Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.51(7) > 1008866

Song and Paik: Augmented Asymmetric Lateral Rectus Recession in Intermittent Exotropia With Fixing Eye

Abstract

Purpose

To document and compare the clinical results of symmetrical rectus muscle recession and asymmetrical rectus muscle recession in intermittent exotropia.

Methods

The medical records of 27 patients who had symmetric bilateral rectus recession and 24 patients who had asymmetric bilateral rectus recession for intermittent exotropia with at least six months of postoperative follow-up from March 2004 to March 2007 were reviewed retrospectively. The authors performed a recession of 2 mm or greater in the deviating eye than in the fixing eye.

Results

The mean age was 7.14±4.23 (range 3 to 15) years for symmetric bilateral rectus recession and 7.33±4.01 (range 3 to 14) years for asymmetric bilateral rectus recession. The mean follow-up was 11.83±5.74 (range 6 to 26) months in the sym-metric bilateral rectus recession group and 11.14±5.05 (range 6 to 30) months in the asymmetric bilateral rectus recession group. The mean preoperative angle deviations were 27.5±4.8 prism diopter (PD) (range 30 to 40PD) and 27.3±4.6PD (range 20 to 40PD) in each group. The outcome of final follow-up (postoperative 24 months) was favorable in both groups, and slightly more successful in the asymmetric bilateral recession group but not a statistically significant amount (75.5% in the symmetric bilateral recession group and 81.2% in the asymmetric bilateral recession group).

Conclusions

The present study suggests that there are no significant differences at postoperative 24 months between sym-metric bilateral recession and asymmetric bilateral recession in intermittent exotropia having a fixing and a deviating eye.

References

1. Friedmann L, Biedner B, David R, Sachs U. Screening for refractive er-rors, strabismus and other ocular anomalies from ages 6 months to 3 years. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1977; 17:315–7.
crossref
2. Yu YS, Kim SM, Kwon JY, et al. Preschool vision screening in Korea: Preliminary study. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1991; 32:1092–6.
3. Preslan MW, Novak A. Baltimore vision screening project. Ophthalmology. 1996; 103:105–9.
crossref
4. Rah SH, Jun HS, Kim SH. An epidemiologic survey of strabismus among school – children in Korea. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1997; 38:2195–9.
5. Pratt-Johnson JA, Barlow JM, Tillson G. Early surgery in intermittent exotropia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1977; 84:689–94.
crossref
6. Scott WE, Keech RV, Marsh A. The postoperative results and stability of exodeviations. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981; 99:1814–8.
crossref
7. Hardesty HH, Boynton JR, Keenan JP. Treatment of intermittent exotropia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978; 96:268–74.
crossref
8. Richard JM, Parks MM. Intermittent exotropia. Surgical results in dif-ferent age groups. Ophthalmology. 1983; 90:1172–7.
9. Chang BL. Operative results in exotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1983; 37:729–34.
10. Kim MM, Cho ST. Long term surgical results of intermittent exotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1994; 35:1321–6.
11. Ko KW, Min BM. Factors related to surgical results of intermittent exotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1996; 37:179–84.
12. Kushner BJ. Selective surgery for intermittent exotropia based on distant/near differences. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998; 16:324–8.
13. Ing MR, Nishimura J, Okino L. Outcome study of bilateral lateral rectus recession for intermittent exotropia in children. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1999; 30:110–7.
crossref
14. Cho YA, Kang SM, Roh GH. Asymmetric bilateral lateral recti re-cession in intermittent exotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1999; 40:544–9.
15. Jampolsky A. Characteristics of suppression in strabismus. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1955; 54:683–96.
crossref
16. Von Noorden GK. Binocular vision and ocular motility. Theory and management of strabismus. 6th ed.St. Louis: Mosby;2002. p. 356–76.
17. Burian HM. Exodeviations: their classification, diagnosis and treatment. Am J Ophthalmol. 1966; 62:1161–6.
crossref
18. Scott AB, Mash AJ, Jampolsky A. Quantitative guidelines for exotropia surgery. Invest Ophthalmol. 1975; 14:428–36.
19. Keenan JM, Willshaw HE. The outcome of strabismus surgery in childhood exotropia. Eye. 1994; 8:632–7.
crossref
20. Stoller SH, Simon JW, Lininger LL. Bilateral lateral rectus recession for exotropia: a survival analysis. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1994; 31:89–92.
crossref
21. Gezer A, Sezen F, Nasri N, Gözüm N. Factors influencing the outcome of strabismus surgery in patients with exotropia. J AAPOS. 2004; 8:56–60.
crossref
22. Raab EL, Parks MM. Recession of the lateral recti. Early and late post-operative alignments. Arch Ophthalmol. 1969; 82:203–8.
23. Kushner BJ, Morton GV. Postoperative binocularity in adults with longstanding strabismus. Ophthalmology. 1992; 99:316–9.
crossref
24. Morris RJ, Scott WE, Dickey CF. Fusion after surgical alignment of longstanding strabismus in adults. Ophthalmology. 1993; 100:135–8.
crossref
25. Goldstein JH, Schneekloth BB. The Potential for Binocular Vision in Constant Exotropia. Am Orthopt J. 1993; 43:67–70.
crossref
26. Lee KS, Cho YA, Roh GH. Streopsis after surgery in longstanding adult horizontal strabismus. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1999; 40:1656–62.
27. Yoon SC, Paik HJ. The Post-operative Changes of Stereopsis in Adult Strabismus. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2008; 49:1807–11.
crossref

