Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.50(10) > 1008387

Kim, Kweon, Lee, Ahn, and You: Prognostic Factor and Antibiotic Susceptibility in Bacterial Keratitis: Results of an Eight-Year Period

Abstract

Purpose

To identify the clinical manifestations and risk factors for poor visual outcome, as well as antibiotic susceptibility of isolates in bacterial keratitis.

Methods

A total of 128 eyes in 128 patients with bacterial keratitis, who were diagnosed by smears and cultures from January 2000 to December 2007 were reviewed retrospectively. Sex, age, previous ocular disease, trauma history, pre-treatment duration, previous ocular surgery, clinical manifestation, causative bacteria, pre- and post-treatment visual acuity, and treatment results were evaluated. An initial univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify and select the main prognostic factors. The antibiotic susceptibility was evaluated in 2 consecutive 4-year periods.

Results

The mean age of the 128 patients was 59.0±18.2 years; 67 (52.3%) patients were male. The most common risk factor was ocular trauma (40.6%). The most prevalent isolate was coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (43.7%). Large size (p <0.001) and previous ocular disease (p<0.001) were significant prognostic factors in the multivariate logistic regression model. Resistance of cefazolin and aminoglycoside antibiotics that were commonly used as a combination therapy increased over the 8 years, but there was no significant difference in the 2 time periods tested (all p >0.05). Among the fluoroquinolone antibiotics, susceptibility of ciprofloxacin was 75.7%.

Conclusions

In patients with bacterial keratitis, a large ulcer size and the presence of previous ocular disease were risk factors for poor visual outcome. Gentamicin, cefazolin, and ciprofloxacin should be avoided as primary monotherapy for bacterial keratitis.

