Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.51(6) > 1008837

Kim, Hong, Park, and Sohn: Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Between Sutureless and Sutured 23-gauge Vitrectomy

Abstract

Purpose

To compare 23-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy (TSV) and sutured vitrectomy in the aspect of intraocular pressure (IOP) changes and complications.

Methods

Through a retrospective chart review, 45 sutureless patients (48 eyes) and 48 sutured patients (52 eyes) who had undergone 23-gauge transconjunctival vitrectomy by one surgeon (J.H. Sohn) were compared. IOP was measured routinely pre-operativley, at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month post-operatively. Postoperative IOP, hypotony (IOP<7 mmHg) rates and complications associated with hypotony were assessed respectively. In addition, the cases involving intraocular air or gas tamponade or cataract extraction were compared.

Results

One day after the surgery, 3 eyes of the sutureless group developed hypotony, which persisted in 2 eyes through post-operative 1 week. Two eyes of the sutureless group developed hypotony 1 week after the surgery. Most of the hypotony cases were transient, but choroidal detachment occurred in 2 cases, and retinal detachment occurred in 1 case. In contrast, none of the sutured group developed hypotony. Intraocular air or gas tamponade significantly raised IOP 1 day after the surgery. When the operation was combined with cataract extraction, IOP was reduced postoperative 1 week and 1 month.

Conclusions

The well-known risk factor of 23-gauge sutureless vitrectomy is postoperative hypotony. The present study showed postoperative hypotony can result in retinal detachment as a complication in contrast to previous studies. The authors conclude that suturing the wound for the prevention of hypotony is better, especially in cases with high risk of hypotony or defi-nite wound leakage.

References

1. Machemer R, Buettner H, Norton EW, Parel JM. Vitrectomy: a pars plana approach. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1971; 75:813–20.
2. Fujii GY, De Juan E Jr, Humayun MS, et al. Initial experience using the transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy system for vitreoretinal surgery. Ophthalmology. 2002; 109:1814–20.
3. Fujii GY, De Juan E Jr, Humayun MS, et al. A new 25-gauge instrument system for transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy surgery. Ophthalmology. 2002; 109:1807–12.
4. Eckardt C. Transconjunctival sutureless 23-gauge vitrectomy. Retina. 2005; 25:208–11.
crossref
5. Fine HF, Iranmanesh R, Iturralde D, Spaide RF. Outcomes of 77 consecutive cases of 23-gauge transconjunctival vitrectomy surgery for posterior segment disease. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114:1197–200.
crossref
6. Tewari A, Shah GK, Fang A. Visual outcomes with 23-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy. Retina. 2008; 28:256–62.
crossref
7. Chen E. 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007; 18:188–93.
crossref
8. Yanyali A, Celik E, Horozoglu F, Nohutcu AF. Corneal topographic changes after transconjunctival(25-gauge) sutureless vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005; 140:939–41.
9. Woo SJ, Park KH, Hwang JM, et al. Risk factors associated with scle-rotomy leakage and postoperative hypotony after 23-gauge transconjunctival sutureless Vitrectomy. Retina. 2009; 29:456–63.
crossref
10. Schweitzer C, Delyfer MN, Colin J, Korobelnik JF. 23-Gauge transconjunctival sutureless pars plana vitrectomy: results of a prospective study. Eye (Lond). 2009; 23:2206–14.
crossref
11. Kim MJ, Park KH, Hwang JM, et al. The safety and efficacy of transconjunctival sutureless 23-gauge vitrectomy. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2007; 21:201–7.
crossref
12. Parolini B, Prigione G, Romanelli F, et al. Postoperative complications and intraocular pressure in 943 consecutive cases of 23-gauge transconjunctival pars plana vitrectomy with 1-year followup. Retina. 2010; 30:107–11.
crossref
13. Gupta op, Weichel ED, Regillo CD, et al. Postoperative complications associated with 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2007; 38:270–5.
crossref

