Abstract
Purpose
To examine the morphological characteristics of the transplanted cornea in patients who received penetrating keratoplasty at least 10 years previously prior.
Case summery
Each layer of the transplanted cornea of patients who received penetrating keratoplasty 10 years previously prior was examined with a confocal microscope (ConfoScan 4.1, Fortune Technology, Italy). Cross-sectioned corneal images of the corneal epithelium, Bowman's layer, stromal layer, Descement's membrane, and endothelium were evaluated and compared with the normal fellow other eye. A total of three eyes from three subjects between the ages of 60 and 70 years were examined. The epithelial cells had large cell borders, and a spindle shaped, and a highly reflective nucleus. The keratocytes were highly reflective and the density of keratocytes was lower than that in the normal cornea. The regenerated nerve fibers were markedly altered, as characterized by increased nerve tortuosity, reduced branching patterns, and shorter nerve lengths. In the endothelial cell layer, a bright nucleus, a reduced ratio of hexagonal cells, and several multinuclear cells were observed.
References
1. Kim HS, Kim JH, Kim HM, Song JS. Comparison of Corneal Thickness Measured by Specular, US Pachymetry, and Orbscan in Post-PKP Eyes. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2007; 48:245–50.
2. Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD, Jester JV. Clinical confocal microscopy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1998; 9:59–65.
3. Lee JS, Jong WH, Kim HK. Confocal Microscopic Corneal Findings in the Normal Rabbit and Human. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2002; 43:739–44.
4. Mustonen RK, McDonald MB, Srivannaboon S, et al. Normal human Corneal cell Populations Evaluated by In Vivo Scanning Slit Confocal Microscopy. Cornea. 1998; 17:485–92.
5. Chiou AG, Kaufman SC, Kaufman HE, Beuerman RW. Clinical Corneal Confocal Microscopy. Surv Ophthalmol. 2006; 51:482–500.
6. Szaflik JP, Kaminska A, Udziela M, Szaflik J. In vivo confocal microscopy of corneal grafts shortly after penetrating keratoplasty. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007; 17:891–6.
7. Hollingsworth JG, Efron N, Tullo AB. A longitudinal case series investigating cellular changes to the transplanted cornea using confocal microscopy. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2006; 29:135–41.
8. Kohlhaas M. Corneal sensation after cataract and refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998; 24:1399–409.
9. Neiderer RL, Perumal D, Sherwin T, McGhee CN. Corneal Innervation and cellular Changes after Corneal Transplantation: An In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007; 48:621–6.
10. Moller-Pedersen T. Keratocyte reflectivity and corneal haze. Exp Eye Res. 2004; 78:553–60.
11. Imre L, Resch M, Nagymihaly A. In vivo confocal corneal microscopy after keratoplasty. Ophthalmologe. 2005; 102:140–6.
12. Bourne WM, Hodge DO, Nelson LR. Corenal endothelium five years after transplantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994; 118:185–96.
13. Bertelmann E, Hartmann C, Scherer M, Rieck P. Outcome of rotational keratoplasty: comparison of endothelial cell loss in autografts vs allografts. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004; 122:1437–40.
14. Ma DH, See LC, Chen JJ. Long-term observation of aqeous flare following penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2003; 22:413–9.