Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.54(4) > 1009647

Choi, Oh, and Yoon: Long-Term Results after Cataract Surgery in Patients with Low Corneal Endothelial Cell Density

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the long-term results after cataract surgery in eyes with low endothelial cell density (ECD). Methods: A retrospective medical record review was performed of 19 patients with low ECD (lower than 1000 cells/mm2)
who 31 patients with a normal ECD (higher than 1600 cells/mm2) underwent cataract surgery. Clinical parameters including visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), spherical equivalent refraction, anterior chamber depth, axial length and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured and specular microscopy was performed to analyze the ECD and its morphology. The follow-up periods were 1 week, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

Results

Clinical parameters except ECD and CCT had no significant difference between the 2 groups until 12 months postoperatively. The decreasing rate of ECD and increase of CCT were significantly different between the 2 groups at 1 week and 1 month postoperatively. However, no significant difference was found after 3 months postoperatively. Only 1 eye in the low ECD group with 367 cells/mm2 developed bullous keratopathy.

Conclusions

In the low ECD group, a significant decrease of ECD and increase of CCT were observed at 1 month after cataract surgery. However there were no significant differences compared with the control group after 3 months postoperatively. The results suggest that cataract surgery is safe postoperatively for a long-term for a patient with low ECD.

References

1. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Corneal endothelial photography. Three-year revision. Ophthalmology. 1997; 104:1360–5.
2. Walkow T, Anders N, Klebe S. Endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification: relation to preoperative and intraoperative parameters. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000; 26:727–32.
crossref
3. Powe NR, Schein OD, Gieser SC, et al. Synthesis of the literature on visual acuity and complications following cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation. Cataract Patient Outcome Research Team. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994; 112:239–52.
crossref
4. Seitzman GD, Gottsch JD, Stark WJ. Cataract surgery in patients with Fuchs' corneal dystrophy: expanding recommendations for cataract surgery without simultaneous keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2005; 112:441–6.
5. Seitzman GD. Cataract surgery in Fuchs' dystrophy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2005; 16:241–5.
crossref
6. Tarnawska D, Wylegała E. Effectiveness of the soft-shell technique in patients with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007; 33:1907–12.
crossref
7. Chikamoto N, Takahashi N, Wakuta M, et al. Recovery of corneal thickness promoted by glucocorticoid administration after phacoemulsification in eyes affected by Fuchs' dystrophy. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2008; 52:336–9.
8. Traish AS, Colby KA. Approaching cataract surgery in patients with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2010; 50:1–11.
crossref
9. Yasukawa T, Suga K, Yokoo N, Asada S. Cataract surgery in a patient with severe chronic iritis and corneal endothelial damage. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998; 24:885–8.
crossref
10. Olsen T. The endothelial cell damage in acute glaucoma. On the corneal thickness response to intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1980; 58:257–66.
11. Malaise-Stals J, Collignon-Brach J, Weekers JF. Corneal endothelial cell density in acute angle-closure glaucoma. Ophthalmologica. 1984; 189:104–9.
crossref
12. Sihota R, Lakshmaiah NC, Titiyal JS, et al. Corneal endothelial status in the subtypes of primary angle closure glaucoma. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2003; 31:492–5.
crossref
13. Ko YC, Liu CI, Lau LI, et al. Factors related to corneal endothelial damage after phacoemulsification in eyes with occludable angles. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 34:46–51.
crossref
14. van den Bruel A, Gailly J, Devriese S, et al. The protective effect of ophthalmic viscoelastic devices on endothelial cell loss during cataract surgery: a meta-analysis using mixed treatment comparisons. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011; 95:5–10.
crossref
15. Lee EK, Kim MK, Wee WR, Lee JH. Short-term outcome of cataract surgery using torsional-mode phacoemulsification for patients with low endothelial cell counts. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2011; 52:434–41.
crossref
16. Hayashi K, Yoshida M, Manabe S, Hirata A. Cataract surgery in eyes with low corneal endothelial cell density. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37:1419–25.
crossref
17. Bourne RR, Minassian DC, Dart JK, et al. Effect of cataract surgery on the corneal endothelium: modern phacoemulsification compared with extracapsular cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111:679–85.
18. Bourne WM, Hodge DO, Nelson LR. Corneal endothelium five years after transplantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994; 118:185–96.
crossref
19. Ing JJ, Ing HH, Nelson LR, et al. Ten-year postoperative results of penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1998; 105:1855–65.
crossref
20. Cornea Donor Study Investigator Group. Donor age and corneal endothelial cell loss 5 years after successful corneal transplantation. Specular microscopy ancillary study results. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115:627–32.
21. Polack FM, Sugar A. The phacoemulsification procedure. III. Corneal complications. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1977; 16:39–46.
22. Gwin RM, Warren JK, Samuelson DA, Gum GG. Effects of phacoemulsification and extracapsular lens removal on corneal thickness and endothelial cell density in the dog. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1983; 24:227–36.
23. Sugar A, Fetherolf EC, Lin LL, et al. Endothelial cell loss from intraocular lens insertion. Ophthalmology. 1978; 85:394–9.
crossref
24. Kaufman E, Katz JI. Endothelial change from intraocular lens insertion. Invest Ophthalmol. 1976; 15:996–1000.
25. Edelhauser HF, Van Horn DL, Hyndiuk RA, Schultz RO. Intraocular irrigating solutions. Their effect on the corneal endothelium. Arch Ophthalmol. 1975; 93:648–57.
crossref
26. Yamazoe K, Yamaguchi T, Hotta K, et al. Outcomes of cataract surgery in eyes with a low corneal endothelial cell density. J Cataract Rrefract Surg. 2011; 37:2130–6.
crossref
27. Martin TP, Reed JW, Legault C, et al. Cataract formation and cataract extraction after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1994; 101:113–9.
crossref
29. Ohguro N, Matsuda M, Kinoshita S. Effects of posterior chamber lens implantation on the endothelium of transplanted corneas. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997; 81:1056–9.
crossref
30. Kim EC, Kim MS. A comparison of endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification in penetrating keratoplasty patients and normal patients. Cornea. 2010; 29:510–5.
crossref
31. Wilson SE, Bourne WM. Fuchs' dystrophy. Cornea. 1988; 7:2–18.
crossref

