Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.54(12) > 1009554

Kim, Kim, Kim, Han, Seo, Yoo, Chung, and Park: The Change of Anterior Chamber Parameters with Pentacam® after Intravitreal Injection

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the changes of anterior chamber parameters and intraocular pressure (IOP) with Pentacam® after intravitreal injection.

Methods

A total of 76 eyes of 76 patients received an intravitreal injection of either triamcinolone acetonide (TA) or bevacizumab. Twelve patients were treated with an intravitreal injection of TA 0.1 ml, 16 patients were treated with an intravitreal injection of TA 0.05 ml, while the remaining 48 patients received a bevacizumab 0.05 ml injection. All patients underwent anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber angle, and anterior chamber volume evaluation with Pentacam® before and 5 minutes after injection. Additionally, IOP measurements were taken 5 minutes before and 5 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour and 1 day after injection.

Results

Anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber angle, anterior chamber volume, and IOP changes in patients receiving TA 0.1 ml were 0.4 ± 0.11 mm, 10.2 ± 4.1°, 33.7 ± 5.9 mm3 and 18.8 ± 12.1 mm Hg, respectively. Anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber angle, anterior chamber volume, and IOP changes in patients receiving TA 0.05 ml were -0.01 ± 0.05 mm, 2.4 ± 3.2°, 5.8 ± 9.5 mm3 and 4.8 ± 7.4 mm Hg, respectively. Anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber angle, anterior chamber volume, and IOP changes in patients receiving bevacizumab were 0.28 ± 0.99 mm, 0.8 ± 4.0°, 7.1 ± 9.6 mm3 and 5.4 ± 6.3 mm Hg, respectively. There was a significant difference between TA 0.1 ml and 0.05 ml. However, there was no significant difference between TA 0.05 ml and bevacizumab 0.05 ml.

Conclusions

Because of similar anterior chamber parameters changes after 0.05 ml intravitreal injection with TA or bevacizumab, early period IOP increases due to intravitreal volume expansion. Intravitreal 0.05 ml injections do not require any other procedures for controlling IOP 30 minutes after injection.

References

1. Kim TH, Moon YS, Chin HS. Change of residual period and clearance rate of intravitreal triamcinolone according to initial injection dosage. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2005; 46:1569–74.
2. Jermak CM, Dellacroce JT, Heffez J, Peyman GA. Triamcinolone acetonide in ocular therapeutics. Surv Ophthalmol. 2007; 52:503–22.
crossref
3. Jonas JB, Kreissig I, Degenring R. Intraocular pressure after intra-vitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003; 87:24–7.
crossref
4. Roth DB, Realini T, Feuer WJ. . Short-term complications of intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide. Retina. 2008; 28:66–70.
crossref
5. Smithen LM, Ober MD, Maranan L, Spaide RF. Intravitreal tri-amcinolone acetonide and intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004; 138:740–3.
crossref
6. Wingate RJ, Beaumont PE. Intravitreal triamcinolone and elevated intraocular pressure. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1999; 27:431–2.
7. Ozkiriş A, Erkiliç K. Complications of intravitreal injection of tri-amcinolone acetonide. Can J Ophthalmol. 2005; 40:63–8.
8. Yang YH, Kim KR, Yang SW, Yim HB. The effect of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide on intraocular pressure. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2004; 45:1081–5.
9. Bakri SJ, Beer PM. The effect of intravitreal triamcinolone aceto-nide on intraocular pressure. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2003; 34:386–90.
crossref
10. Park HY, Yi K, Kim HK. Intraocular pressure elevation after intra-vitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2005; 19:122–7.
crossref
11. Falkenstein IA, Cheng L, Freeman WR. Changes of intraocular pressure after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (avastin). Retina. 2007; 27:1044–7.
crossref
12. Hattenbach LO, Klais C, Koch FH, Gümbel HO. Intravitreous in-jection of tissue plasminogen activator and gas in the treatment of submacular hemorrhage under various conditions. Ophthalmology. 2001; 108:1485–92.
crossref
13. Kerimoglu H, Ozturk BT, Bozkurt B. . Does lens status affect the course of early intraocular pressure and anterior chamber changes after intravitreal injection? Acta Ophthalmol. 2011; 89:138–42.
crossref
14. Höhn F, Mirshahi A. Impact of injection techniques on intraocular pressure (IOP) increase after intravitreal ranibizumab application. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010; 248:1371–5.
crossref
15. Singh IP, Ahmad SI, Yeh D. . Early rapid rise in intraocular pressure after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004; 138:286–7.
crossref
16. Park SY, Chol KS. Intraocular pressure elevation after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide of different volumes: Comparing 0.1 ml vs 0.05 ml. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2008; 49:589–94.
crossref
17. Hariprasad SM, Shah GK, Blinder KJ. Short-term intraocular pres-sure trends following intravitreal pegaptanib (Macugen) injection. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 141:200–1.
crossref
18. Lee EW, Hariprasad SM, Mieler WF. . Short-term intraocular pressure trends after intravitreal triamcinolone injection. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007; 143:365–7.
crossref
19. Falkenstein IA, Cheng L, Freeman WR. Changes of intraocular pressure after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (avastin). Retina. 2007; 27:1044–7.
crossref
20. Hollands H, Wong J, Bruen R. . Short-term intraocular pres-sure changes after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab. Can J Ophthalmol. 2007; 42:807–11.
crossref
21. Hollands H, Wong J, Bruen R. . Short-term intraocular pres-sure changes after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab. Can J Ophthalmol. 2007; 42:807–11.
crossref
22. Sharei V, Höhn F, Köhler T. . Course of intraocular pressure af-ter intravitreal injection of 0.05 mL ranibizumab (Lucentis). Eur J Ophthalmol. 2010; 20:174–9.
crossref
23. Shankar H, Taranath D, Santhirathelagan CT, Pesudovs K. Anterior segment biometry with the Pentacam: comprehensive as-sessment of repeatability of automated measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 34:103–13.
crossref
24. Rosa N, Lanza M, Borrelli M. . Comparison of central corneal thickness measured with Orbscan and Pentacam. J Refract Surg. 2007; 23:895–9.
crossref
25. Rabsilber TM, Khoramnia R, Auffarth GU. Anterior chamber measurements using Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:456–9.
crossref

