Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the efficacy of the combination therapy of intravitreal bevacizumab injection and photodynamic therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration associated with large retinal pigment epithelial detachment.
Methods
A total of 13 eyes were reviewed, with 9 eyes diagnosed with definite choroidal neovascularization (CNV) and 4 eyes diagnosed with CNV or polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) becausethe exact type could not be determined. Photodynamic therapy was performed within 1 week after bevacizumab injection according to indocyanine green angiography (ICGA). Additional bevacizumab injections were performed within a 4 to 6 week interval. Additional photodynamic therapy was performed within 4 months.
Results
The visual acuity on final examination had improved in 3 eyes (23.1%), was maintained in 7 eyes (53.8%), and decreased in 3 eyes (23.1%). The change of the PED before and after treatment showed regression in 5 eyes (38.5%), recurrence after regression in 2 eyes (15.4%), persistence in 4 eyes (30.8%), and retinal pigment epithelial tear in 2 eyes (15.4%). The maintained or improved visual acuity rate was 66.7% (6/9) and 100% (4/4) in the CNV and CNV or PCV group, respectively.
Conclusions
The combination therapy in neovascular age-related macular degenerationassociated with large retinal pigment epithelial detachment is a viable alternative treatment in the stabilization and improvement of vision. However, further studies with long-term follow up and controlled studies with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody monotherapy are required.
References
1. Dastgheib K, Green WR. Granulomatous reaction to Bruch's membrane in age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994; 112:813–8.
2. Oh H, Takagi H, Takagi C, et al. The potential angiogenic role of macrophages in the formation of choroidal neovascular membranes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999; 40:1891–8.
3. Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor. The trigger for neovascularization in the eye. Lab Invest. 1995; 72:615–18.
4. Adamis SP, Shima DT. The role of vascular endothelial growth factor in ocular health and disease. Retina. 2005; 25:111–8.
5. Spaide RF, Sorenson J, Maranan L. Combined photodynamic therapy with verteporfin and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for choroidal neovascularization. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110:1517–25.
6. Chan WM, Lai TY, Wong AL, et al. Combined photodynamic therapy and intravitreal triamcinolone injection for the treatment of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age related macular degeneration: a comparative study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90:337–41.
7. Freund KB, Klais CM, Eandi CM, et al. Sequenced combined intravitreal triamcinolone and indocyanine green angiography-guided photodynamic therapy for retinal angiomatous proliferation. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006; 124:487–92.
8. Dhalla MS, Shah GK, Blinder KJ, et al. Combined photodynamic therapy with verteporfin and intravitreal bevacizumab for choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2006; 26:988–93.
9. Costa RA, Jorge R, Calucci D, et al. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) in combination with verteporfin photodynamic therapy for choroidal neovascularization associated with age-related macular degeneration (IBeVe Study). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007; 245:1273–80.
10. Smith BT, Dhalla MS, Shah GK, et al. Intravitreal injection of bevacizumab combined with verteporfin photodynamic therapy for choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2008; 28:675–81.
11. Ladewig MS, Karl SE, Hamelmann V, et al. Combined intravitreal bevacizumab and photodynamic therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008; 246:17–25.
12. Krzystolik MG, Afshari MA, Adamis AP, et al. Prevention of experimental choroidal neovascularization with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody fragment. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002; 120:338–46.
13. Ferrara N, Damico L, Shams N, et al. Development of ranibizumab, an antivascular endothelial growth factor antigen binding fragment, as therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2006; 26:859–70.
14. Schmidt-Erfurth U, Hasan T. Mechanisms of action of photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000; 45:195–214.
15. Schmidt-Erfurth U, Schlötzer-Schrehard U, Cursiefen C, et al. Influence of photodynamic therapy on expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF receptor 3, and pigment epithelium-derived factor. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44:4473–80.
16. Spaide RF. Rationale for combination therapies for choroidal neovascularization. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 141:149–56.
17. Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration with verteporfin: one-year results of 2 randomized clinical trials—TAP report. Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Photodynamic Therapy (TAP) Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999; 117:1329–45.
18. Meredith TA, Braley RE, Aaberg TM. Natural history of serous detachments of the retinal pigment epithelium. Am J Ophthalmol. 1979; 88:643–51.
19. Poliner LS, Olk RJ, Burgess D, et al. Natural history of retinal pigment epithelial detachments in age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 1986; 93:543–50.
20. Elman MJ, Finde SL, Murphy RP, et al. The naturalhistory of serous retinal pigment epithelium detachment in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 1986; 93:224–30.
21. Pauleikhoff D, Löffert D, Spital G, et al. Pigment epithelial detachment in the elderly. Clinical differentiation, natural course and pathogenetic implications. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002; 240:533–8.
22. Slakter JS, Yannuzzi LA, Sorenson JA, et al. A pilot study of indocyanine green videoangiography guided laser photocoagulation treatment of occult choroidal neovascularization. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994; 112:465–72.
23. Lim JI, Aaberg TM, Capone A, Sternberg P. Indocyanine green angiography-guided photocoagulation of choroidal neovascularization associated with retinal pigment epithelial detachment. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997; 123:524–32.
24. Brancato R, Introini U, Bolognesi G, et al. ICGA-guided laser photocoagulation of occult choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2000; 20:134–42.
25. Han JW, Lee WK. Photodynamic therapy of choroidal neovascularization associated with large serous pigment epithelial detachment. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2004; 45:79–86.
26. Axer-Siegel R, Rosenblatt I, Kramer M, et al. Photodynamic therapy for occult choroidal neovascularization with pigment epithelium detachment in age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004; 122:453–9.
