Abstract
Purpose
The goal of the present study was to compare the stability of the 3-piece (Tecnis® ZA9003) and single-piece (AcrySof® IQ) aspheric intraocular lenses (IOL) by testing decentration, tilt, anterior chamber depth, and refraction.
Methods
The subjects of this study consisted of 101 eyes who had undergone cataract surgeries with a 3-piece aspheric IOL (54 eyes) and with a single-piece aspheric IOL (47 eyes). The decentration, tilt, anterior chamber depth, and refraction were measured on postoperative day 1, 1 month, and 2 months, using an anterior eye segment analysis system (EAS-1000, Nidek, Japan).
Results
There was a statistically significant difference in the decentration on the postoperative day 1 (p = 0.04). However, there was no statistically significant difference on postoperative 1 month (p = 0.15) and 2 months (p = 0.13). There was no statistically significant difference in the tilt on postoperative day 1, 1 month, and 2 months. There was no statistically significant difference in the anterior chamber depth on postoperative day 1, 1 month, and 2 months. There was a statistically significant difference in the refraction on postoperative day 1 (p = 0.03). However, there was no statistically significant difference on postoperative 1 month (p = 0.07) and 2 months (p = 0.07).
Conclusions
There was no statistically significant difference in the decentration, anterior chamber depth, and refraction between the 3-piece and single-piece aspheric IOL. Therefore, there is no difference between the 3-piece and single-piece aspheric IOL in the capsular bag stability until 2 months postoperatively.
References
1. Brandser R, Haaskjold E, Drolsum L. Accuracy of IOL calculation in cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1997; 75:162–5.
2. Zaldivar R, Shultz MC, Davidorf JM, Holladay JT. Intraocular lens power calculation in patients with extreme myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000; 26:668–4.
3. Olsen T, Corydon L, Gimbel H. Intraocular lens power calculation with an improved anterior chamber prediction algorithm. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1995; 21:313–9.
4. Minassian DC, Rosen P, Dart JK, et al. Extracapsular cataract extraction compared with small incision surgery by phacoemulsification: a randomized trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001; 85:822–9.
5. Kondrot EC. Keratometric cylinder and visual recovery following Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation using a self-sealing cataract incision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1991; 17:731–3.
6. Merriam JC, Zheng L, Merriam JE, et al. The effect of incisions for cataract curvature. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110:1807–13.
7. Long DA, Monica ML. A prospective evaluation of corneal curvature changes with 3.0 to 3.5 mm corneal tunnel phacoemulsification. Ophthalmology. 1996; 103:226–32.
8. Ali JL, Rodfiguez-Prats JL, Gala A, Ramzy M. Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification. Ophthalmology. 2005; 112:1997–2003.
9. Drews RC. Five year study of astigmatic stability after cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation: comparison of wound sizes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000; 26:250–3.
10. Nemeth J, Fekete O, Pesztenlehrer N. Optical and ultrasound measurement of axial length and anterior chamber depth for intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29:85–8.
11. Olsen T, Nielsen PJ. Immersion versus contact technique in the measurement of axial length by ultrasound. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1989; 67:101–2.
12. Watson A, Armstrong R. Contact or immersion technique for axial length measurement. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1999; 27:49–51.
13. Rose LT, Moshegov CN. Comparison of Zeiss IOL master and application A-scan ultrasound: biometry for intraocular lens calculation. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2003; 31:121–4.
14. Brint SF, Ostrick DM, Bryan JE. Keratometric cylinder and visual performance following phacoemulsification and implantation with silicon small incision or poly(methylmethacrylate) intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1991; 17:32–6.
15. Guirao A, Redondo M, Geraghty E, et al. Corneal optical aberrations and retinal image quality in patients in whom monofocal intraocular lenses were implanted. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002; 120:1143–51.
16. Werner L, Mamalis N. Wavefront corrections of intraocular lenses. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2004; 17:233–45.
17. Chalita MR, Krueger RR. Correlation of aberrations with visual acuity and symptoms. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2004; 17:135–42.
18. Chae JK, Jang JW, Choi TH, Lee HB. Changes in refraction and anterior chamber depth according to type of intraocular lenes. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2006; 47:1935–42.
19. Kim HS, Kim SW, Ha BJ, et al. Ocular aberrations and contrast sensitivity in eyes implanted with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2008; 49:1256–62.
20. Lee J-Y, Lee SH, Chung SK. Decentration, tilt and anterior chamber depth: aspheric vs spheric acrylic intraocular lens. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2009; 50:852–7.
21. Ahn HS, Kim SW, Kim EK, Kim TI. Wavefront and visual analysis after aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses implantation. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2008; 49:1248–55.
22. Kang IS, You IC, Pack YG, Yoon KC. Comparision of visual function among aspheric intraocular lenes. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2009; 50:691–7.
23. Wirtitsch MG, Findl O, Menapace R, et al. Effect of haptic design on change in axial lens position after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30:45–51.
24. Kim JS, Shyn KH. Periodic Biometry in Three Types of Posteriorly Implanted IOLs: PMMA, Silicone, and Acrylic Soft, by EAS-1000 Scheimpflug Photography. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2000; 41:2205–10.
25. Dietze HH, Cox MJ. Limitations of correcting spherical aberration with aspheric intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2005; 31:574–85.
26. Mutlu FM, Erdurman C, Sobaci G, Bayraktar MZ. Comparision of tilt and decentration of 1-piece and 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31:343–7.
27. Cha YD, Oh SH, Lee DH. Comparative assessment of clinical results in various acrylate IOLs. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2006; 47:740–7.
Table 1.
Table 2.
| IOL groups |
Postoperative day |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 day | 1 mon | 2 months | ||
Decentration (mm) | Tecnis ZA9003 | 0.071 ± 0.051 | 0.096 ± 0.063 | 0.062 ± 0.039 |
| AcrySof IQ | 0.112 ± 0.087 | 0.176 ± 0.414 | 0.052 ± 0.062 |
| p value* | 0.04 | 0.15 | 0.13 |
Tilt (°) | Tecnis ZA9003 | 2.47 ± 0.94 | 2.01 ± 0.81 | 1.71 ± 0.78 |
| AcrySof IQ | 2.69 ± 0.84 | 2.35 ± 1.01 | 2.18 ± 0.85 |
| p value* | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.14 |
Anterior chamber depth (mm) | Tecnis ZA9003 | 0.354 ± 0.041 | 0.353 ± 0.031 | 0.352 ± 0.029 |
| AcrySof IQ | 0.272 ± 0.058 | 0.198 ± 0.051 | 0.184 ± 0.041 |
| p value* | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.08 |
Table 3.
IOL groups |
Postoperative day |
||
---|---|---|---|
1 day | 1 mon | 2 months | |
Tecnis ZA9003 | 0.36 ± 0.62 | 0.58 ± 0.57 | 0.64 ± 0.42 |
AcrySof IQ | 0.52 ± 0.84 | 0.72 ± 0.68 | 0.79 ± 0.64 |
p value* | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.07 |