = 0.431, p = 0.074). prePPKP△ CD = decrease in endo-thelial density before penetrating keratoplasty; postPPKP△ CD = decrease in endothelial density after penetrating keratoplasty.
jkos-54-862f2.tif
Figure 3.
Correlation between prePPKP△ CD and total PPKP △CD (r = 0.519, p = 0.027). prePPKP△CD = decrease in endothelial density before penetrating keratoplasty; total PPKP △CD = decrease in endothelial density since preservation.
jkos-54-862f3.tif
Table 1.
Endothelial cell density change before and after pene-trating keratoplasty
Endothelial cell density (cells/mm2)
At preservation 2828.00 ± 257.77
Before keratoplasty 2569.06 ± 269.50
Preoperative cell loss count 258.94 ± 128.58
After keratoplasty 1 week-1 month 2586.22 ± 508.85
After keratoplasty 6 months 2230.78 ± 469.13
Postoperative cell loss count (for 6 months) 355.44 ± 371.83
Postoperative cell loss count (total) 597.22 ± 416.08

Value are presented as mean ± SD.

Table 2.
Comparison of endothelial cell density-related factors according to preoperative cell loss count
Group 1* Group 2 p-value
Donor age (years) 58.00 ± 13.32 51.22 ± 19.37 0.400
Donor cell count (cells/mm2) 2769.44 ± 184.19 2886.56 ± 315.53 0.351
Death to preserve time (hours) 11.21 ± 8.34 9.03 ± 7.02 0.559
Preservation time (hours) 178.13 ± 41.50 182.97 ± 42.94 0.811
Death to graft time (hours) 189.33 ± 42.33 192.00 ± 43.27 0.897
Postoperative cell loss (cells/mm2) 173.00 ± 257.18 537.89 ± 390.89 0.033

Value are presented as mean ± SD.

* Preoperative cell loss count <250;

Preoperative cell loss count ≥250 (cells/mm2);

Statistically significant (p-value < 0.05).

Table 3.
Comparison of endothelial cell density-related factors according to range of preoperative cell loss count
Group I* Group II Group III p-value
Donor age (years) 49.50 ± 15.93 57.25 ± 18.45 54.50 ± 16.28 0.768
Donor cell count (cells/mm2) 2889.00 ± 228.78 2765.88 ± 221.74 2870.17 ± 338.21 0.681
Death to preserve time (hours) 11.81 ± 10.94 7.43 ± 7.01 12.58 ± 5.73 0.423
Preservation time (hours) 204.19 ± 33.90 172.57 ± 43.51 175.43 ± 42.51 0.449
Death to graft time (hours) 216.00 ± 39.19 180.00 ± 40.57 188.00 ± 44.04 0.384
Postoperative cell loss (cells/mm2) 71.00 ± 264.03 309.38 ± 241.37 606.50 ± 450.54 0.065

Value are presented as mean ± SD.

* Preoperative cell loss count <150;

Preoperative cell loss count ≥150, <350;

Preoperative cell loss count ≥350 (cells/mm2).

TOOLS
Similar articles