27. Ladas ID, Kotsolis AI, Rouvas A, et al. Efficacy of photodynamic therapy in the management of occult choroidal neovascularization associated with serous pigment epithelium detachment. Ophthalmologica. 2007; 221:313–9.
28. Bom Aggio F, Eid Farah M, Melo GB. Intravitreal bevacizumab for occult choroidal neovascularization with pigment epithelium detachment in age-related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006; 84:713–4.
29. Frimpong-Boateng A, Varde MA, Rüfer F, et al. Intravitreal administration of triamcinolone and bevacizumab for pigment epithelial detachment in conjunction with AMD. Ophthalmologe. 2008; 105:661–8.
30. Chen E, Kaiser RS, Vander JF. Intravitreal bevacizumab for refractory pigment epithelial detachment with occult choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2007; 27:445–50.
31. Ladas ID, Kotsolis AI, Papakostas TD, et al. Intravitreal bevacizumab combined with photodynamic therapy for the treatment of occult choroidal neovascularization associated with serous pigment epithelium detachment in age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2007; 27:891–6.
32. Coscas G, Koenig F, Soubrane G. The pretear characteristics of pigment epithelial detachments. A study of 40 eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990; 108:1687–93.
33. Chang LK, Sarraf D. Tears of the retinal pigment epithelium: an old problem in a new era. Retina. 2007; 27:523–34.
34. Chan CK, Meyer CH, Gross JG, et al. Retinal pigment epithelial tears after intravitreal bevacizumab injection for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2007; 27:541–51.
35. Casswell AG, Kohen D, Bird AC. Retinal pigment epithelial detachments in the elderly: classification and outcome. Br J Ophthalmol. 1985; 69:397–403.
36. Pece A, Isola V, Vadala M, Calori G. Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for choroidal neovascularization associated with retinal pigment epithelial detachment in age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2007; 27:342–8.
37. Meyer CH, Mennel S, Schmith JC, et al. Acute retinal pigment epithelial tear following intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) injection for occult choroidal neovascularization secondary to age related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90:1207–8.
38. Chang LK, Flaxel CJ, Lauer AK, Sarraf D. RPE tears after pegaptanib treatment in age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2007; 27:857–63.
39. Goldstein M, Heilweil G, Barak A, et al. Retinal pigment epithelial tear following photodynamic therapy for choroidal neovascularization secondary to AMD. Eye. 2005; 9:1315–24.
40. Gass JD. Retinal pigment epithelial rip during krypton red laser photocoagulation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984; 98:700–6.
Table 1.
Pt. | Dx. | Age/ Sex | PED* Size (DD†) | Previous treatment | Combination treatment | F/U (m‡) | logMAR BCVA§ | PED | Abnormal vessel | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Final | |||||||||
1 | CNV∏ | 64/F | 2.53 | no | Combo** 1(add avastin 2) | 10 | 0.3 | 0.1 | regression | regression |
2 | CNV | 73/F | 1.87 | no | Combo 1(add avastin 2) | 11 | 0.2 | 0.1 | regression | regression |
3 | CNV | 72/F | 1.87 | PDT 2+IVTA 2 | Combo 1(add avastin 1) | 14 | 0.4 | 0.4 | recur | recur |
4 | CNV | 76/M | 2.33 | PDT 1+IVTA 1 | Combo 3(add avastin 2) | 15 | 0.3 | 0.6 | recur | recur |
5 | CNV | 67/M | 2.03 | PDT 1, IVTA 1 | Combo 1 | 8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | persist | persist |
6 | CNV | 66/M | 3.70 | Laser 1, IVTA 1, PDT 1 | Combo 2(add avastin 1) | 10 | 0.5 | 0.5 | persist | persist |
7 | CNV | 62/M | 2.60 | PDT 3+IVTA 3 | Combo 2(add avastin 2) | 12 | 0.2 | 0.2 | persist | persist |
8 | CNV | 79/M | 2.43 | No | Combo 1(add avastin 2) | 16 | 0.2 | 1.4 | RPE tear | persist |
9 | CNV | 79/F | 2.72 | PDT 1+IVTA 1 | Combo 1 | 13 | 0.7 | 1.1 | RPE tear | regression |
10 | CNV or PCV# | 77/M | 1.18 | no | Combo 1 | 10 | 1.4 | 1.1 | regression | regression |
11 | CNV or PCV | 75/M | 1.83 | PDT 2 | Combo 1(add avastin 1) | 9 | 0.7 | 0.2 | regression | regression |
12 | CNV or PCV | 77/M | 1.98 | No | Combo 1(add avastin 1) | 11 | 1.2 | 1.1 | regression | regression |
13 | CNV or PCV | 67/M | 2.5 | IVTA 1+PDT 1 | Combo 1(add avastin 2) | 7 | 0.2 | 0.2 | persist | persist |
Table 2.
| PED* | | Abnormal vessel | | Visual outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNV† group (n:9) | regression (n:2) | → | regression (n:2) | → | improve (n:1) |
| | | | | stable (n:1) |
| persist (n:3) | → | persist (n:3) | → | stable (n:3) |
| recur (n:2) | → | recur (n:2) | → | stable (n:1) |
| | | | | decrease (n:1) |
| RPE§ tear (n:2) | → | regression (n:1) | → | decrease (n:2) |
| | | persist (n:1) | | |
CNV or PCV‡ | regression (n:3) | → | regression (n:3) | → | improve (n:2) |
group (n:4) | | | | | stable (n:1) |
| persist (n:1) | → | persist (n:1) | → | stable (n:1) |