Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.50(10) > 1008382

Seo and Ahn: Morphological Changes of the Eyelid According to Age

Abstract

Purpose

The morphological changes of the eyelids according to gender among different age groups in Korea were analyzed.

Methods

Six-hundred adults without any ocular disease were selected, and sorted by age (ranging from 20 to 79 years), and gender. Each group consisted of 50 adults. Interpalpebral fissure (IPF), marginal reflex distance 1 (MRD1), amount of the upper lid, degree of browptosis, lateral hood width of the eyelid, and protrusion of the eyelid fat were measured. The measured values were analyzed to determine changes related to the aging process. Other age groups were analyzed and compared with the subjects between 20 and 30 years old, using the Student’s t-test with SPSS.

Results

MRD 1 and IPF slightly decreased with age, but there was no statistical significance. The upper lid amount showed a statistically significant increase at the 7th and 8th decade. The degree of browptosis showed a statistically significant increase from the 7th decade of age in men, and from the 6th decade in women. In particular, the lateral browptosis was more drooped than the center browptosis. The lateral hood width of the eyelid showed a statistically significant increase from the 7th decade of age in men, and from the 6th decade in women. Eyelid fat was most protruded at the central lower part, but there was no statistical significance.

Conclusions

It is important to understand the change related to aging in the study of eyelid morphology and eyelid operation. The results from present study may be used to determine standard for the safe amount of skin resection in Korean eyelid operations.

References

1. Sanke RF. Relationship of senile ptosis to age. Ann Ophthalmol. 1984; 16:928–931.
2. Goldberg B, Rabinovitch M. Connective tissue, in Histology. 4th ed.New York: McGraw-Hill;1977. p. 145–78.
3. Bailey AJ, Duance VC. Collagen in acquired connective tissue disease: An active or passive role? Eur J Clin Invest. 1980; 10:1–5.
4. Na KS. Upper blepharoplasty. Journal Korean Society of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery. 2004; 135.
5. Kim IS, Choi JB, Rah SH, Lee SY. Classification of ptosis in Korea. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2005; 46:1262–9.
6. Park DM, Song JW, Han KH, Kang JS. Anthropometry of normal Korean eyelids. Journal Korean Society of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery. 1990; 17:822–34.
7. Song WS, Kim YH, Lee SJ. Morphologic study of upper eyelid contour and functional evaluation of levator palpebrae superiors muscle in adult and young people. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2001; 42:1523–9.
8. Lee JS, On KK, Kim JD. Superior visual field on MRD1 and aging changes of MRD1. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1994; 35:884–8.
9. Yim HK, Son MS. A statistical study on the palprbral fissure in Korean. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1981; 22:333–40.
10. van den Bosch WA, Leenders I, Mulder P. Topographic anatomy of the eyelids, and the effects of sex and age. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999; 83:347–52.
crossref
11. Park JW, Lee BH, Jeong SK, Kim JB. Morphological evaluation of upper eyelid in Korean. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2000; 41:879–85.
12. Kim KC, Kim YW, Kim HB. The levator action in Korean. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1986; 27:995–9.
13. Park CY, Jeon SL, Woo KI, Chang HR. The frequency and aspects of ptosis in Korean old age. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2007; 48:205–10.
14. Moses RA. The eyelid. Moses RA, Adler's physiology of the eye, clinical application. 8th ed.St. Louis: Mosby;1987. p. 11–36.
15. Beard C. The surgical treatment of blepharoptosis: A quantitative approach. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1966; 64:404.
16. Cartwright MJ, Kurumetry UR, Nelson CC, et al. Measurements of upper eyelid and eyebrow dimentions in healthy white in-divisuals. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994; 117:231–4.
17. Moon CS, Moon SH, Jang JW. Topographic anatomic difference of the eyelid according to age in Korean. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2003; 44:1865–71.
18. Kunjur J, Sabesan T, Ilankovan V. Anthropometric analysis of eyebrow and eyelids: An inter-racial study. Br J Oral Maxillo-facial Surg. 2005; 44:89–93.
19. Hoenig JA. Comprehensive management of eyebrow and forehead ptosis. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2005; 38:947–84.
crossref
20. Brooth AJ, Murray A, Tyers AG. The direct brow lift: efficacy, complications, and patient satisfaction. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004; 88:688–91.
21. Scott M, Goldstein SM, Katowitz JA. The male eyebrow: a topographic anastomic analysis. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 21:285–91.
22. Har-Shai Y, Hirshowitz B. Extended upper blepharoplasty for lateral hooding of the upper eyelid using a scalpel-shaped excision: a 13-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 113:1028–35.
crossref
23. Shore JW, McCord CD Jr. Anatomic changes in involutional blepharoptosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984; 98:21–7.
crossref
24. Kim SY, Chung WS. Analysis of the cause of ptosis. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1995; 36:1649–54.
25. Camirand A, Doucet J, Harris J. Eyelid aging: the historical evolution of its management. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2005; 29:65–73.
crossref
26. Goldberg RA, McCann JD, Fiaschetti D, Ben Simon GJ. What causes eyelid bags? Analysis of 114 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 115:1395–402.
crossref

