Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.50(3) > 1008492

Ku, Sohn, Lee, and Nam: Partial Fluid-Air-Exchange at the End of 23 Gauge Sutureless Vitrectomy to Prevent Postoperative Hypotony

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of partial fluid air exchange at the end of 23-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy to prevent postoperative hypotony.

Methods

Fifty-five eyes in 49 consecutive patients who underwent partial fluid air exchange at the end of 23-gauge sutureless vitrectomy by a single surgeon at Gil Hospital between August 2007 and February 2008 were recruited for this study. Intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity and post-operative complications were evaluated.

Results

Surgical indications included proliferative diabetic retinopathy (n=31), epiretinal membrane (n=9), nondiabetic vitreous hemorrhage (n=5), vitreous opacities (n=3), and others (n=7). Two eyes showed hypotony (<6 mmHg) on postoperative day 1 and resolved within a week without any supplemental procedures. Other complications included choroidal detachment in 1 eye, hyphema in 1 eye, and transient IIOP in 2 eyes. In 38 eyes in which combined cataract surgery was performed, air bubble-related complications including iris capture by the IOL in 3 eyes (7.9%) and opacification of the posterior capsule in 11 eyes (28.9%) occurred. No case of retinal detachment or endophthalmitis was observed. The final best corrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 14 eyes (25.5%).

Conclusions

The partial fluid air exchange shows promise as an effective and safe procedure for prevention of postoperative hypotony after sutureless vitrectomy. Air bubble-related complications after combined cataract surgery can be avoided by several techniques.

References

1. Lakhanpal RR, Humayun MS, de Juan E Jr, et al. Outcomes of 140 consecutive cases of 25-gauge transconjunctival surgery for posterior segment disease. Ophthalmology. 2005; 112:817–24.
crossref
2. Theelen T, Verbeek AM, Tilanus MA, van den Biesen PR. A novel technique for self-sealing, wedge-shaped pars plana sclerotomies and its features in ultrasound biomicroscopy and clinical outcome. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 136:1085–92.
crossref
3. Yanyali A, Celik E, Horozoglu F, Nohutcu AF. Corneal topographic changes after transconjunctival (25-gauge) sutureless vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005; 140:939–41.
crossref
4. Fine HF, Iranmanesh R, Iturralde D, Spaide RF. Outcomes of 77 consecutive cases of 23-gauge transconjunctival vitrectomy surgery for posterior segment disease. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114:1197–200.
crossref
5. Chen E. 25-Gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007; 18:188–93.
crossref
6. Fujii GY, De Juan E Jr, Humayun MS, et al. Initial experience using the transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy system for vitreoretinal surgery. Ophthalmology. 2002; 109:1814–20.
7. Fujii GY, De Juan E Jr, Humayun MS, et al. A new 25-gauge instrument system for transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy surgery. Ophthalmology. 2002; 109:1807–12.
8. Byeon SH, Chu YK, Lee SC, et al. Problems associated with the 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy system during and after surgery. Ophthalmologica. 2006; 220:259–65.
crossref
9. Shimada H, Nakashizuka H, Mori R, et al. 25-gauge scleral tunnel transconjunctival vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 142:871–3.
crossref
10. Kunimoto DY, Kaiser RS. Incidence of endophthalmitis after 20- and 25-gauge vitrectomy. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114:2133–7.
crossref
11. Scott IU, Flynn HW Jr, Dev S, et al. Endophthalmitis after 25-gauge and 20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy: incidence and outcomes. Retina. 2008; 28:138–42.
12. Kim MJ, Park KH, Hwang JM, et al. The safety and efficacy of transconjunctival sutureless 23-gauge vitrectomy. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2007; 21:201–7.
crossref
13. Eckardt C. Transconjunctival sutureless 23-gauge vitrectomy. Retina. 2005; 25:208–11.
crossref
14. Lopez-Guajardo L, Pareja-Esteban J, Teus-Guezala MA. Oblique sclerotomy technique for prevention of incompetent wound closure in transconjunctival 25-gauge vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 141:1154–6.
15. Amato JE, Akduman L. Incidence of complications in 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy based on the surgical indications. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2007; 38:100–2.
crossref
16. Gupta OP, Weichel ED, Regillo CD, et al. Postoperative complications associated with 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2007; 38:270–5.
crossref
17. Inoue M, Shinoda K, Shinoda H, et al. Two-step oblique incision during 25-gauge vitrectomy reduces incidence of postoperative hypotony. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2007; 35:693–6.
crossref
18. Sim DA, Wong R, Griffiths MF. Injecting an air bubble at the end of sutureless cataract surgery to prevent inflow of ocular surface fluid. Eye. 2007; 21:1444–5.
crossref
19. Tewari A, Shah GK, Fang A. Visual outcomes with 23-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy. Retina. 2008; 28:258–62.
crossref
20. Demetriades AM, Gottsch JD, Thomsen R, et al. Combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and vitrectomy for eyes with coexisting cataract and vitreoretinal pathology. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 135:291–6.
crossref
21. Scharwey K, Pavlovic S, Jacobi KW. Combined clear corneal phacoemulsification, vitreoretinal surgery, and intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999; 25:693–8.
crossref
22. Suzuki Y, Sakuraba T, Mizutani H, et al. Postoperative refractive error after simultaneous vitrectomy and cataract surgery. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2000; 31:271–5.
crossref

