Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.50(1) > 1008599

Lee and Baek: Risk Factors of Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Changes in Pseudoexfoliation (PEX) Syndrome

Abstract

Purpose

We evaluated the short and long-term changes of intraocular pressure (IOP) and studied its risk factors in pseudoexfoliation (PEX).

Methods

A total of 40 eyes that had been newly diagnosed with PEX from January 1, 1995 to December 31, 2007 were included in this study. Age, gender and accompanying systemic disease were recorded. In addition, the age, gender, number of antiglaucoma eye drops, history of cataract operation, and history of systemic disease were evaluated as risk factors for IOP elevation during the follow-up periods. Pre and post cataract operation IOP was checked to evaluate the effect of the cataract operation on IOP.

Results

The risk factors for IOP elevation in patients newly diagnosed with PEX were old age and female gender. After treatment, a long follow-up period and number of eyedrops were risk factors for IOP elevation. The cataract operation had a one year IOP control effect, especially in cases where the pre operative IOP was greater than 21 mmHg. Over the long term, however, the IOP control effect of cataract surgery could not be determined.

Conclusions

IOP increased as result of increased patient age. Phacoemulsification was a protective factor for IOP elevation and may be a good method for short-term IOP control. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2009;50(1):99–104

References

1. Ritch R, Schlotzer-Schrehardt U. Exfoliation (pseudoexfoliation) syndrome: toward a new understanding. Proceedings of the First International Think Tank. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2001; 79:213–7.
2. Jonasson F, Damji KF, Arnarsson A, et al. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in Iceland: Reykjavik Eye Study. Eye. 2003; 17:747–53.
crossref
3. Cashwell LF Jr, Shields MB. Exfoliation syndrome. Prevalence in a southeastern United States population. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988; 106:335–6.
crossref
4. Hiller R, Sperduto RD, Krueger DE. Pseudoexfoliation, intraocular pressure, and senile lens changes in a population based survey. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982; 100:1080–2.
5. Kozart DM, Yanoff M. Intraocular pressure status in 100 consecutive patients with exfoliation syndrome. Ophthalmology. 1982; 89:214–8.
crossref
6. Henry JC, Krupin T, Schmitt M, et al. Long-term follow-up of pseudoexfoliation and the development of elevated intraocular pressure. Ophthalmology. 1987; 94:545–52.
crossref
7. Choi J, Park KH. Clinical characteristics of Korean patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2006; 47:577–86.
8. Ball SF. Exfoliation prevalence in the glaucoma population of South Louisiana. Acta Ophthalmol. 1988; 184:93–8.
9. Mizuno K, Muroi S. Cycloscopy of pseudoexfoliation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1979; 87:513–8.
crossref
10. Aasved H. Intraocular pressure in eyes with and without fibrillopathia epitheliocapsularis. Acta Ophthalmol. 1971; 49:601–10.
crossref
11. Kivelä T, Hietanen J, Uusitalo M. Autopsy analysis of clinically unilateral exfoliation syndrome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997; 38:2008–15.
12. Kozobolis VP, Papatzanaki M, Vlachonikolis IG, et al. Epidemiology of pseudoexfoliation in the island of Crete (Greece). Acta Ophthalmol. 1997; 75:726–9.
crossref
13. Ringvold A, Blika S, Elsås T, et al. The Middle-Norway Eye-Screening Study. II. Prevalence of simple and capsular glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 1991; 69:273–80.
14. Abdul-Rahman AM, Casson RJ, Newland HS, et al. Pseudoexfoliation in a rural Burmese population: the Meiktila Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008; 92:1325–8.
crossref
15. Mierzejewski A, Eliks I, Kałuzny B, et al. Cataract phacoemulsification and intraocular pressure in glaucoma patients. Klin Oczna. 2008; 110:11–7.
16. Shingleton BJ, Heltzer J, O'Donoghue MW. Outcomes of phacoemulsification in patients with and without pseudoexfoliation syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29:1080–6.
crossref
17. Damji KF, Konstas AG, Liebmann JM, et al. Intraocular pressure following phacoemulsification in patients with and without exfoliation syndrome: a 2 year prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90:1014–8.
crossref
18. Streho M, Rohart C, Guigui B, et al. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome in cataract surgery. Retrospective study of 37 cases. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2008; 31:11–5.
19. Grødum K, Heijl A, Bengtsson B. Riskof glaucoma in ocular hypertension with and without pseudoexfoliation Ophthalmology. 2005; 112:386–90.
20. Mitchell P, Wang JJ, Hourihan F. The relationship between glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation: The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999; 117:1319–24.
21. Shimizu K, Kimura Y, Aoki K. Prevalence of exfoliation syndrome in the Japanese. Acta Ophthalmol. 1988; 184:S112–5.
crossref
22. Forsius H. Exfoliation syndrome in various ethnic populations. Acta Ophthalmol. 1988; 184:S71–85.
crossref

Table 1.
The characteristics of patients newly diagnosed with psuedoexfoliation syndrome
  IOP IOP
  Over 21 mmHg same or under 21 mmHg
Number of patients (%) 14 (35.0%) 26 (65.0%)
Average IOP    
(range) 27.2±4.5* 18.2±5.6*
(mmHg) (23∼37) (11∼20)
Age 73.5±10.2 64.52±9.5
(years) (63∼88) (52∼64)
Gender M:F=3:18 M:F=11:8
Diabetes Mellitus 2 2
Hypertension 13 12
Cardio-vascular disease 0 2*

* ,

unpaired t-test, statistically significant at the level of P=0.01,

Fisher's exact test (P<0.01); IOP=intraocular pressure;

M=male; F=female; The number of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases were so small, we could not perform the *In case of statistic analysis. There was no significant difference between thetwo groups in hypertensive patients; cardiovascular disease, all 2 cases had diabetes simultaneously.