Figure 1.
Amount of upper lid (a) and width of lateral hood (b).
jkos-50-1461f1.tif
Table 1.
The mean of MRD1 (mm)
Age Male Female
20∼29 3.04±0.70 3.14±0.73
30∼39 3.02±0.60 3.12±0.48
40∼49 2.84±0.87 3.00±0.88
50∼59 2.54±0.76 2.72±0.45
60∼69 2.20±0.70 2.44±0.76
70∼79 1.98±0.80 2.08±0.63

Each group consisted of 50 adults.

Table 2.
The mean of interpalpebral fissure height (mm)
Age Male Female
20∼29 8.10±0.86 8.18±0.80
30∼39 8.08±0.88 8.12±0.85
40∼49 7.84±0.87 7.96±0.88
50∼59 7.58±0.95 7.70±0.86
60∼69 7.20±0.97 7.36±0.92
70∼79 6.96±0.81 7.17±0.78

Each group consisted of 50 adults.

Table 3.
The mean of upper lid amount (mm)
Age Male Female
20∼29 20.20±1.26 20.40±1.26
30∼39 20.70±1.37 21.08±1.56
40∼49 21.80±1.44 22.10±1.34
50∼59 22.66±1.15 22.80±1.14
60∼69 24.72±1.25* 25.12±1.38*
70∼79 25.24±1.39* 25.56±1.30*

Each group consisted of 50 adults.

* showed statistically significant difference (p<0.05).

Table 4.
The mean of browptosis (mm)
Age Male
Female
Medial Center Lateral Medial Center Lateral
20∼29 0.10±0.42 0.10±0.42 0.16±0.51 0.02±0.32 0.02±0.32 0.08±0.40
30∼39 0.16±0.37 0.16±0.37 0.20±0.40 0.10±0.42 0.10±0.42 0.14±0.45
40∼49 2.50±1.40 2.72±1.40 2.96±1.34 3.10±1.18 3.20±1.23 3.36±1.21
50∼59 3.12±1.21 3.36±1.10 3.58±1.13 4.02±1.08* 4.20±0.97* 4.46±1.03*
60∼69 4.26±0.90* 4.48±0.84* 4.74±0.75* 4.50±0.84* 4.80±1.05* 5.14±1.16*
70∼79 5.06±0.87* 5.48±0.97* 5.76±1.08* 5.38±1.18* 5.64±1.05* 5.92±1.10*

Each group consisted of 50 adults.

* showed statistically significant difference (p<0.05).

Table 5.
The mean of lateral hood width (mm)
Age Male Female
20∼29 0.30±0.76 0.40±0.88
30∼39 0.52±1.11 0.88±1.55
40∼49 3.44±1.13 3.86±1.31
50∼59 8.00±1.51 11.62±2.31*
60∼69 14.00±1.80* 14.08±2.08*
70∼79 16.26±1.19* 16.32±1.47*

Each group consisted of 50 adults.

* showed statistically significant difference (p<0.05).

Table 6.
The number over moderate degree of fat protrusion at upper lid
Age Male
Female
Medial Center Medial Center
40∼49 2 4 4 6
50∼59 0 5 2 5
60∼69 5 8 5 8
70∼79 12 17 14 16

Each group consisted of 50 adults, moderate degree of fat protrusion: +2, +3

Table 7.
The number over moderate degree of fat protrusion at lower lid
Age Male
Female
Medial Center Lateral Medial Center Lateral
40∼49 6 7 6 6 11 6
50∼59 6 12 10 6 12 10
60∼69 19 28 24 21 30 25
70∼79 30 38 30 28 42 32

Each group consisted of 50 adults, moderate degree of fat protrusion: +2, +3

TOOLS
Similar articles