Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.50(1) > 1008308

Lee, Lee, and Kim: The Relationship Between Intraocular Pressure and Health Parameters

Abstract

Purpose

This study analyzed the relationship between intraocular pressure (IOP) and health parameters, including waist circumference, in healthy Koreans.Methods: A total of 6169 healthy participants underwent automated multi-phasic tests including tonometry, automated perimetry, and fundus photography. Parameters of these patients including height, weight, degree of obesity, body fat percentage, waist circumference, body mass index, and body muscle rate, were recorded. The subjects were divided into six age groups by decades ranging from 20∼29 years to over 70 years. Multiple regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between IOP and the parameters mentioned above.Results: The mean age of the participants was 47.87 years, and 3015 (51.1%) of the participants were men. The mean IOP was 13.58±3.1 mmHg, and was significantly higher in men than in women (p<0.05). The prevalence of ocular hypertension was 2.0% in men and 2.2% in women. IOP was associated with gender, age, height, weight, degree of obesity, body fat percentage, waist circumference, and body mass index (p<0.05). The relation between IOP and age showed a significantly negative tendency (p<0.05). Height, weight, degree of obesity, body fat percentage, waist circumference, and body mass index had a significantly positive relation with IOP (p<0.05). There was no significant relation between IOP and body muscle percentage (p>0.05).Conclusions: Because increased IOP is associated with several health parameters that can be modified by diet and exercise such as weight, body fat percentage, body mass index, and waist circumference, it is recommended that these be reduced.

References

1. Meckenzie W. Practical treatise on the disease of the eye. 2nd. London: Longman;1835. p. 822.
2. Jung SK, Lee SK, Kim JH. Intraocular pressure change by the hemodialysis. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1995; 36:2195–201.
3. Drance S, Sweeney U, Morgan R. Studies of factors involved in the production of low-tension glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1973; 89:457–65.
4. Gasser P. Ocular vasospasm: A risk factor in the pathogenesis of low tension glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol. 1989; 13:281–90.
5. Rojanapongpun P, Drance SM. The response of blood flow velocity in the ophthalmic artery and cold stimuli in glaucomatous patients. Graefe Arch Clin Ophthalmol. 1993; 231:375–7.
6. Demailly P, Cambien F, Plouin PF. Do patient with low tension glaucoma have particular cardiovascular characteristics? Ophthalmologica. 1984; 188:65–75.
7. Kaiser HJ, Flammer J. Systemic hypotension: a risk factor for glaucomatous damage? Ophthalmologica. 1991; 203:105–8.
8. Hollows FC, Graham PA. Intraocular pressure, glaucoma and glaucoma suspects in a defined population. Br J Ophthalmol. 1966; 50:570–86.
crossref
9. Carel RS, Korczyn AD, Rock M, Goya I. Association between ocular pressure and certain health parameters. Ophthalmology. 1984; 91:311–4.
crossref
10. Schulzer M, Drance SM. Intraocular pressure, systemic blood pressure, and age: a correlation study. Br J Ophthalmol. 1987; 71:245–9.
11. Kahn HA, Leibowwitz HM, Ganly JP. . The Framlingham Eye Study: 2. Association of ophthalmic pathology with single variables previously measured in Framlingham Heart Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1977; 106:33–41.
12. Shiose Y, Kawase Y. A new approach to stratified normal intraocular pressure in a general population. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986; 101:714–21.
crossref
13. Shiose Y. The aging effect on intraocular pressure in an apparently normal population. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984; 102:883–7.
crossref
14. Qureshi IA. Intraocular pressure: a comparative analysis in two sexes. Clin Physiol. 1997; 17:247–55.
crossref
15. Nomura H, Shimokata H, Ando F. . Age-related changes in intraocular pressure in a large Japanese population. Ophthalmology. 1999; 106:2016–22.
crossref
16. Leske MC, Connell AM, Wu SY. . Distribution of intraocular pressure: the Barbados Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997; 115:1051–7.
17. Mori K, Ando F, Nomura H. . Relationship between intraocular pressure and obesity in Japan. Int J Epidimiol. 2000; 29:661–6.
crossref
18. Lee JS, Kim CM, Choi HY, Oum BS. A relationship between Intraocular pressure and Age and Body Mass Index in a Korean Population. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2003; 44:1559–66.
19. Kwon GR, Kang SW, Kee CW. The Influence of Central Corneal Thickness on Intraocular Pressures Measured with Goldmann Applanation Tonometer and Non-contact Tonometer. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1998; 39:1494–8.
20. Bae GJ, Han TW, Ahn MD, Kim JH. Comparison of the Noncontact Tonometer with Goldmann Tonometer. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1992; 33:642–8.
21. Kass MA, Zimmerman TJ, Alton E. . Intraocular pressure and glaucoma in the Zuni Indians. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978; 96:2212–3.
crossref
22. Klein BE, Klein R, Linton KL. Intraocular pressure in an American community. The Beave Dam Eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992; 33:2224–8.
23. Stoupel E, Goldenfeld M, Shimshoni M, Siegel R. Intraocular pressure in relation to four levels of daily geomagnetic and extreme yearly solar activity. Int J Biometeorol. 1993; 37:42–5.
24. Bulpitt CJ, Hodes C, Everott MG. Intraocular pressure and systemic blood pressure in the elderly. Br J Ophthalmol. 1975; 59:717–20.
crossref
25. Kass MA, Sears ML. Hormonal regulation of intraocular pressure. Surv Ophthalmol. 1977; 22:153–76.
crossref
26. Matsuki S, Suzuki A. Definition, judgement and epidemiology of obesity. Clin Adult Dis. 1979; 9:919–23.
27. Jung SC, Choi YR, Lee JS. The Relationship between Intraocular Pressure and Cardiovascular Risk Factors. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2003; 44:1559–66.
28. Katavisto M, Sammalkivi J. Tonometry among persons over 40 years of age. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1964; 42:370–7.
29. Perry AC, Applegate EB, Allison ML. . Relation between anthropometric measures of fat distribution and cardiovascular risk factors in overweight pre- and postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997; 66:829–36.
crossref
30. Seidell JC, Han TS, Feskens EJ, Lean ME. Narrow hips and broad waist circumference independently contribute to increased risk of noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Intern Med. 1997; 242:401–6.
31. Han TS, Bijnen FC, Lean ME, Seidell JC. Separate associations of waist and hip circumference with lifestyle factors. Int J Epidemiol. 1998; 27:422–30.
crossref
32. Fujioka S, Matsuzawa Y, Tokunaga K, Tauri S. Contribution of intra-abdominal fat accumulation to the impairment of glucose and lipid metabolism in human obesity. Metabolism. 1987; 36:54–9.
crossref
33. Kwon OH, Lee KM, No TM. . Cardiovascular risk factors in men with normal and overweight according to waist- to-height ratio. J Korean Acad Fam Med. 2001; 22:1757–64.

