Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.52(5) > 1009033

Lee, Rhee, Choi, and Lee: The Change in Corneal Endothelial Cell Density after Pars Plana Vitrectomy

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the effect of pars plana vitrectomy and gas tamponade on corneal endothelial cell density.

Methods

The corneal endothelial cell density in 145 eyes that underwent pars plana vitrectomy was examined with a non-contact specular microscope 3 months pre- and post-operation. The subjects were divided as follows: Group 1 (32 eyes) underwent pars plana vitrectomy, group 2 (26 eyes) underwent pars plana vitrectomy combined with gas tamponade, group 3 (34 eyes) underwent pars plana vitrectomy combined with phacoemulsification and group 4 (48 eyes) underwent pars plana vitrectomy combined with phacoemulsification and gas tamponade. The changes in corneal endothelial cell density between groups was compared.

Results

The mean endothelial cell loss was more significant in group 2 than in group 1 (p = 0.012), and there was no difference between groups 3 and 4 (p = 0.063). However, after excluding 6 eyes that had blood in the center of the corneal endothelium as a result of being in the prone position following gas tamponade, the mean endothelial cell loss in group 2 was not less than in group 1. In eyes with blood in the corneal endothelium, endothelial cell loss significantly increased (p <0.001).

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that ophthalmic surgeons should attempt to carefully control bleeding and sufficiently irrigate the vitreous during pars plana vitrectomy combined with gas tamponade.

References

1. Holzer MP, Tetz MR, Auffarth GU, et al. Effect of Healon5 and 4 other viscoelastic substances on intraocular pressure and endothelium after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001; 27:213–8.
crossref
2. Walkow T, Anders N, Klebe S. Endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification: relation to preoperative and intraoperative parameters. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000; 26:727–32.
crossref
3. Basti S, Aasuri MK, Reddy S, et al. Prospective evaluation of corneal endothelial cell loss after pediatric cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998; 24:1469–73.
crossref
4. Baradaran-Rafii A, Rahmati-Kamel M, Eslani M, et al. Effect of hydrodynamic parameters on corneal endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009; 35:732–7.
crossref
5. Jacobs PM, Cheng H, Price NC, et al. Endothelial cell loss after cataract surgery-the problem of interpretation. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1982; 102:291–3.
6. Buettner H, Bourne WM. Effect of trans pars plana surgery on the corneal endothelium. Dev Ophthalmol. 1981; 2:28–34.
7. Diddie KR, Schanzlin DJ. Specular microscopy in pars plana vitrectomy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983; 101:408–9.
crossref
8. Friberg TR, Doran DL, Lazenby FL. The effect of vitreous and retinal surgery on corneal endothelial cell density. Ophthalmology. 1984; 91:1166–9.
crossref
9. Mitamura Y, Yamamoto S, Yamazaki S. Corneal endothelial cell loss in eyes undergoing lensectomy with and without anterior lens capsule removal combined with pars plana vitrectomy and gas tamponade. Retina. 2000; 20:59–62.
crossref
10. Agapitos PJ, Noel LP, Clarke WN. Traumatic hyphema in children. Ophthalmology. 1987; 94:1238–41.
crossref
11. Fischbarg J. Active and passive properties of the rabbit corneal endothelium. Exp Eye Res. 1973; 15:615–38.
crossref
12. Stiemke MM, Watsky MA, Kangas TA, Edelhauser HF. The establishment and maintenance of corneal transparency. Prog Retinal Eye Res. 1995; 14:109–40.
13. Sugar J, Mitchelson J, Kraff M. The effect of phacoemulsification on corneal endothelial cell density. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978; 96:446–8.
crossref
14. Matsuda M, Miyake K, Inaba M. Long-term corneal endothelial changes after intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988; 105:248–52.
crossref
15. Masket S. One year postoperative astigmatic comparison of sutured and unsutured 4.0 mm scleral pocket incisions. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993; 19:453–6.
crossref
16. Mitamura Y, Takeuchi S, Kasai H, et al. Corneal endothelial cell damage associated with pars plana vitrectomy. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 1998; 102:59–63.
17. Mittl RN, Koester CJ, Kates MR, Wilkes E. Endothelial cell counts following pars plana vitrectomy in pseudophakic and aphakic eyes. Ophthalmic Surg. 1989; 20:13–6.
crossref
18. Bourne RR, Minassian DC, Dart JK, et al. Effect of cataract surgery on the corneal endothelium: modern phacoemulsification compared with extracapsular cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111:679–85.
19. Millá E, Vergés C, Ciprés M. Corneal endothelium evaluation after phacoemulsification with continuous anterior chamber infusion. Cornea. 2005; 24:278–82.
crossref
20. Green K, Cheeks L, Stewart DA, Norman BC. Intraocular gas effects on corneal endothelial permeability. Lens Eye Toxic Res. 1992; 9:85–91.
21. Lee DA, Wilson MR, Yoshizumi MO, Hall M. The ocular effects of gases when injected into the anterior chamber of rabbit eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991; 109:571–5.
crossref
22. Matsuda M, Tano Y, Inaba M, Manabe R. Corneal endothelial cell damage associated with intraocular gas tamponade during pars plana vitrectomy. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1986; 30:324–9.
23. Pong J, Lai J. Effect on corneal endothelial cell count of traumatic microhyphaema and hyphaema. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009; 87:559–61.
crossref
24. Messmer EP, Gottsch J, Font RL. Blood staining of the cornea: a histopathologic analysis of 16 cases. Cornea. 1984-1985; 3:205–12.