References

1. Erie JC, Nevitt MP, Hodge DO, Ballard DJ. Incidence of ulcerative keratitis in a defined population from 1950 through 1988. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993; 111:1665–71.
crossref
2. Wilhelmus KR. Review of clinical experience with microbial keratitis associated with contact lens. CLAO J. 1987; 13:211–4.
3. Jones DB. Decision-making in the management of microbial keratitis. Ophthalmology. 1981; 88:814–20.
crossref
4. Blanton CL, Rapuano CJ, Cohen EJ, Laibson PR. Initial treatment of microbial keratitis. CLAO J. 1996; 22:136–40.
5. Afshari NA, Ma JJ, Duncan SM, et al. Trends in resistance to ciprofloxacin, cefazolin, and gentamicin in the treatment of bacterial keratitis. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2008; 24:217–23.
crossref
6. Snyder ME, Katz HR. Ciprofloxacin resistant bacterial keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992; 114:336–8.
7. Gelender H, Rettich C. Gentamicin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa corneal ulcers. Cornea. 1984; 3:21–6.
crossref
8. Hahn YH, Hahn TW, Choi SH, et al. Epidemiology of infectious keratitis (I): a multicenter study. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1998; 39:1633–51.
9. Hahn YH, Hahn TW, Tchah HW, et al. Epidemiology of infectious keratitis (II): a multicenter study. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2001; 42:247–65.
10. Hahn YH, Lee SJ, Hahn TW, et al. Antibiotic susceptibilities of ocular isolates from patients with bacterial keratitis: a multicenter study. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1999; 40:2401–10.
11. Mukerji N, Vajpayee RB, Sharma N. Technique of area measurement of epithelial defects. Cornea. 2003; 22:549–51.
crossref
12. McLeod SD, Kolahdouz-Isfahani A, Rosamian K, et al. The role of smears, cultures, and antibiotic sensitivity testing in the management of suspected infectious keratitis. Ophthalmology. 1996; 103:23–8.
crossref
13. Ly CN, Pham JN, Badenoch PR, et al. Bacteria commonly isolated from keratitis specimens retain antibiotic susceptibility to fluouroquinolones and gentamicin plus cephalothin. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2006; 34:44–50.
14. Yeh DL, Stinnett SS, Afshari NA. Analysis of bacterial cultures in infectious keratitis, 1997 to 2004. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 142:1066–8.
crossref
15. Bourcier T, Thomas F, Borderie V, et al. Bacterial keratitis: predisposing factors, clinical and microbiological review of 300 cases. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003; 87:834–8.
crossref
16. Yilmaz S, Ozturk I, Maden A. Microbial keratitis in West Anatolia, Turkey: a retrospective review. Int Ophthalmol. 2007; 27:261–8.
crossref
17. Wong T, Ormonde S, Gamble G, McGhee CN. Severe infective keratitis leading to hospital admission in New Zealand. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003; 87:1103–8.
crossref
18. Katz NN, Wadud SA, Ayazuddin M. Corneal ulcer disease in Bangladesh. Ann Ophthalmol. 1983; 15:834–6.
19. Fong CF, Hu FR, Tseng CH, et al. Antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial isolates from bacterial keratitis cases in a university hospital in Taiwan. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007; 144:682–9.
crossref
20. Keay L, Edwards K, Naduvilath T, et al. Microbial keratitis predisposing factors and morbidity. Ophthalmology. 2006; 113:109–16.
21. Green M, Apel A, Stapleton F. Risk factors and causative organisms in microbial keratitis. Cornea. 2008; 27:22–7.
crossref
22. Green M, Apel A, Stapleton F. A longitudinal study of trends in keratitis in Australia. Cornea. 2008; 27:33–9.
crossref
23. Toshida H, Kogure N, Inoue N, Murakami A. Trends in microbial keratitis in Japan. Eye Contact Lens. 2007; 33:70–3.
crossref
24. Miedziak AI, Miller MR, Rapuano CJ, et al. Risk factors in microbial keratitis leading to penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1999; 106:1166–71.
crossref
25. Musch DC, Sugar A, Meyer RF. Demographic and predisposing factors in corneal ulceration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983; 101:1545–8.
crossref
26. McLeod SD, LaBree LD, Tayyanipour R, et al. The importance of initial management in the treatment of severe infectious corneal ulcers. Ophthalmology. 1995; 102:1943–8.
crossref
27. Morlet N, Minassian D, Butcher J, et al. Risk factors for treatment outcome of suspected microbial keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999; 83:1027–31.
crossref
28. Bower KS, Kowalski RP, Gordon YJ. Fluoroquinolone in the treatment of bacterial keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996; 121:712–5.
29. Jhanji V, Sharma N, Satpathy G, et al. Fourth generation fluoroquinolone resistant bacterial keratitis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007; 33:1488–9.
30. Moshirfar M, Mirzaian G, Feiz V, Kang PC. Fourth generation fluoroquinolone resistant bacterial keratitis after refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 23:515–8.
31. Alexandrakis G, Alfonso EC, Miller D. Shifting trends in bacterial keratitis in South Florida and emerging resistance to fluoroquinolones. Ophthalmology. 2000; 107:1497–502.
crossref
32. Smitha S, Lalitha P, Prajna VN, Srinivasan M. Susceptibility trends of Pseudomonas species from corneal ulcers. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2005; 23:168–71.
crossref
33. Pachigolla G, Blomquist P, Cavanagh HD. Microbiologic keratitis pathogens and antibiotic susceptibilities: a 5-year review of cases at an urban county hospital in North Texas. Eye Contact Lens. 2007; 33:45–9.
34. Kowal VO, Levey SB, Laibson PR, et al. Use of routine antibiotic sensitivity testing for the management of corneal ulcers. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997; 115:462–5.
crossref