Table 1.
Percent distribution of age and gender
Age (Years) Female Case (%) Male Case (%) Total Case (%)
20-29 106 (3.5) 102 (3.2) 208 (3.4)
30-39 609 (20.2) 535 (17.0) 1144 (18.5)
40-49 1070 (35.5) 1185 (37.6) 2255 (36.6)
50-59 818 (27.1) 862 (27.3) 1680 (27.2)
60-69 345 (11.4) 408 (12.9) 753 (12.2)
≥70 67 (2.2) 62 (2.0) 129 (2.1)
Total 3015 3154 6169
Table 2.
Mean values of age, intraocular pressure and health parameters by gender
Variables Female Male Total
Mean age (years) 47.61±10.5 48.13±10.2 47.87±10.3
Mean IOP (mmHg)§ 13.58±3.1 14.34±3.3 13.97±3.2
Mean Height (Cm)§ 157.57±5.2 170.09±5.7 163.97±8.3
Mean Weight (Kg)§ 58.192±7.5 70.594±9.2 64.533±10.5
Degree of obesity (%)§ 114.49±15.1 112.84±13.0 113.65±14.1
Mean Body Fat Rate (%)§ 28.501±5.1 20.378±4.6 24.348±6.3
Mean Waist Circumference (Cm) 77.11±8.0 85.67±7.4 81.49±8.8
BMI (Kg/m2) 23.45±2.9 24.38±2.7 23.93±2.8
Mean Body Muscle Rate (%) 38.56±3.8 52.40±5.8 45.64±8.5

Values are given as a mean± standard deviation

Intraocular pressure

Body mass index: weight (kg) devided by height (m) squar

§ P value<0.05.