Figure 1.
Preop (A) and postop (B) Pentacam® images of intravitreal triamcinolon 0.05 ml injection patient.
jkos-54-1824f1.tif
Figure 2.
Preop (A) and postop (B) Pentacam® images of intravitreal triamcinolone 0.1 ml injection patient.
jkos-54-1824f2.tif
Figure 3.
IOP changes in IVTA patients and IVB or IVR patients. Preop (I) = immediate before injection; Postop (I) = immediate after injection; Dash line = IVB patients; Continuous line = IVTA 0.05 ml patients.
jkos-54-1824f3.tif
Table 1.
Patients demographics
  Total patients IVTA 0.1 ml patients IVTA 0.05 ml patients IVB patients p-value*
Number of eyes 76 12 16 48  
Sex         0.201
  Male 38 10 6 22  
  Female 38 2 10 26  
Age (years) 55.5 ± 11.2 57.6 ± 11.5 52.9 ± 10.2 56.2 ± 13.7 0.786
Laterality         0.874
  OD 62 10 12 40  
  OS 14 2 4 8  
Diagnosis          
  AMD 22 0 0 22  
  DMR with ME 40 10 14 16  
  BRVO with ME 9 0 1 8  
  CRVO with ME 5 2 1 2  
Basal IOP (mm Hg) 15.6 ± 2.2 16.3 ± 1.5 15.3 ± 2.1 15.7 ± 2.6 0.708

Values are presented as mean ± SD.

AMD = age related macular degeneration; DMR with ME = diabetic retinopathy with macular edema; BRVO with ME = branch retinal vein occlusion with macular edema; CRVO with ME = central retinal vein occlusion with macular edema; Basal IOP = intraocular pressure of 1 hour before injection; IVTA = intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection; IVB = intravitreal bevacizumab injection.

* One-way ANOVA test.

Table 2.
Changes of anterior chamber parameters
  Total patients
IVTA 0.1 ml patients
IVTA 0.05 ml patients
IVB patients
  Pre-injection Post-injection Pre-injection Post-injection Pre-injection Post-injection Pre-injection Post-injection
Corneal thickness 535.3 ± 28.1 566.9 ± 30.1 542.2 ± 18.8 578.2 ± 13.6 535.3 ± 19.8 563.4 ± 23.9 535.7 ± 31.5 569.1 ± 32.9
  p-value* <0.001 0.035 <0.001 <0.001
ACD 2.8 ± 0.5 2.6 ± 0.6 2.7 ± 0.2 2.3 ± 0.2 2.6 ± 0.2 2.6 ± 0.3 2.9 ± 0.8 2.7 ± 0.8
  p-value* 0.022 0.013 0.803 0.200
ACV 147.8 ± 30.1 137.3 ± 31.4 158.8 ± 23.4 125.2 ± 25.1 136.5 ± 15.6 130.6 ± 11.8 146.9 ± 34.3 128.5 ± 50.0
  p-value* 0.001 0.001 0.131 0.145
ACA 29.2 ± 6.3 27.0 ± 6.8 33.6 ± 7.1 23.4 ± 4.8 30.3 ± 2.3 27.9 ± 2.6 28.1 ± 6.4 27.3 ± 7.7
  p-value* 0.009 0.041 0.067 0.322

Values are presented as mean ± SD.

