Two Cases of Lacrimal Drainage Obstruction Associated With S-1 Anticancer Treatment

Jong-Seo Park; Sung Woo Ha; Helen Lew

doi:10.3341/jkos.2010.51.6.890

Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.51(6) > 1008846

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Park, Ha, and Lew: Two Cases of Lacrimal Drainage Obstruction Associated With S-1 Anticancer Treatment

Original Article

J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2010;51(6):890-894.

Published online: 3 June 2010

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2010.51.6.890

Two Cases of Lacrimal Drainage Obstruction Associated With S-1 Anticancer Treatment

Jong-Seo Park, MD, Sung Woo Ha, MD, Helen Lew, MD, PhD

Department of Ophthalmology, Bundang CHA Medical Center, CHA University, Sungnam, Korea

Address reprint requests to Helen Lew, MD, PhD Department of Ophthalmology, CHA University, Bundang CHA Medical Center #351 Yatap-dong, Bundang-gu, Sungnam 463-712, Korea Tel: 82-31-780-5330, Fax: 82-31-780-5333, E-mail: eye@cha.ac.kr

Received 4 January 2010 Accepted 16 March 2010

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

To report two cases of lacrimal drainage obstruction associated with the anticancer drug S-1 (tegafur, gimeracil, oteracil; TS-1^®, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Japan).

Case summary

(Case 1) A 34-year-old male who had previously undergone a total gastrectomy for treatment of gastric cancer visited with epiphora in both eyes that had developed 6 months after S-1 treatment. On examination, a right canalicular obstruction and left punctal and nasolacrimal partial obstruction were noted. Endoscopic dacrycystorhinostomy with lacrimal trephinization was done in the right eye and punc-toplasty with punctal membrane removal and silicone tube intubation were performed in the left eye and the epiphora were successfully treated. (Case 2) A 60-year-old male who was treated with S-1 for gastric cancer presented with tearing in both eyes that had developed 2 months after S-1 treatment. Ophthalmic examinations revealed a right nasolacrimal partial obstruction in the right eye and lacrimal sac obstruction in the left. Silicone intubations were performed on both sides and the epiphora were successfully treated.

Conclusions

Lacrimal drainage obstructions may develop after S-1 treatment. Therefore, ophthalmologic evaluations should be performed in patients treated with S-1 to detect lacrimal drainage obstruction.

Keywords: Epiphora, Lacrimal drainage obstruction, S-1

References

1. Shirasaka T. Development history and concept of an oral anticancer agent S-1 (TS-1): its clinical usefulness and future vistas. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2009; 39:2–15.

2. Kubota T. The role of S-1 in the treatment of gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008; 98:1301–4.

3. Eiseman AS, Flanagan JC, Brooks AB, et al. Ocular surface, ocular adnexal, and lacrimal complications associated with the use of systemic 5-fluorouracil. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 19:216–24.

4. Caravella LP Jr, Burns JA, Zangmeister M. Punctal-canalicular stenosis related to systemic fluorouracil therapy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981; 99:284–6.

5. Brink HM, Beex LV. Punctal and canalicular stenosis associated with systemic fluorouracil therapy. Report of five cases and review of the literature. Doc Ophthalmol. 1995; 90:1–6.

6. Lee V, Bentley CR, Olver JM. Sclerosing canaliculitis after 5-fluorour-acil breast cancer chemotherapy. Eye. 1998; 12:343–9.

7. Fezza JP, Wesley RE, Klippenstein KA. The treatment of punctal and canalicular stenosis in patients on systemic 5-FU. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1999; 30:105–8.

8. Jeung HC, Rha SY. Recent advance in tailored treatment of gastric cancer. Korean J Med. 2009; 77:1–8.

9. Kennedy BJ. 5-fluorouracil toxicity: old or new? Cancer. 1999; 86:1099–100.

10. Imperia PS, Lazarus HM, Lass JH. Ocular complications of systemic cancer chemotherapy. Surv Ophthalmol. 1989; 34:209–30.

11. Straus DJ, Mausolf FA, Ellerby RA, et al. Cicitricial ectropion secondary to 5-Fluorouracil therapy. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1977; 3:15–9.

12. Esmaeli B, Golio D, Lubecki L, Ajani J. Canalicular and nasolacrimal duct blockage: an ocular side effect associated with the antineoplastic drug S-1. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005; 140:325–7.

Figure 1.

Preoperative photographs of case 1 patient show left (A) upper and (B) lower punctal stenosis.

Figure 2.

Preoperative macro digital subtraction dacryocystographic findings of case 1 patient show (A) right canalicular obstruction and (B) left nasolacrimal duct partial obstruction.

Figure 3.

(A) Histopathologic findings of punctal membrane (case 1) show subepithelial fibrosis (white arrow) be-low stratified squamous epithelium (black arrow) (hematoxylin-eosin, ×200) (B) Histopathologic findings of lacrimal sac (case 1) show chronic inflammation consisting of lymphocytes (black arrow) with fibrosis (white arrow) (hematoxylin-eosin, ×200).

Figure 4.

Preoperative macro digital subtraction dacryocystographic findings of case 2 patient show (A) right nasolacrimal duct partial obstruction and (B) left lacrimal sac obstruction.

TOOLS

Similar articles