Table 3.
Nunbers of ocular hypertension in each gender group
Age (Years) Female (Case, %) Male (Case, %) Total (Case, %)
N Ocular HT N Ocular HT N Ocular HT
20-29 106 (3.5) 1 (.9) 102 (3.2) 6 (5.9) 208 (3.4) 7 (3.4)
30-39 609 (20.2) 9 (1.5) 535 (17.0) 26 (4.9) 1144 (18.5) 35 (3.1)
40-49 1070 (35.5) 23 (2.1) 1185 (37.6) 60 (5.1) 2255 (36.6) 83 (3.7)
50-59 818 (27.1) 28 (3.4) 862 (27.3) 47 (5.5) 1680 (27.2) 75 (4.5)
60-69 345 (11.4) 14 (4.1) 408 (12.9) 23 (5.6) 753 (12.2) 37 (4.9)
≥70 67 (2.2) 0 (.0) 62 (2.0) 2 (3.2) 129 (2.1) 2 (1.6)
Total 3015 (48.9) 67 (2.2) 3154 (51.1) 62 (2.0) 6169 (100.0) 129 (2.1)

Ocular HT (hypertension) – IOP greater than 21mmHg without visual field defect or glaucomatous optic disc abnormalities

(No. of each age group/Total No. of subject)×100;

(No. of ocular HT/Total No. of each age group)×100.

Table 4.
Number and characteristic of subjects in each group
Female
Group N Mean IOP†(mmHg) Mean Height (Cm) Mean Weight (Kg) Degree of obesity (%) Mean Body Fat Rate (%) C Mean Waist Circumference (Cm) BMI(Kg/m2) Mean Body Muscle Rate (%)
20-29 106 13.14±3.1 161.54±5.9 53.687±8.3 98.40±11.7 25.568±5.1 69.22±6.2 20.53±2.4 37.23±5.1
30-39 609 12.86±3.2 159.92±5.0 57.035±8.1 107.74±14.8 26.503±5.0 73.44±7.5 22.31±2.9 38.85±4.0
40-49 1070 13.74±3.0 158.01±4.8 58.324±7.2 113.76±13.6 27.903±4.8 76.21±7.0 23.36±2.7 38.99±3.7
50-59 818 13.91±3.0 156.42±4.7 59.137±7.2 118.50±13.8 29.738±4.7 79.49±7.5 24.17±2.7 38.53±3.6
60-69 345 13.72±3.1 154.60±5.1 58.857±7.2 121.79±14.4 30.906±4.9 81.82±7.5 24.62±2.7 37.67±3.8
≥70 67 13.64±2.7 152.33±5.0 58.757±8.4 126.45±17.0 33.376±4.7 84.06±7.8 25.31±3.3 36.20±3.7
Total 3015 13.58±3.1 157.57±5.2 58.192±7.5 114.49±15.1 28.501±5.1 77.11±8.0 23.45±2.9 38.56±3.8
P <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Male
20-29 102 13.85±3.6 174.38±5.6 72.228±10.9 107.94±14.4 18.307±5.4 81.47±8.4 23.71±3.1 54.60±6.7
30-39 535 14.14±3.4 172.21±5.5 73.047±10.5 113.13±14.2 19.924±5.1 85.03±8.0 24.65±3.0 54.57±6.0
40-49 1185 14.48±3.3 170.76±5.5 71.244±8.9 112.64±12.7 19.924±4.4 85.50±7.1 24.41±2.7 53.18±5.6
50-59 862 14.50±3.2 168.75±5.2 69.669±8.5 113.72±12.5 20.895±4.4 86.43±7.1 24.45±2.6 51.37±5.4
60-69 408 14.11±3.3 167.64±5.6 67.838±8.3 112.74±12.2 21.438±4.4 86.38±7.4 24.12±2.5 49.67±5.1
≥70 62 13.73±3.4 166.55±4.9 65.334±8.1 110.52±12.7 22.216±4.7 86.42±8.1 23.54±2.6 47.20±4.5
Total 3154 14.34±3.3 170.09±5.7 70.594±9.2 112.84±13.0 20.378±4.6 85.67±7.4 24.38±2.7 52.40±5.8
P .037 <0.001 <0.001 .001 <0.001 <0.001 .001 <0.001

Values are given as a mean± standard deviation;

Intraocular pressure

Body mass index: weight (kg) devided by height (m) squar.