Table 1.
Prevalence of the micro-organisms isolated from corneal cultures of eyes diagnosed with bacterial keratitis
organism 2000∼2003 n* (%) 2004∼2007 n (%) Total n (%)
Gram-positive bacteria
 Staphylococcus aureus 9 (5.3) 3 (2.4) 12 (7.7)
 Staphylococcus epidermidis 19 (11.2) 24 (14.2) 43 (25.4)
 Other coagulase-negative staphylococci 21 (12.4) 9 (5.3) 30 (17.7)
 Viridans streptococcus 13 (7.7) 3 (1.8) 16 (9.5)
 Streptococcus pneumonia 4 (2.4) 8 (4.7) 12 (7.1)
 Enterococcus faecalis 0 (0.0) 2 (1.2) 2 (1.2)
 Other streptococcus 2 (1.2) 1 (0.6) 3 (1.8)
 bacillus species 2 (1.2) 2 (1.2) 4 (2.4)
 Gram-positive rod 4 (2.4) 8 (4.7) 12 (7.1)
 Subtotal 74 (80.4) 60 (79.2) 134 (79.9)
Gram-negative bacteria
 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 6 (3.5) 3 (1.8) 9 (5.3)
 Burkholderia cepacia 2 (1.2) 2 (1.2) 4 (2.4)
 Serratia marcescens 2 (1.2) 3 (1.8) 5 (3.0)
 Klebsiella species 4 (2.4) 0 (0.0) 4 (2.4)
 Proteus species 0 (0.0) 3 (1.8) 3 (1.8)
 Enterobacter clocae 2 (1.2) 0 (0.6) 2 (1.8)
 Sphingomonas paucimobilis 0 (0.0) 1 (0.6) 1 (0.6)
 Alcaligenes faecalis 0 (0.0) 1 (0.6) 1 (0.6)
 Morganella morganii 0 (0.0) 1 (0.6) 1 (0.6)
 Acinetobacter baumanii 0 (0.0) 1 (0.6) 1 (0.6)
 Providencia rettgeri 1 (0.6) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.6)
 Other non-fermentating bacilli 1 (0.6) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.6)
 Subtotal 18 (19.6) 15 (20.8) 33 (20.1)
Total 92 (100.0) 75 (100.0) 167 (100.0)

* n=Number of patients.

Table 2.
Comparison of demographic characteristics between the treatment success and failure groups
Treatment success Treatment failure p value
Age (yrs) 56.00±20.47 63.71±12.80 0.001
Pretreatment symptom duration 3.95±3.45 4.78±4.48 0.226
Hypopyon height (mm) 0.72±0.42 1.36±0.82 0.002
Ulcer size (mm2) 3.9±4.6 12.3±11.5 <0.001
Initial VA* (LogMAR) 1.19±0.90 2.16±0.98 <0.001

* VA=visual acuity.

Table 3.
Significant predictors for treatment failure in bacterial keratitis (Univariate analysis)
Predictor Variable Eyes Obtaining Outcome/Total Eyes (%) Odds ratio 95% CI p value
Age (years) 2.716 1.237∼5.967 0.013
 <60 12/49 (24.5)
 ≥60 37/79 (46.8)
Duration (days) 1.713 0.792∼3.703 0.171
 <5 31/90 (34.4)
 ≥5 18/38 (47.4)
Hypopyon 0.250 0.117∼0.533 <0.001
 Yes 29/50 (58.0)
 No 20/78 (25.6)
Culture (multi-infection) 2.118 0.960∼4.669 0.063
 Single 19/35 (54.3)
 Multiple 31/93 (33.3)
Deep infiltration 5.519 1.791∼17.002 0.003
 Yes 45/98 (45.9)
 No 4/30 (13.3)
Previous ocular disease 0.163 0.065∼0.413 <0.001
 Yes 20/28 (71.4)
 No 29/100 (29.0)
Trauma histroy 1.997 0.942∼4.233 0.071
 Yes 15/52 (28.8)
 No 34/76 (44.7)
Area (mm2) 10.646 4.496∼25.210 <0.001
 <7.0 18/86 (20.9)
 ≥7.0 31/42 (73.8)
Central 1.459 0.643∼3.312 0.367
 <3 mm 35/97 (36.1)
 ≥3 mm 14/31 (45/2)
Table 4.
Significant predictors for treatment failure in bacterial keratitis (Multivariate analysis)
Variable Odds ratio 95% CI* p value
Age 2.653 0.964∼6.918 0.059
Deep infiltration 1.089 0.638∼10.593 0.182
Hypopyon 0.652 0.303∼2.471 0.787
Previous ocular history 0.140 0.037∼0.398 <0.001
Size of ulcer 9.729 2.984∼23.799 <0.001

* CI=confidence interval.

