Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.50(8) > 1008336

Jun, Min, and Woo: Clinical Characteristics of Traumatic Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

Abstract

Purpose:

To analyze the clinical characteristics and factors affecting visual outcome after surgery in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment resulting from blunt trauma.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 122 patients (122 eyes) who were diagnosed with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment after blunt trauma and who had been under regular observation for at least six months.

Results:

The frequency of traumatic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment was 122 eyes out of 989 total eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (12.3%). The mean age was 36.3 years (7-66): 93 (76.2%) male, 29 (23.8%) female. The most common type of retinal break was a horseshoe-shaped retinal tear (31.1%), and the most common location was the superotemporal quadrant (32.8%) and on the retinal equator or anterior to the equator (90.2%). Patients older than 50 years had a shorter latent period from the traumatic event to the symptom presentation (p=0.028). Whether the retinal detachment involve the macula, the extent of detachment, the initial visual acuity and the time interval from symptom presentation to treatment influenced on the postoperative visual recovery.

Conclusions:

Traumatic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment had a favorable visual recovery in cases of early diagnosis. Therefore, detailed and frequent examinations of the retinal periphery after ocular trauma are important if vision is to be preserved. Older patients showed a tendency to advance into traumatic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment more rapidly after trauma than did younger patients. Therefore, elderly patients will require special intensive treatment following traumatic retinal detachment.

References

1. Dolan BJ. Traumatic retinal detachment. Optom Clin. 1993; 3:67–80.
2. Dumas JJ. Retinal detachment following contusion of the eye. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1967; 7:19–38.
crossref
3. Goffstein R, Burton TC. Differenciating traumatic from non-traumatic retinal detachment. Ophthalmology. 1982; 89:361–8.
4. Schepens CL. Retinal detachment and allied disease. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 1983; 68–87.
5. Johnston PB. Traumatic retinal detachment. Br J Ophthalmol. 1991; 75:18–21.
crossref
6. Menezo JL, Suarez-Reynolds R, Francés J, Vila E. Shape, number and localization of retinal tears in myopic over 8D, aphakic and traumatic cases of retinal detachment. An experience report. Ophthalmologica. 1977; 175:10–8.
7. Wion VM, Burton TC. Retinal dialysis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980; 98:1971–4.
8. Freeman HM, Cox MS, Schepens CL. Traumatic retinal detachments. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1974; 14:151–70.
crossref
9. Soheilian M, Peyman GA, Wafapoor H, et al. Surgical management of traumatic retinal detachment with perfluorocarbon liquid. The Vitreon Study Group. Int Ophthalmol. 1996-1997; 20:241–9.
10. Chen YP, Chen TL, Chao AN, et al. Surgical management of traumatic macular hole-related retinal detachment. Am J Oph− thalmol. 2005; 140:331–3.
crossref
11. Aylward GW, Cooling RJ, Leaver PK. Trauma-induced retinal detachment associated with giant retinal tears. Retina. 1993; 13:136–41.
crossref
12. Cox MS, Schepens CL, Freeman HM. Retinal detachment due to ocular contusion. Arch Ophthalmol. 1966; 76:678–85.
crossref
13. Ross WH. Traumatic retinal dialysis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981; 99:1371–4.
14. Schepens CL. Pathogenesis of traumatic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Freeman HM, editor. Ocular trauma. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts;1979. 1:chap. 14.
15. Kinyoun JL, Knobloch WH. Idiopathic retinal dialysis. Retina. 1984; 4:9–14.
crossref
16. Campo RV, Sipperley JO, Sneed SR, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy without sclera buckle for pseudophakic retinal detachments. Ophthalmology. 1999; 106:1811–5.
17. Oshima Y, Yamanishi S, Sawa M, et al. Two-year follow-up study comparing primary vitrectomy with scleral buckling for macula− off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2000; 44:538–49.
18. Garty DS, Chignell AH, Franks WA, Wong D. pars plana vitrec-tomy for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment uncomplicated by advanced proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993; 77:199–203.
19. Wilkinson CP, Brandford RH Jr. Complications of draining subretinal fluid. Retina. 1984; 4:1–4.
crossref
20. Fetkenhour CL, Hauch TL. Scleral buckling without thermal adhesion. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980; 89:662–6.
crossref
21. Girard P, Minoun G, Karpouzas I, Montefiore G. Clinical risk for proliferative vitreoretinopathy after retinal detachment surgery. Retina. 1994; 14:417–24.
22. Kang SW, Min JP. Vitrectomy without sclera buckling for the treatment of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1997; 38:227–35.
23. Burton TC, Lambert RW. A predictive model for visual recovery following retinal detachment surgery. Ophthalmology. 1978; 85:619–25.
crossref
24. Ahmadieh H, Entezari M, Soheilian M. Factors influencing anatomic and visual results in primary scleral buckling. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2000; 10:153–9.
crossref
25. Tani P, Robertson DM, Langworthy A. Prognosis for central vision and anatomic reattachment in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with macula detached. Am J Ophthalmol. 1981; 92:611–20.
crossref
26. Park JL, Kim SD, Yun IH. A Clinical study of the rhegmato-genous retinal detachment. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2002; 43:1015–24.
27. Lattikainen L, Harju H, tolppanen EM. Post operative outcome in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol. 1985; 63:647–55.
28. Tani P, Robertson DM, Langworthy A. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment without macular involvement treated with sclera buckling. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980; 90:503–8.