Table 2.
Comparing the characteristics of patients in between IOP elevation group and control group during follow-up periods
  IOP elevation Control group
Number of patients (%) 15 (37.5%) 25 (62.5%)
Age 76.5±8.5* 68.2±9.9*
Gender M:F=1:14 M:F=13:12
Number of eyedrops (before IOP elevation) 1.1±0.6 0.8±0.5
Number of eyedrops (last follow-up) 1.9±0.5§ 0.9±0.5§
Cataractoperation Yes:no=2:13П Yes:no=17:8П
Diabetes mellitus 1 3
Hypertension 14 11
Cardiovascular disease 1 3
Follow-up duration (years) 7.9±3.9# 5.6±4.4#

* ,

,

§ ,

statistically significant at the level of P=0.01 (unpaired t-test,),

,

# Fisher's exact test, P<0.01; The numbers of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases were so small, we could not perform the statistic analysis. There was no significant difference between two groups in hypertensive patients. Notice: In case of cardiovascular disease, all 2 cases had diabetes mellitus simultaneously.

Table 3.
The changes of intraocular pressure (IOP) and number of antiglaucoma eye drops before and after cataract operation
  IOP same or under 21 mmHg   IOP over 21 mmHg Average
  IOP Number of antiglaucoma eye drops Number of eye IOP Number of antiglaucoma eye drops Number of eyes (number of eye drops-used eyes) IOP Number of antiglaucoma eye drops
Pre-operation 17.7±2.2 1.2±0.4 n=10 24.3±1.6 1.20±0.42* n=14 (n=10) 21.6±1.8 1.23±0.43
POD 1 day 14.7±1.2 1.2±0.4 n=10 17.0±1.2 1.20±0.42 n=14 (n=10) 16.0±1.4 1.23±0.43
POD 1 week 14.4±1.4 1.2±0.4 n=10 16.7±1.8 1.20±0.42 n=14 (n=10) 15.7±1.5 1.23±0.43
POD 1 month 15.6±1.7 1.2±0.4 n=10 16.8±1.6 1.20±0.42 n=14 (n=10) 16.3±1.5 1.23±0.43
POD 2 months 14.7±1.8 1.2±0.4 n=10 16.8±1.4 1.20±0.42 n=14 (n=10) 15.9±1.7 1.23±0.43
POD 6 months 14.9±1.2 0.2±0.4 n=10 16.8±1.8 0.8±0.4 n=12 (n=8) 16.0±1.3 0.7±0.48
POD 1 year 15.1±3.1 0.3±0.5§ n=8 17.4±3.3 0.6±0.4# n=12 (n=8) 16.1±1.7* 0.8±0.4
POD 3 years 18.3±1.2 1.0±0.6§ n=6 19.4±1.4 1.8±1.0# n=8 (n=7) 18.4±4.1* 1.4±0.9
POD 5 years 18.8±1.3 1.8±2.0 n=4 19.3±1.2 2.2±2.0 n=6 (n=5) 19.1±1.2 1.9±1.7
POD 7 years 18.5±1.7 2.3±0.7 n=3 20.3±1.0 2.8±1.0 n=4 (n=4) 1 19.57±1.21 2.57±0.81

* ,

,

,

§ ,

,

statisticallysignificant at the level of P=0.01; IOP=intraocular pressure; POD=postoperative days; n=number of eyes of the patients; The IOP significantly decreased at the first postoperative day compared to pre-operative IOP. The IOP had been kept at the level similar to that of POD 1 day for 1 year (Bold). The number of eye drops decreased after cataract operation and kept similar number up to POD 1 year. Then after POD 3 years, the IOP and the number of eye drops increased. (After cataract operation, the antiglaucoma eye drops were continued in the same manneras pre-cataract operation for 2 months)

Table 4.
The results of multivariate regression test in intraocular pressure elevation group during follow-up periods
  Coefficients Significance
Constant 23.593 0.000
Intraocular pressure (IOP) at diagnosis 0.611 0.000
Age 0.212 0.000
Gender (male=1, female=2) 3.131 0.000
Number of eye drops 0.628 0.000
Cataract operation (yes=1, no=0) 4.512 0.000
Diabetes mellitus 1.06E–012 1.000
Hypertension 1.01E–011 1.000
Cardiovascular disease 1.85E–009 1.000
TOOLS
Similar articles