Table 5.
Antibiotic susceptibility profiles for isolates recovered from bacterial culture in all cases from 2000 to 2007
Antibiotics 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total (%)
Gentamycin 4/4 3/4 7/12 3/13 8/14 9/10 9/10 15/21 58/88 (65.9)
Amikacin 4/4 3/4 2/4 4/6 3/3 2/2 6/6 1/4 25/33 (75.8)
Tobramycin 3/4 3/4 2/4 2/6 2/3 6/7 5/6 6/11 29/45 (64.4)
Tetracyclin 8/24 13/27 13/18 5/8 5/14 8/9 4/9 15/20 71/129 (55.0)
Erythromycin 11/20 14/23 10/17 4/8 10/14 5/8 4/5 14/18 72/113 (63.7)
Clindamycin 15/20 20/23 12/17 5/8 11/12 6/8 3/4 14/18 86/110 (78.2)
Chloramphenicol 1/4 1/4 1/1 1/1 9/9 - 1/1 1/1 15/21 (71.4)
Penicillin G - - 1/9 1/7 2/8 1/8 1/5 4/18 10/55 (18.2)
Ampicillin 5/24 6/27 6/12 1/4 5/9 2/2 2/4 0/1 27/83 (32.5)
Piperacillin 2/3 3/4 3/4 3/5 2/3 2/2 6/6 4/4 25/31 (80.6)
Oxacillin 7/20 10/23 11/17 3/7 5/10 4/7 3/4 9/18 52/106 (49.1)
Cefazolin 18/21 16/27 3/4 2/3 - - 2/4 0/2 41/61 (67.2)
Cefotaxime 4/4 3/4 1/1 - 1/1 1/1 4/4 1/2 15/17 (88.2)
Ceftazidime 3/4 4/4 2/3 1/3 3/3 1/1 5/5 4/4 23/27 (85.2)
Imipenem 4/4 4/4 3/4 5/6 5/5 4/4 7/7 3/5 34/38 (89.5)
Aztreonam 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/6 3/3 1/1 1/1 3/3 20/26 (76.9)
Teicoplanin 20/20 22/23 17/17 6/6 10/10 8/8 5/5 18/18 106/107 (99.1)
Vancomycin 20/20 22/23 17/17 8/8 14/14 9/9 5/5 19/19 114/115 (99.1)
Trimethoprim/ - - 10/10 9/13 10/16 7/11 8/11 21/21 65/82 (79.3)
Sulfamethoxazole
Ciprofloxacin 14/24 22/27 16/21 7/12 12/14 8/10 9/10 18/22 106/140 (75.7)
Moxifloxacin - - - - 1/1 9/9 5/5 18/18 33/33 (100.0)
Norfloxacin - - - - - 6/8 6/7 14/17 26/32 (81.3)
Levofloxacin - - - - 1/1 9/9 5/5 18/18 33/33 (100.0)
Linezolide - - - - 6/6 9/9 5/5 18/18 38/38 (100.0)
Ofloxacin - - - - 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 4/4 (100.0)
Gatifloxacin - - - - 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 4/4 (100.0)

* Not done.