Table 1.
Patient characteristics of symmetric and asymmetric recession groups
Characteristics Symmetric LROU Rec
(N=27)
Asymmetric LROU Rec
(N=24)
P value
Sex     0.326*
Male 12 11  
Female 15 13  
Age at operation (yr)(mean± SD) 7.14±4.23 7.33±4.01 0.185
Follow up (mon) (mean± SD) 11.83±5.74 11.14±5.05 0.168
Deviated eye     0.257*
Right/Left 13/14 10/14  

LROU Rec=bilateral lateral rectus recession; N=number of patients.

* P value was calculated by Fisher's exact

P value was calculated by Mann-Whitney U test.

Table 2.
Comparison of preoperative deviation between symmetric and asymmetric recession group
Deviation (PD) Symmetric LROU Rec (N=27) Asymmetric LROU Rec (N=24)
20∼25 16 (59.3%) 14 (58.3%)
26∼30 9 (33.3%) 9 (37.5%)
31∼40 2 (7.4%) 1 (4.2%)
Mean deviation (PD)(mean± SD) 22.8±3.7* 22.7±3.4*

LROU Rec: bilateral lateral rectus recession; PD: prism diopter.

P*=0.974 by Mann-Whitney U test.

Table 3.
Comparison of preoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between symmetric and asymmetric re-cession group
BCVA Symmetric LROU Rec (N=27) Asymmetric LROU Rec (N=24)
Fixing eye Deviated eye Fixing eye Deviated eye
0.4∼0.5 0 (0.0%) 3 (11.1%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (8.4%)
0.6∼0.7 0 (0.0%) 3 (11.1%) 0 (0.0%) 5 (20.8%)
0.8∼1.0 27 (100.0%) 21 (77.8%) 24 (100.0%) 17 (70.8%)
Mean BCVA (LogMAR) (mean± SD) 0.01±0.24* 0.06±0.69* 0.01±0.22 0.06±0.72

* P=0.017 by Mann-Whitney U test

P=0.029 by Mann-Whitney U test; LROU Rec=bilateral lateral rectus recession.

Table 4.
Comparison of preoperative stereopsis between symmetric and asymmetric recession group
Stereopsis (seconds of arc) Symmetric LROU Rec (N=27) Asymmetric LROU Rec (N=24)
3000 1 (3.7%) 2 (8.4%)
400 1 (3.7%) 2 (8.4%)
200 3 (11.1%) 1 (4.2%)
≤100 22 (81.5%) 18 (75.0%)

LROU Rec=bilateral lateral rectus recession.

Table 5.
Surgical outcome at postoperative 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up between symmetric recession group and asymmetric recession group
  Symmetric LROU rec Asymmetric LROU rec P value
6 months follow-up(N) 27 24  
Success 25 (92.6%) 22 (91.7%) 0.649
Overcorrection 1 (3.7%) 2 (8.3%)  
Recurrence 1 (3.7%) 0 (0.0%)  
12 months follow-up(N) 22 21  
Success 18 (81.8%) 18 (85.7%) 0.327
Overcorrection 1 (4.5%) 1 (4.8%)  
Recurrence 3 (13.6%) 2 (9.5%)  
24 months follow-up(N) 16 16  
Success 12 (75.0%) 13 (81.2%) 0.415
Overcorrection 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)  
Recurrence 4 (25.0%) 3 (18.8%)  

LROU Rec=bilateral lateral rectus recession; N=number of patients.

Overcorrection: Esotropia ≥6PD, Recurrence: Exotropia ≥11 PD. P value was calculated by Fisher's exact test.

TOOLS
Similar articles