Table 1.
Age and sex distribution of traumatic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
Age (years) Sex Total (%)
Male %   Female %
0~9 3 3.2   1 3.4 4 (3.3)
10~19 24 25.8   3 10.3 27 (22.1)
20~29 17 18.3   5 17.3 22 (18.0)
30~39 14 15.1   4 13.8 18 (14.8)
40~49 18 19.3   4 13.8 22 (18.0)
50~59 9 9.7   4 13.8 13 (10.7)
≥60 8 8.6   8 27.6 16 (13.1)
Total 93 100   29 100 122 (100)
Table 2.
Comparison between traumatic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and non-traumatic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
  Traumatic RRD Non-traumatic RRD Total p-value
Number of eyes 122 867 989  
Male/Female 93/29 504/363 597/392 0.000
Mean age (years) 36.3 45.8 44.7 0.000
Number of high myopia (%) 15 (12.3) 232 (26.8) 247 (25.0) 0.001

RRD=rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Examined with Pearson Chi-square test

Examined with independent Ttest.

Table 3.
Associated ocular injury
  Number of eyes (%)
Vitreous hemorrhage 17 (13.9)
Lens subluxation 11 (9.0)
Hyphema 7 (5.7)
Blow-out fracture 3 (2.5)
None 84 (68.9)
Total 122 (100)
Table 4.
Time interval from injury to symptom presentation
Time interval Age < 50 years
Age ≥ 50 years
Number of eyes % Number of eyes %
< 1 day 7 7.5 8 27.6
1 day ~ 4 weeks 29 31.2 10 34.5
4 weeks ~ 4 months 32 34.4 7 24.2
4 months~ 8 months 15 16.1 3 10.3
> 8 months 10 10.8 1 3.4
Total 93 100 29 100
Table 5.
Characteristics of traumatic retinal break and detachment (N=122)
Character Number of eyes (%)
Type of breaks  
 Horse-shoe tear 38 (31.1)
 Dialysis 29 (23.8)
 Round hole 22 (18.0)
 Cluster of atrophic holes 16 (13.1)
 Oval or streak like break 10 (8.2)
 Giant tear 7 (5.7)
Quadrantric location of breaks  
 Superotemporal quadrant 40 (32.8)
 Superonasal quadrant 34 (27.9)
 Inferotemporal quadrant 31 (25.4)
 Inferonasal quadrant 17 (13.9)
Equatorial location of breaks  
 Anterior to equator 110 (90.2)
 Posterior to equator 12 (9.8)
Extent of retinal detachment  
 One quadrant 29 (23.8)
 Two quadrant 47 (38.5)
 Three quadrant 10 (8.2)
 Four quadrant 36 (29.5)
Table 6.
Treatment methods and success rate
Methods Number of eyes Anatomic success (%) Functional success (%)
Scleral buckling 81 69 (85.2) 37 (45.7)
Vitrectomy 30 26 (86.7) 10 (33.3)
Total 111 95 (85.6) 47 (42.3)
Examined with Pearson Chi-square test.   (p=0.844) (p=0.242)
Table 7.
Causes of reattachment failure
