Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.53(11) > 1009224

Han, Han, Ahn, Jeong, Lee, Seo, Kim, and Kim: Influence of Pupil Size on Visual Acuity after Implantation of the TECNIS 1-Piece Intraocular Lens

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the influence of pupil size on uncorrected visual acuity and spherical aberration of the TECNIS 1-piece intraocular lens (IOL).

Methods

In this study 61 eyes were implanted with a TECNIS 1-piece IOL. Pupil size was checked by standard pupil card with cobalt blue light postoperatively. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) were assessed postoperatively. Total spherical aberration and high-order aberration for mesopic pupil size zone were measured.

Results

There were no significant differences of spherical equivalent, age, preoperative astigmatism, BCVA between two groups, but small pupil group revealed better UCVA (p = 0.02) and lower ocular aberration than large pupil group.

Conclusions

After cataract surgery, pupil size greater than 5.0 mm increases total aberration. Thus, visual acuity with small pupil after aspheric TECNIS 1-piece IOL implantation show better clinical result on uncorrected visual acuity.

Figures and Tables

Table 1
Preoperative demographics of study groups
jkos-53-1615-i001

All values are displayed as log MAR visual acuity.

No. = number; SD = standard deviation; BCVA = best corrected visual acuity; SE = spherical equivalent.

Table 2
Postoperative visual acuity and spherical equivalent
jkos-53-1615-i002

All values are displayed as log MAR visual acuity.

UCVA = uncorrected visual acuity; BCVA = best corrected visual acuity; SE = spherical equivalent.

*Analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test.

Table 3
Comparison of total ocular aberrations (µm) between two groups
jkos-53-1615-i003

Values are presented as mean ± SD.

RMS = root mean square; LO A = low-order aberration; HO A = higher-order aberration; Sph A = spherical aberration.

Table 4
Comparison of internal optics aberrations (µm) between two groups
jkos-53-1615-i004

Values are presented as mean ± SD.

RMS = root mean square; LO A = low-order aberration; HO A = higher-order aberration; Sph A = spherical aberration.

Table 5
Comparison of corneal aberrations (µm) between two groups
jkos-53-1615-i005

Values are presented as mean ± SD.

RMS = root mean square; LO A = low-order aberration; HO A = higher-order aberration; Sph A = spherical aberration.

Table 6
Comparison of total ocular aberrations (µm) between two groups at 3.0 mm pupil zone
jkos-53-1615-i006

Values are presented as mean ± SD.

RMS = root mean square; LO A = low-order aberration; HO A = higher-order aberration; Sph A = spherical aberration.

References

1. Lau J, Michon JJ, Chan WS, Ellwein LB. Visual acuity and quality of life outcomes in cataract surgery patients in Hong Kong. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002. 86:12–17.
2. Park CY, Chuck RS. Residual refractive error and visual outcome after cataract surgery using spherical versus Aspheric IOLs. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2011. 42:37–43.
3. Schwiegerling J. Theoretical limits to visual performance. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000. 45:139–146.
4. Campbell FW, Gregory AH. Effect of size of pupil on visual acuity. Nature. 1960. 187:1121–1123.
5. Gibbens MV, Goel R, Smith SE. Effect of cataract extraction on the pupil response to mydriatics. Br J Ophthalmol. 1989. 73:563–565.
6. Hayashi K, Hayashi H. Pupil size before and after phacoemulsification in nondiabetic and diabetic patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004. 30:2543–2550.
7. Kim H, Kim HJ, Joo CK. Change of pupil diameter after cataract surgery or after-cataract surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2005. 46:51–56.
8. Wachler BS, Krueger RR. Agreement and repeatability of infrared pupillometry and the comparison method. Ophthalmology. 1999. 106:319–323.
9. Chaglasian EL, Akbar S, Probst LE. Pupil measurement using the Colvard pupillometer and a standard pupil card with a cobalt blue filter penlight. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006. 32:255–260.
10. Pop M, Payette Y, Santoriello E. Comparison of the pupil card and pupillometer in measuring pupil size. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002. 28:283–288.
11. Awwad ST, Warmerdam D, Bowman RW, et al. Contrast sensitivity and higher order aberrations in eyes implanted with AcrySof IQ SN60WF and AcrySof SN60AT intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2008. 24:619–625.
12. Kim HS, Kim SW, Ha BJ, et al. Ocular aberrations and contrast sensitivity in eyes implanted with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2008. 49:1256–1262.
13. Ahn H, Kim SW, Kim EK, Kim TI. Wavefront and visual function analysis after aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses implantation. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2008. 49:1248–1255.
14. Denoyer A, Le Lez ML, Majzoub S, Pisella PJ. Quality of vision after cataract surgery after Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lens implantation: effect of contrast sensitivity and wavefront aberration improvements on the quality of daily vision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007. 33:210–216.
15. Kohnen T, Klaproth OK. [Aspheric intraocular lenses]. Ophthalmologe. 2008. 105:234–240.
16. Mester U, Kaymak H. Comparison of the AcrySof IQ aspheric blue light filter and the AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2008. 24:817–825.
17. Yamaguchi T, Dogru M, Yamaguchi K, et al. Effect of spherical aberration on visual function under photopic and mesopic conditions after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009. 35:57–63.
18. Bellucci R, Morselli S, Piers P. Comparison of wavefront aberrations and optical quality of eyes implanted with five different intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2004. 20:297–306.
19. Petermeier K, Frank C, Gekeler F, et al. Influence of the pupil size on visual quality and spherical aberration after implantation of the Tecnis 1-piece intraocular lens. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011. 95:42–45.
20. Montés-Micó R, Ferrer-Blasco T, Cerviño A. Analysis of the possible benefits of aspheric intraocular lenses: review of the literature. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009. 35:172–181.
TOOLS
Similar articles