Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.51(11) > 1008698

Kim, Kim, Park, and Lee: A Case of Complete Recovery of Visual Loss Associated With Electroconvulsive Therapy

Abstract

Purpose

To report a case of complete recovery within 1 day of cortical blindness associated with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).

Case summary

A 15-year-old girl, who had no ophthalmologic disease, complained of bilateral visual loss immediately after ECT. At the first ophthalmologic examination, best corrected visual acuity was 0.03 in both eyes. Findings of anterior segment and fundus, movement of external ocular muscles, and pupillary light reflex were normal. Visual field examination showed generalized reduction of sensitivity and increased fixation loss in both eyes. Optical coherence tomography revealed no abnormalities. Electroretinography was normal, and a slightly prolonged latency of P100 was noted in the right and left flash visual evoked potentials. Without any specific treatment, the patient's vision improved gradually after 18 hours of ECT and was recovered completely, with vision of 1.0 in both eyes the next day. There were no abnormalities in visual evoked potentials or the visual field.

Conclusions

Transient visual loss can occur after ECT, because of cortical blindness by transient cerebral ischemia, and can be recovered completely without specific treatment.

References

1. Aldrich MS, Alessi AG, Beck RW, Gilman S. Cortical blindness: etiology, diagnosis, and prognosis. Ann Neurol. 1987; 21:149–58.
crossref
2. Parry R, Rees JR, Wilde P. Transient cortical blindness after coronary angiograhpy. Br Heart J. 1993; 70:563–4.
3. Rodriguez A, Lozano JA, del Pozo D, Homar Paez J. Post-traumatic transient cortical blindness. Int Ophthalmol. 1993; 17:277–83.
crossref
4. Quattrocolo G, Leotta D, Appendino L, et al. A case of cortical blindness due to carbon monoxide poisoning. Ital J Neurol Sci. 1987; 8:57–8.
crossref
5. Gijtenbeek JM, van den Bent MJ, Vecht CJ. Cyclosporine neurotoxicity: a review. J Neurol. 1999; 246:339–46.
crossref
6. Huo R, Burden SK, Hoyt CS, Good WV. Chronic cortical visual impairment in children: etiology, prognosis, and associated neurological deficits. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999; 83:670–5.
7. Cunningham FG, Fernandez CO, Hernandez C. Blindness associated with preeclampsia and eclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 172:1291–8.
crossref
8. Joseph JM, Louis S. Transient ictal cortical blindness during middle age. A case report and review of the the literature. J aberrations. 1995; 15:39–42.
9. Cha IS, Kim HJ. Clinical study of cortical blindness after open-heart surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol. 1983; 24:865–8.
10. Kwon IT, Nam KR, Kim BC. Cortical blindness after cerebral angiography. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1992; 33:1238–42.
11. Baek CE, Kim DS, Kim SH, Shin JC. Two cases of cortical blindness after gas exposure. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1996; 37:1576–81.
12. Cho HJ, Park JW, Seo MS. Transient cortical blindness related to general anesthesia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2001; 42:650–3.
13. Miller NR. Walsh and Hoyt's Clinical Neuro-Ophthalmology. 4th ed.Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins;1991. p. 138–49.
14. Yoon DH, Lee SW, Choi Y. Ophthalmology. 6th ed.Ilchokak;2002. p. 321–2.
15. Belden JR, Caplan LR, Pessin MS, Kwan E. Mechanisms and clinical features of posterior border-zone infarcts. Neurology. 1999; 53:1312–8.
crossref
16. Kurani AP, Kellner CH, Turbin RE, et al. Transient visual loss after right unilateral ECT. J ECT. 2005; 21:186–7.
crossref
17. Sonavane S, Borade S, Gajbhiye S, et al. Cortical blindness associated with electroconvulsive therapy. J ECT. 2006; 22:155–7.
crossref
18. Subash M, Sheth HG, Saihan Z, Plant GT. Transient visual loss after seizures. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2010 Apr 28. [Epub ahead of print].
crossref
19. Meyer JS, Gotoh F, Favale E. Cerebral metabolism during epileptic seizures in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1966; 21:10–22.
crossref
20. Kahana A, Rowley HA, Weinstein JM. Cortical blindness: clinical and radiologic findings in reversible posterior leukoencephalop-athy syndrome. Ophthalmology. 2005; 112:e7–11.
crossref

Figure 1.
Visual field reveals generalized reduction of sensitivity and increased fixation loss. These results may be caused not only by poor cooperation but also poor visual acuity.
jkos-51-1543f1.tif
Figure 2.
(A) Pattern visual evoked potentials show no potential in both sides. (B) Slightly prolonged latency of P100 is noted in the right and left flash visual evoked potentials.
jkos-51-1543f2.tif
Figure 3.
Visual field reveals no abnormality after complete recovery of visual loss.
jkos-51-1543f3.tif
Figure 4.
There are no abnormalities in (A) both side pattern visual evoked potentials and (B) in both flash visual evoked potentials after complete recovery of visual loss.
jkos-51-1543f4.tif
TOOLS
Similar articles