Table 5.
Relation of IOP with gender, age, height, weight, Degree of obesity, Body Fat Rate, Waist circumference, BMI, Body Muscle Rate
Variable Coefficient Standard error P-value
Gender .013 .083 <0.001
Age .002 .004 <0.001
Height .002 .005 .001
Weight .015 .004 <0.001
Degree of obesity .012 .003 <0.001
Body Fat Rate .010 .005 <0.001
Waist circumference .017 .005 <0.001
BMI .016 .014 <0.001
Body Muscle Rate .000 .007 .440

Body mass index: weight (kg) devided by height (m) squar.

Table 6.
Adjusted mean intraocular pressure (mean, standard error) by age
Age (Years) Female Male
Mean IOP Standard error Mean IOP Standard error
20-29 13.14 .316 13.85 .322
30-39 12.86 .132 14.14 .140
40-49 13.74 .099 14.48 .094
50-59 13.91 .114 14.50 .111
60-69 13.72 .175 14.10 .161
≥70 13.64 .397 13.73 .413
P .037 .000

Adjusted for health parameters by ANACOVA test

P value for linear trend

Table 7.
Adjusted mean intraocular pressure (mean, standard error) by height
Height (Cm) Female Male
Mean IOP Standard error Mean IOPS Standard error
≤149 14.07 .235 14.00 2.301
150-159 13.73 .078 14.61 .359
160-169 13.29 .101 14.51 .089
170-179 12.60 .515 14.25 .082
≥180 11.00 3.255 13.71 .261
P .000 .031

Adjusted for health parameters by ANACOVA test

P value for linear trend.

Table 8.
Adjusted mean intraocular pressure (mean, standard error) by weight
Weight (Kg) Female Male
Mean IOP Standard error Mean IOP Standard error
≤39 12.50 1.029 12.50 2.302
40-49 13.36 .172 13.36 .694
50-59 13.51 .083 13.90 .175
60-69 13.65 .108 14.22 .095
70-79 14.10 .253 14.53 .096
80-89 15.11 .528 14.63 .168
≥90 15.50 2.302 14.43 .351
P .005 .011

Adjusted for health parameters by ANACOVA test

P value for linear trend.

Table 9.
Adjusted mean intraocular pressure (mean, standard error) by Degree of obesity
Degree of obesity (%) Female Male
Mean IOP Standard erro orMean IOP Standard error
≤79 12.00 1.449 13.08 .936
80-89 12.65 .327 12.94 .347
90-99 13.05 .170 14.08 .167
100-109 13.50 .120 13.97 .114
110-119 13.54 .114 14.45 .107
≥120 13.97 .101 14.82 .106
P .000 .000

Adjusted for health parameters by ANACOVA test

P value for linear trend.

Table 10.
Adjusted mean intraocular pressure (mean, standard error) by Body Fat Rate
Body Fat Rate (%) Female Male
Mean IOP Standard error Mean IOP Standard error
≤9 9.00 3.241 12.68 .556
10-19 12.88 .277 14.02 .086
20-29 13.33 .080 14.66 .081
30-39 13.99 .095 14.46 .367
≥40 15.05 .512 . .
P .000 .000

Adjusted for health parameters by ANACOVA test

P value for linear trend.

Table 11.
Adjusted mean intraocular pressure (mean, standard error) by waist circumference
waist circumference (Cm) e Female Male
Mean IOP Standard error Mean IOP Standard error
≤59 12.00 1.084 15.00 3.252
60-69 13.22 .141 13.59 .427
70-79 13.51 .086 14.01 .134
80-89 13.75 .113 14.33 .082
90-99 14.33 .233 14.61 .115
≥100 15.23 .693 14.72 .310
P .000 .010

Adjusted for health parameters by ANACOVA test

P value for linear trend.

Table 12.
Adjusted mean intraocular pressure (mean, standard error) by BMI
BMI (Kg/m2) Female Male
Mean IOP Standard error Mean IOP Standard error
≤19 13.06 .185 13.35 .262
20-24 13.49 .075 14.18 .079
25-29 13.90 .120 14.67 .092
≥30 14.86 .356 14.79 .361
P .000 .000

Adjusted for health parameters by ANACOVA test

P value for linear trend.

Table 13.
Adjusted mean intraocular pressure (mean, standard error) by Body mass rate
Body mass rate (%) Female Male
Mean IOP Standard error Mean IOP Standard error
≤29 12.65 .729 . .
30-39 13.60 .073 13.94 .551
40-49 13.58 .103 14.21 .100
50-59 12.87 .842 14.41 .078
≥60 16.00 3.261 14.44 .181
P .527 .384

Adjusted for health parameters by ANACOVA test

P value for linear trend.

TOOLS
Similar articles