Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.50(5) > 1008554

Chang, Kim, and Kim: Visual Outcome in Children With Congenital Glaucoma

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the prognosis of vision and the development of amblyopia in primary congenital glaucoma patients.

Methods

The author reviewed 38 eyes of 22 primary congenital glaucoma patients and evaluated variables such as age at time of surgery and at the last visit, preoperative IOP, Cup-to-disc(CD) ratio, corneal diameter, refractive error, axial lengths and IOP, CD ratio and visual acuity at the last visit. According to visual acuity, the patients were divided into 3 groups, good (>0.5), fair (0.1∼0.5), and poor (<0.1). The amblyopia was defined when BCVA was below 0.8 and no evidence of progression of glaucoma. There were 4 types of amblyopia: deprivation, anisometropic, strabismic and organic. The author compared the 3 groups and evaluated factors affecting the vision as well as the prevalence of amblyopia.

Results

There were 17 eyes in the good group, 4 eyes in the fair group and 17 eyes in the poor group (p<0.05). Amblyopia developed in 17 eyes with 7 eyes showing deprivation amblyopia. Anisometropic and organic amblyopia were each found in 4 eyes, and strabismic amblyopia was found in 2 eyes. The postoperative IOP and CD ratio and preoperative CD ratio were significantly lower in the good group than the other groups (p<0.05).

Conclusions

Final VA was poor in 45% of eyes with primary congenital glaucoma, and amblyopia developed in 45% of these eyes. The prognosis for vision may be related to the treatment of glaucoma and amblyopia.

References

1. Bermejo E, Martinez-Frias ML. Congenital eye malformation: clinical-epidemiological analysis of 1,124,654 consecutive births in spain. Am J Med Genet. 1998; 75:497–504.
2. Richardson KT Jr, Ferguson WJ Jr, Shaffer RN. Long-term functional results in infantile glaucoma. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1967; 71:833–6.
3. Haas J. Principles and problems of therapy in congenital glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol. 1968; 7:140–6.
4. Morgan KS, Black B, Ellis FD, Helveston EM. Treatment of congenital glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1981; 92:799–803.
crossref
5. Haas JS. End results of treatment. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1955; 59:333–41.
6. Taylor RH, Ainsworth JR, Evans AR, Levin AV. The epidemiology of pediatric glaucoma: the Toronto experience. J AAPOS. 1999; 3:308–15.
crossref
7. Barsoum-Homsy M, Chevrette L. Incidence and prognosis of childhood glaucoma: a study of 63 cases. Ophthalmology. 1986; 93:1323–7.
8. Biglan AW, Hiles DA. The visual results following infantile glaucoma surgery. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1979; 16:377–81.
crossref
9. O'Reilly J, Lanigan B, O'Keefe M. Long-term visual results following primary trabeculectomy for infantile glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2001; 79:472–5.
10. Gollamudi SR, Traboulsi EI, Chamon W, et al. Visual outcome after surgery for Peters' anomaly. Ophthalmic Genet. 1994; 15:31–5.
crossref
11. Beck AD. Diagnosis and management of pediatric glaucoma. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2001; 14:501–12.
crossref
12. Broughton WL, Parks MM. An analysis of treatment of congenital glaucoma by goniotomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1981; 91:566–72.
crossref
13. Morin JD, Merin S, Sheppard RW. Primary congenital glaucoma a survey. Can J Ophthalmol. 1974; 9:17–28.
14. Clothier CM, Rice NS, Dobinson P, Wakefield E. Amblyopia in congenital glaucoma. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1979; 99:427–31.
15. Robin AL, Quigley HA, Pollack IP, et al. An analysis of visual acuity, visual fields, and disk cupping in childhood glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1979; 88:847–58.
crossref
16. Barkan O. Operation for congenital glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1942; 25:552–68.
crossref
17. Morin JD, Bryars JH. Causes of loss of vision in congenital glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980; 98:1575–6.
crossref
18. Richardson KT Jr, Ferguson WJ Jr, Shaffer RN. Long-term functional results in infantile glaucoma. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1967; 71:836–7.
19. Wallace DK, Plager DA, Snyder SK, et al. Surgical results of secondary glaucomas in childhood. Ophthalmology. 1998; 105:101–11.
crossref
20. Yang LL, Lambert SR. Peters'anomaly. A synopsis of surgical management and visual outcome. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2001; 14:467–77.
21. Kushner BJ. Successful treatment of functional amblyopia associated with juvenile glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1988; 226:150–3.
crossref
22. Rice NS. Management of infantile glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1972; 56:294–8.
crossref
23. Mandal AK, Gothwal VK, Bagga H, et al. Outcome of surgery on infants younger than 1 month with congenital glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110:1909–15.
crossref
24. Mandal AK, Bhatia PG, Bhaskar A, Nutheti R. Long-term surgical and visual outcomes in Indian children with developmental glaucoma operated on within 6 months of birth. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111:283–90.
crossref
25. Kargi SH, Koc F, Biglan AW, Davis JS. Visual acuity in children with glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2006; 113:229–38.
crossref
26. Jaafar MS, Kazi GA. Normal intraocular pressure in children: a comparative study of the Perkins applanation tonometer and the pneumatonometer. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1993; 30:284–7.
crossref
27. Pensiero S, Da Pozzo S, Perissutti P, et al. Normal intraocular pressure in children. J Pediatric Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1992; 29:79–84.
crossref
28. Von Noorden GK, Campos EC. Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility. 6th ed.St. Louis: Mosby;2002. p. 246.