Figure 1.
Comparison of visual acuity (A), intraocular pressure (B), spherical equivalent refraction (C) and anterior chamber depth (D) between the low ECD and control groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. ECD = endothelial cell density.
jkos-54-602f1.tif
Figure 2.
Changes of ECD after cataract surgery in the low ECD (A) and control (B) groups. ECD = endothelial cell density. *p < 0.05 compared with preoperative levels.
jkos-54-602f2.tif
Figure 3.
Comparison of the decreasing rate of ECD after cataract surgery between the low ECD and control groups. ECD = endothelial cell density. *Statistically difference between the low ECD and control groups.
jkos-54-602f3.tif
Figure 4.
Comparison of hexagonality (A) and variation coefficient of endothelial cell size (B) between the low ECD and control groups. There were no statistically significant differences between low ECD and control groups. ECD = endothelial cell density.
jkos-54-602f4.tif
Figure 5.
Changes of central corneal thickness after cataract surgery in the low ECD (A) and control (B) groups. ECD = endothelial cell density. *p < 0.05 compared with preoperative levels.
jkos-54-602f5.tif
Figure 6.
Comparison of central corneal thickness after cataract surgery between the low ECD and control groups. ECD = endothelial cell density. *Statistically difference between the low ECD and control groups.
jkos-54-602f6.tif
Table 1.
Demographics of patients who underwent cataract surgery
Parameters Groups p value
Low ECD (n=19) Control (n=31)
Mean age (years) 67.0 ± 13.78 65.2 ± 13.04 0.64
Sex (M:F) 12:7 14:17 0.23
Mean visual acuity (log MAR) 1.14 ± 0.72 0.78 ± 0.61 0.15
Spherical equivalent refraction (D) -1.16 ± 3.12 -1.97 ± 3.10 0.64
Mean IOP (mm Hg) 15.42 ± 3.49 14.04 ± 1.51 0.83
Anterior chamber depth (mm) 2.59 ± 0.43 2.72 ± 0.31 0.53
Mean axial length (mm) 24.40 ± 4.03 23.33 ± 1.42 0.19
Mean CCT (μm) 514.20 ± 85.30 526.60 ± 62.81 0.61
Mean ECD (cells/mm2) 860.59 ± 194.72 2394.50 ± 489.69 <0.01
Range of ECD 376-986 1605-2985
Nucleus sclerosis (LOCS III grade) 2.63 ± 0.50 2.55 ± 0.51 0.58
Phacoemulsification time (sec) 50.76 ± 33.59 50.35 ± 35.11 0.85
Cumulative dissipated energy (sec) 12.62 ± 8.19 8.55 ± 4.73 0.15

Values are presented as mean ± SD or number.

ECD = endothelial cell density; IOP = intraocular pressure; CCT = central corneal thickness; LOCS = Lens Opacities Classification System, version III.

Table 2.
Causes of low endothelial cell density
Diagnosis No. of eyes (%)
Previous penetrating keratoplasty 7 36.8
Keratitis 3 15.8
Intraocular inflammation 3 15.8
Band keratopathy 1 5.3
Others 5 26.3
Total 19 100
TOOLS
Similar articles