Figure 1.
An anterior segment photograph of the patient who underwent pars plana vitrectomy, phacoemulsification and gas tamponade 2 weeks later. The component of blood is located between the pseudophakic lens and posterior capsule immediately, and then collected in the center of the corneal endothelium after being prone position.
jkos-52-544f1.tif
Table 1.
Comparison of endothelial cell densities (cells/mm 2) between groups
Endothelial cell density Group 1 (n = 32) Group 2 (n = 26) Group 3 (n = 34) Group 4 (n = 53)
Preoperative (mean ± SD) 2675.40 ± 290.90 2563.58 ± 387.80 2830.76 ± 222.81 2767.96 ± 304.12
Postoperative 12 wk (mean ± SD) 2672.16 ± 267.31 2274.27 ± 508.34* 2602.32 ± 403.55* 2392.72 ± 363.37*
Endothelial cell loss (%) -0.11% 10.27% 7.77% 13.16%

Values represent the mean ± standard deviation.

* p < 0.05, compared with preoperative;

p < 0.05, compared with group 1.

Table 2.
Comparison of endothelial cell densities (cells/mm2) between groups after excluding 15 eyes with component of blood in he center of the corneal endothelium in group 2 and 4
Endothelial cell density Group 1 (n = 32) Group 2 (n = 20) Group 3 (n = 34) Group 4 (n = 44)
Preoperative (mean ± SD) 2675.40 ± 290.90 2500.65 ± 385.10 2830.76 ± 222.81 2459.73 ± 350.46
Postoperative 12 wk (mean ± SD) 2672.16 ± 267.31 2469.00 ± 363.06 2602.32 ± 403.55* 2459.73 ± 350.46*
Endothelial cell loss (%) -0.11% 1.02% 7.77% 10.79%

Values represent the mean ± standard deviation.

* p < 0.05, compared with preoperative;

p < 0.05, compared with group 1;

p < 0.05, compared with group 2.

Table 3.
Comparison of endothelial cell densities (cells/mm2) between eyes of component of blood in the center of the corneal endo-thelium and the others in group 2 and 4
Component of blood in corneal endothelium (n = 15) The others (n = 64)
Preoperative (mean ± SD) 2687.83 ± 362.92 2755.60 ± 259.72
Postoperative 12 wk (mean ± SD) 1889.13 ± 351.57 2462.63 ± 351.57
Endothelial cell loss (%) 31.27%* 7.74%

Values represent the mean ± standard deviation.

* p < 0.001, tested by t-test, comparison with the others;

This data tested by normality, p < 0.05.

TOOLS
Similar articles