Table 6.
Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Gram-positive bacteria from bacterial keratitis case grouped into two four-year study periods
2000 to 2003
2004 to 2007
2000 to 2007
p value
Susceptible n (%) Resistant n (%) Susceptible n (%) Resistant n (%) Susceptible n (%) Resistant n (%)
Gram (+)
 Oxacillin 31 (46.3) 36 (53.7) 21 (53.8) 18 (46.2) 52 (49.1) 54 (50.9) 0.452
 Cefazolin 36 (80) 9 (20) 0 (0) 1 (100) 36 (78.3) 10 (21.7) 0.055
 Vancomycin 57 (98.3) 1 (1.7) 47 (100) 0 (0) 104 (99.1) 1 (0.9) 0.366
 Ciprofloxacin 42 (66.7) 21 (33.3) 31 (79.5) 8 (20.5) 73 (71.6) 29 (28.4) 0.163

The p value is the comparison between the years 2000 to 2003 and 2004 to 2007.

Table 7.
Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Gram-negative bacteria from bacterial keratitis cases, grouped into two four-year study periods
2000 to 2003
2004 to 2007
2000 to 2007
p value
Susceptible n (%) Resistant n (%) Susceptible n (%) Resistant n (%) Susceptible n (%) Resistant n (%)
Gram (-)
 Ceftazidime 10 (71.4) 4 (28.6) 13 (100) 0 (0) 23 (85.2) 4 (14.8) 0.037
 Tobramycin 10 (55.6) 8 (44.4) 6 (54.5) 5 (45.5) 16 (55.2) 13 (44.8) 0.958
 Ciprofloxacin 13 (72.2) 5 (27.8) 15 (93.7) 1 (6.3) 28 (82.4) 6 (17.6) 0.100
 Piperacillin 11 (68.7) 5 (31.3) 14 (93.3) 1 (6.7) 25 (80.6) 6 (19.4) 0.083
 Gentamicin 11 (61.1) 7 (38.9) 12 (75) 4 (25) 23 (67.6) 11 (32.4) 0.388

The p value is the comparison between the years 2000 to 2003 and 2004 to 2007.

Table 8.
Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Staphylococcus epidermidis from bacterial keratitis cases, grouped into two four-year study periods
2000 to 2003
2004 to 2007
2000 to 2007
p value
Susceptible n (%) Resistant n (%) Susceptible n (%) Resistant n (%) Susceptible n (%) Resistant n (%)
S. epidermis
 Oxacillin 8 (47.1) 9 (52.9) 10 (45.5) 12 (54.5) 18 (46.2) 21 (53.8) 0.921
 Cefazolin 8 (66.7) 4 (33.3) 0 (0) 0 (0) 8 (66.7) 4 (33.3) -*
 Vancomycin 17 (100) 0 (0) 22 (100) 0 (0) 39 (100) 0 (0) -*
 Ciprofloxacin 15 (78.9) 4 (21.1) 17 (73.9) 6 (26.1) 32 (76.2) 10 (23.8) 0.496

* Can’t calculated.

The p value is the comparison between the years 2000 to 2003 and 2004 to 2007.

Table 9.
Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from bacterial keratitis cases, grouped into two four-year study periods
2000 to 2003
2004 to 2007
2000 to 2007
p value
Susceptible n (%) Resistant n (%) Susceptible n (%) Resistant n (%) Susceptible n (%) Resistant n (%)
P. aeruginosa
 Piperacillin 2 (40) 3 (60) 3 (100) 0 (0) 5 (62.5) 3 (37.5) 0.090
 Ceftazidime 4 (80) 1 (20) 2 (100) 0 (0) 6 (85.7) 1 (14.3) 0.495
 Gentamicin 3 (60) 2 (40) 3 (100) 0 (0) 6 (75) 2 (25) 0.206
 Amikacin 3 (75) 1 (25) 3 (100) 0 (0) 6 (85.7) 1 (14.3) 0.350
 Ciprofloxacin 3 (60) 2 (40) 3 (100) 0 (0) 6 (75) 2 (25) 0.206

The p value is the comparison between the years 2000 to 2003 and 2004 to 2007.

TOOLS
Similar articles