Causes of failure Number of eyes (%)
Proliferative vitreoretinopathy 11 (68.8)
New break 4 (25)
Epiretinal membrane 1 (6.2)
Total 16 (100)
Table 8.
Preoperative and operative variables and surgical success rate (N=111)
Variables Number of eyes Anatomic success (%) p-value Functional success (%) p-value
Age     0.424   0.172
  <50 years 85 74 (87.1)   39 (45.9)  
  ≥50 years 26 21 (80.8)   8 (30.8)  
Sex     0.366   0.267
  Male 86 75 (87.2)   34 (39.5)  
  Female 25 20 (80.0)   13 (52.0)  
Refractive error     0.146   0.715
  <-6D 96 84 (87.5)   40 (41.7)  
  ≥-6D 15 11 (73.3)   7 (46.7)  
Lens status     0.804   0.051
  Phakia 100 86 (86.0)   45 (45.0)  
  Pseudophakia 11 9 (81.8)   2 (18.2)  
Visual acuity     0.012   0.058
  >20/200 44 43 (97.7)   20 (45.5)  
  CF 33 26 (78.8)   18 (54.5)  
  HM 34 26 (76.5)   9 (26.5)  
Initial IOP     0.152   0.172
  <10 mmHg 26 20 (76.9)   8 (30.8)  
  ≥10 mmHg 85 75 (88.2)   39 (45.9)  
Associated ocular injury     0.065   0.207
  Vitreous hemorrhage 17 13 (76.4)   6 (35.3)  
  Lens subluxation 11 8 (72.7)   4 (36.4)  
  Hyphema 7 5 (71.4)   2 (28.6)  
  Blow-out fracture 3 2 (66.7)   1 (33.3)  
  No other injury 73 67 (91.8)   34 (46.6)  
Type of trauma     0.222   0.705
  Direct trauma 83 73 (88.0)   36 (46.4)  
  Indirect trauma 28 22 (78.6)   11 (39.3)  
Time interval     0.059   0.007
  <1 week 55 50 (90.9)   31 (56.3)  
  1 week ~ 4 weeks 37 32 (86.5)   14 (37.8)  
  >4 weeks 19 13 (68.4)   2 (10.5)  
Type of breaks     0.106   0.204
  Horse-shoe tear 32 29 (90.6)   13 (40.6)  
  Dialysis 29 21 (72.4)   9 (31.0)  
  Round hole 20 19 (95.0)   11 (55.0)  
  Cluster of atrophic holes 14 14 (100)   7 (50.0)  
  Oval or streak like break 9 8 (88.9)   5 (55.6)  
  Giant tear 7 4 (57.1)   2 (28.6)  
Location of breaks     0.688   0.457
  Superotemporal quadrant 37 33 (89.2)   17 (45.9)  
  Superonasal quadrant 31 27 (87.1)   17 (54.8)  
  Inferotemporal quadrant 28 23 (82.1)   10 (35.7)  
  Inferonasal quadrant 15 12 (80.0)   5 (33.3)  
Extent of RD     0.039   0.000
  One quadrant 18 17 (94.4)   12 (66.7)  
  Two quadrant 47 43 (97.7)   28 (59.6)  
  Three quadrant 10 8 (80.0)   4 (40.0)  
  Four quadrant 36 27 (75.0)   3 (8.3)  
Macular involvement     0.001   0.004
  Yes 69 53 (76.8)   22 (31.9)  
  No 42 42 (100)   25 (59.5)  

Examined with logistic regression.

TOOLS
Similar articles