Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.52(11) > 1008926

Kim, Lee, and Rah: Postoperative Exotropic Drift: Comparison of Surgical Methods Combined with Lateral Rectus Muscle Recession in Exotropia

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the difference in the change of postoperative ocular alignment in intermittent exotropia corrected by horizontal muscle transposition or inferior oblique muscle recession together with lateral rectus muscle recession.

Methods

A total of 110 patients with intermittent exotropia with a follow-up period of more than 6 months after lateral rectus muscle recession were enrolled in the present study. The patients who received lateral rectus muscle recession only were classified as group 1, patients who received both lateral rectus muscle recession and horizontal muscle vertical transposition in both eyes were classified as group 2, and patients who underwent lateral rectus muscle and inferior oblique muscle recession were classified as group 3. The differences in postoperative ocular alignment among the patient groups were compared.

Results

Among the 3 groups, group 2 demonstrated the smallest amount of esotropic deviation in mean postoperative ocular alignment measured 1 day and 1 month after surgery. There was no significant difference among the groups in the mean postoperative ocular alignment and mean amount of exotropic drift at 6 months. The difference in the amount of postoperative exotropic drift 1 year after surgery among the 3 groups was statistically significant. The largest amount of postoperative exotropic drift was observed in group 1.

Conclusions

In correcting intermittent exotropia, the largest amount of postoperative exotropic drift was observed in patients who received only lateral rectus muscle recession. By contrast, the smallest amount of postoperative exotropic drift was observed in patients who received lateral rectus muscle recession with vertical transposition of the horizontal muscle. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2011;52(11):1326–1330

References

1. Chew E, Remaley NA, Tamboli A, et al. Risk factors for esotropia and exotropia. Arch ophthalmol. 1994; 112:1349–55.
crossref
2. Rah SH, Jun HS, Kim SH. An epidemiologic survey of strabismus among school-children in Korea. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1997; 38:2195–9.
3. Nakagawa T. Long-term results of the intermittent exotropia. J Eye. 1987; 4:1481–7.
4. Hatsukawa Y. Short-term and Long-term prognosis of recession-resection surgery for exotropia. Nippon Ganka Zasshi. 1992; 96:1466–76.
5. Ham KH, Shin MC, Sohn MA. The change in deviation angle with time course after surgical correction of intermittent exotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2002; 43:2214–9.
6. Maruo T, Kubota N, Sakaue T, Usui C. Intermittent exotropia surgery in children: long term outcome regarding changes in binocular alignment. A study of 666 cases. Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 2001; 16:265–70.
7. Raab EL, Parks MM. Recession of the lateral recti. Early and late postoperative alignments. Arch Ophthalmol. 1969; 82:203–8.
8. Scott WE, Keech R, Mash AJ. The postoperative results and stability of exodeviations. Arch ophthalmol. 1981; 99:1814–8.
crossref
9. Park YH, Kim MM. Surgical results of ontermittent exotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1989; 30:969–74.
10. Pineles SL, Rosenbaum AL, Demer JL. Decreased postoperative drift in intermittent exotropia associated with A and V patterns. J AAPOS. 2009; 13:127–31.
crossref
11. Korean Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Current Concepts in Strabismus. 2nd ed.Seoul: Naewaehaksool;2008. p. 255–7.
12. Minguini N, Dantas FJ, Monteiro de Carvalho KM, Moreira Filho DC. A study to determine: Should conventional amounts of eye muscle surgery for horizontal binocular deviations be changed when oblique muscle weakening procedures are simultaneously performed? Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 2005; 20:21–5.

Table 1.
Characteristics of study participants (mean ± SD)
Group 1 (N* = 56) Group 2(N = 24) Group 3(N = 30) p-value
Age (yr) 6.0 ± 1.81 7.0 ± 1.50 6.6 ± 2.29 0.320
Sex (M/F) 26/30 4/20 16/14 0.015§
Preoperative ocular alignment (PD) 23.6 ± 6.01 22.5 ± 4.74 25.3 ± 4.51 0.244

* N = number

PD = prism diopters

p-values were obtained by Kruskal-Wallis test

§ or by Chi-square test.

Table 2.
Postoperative ocular alignment (mean ± SD)
Immediate PostOp* (PD) PostOp 1 month (PD) PostOp 6 months (PD) PostOp 1 year (PD)
Group1 (N = 35) −12.4 ± 5.69 −0.9 ± 5.96 2.7 ± 5.89 3.4 ± 7.22
Group2 (N = 20) −8.9 ± 7.16 2.2 ± 5.56 2.2 ± 4.6 2.3 ± 4.73
Group3 (N = 16) −12.5 ± 6.75 −2.9 ± 5.31 0.4 ± 3.65 1.4 ± 4.71
Total (N = 71) −11.7 ± 6.42 −0.8 ± 5.99 2.0 ± 2.01 2.6 ± 6.07
p-value§ 0.044 0.03 0.098 0.754

Postoperative 1 year data excludes patients who were observed less than 1 year after surgery.

* PostOP = postoperative

PD = prism diopters

N = number

§ p-value by Kruskal-Wallis test.

Table 3.
Postoperative exotropic drift amount (mean ± SD)
PostOp* 6 months (PD) PostOp 1 year (PD)
Group 1 15.1 ± 6.27 (15.4 ± 6.39) 16.4 ± 6.62
Group 2 11.1 ± 6.93 (9.9 ± 6.38) 10.2 ± 6.40
Group 3 12.8 ± 6.97 (11.8 ± 6.61) 12.9 ± 5.55
Total 13.6 ± 6.74 (13.0 ± 6.81) 13.9 ± 6.97
p-value 0.057 (0.008) 0.004

Data within the parentheses demonstrate postoperative 6-month results of the patients who were observed for 1 year.

* PostOp = postoperative

PD = prism diopters

p-value by Kruskal-Wallis test.

TOOLS
Similar articles