Figure 1.
Preoperative and postoperative IOP changes in 23-gauge vitrectomy. Post operative 1 day IOP is higher in sutured group than sutureless group (IOP: intraocular pressure, Op: operation, D: day, W: week, M: month).
jkos-51-835f1.tif
Table 1.
Preoperative diagnosis
No. of eyes (%)
Sutureless (%) Sutured (%)
Vitreous hemorrhage due to PDR*, tractional retinal detachment 26 (54.2) 27 (51.9)
Diabetic macular edema 2 (4.2) 0 (0)
Vitreous hemorrhage due to RVO 3 (6.3) 4 (7.7)
Macular edema due to RVO 5 (10.4) 1 (1.9)
Macular hole 2 (4.2) 4 (7.7)
Epiretinal membrane 2 (4.2) 4 (7.7)
Vitreous opacity due to uveitis 1 (2.1) 3 (5.8)
IOL dislocation 4 (8.3) 3 (5.8)
Lens dislocation 3 (6.3) 1 (1.9)
Macular hole, Retinal detachment 0 (0) 2 (3.8)
Retinal detachment 0 (0) 2 (3.8)
Central RVO (RON§) 0 (0) 1 (1.9)

* PDR=proliferative diabetic retinopathy;

RVO=retinal vein occlusion;

IOL=intraocular lens;

§ RON=radial optic neurotomy.

Table 2.
Comparison of intraocular pressure changes between sutured and sutureless group associated with cataract extraction and AFX or GFX
Pre-operation Postoperative 1 day Postoperative 1 week k Postoperative 1 month
All group
 With cataract extraction 14.5 21.3 12.6 13.84
 Without cataract extraction 15.7 18.9 16.9 16.17
  P-value* 0.106 0.152 <0.001 <0.001
 With AFX or GFX 14.9 21.9 15.5 15.2
 Without AFX or GFX 15.7 14.9 13.7 14.9
  P-value* 0.657 <0.001 0.319 0.746
Sutured group
 With cataract extraction 14.3 24.1 13.6 14.1
 Without cataract extraction 15.2 23.0 17.8 15.7
  P-value* 0.37 0.604 0.012 0.046
 With AFX or GFX 14.7 24.9 16.4 15.0
 Without AFX or GFX 14.9 19.1 13.8 14.8
  P-value* 0.861 0.027 0.248 0.818
Sutureless group
 With cataract extraction 16.1 17.6 11.3 13.5
 Without cataract extraction 14.6 15.1 16.1 16.6
  P-value* 0.189 0.205 0.006 0.002
 With AFX or GFX 15.1 18.2 14.4 15.4
 Without AFX or GFX 16.5 11.5 13.5 15.1
  P-value* 0.734 0.001 0.88 0.835

* P-values by independent t-test;

AFX=air-fluid exchange;

GFX=gas-fluid exchange. The values in bold indicate statistical significance (P<0.05).

Table 3.
Comparison of intraocular pressure changes between sutured and sutureless group
Intraocular pressure change (mmHg)
Pre-operation Postoperative 1 day Postoperative 1 week Postoperative 1 month
Without cataract extraction
 Sutured group 15.2 23.0 17.8 15.7
 Sutureless group 16.1 15.1 16.1 16.5
  P-value* 0.376 <0.001 0.329 0.405
With cataract extraction
 Sutured group 14.3 24.1 13.7 14.1
 Sutureless group 14.6 17.8 11.0 13.5
  P-value* 0.794 0.007 0.053 0.44
With AFX or GFX
 Sutured group 14.7 24.9 16.4 15.0
 Sutureless group 15.1 18.2 14.4 15.4
  P-value* 0.595 <0.001 0.199 0.626
Without AFX or GFX
 Sutured group 14.9 19.1 13.8 14.8
 Sutureless group 16.5 11.5 13.5 15.1
  P-value* 0.366 0.004 0.862 0.808

* P-values by independent t-test;

AFX=air-fluid exchange;

GFX=gas-fluid exchange. The values in bold indicate statistical significance (P<0.05). The values in bold indicate statistical significance (P<0.05).

Table 4.
Hypotony and complications
No. of eyes
Sutureless Sutured
Postop 1 day IOP* <10 8 1
Postop 1 day IOP* <7 3§ 0
Postop 1day IOP* ≥10 & Postop 1 week IOP*<7 (without anti-glaucoma treatment) 2 0
Choroidal detachment 2 0
Post-operative RD 1 0

* IOP=intraocular pressure;

6 cases persisted through postoperative 1 week;

Persisted through postoperative 1 week;

§ All of the patients showed their IOPs below 10 till postoperative 1 week;

RD=retinal detachment.

Table 5.
Risk factors for hypotony
P-value* Expectancy
Suture 0.064 0.126
Cataract extraction 0.249 0.380
AFX or GFX 0.342 2.233

* P-values by binomial regression analysis;

AFX=air-fluid exchange;

GFX=gas-fluid ex exchange.

TOOLS
Similar articles