ACD = anterior chamber depth; ACV = anterior chamber volume; ACA = anterior chamber angle; IVTA = intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection; IVB = intravitreal bevacizumab injection.

* Student t-test.

Table 3.
Comparison of changes at 5 minutes after intravitreal injection
  IVTA 0.1 ml patients (n = 12) IVTA 0.05 ml patients (n = 16) p-valuev*
△ Corneal Thickness (Pre-Post) -36.0 ± 10.4 -28.1 ± 11.1 0.201
△ ACD (Pre-post) 0.4 ± 0.11 -0.01 ± 0.05 <0.001
△ ACV (Pre-post) 33.7 ± 5.9 5.8 ± 9.5 <0.001
△ ACA (Pre-Post) 10.2 ± 4.1 2.4 ± 3.2 0.002
△ IOP (I) 36.8 ± 10.2 22.1 ± 8.6 0.022
△ IOP (5) 18.8 ± 12.1 4.8 ± 7.4 0.021

Values are presented as mean ± SD.

ACD = anterior chamber depth; ACV = anterior chamber volume; ACA = anterior chamber angle; IOP (I) = IOP difference between immediately post-injection and pre-injection; IOP (5) = IOP difference between 5 minutes post-injection and pre-injection.

* Independent t-test.

Table 4.
Comparison of changes at 5 minutes after intravitreal injection
  IVTA 0.05 ml patients (n = 16) IVB 0.05 ml patients (n = 48) p-value*
△ Corneal Thickness (Pre-Post) -28.1 ± 11.1 -33.0 ± 9.2 0.163
△ ACD (Pre-post) -0.01 ± 0.05 0.10 ± 0.43 0.430
△ ACV (Pre-post) 5.8 ± 9.5 7.1 ± 9.6 0.855
△ ACA (Pre-Post) 2.4 ± 3.2 0.8 ± 4.0 0.288
△ IOP (I) 22.1 ± 8.6 20.7 ± 7.2 0.640
△ IOP (5) 4.8 ± 7.4 5.4 ± 6.3 0.807

Values are presented as mean ± SD.

ACD = anterior chamber depth; ACV = anterior chamber volume; ACA = anterior chamber angle; IOP (I) = IOP difference between immediately post-injection and pre-injection; IOP (5) = IOP difference between 5 minutes post-injection and pre-injection.

* Independent t-test.

Table 5.
Comparison of high IOP (≥21 mm Hg) patients at 5 minutes after intravitreal injection
  IVTA 0.05 ml patients (n = 4) IVB 0.05 ml patients (n = 22) p-value*
△ Corneal thickness (Pre-post) -29.0 ± 5.7 -37.8 ± 11.1 0.309
△ ACD (Pre-post) -0.02 ± 0.02 -0.03 ± 0.07 0.746
△ ACV (Pre-post) -1.5 ± 17.7 11.2 ± 23.5 0.489
△ ACA (Pre-Post) -1.0 ± 5.7 2.3 ± 3.6 0.279
△ IOP (5) 14.5 ± 10.6 11.5 ± 4.8 0.506

Values are presented as mean ± SD.

ACD = anterior chamber depth; ACV = anterior chamber volume; ACA = anterior chamber angle; IOP (5) = IOP difference between 5 minutes post-injection and pre-injection.

* Independent t-test.

Table 6.
Comparison between high IOP (≥21 mm Hg) and normal IOP (<21 mm Hg) patients at 5 minutes after intravitreal injection
  IVTA 0.05 ml patients (n = 16)
IVB patients (n = 48)
  Normal IOP (n = 12) High IOP (n = 4) p-value* Normal IOP (n = 26) High IOP (n = 22) p-value*
△ Corneal thickness (Pre-post) -27.8 ± 12.8 -29.0 ± 5.7 0.909 -30.2 ± 6.0 -37.8 ± 11.1 0.058
△ ACD (Pre-post) -0.002 ± 0.06 -0.02 ± 0.02 0.790 0.19 ± 0.54 -0.03 ± 0.07 0.238
△ ACV (Pre-post) 8.2 ± 6.0 -1.5 ± 17.7 0.239 4.3 ± 17.1 11.2 ± 23.5 0.393
△ ACA (Pre-Post) 3.6 ± 1.2 -1.0 ± 5.7 0.070 0.1 ± 3.8 2.3 ± 3.6 0.144
△ IOP (5) 1.5 ± 3.1 14.5 ± 10.6 0.001 1.2 ± 2.6 11.5 ± 4.8 0.001

Values are presented as mean ± SD.

ACD = anterior chamber depth; ACV = anterior chamber volume; ACA = anterior chamber angle; IOP (5) = IOP difference between 5 minutes post-injection and pre-injection.

* Independent t-test.

TOOLS
Similar articles