Figure 1.
Partial fluid air exchange at the end of 23-gauge sutureless vitrectomy. (A) Schematic picture of the procedure. (B) Intraoperative photograph showing vitreous cavity being replaced by air. Air-bubbles are popping out through the cannula.
jkos-50-359f1.tif
Figure 2.
Preoperative and postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) changes. There were no significant differences in IOP among the measurements. * Two cases of hypotony were observed at postoperative 1 day.
jkos-50-359f2.tif
Table 1.
Indications for surgery
Indication No. of Eyes %
Proliferative diabetic retinopathy 31 56.4
Epiretinal membrane 9 16.4
Nondiabetic vitreous hemorrhage 5 9.0
Vitreous opacities 3 5.5
Panuveitis 2 3.6
Retinal tear 2 3.6
Endophthalmitis 1 1.8
Combined hamartoma of retina & RPE 1 1.8
Decompression retinopathy 1 1.8
Total 55 100
Table 2.
Summary of preoperative and postoperative visual acuity by surgical indication
Indication (n) Preop VA§ (logMARП± SD#) Final Postop VA (logMAR± SD) p value*
PDR** (n=31)†† 1.06±0.2 0.82±0.3 0.02
ERM†† (n=9) 0.7±0.3 0.3±0.2 <0.01
Non-clearing vitreous hemorrhage (n=5) 1.4±0.5 0.3±0.2 <0.01
Other§§ (n=10) 0.54±0.4 0.31±0.3 0.03
Total (n=55) 1.1±0.5 0.5±0.3 <0.01

*paired Student's t-test

Preop=preoperative

Postop=postoperative

§VA=visual acuity

ПlogMAR=logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution

#SD= standard deviation

**PDR=proliferative diabetic retinopathy

††ERM=epiretinal membrane

§§vitreous opacity (3), panuveitis (2), retinal tear (2), endophthalmitis (1), combined hamartoma of retina & RPE (1), decompression retinopathy (1)

Table 3.
Postoperative complications
Complication No. of Eyes %
Leakage-related complication    
Hypotony* 2/55 3.6
Choroidal detachment 1/55 1.8
Combined surgery-related complication    
Opacification of posterior capsule 11/38 28.9
Iris capture by intraocular lens optic 3/38 7.9
Fibrinous anterior chamber inflammation 6/38 15.8
Hyphema 1/38 2.6

*Intraocular pressure <6 mmHg

Among thirty-eight eyes that underwent combined cataract surgery.

TOOLS
Similar articles