Figure 1.
The prevalence of amblyopia.
jkos-50-743f1.tif
Figure 2.
The prevalence of amblyopia in each group.
jkos-50-743f2.tif
Table 1.
Comparison of patients profiles between three groups based upon visual acuity
Poor Fair Good p-value
Sex (M:F) 11:6 1:3 10:7 0.349*
Eyes (OD:OS) 10:7 2:2 7:10 0.589*
Type of surgery 1.000*
Trabeculotomy 12 3 11
Trabeculectomy 4 1 5
Both 1 0 1
Number of surgery 1.41±0.71 1.80±1.78 1.72±0.82 0.549
Age at surgery (mon) 31.5±45.5 3.3±2.2 30.4±40.2 0.448
Follow-up (mon) 88.6±83.8 105.0±85.21 124.2±67.7 0.411
Age at last visit (yr) 9.7±8.5 9.0±7.1 12.5±5.9 0.462
Total (n) 17 4 17

* Pearson's chi-square test

ANOVA test. Visual acuity: Poor<0.1, Fair 0.1∼0.5, Good>0.5.

Table 2.
Comparison of intraocular pressure and CD ratio between three groups
Poor Fair Good p-value*
Preop IOP (mmHg) 32.34±11.47 29.75±7.59 29.53±11.61 0.770
Postop IOP (mmHg) 20.13±11.42 15.25±4.50 12.71±3.06 0.039
Preop CD 0.81±0.20 0.63±0.15 0.62±0.22 0.035
Postop CD 0.85±0.23 0.35±0.07 0.53±0.25 0.002
Axial length (mm) 24.83±3.98 20.73±1.15 24.81±3.17 0.308
Corneal diameter (mm) 12.93±1.45 12.12±0.85 13.01±0.51 0.351

* ANOVA test

IOP=intra ocular pressure

CD=cup to disc ratio.

Visual acuity=Poor<0.1, Fair 0.1∼0.5, Good>0.5.

Table 3.
Comparison of intraocular pressure and CD ratio between 2 groups
Good Others p-value*
Preop IOP (mmHg) 29.53±11.61 31.76±10.72 0.542
Postop IOP (mmHg) 12.71±3.06 19.11±10.44 0.018
Preop CD 0.62±0.22 0.78±0.20 0.026
Postop CD 0.53±0.25 0.79±0.28 0.017
Axial lengths (mm) 24.81±3.17 23.80±3.88 0.564
Corneal diameter (mm) 13.01±0.51 12.76±1.37 0.484

* Independent t-test

IOP=intraocular pressure; CD=Cup to disc ratio.

TOOLS
Similar articles