Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.49(3) > 1008208

Park and Kim: The Changes of With-the-rule Astigmatism After Clear Corneal Temporal Incision Cataract Surgery

Abstract

Purpose

The effect of suture presence or position of intraocular lens was evaluated on the astigmatic changes in cataract patients suffering from with-the-rule astigmatism who underwent temporal clear corneal incision cataract surgeries.

Methods

According to the presence or absence of suture and the lens position (either 180˚ or 90˚), 49 eyes of 47 patients were divided into four groups. Astigmatism was determined using an autorefractor and by topography before surgery, and at one day, one week, one month, and two months after surgery.

Results

The suture group showed significant reduction in astigmatism at postoperative day 1 and week 1 by autorefractor and topography compared with the non-suture group. The group with intraocular lens insertion axis at 180˚ did not show significant reduction of astigmatism by autorefractor evaluation. Astigmatism determination by topography in this group was 1.00±0.73D, 1.01±0.77D and 1.01±0.81D at postoperative week 1, month 1, and month 2, respectively, and this showed significant reduction of astigmatism compared with preoperative astigmatism (1.32±1.17D) and group with intraocular lens insertion axis at 90˚. In particular, the group with the sutured temporal incision and with an inserted intraocular lens axis at 180˚ showed significant reduction of astigmatism by autorefraction.

Conclusions

When performing cataract surgery in with-the-rule astigmatism patients, suturing the temporal incision and inserting the intraocular lens axis at 180˚ can reduce astigmatism and minimize the effect of surgically-induced astigmatism.

References

1. Tejedor J, Murube J. Choosing the location of corneal incision based on preexisting astigmatism in phacoemulsification. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005; 139:767–76.
crossref
2. Khokhar S, Lohiya P, Murugiesan V. Corneal astigmatism correction with opposite clear cornal incisions or single clear corneal incision: Comparative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:1432–37.
3. Bayramlar H, Daglioglu MC, Borazan M. Limbal relaxing incisions for primary mixed astigmatism and mixed astigmatism after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 23:723–28.
crossref
4. Barequet IS, Yu E, Vitale S, et al. Astigmatism outcomes of horizontal temporal versus nasal clear corneal incision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30:418–23.
crossref
5. Kaufmann C, Peter J, Oou K, et al. Limbal relaxing incisions versus on-axis incisions to reduce corneal astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31:2261–5.
crossref
6. Wang L, Misra M, Koch D. Peripheral corneal relaxing incisions combined with cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 23:712–22.
crossref
7. Seo JB, Joo CK. Long-term course of induced astigmatism after temporal clear corneal incision in cataract surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1999; 40:3038–43.
8. Shepherd JR. Induced astigmatism in small incision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1989; 15:85–8.
crossref
9. Cravy TV. Routine use of a lateral approach to cataract extraction to achieve rapid and sustained stabilization of postoperative astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1991; 17:415–23.
crossref
10. Vasavada A, Singh R. Relationship between lens and capsular bag size. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998; 24:547–51.
crossref
11. Axt JC, McCaffery JM. Reduction of postoperative against the-rule astigmatism by lateral incision technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993; 19:380–86.
12. Maloney WF, Sanders DR, Pearcy DE. Astigmatic keratotomy to correct preexisting astigmatism in cataract patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990; 16:297–304.
crossref
13. Muller-Jensen K, Fischer P, Siepe U. Limbal relaxing incisions to correct astigmatism in clear corneal cataract surgery. J Refract Surg. 1999; 15:586–89.
14. Wang L, Misra M, Koch DD. Peripheral corneal relaxing incisions combined with cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29:712–22.
crossref
15. Ruhswurm I, Scholz U, Zehetmayer M, et al. Astigmatism correction with a foldable toric intraocular lens in cataract patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000; 26:1022–27.
crossref
16. Sun X-Y, Vicary D, Montgomery P, Griffiths M. Toric intraocular lenses for correcting astigmatism in 130 eyes. Ophthalmology. 2000; 107:1776–81.
crossref
17. Kohnen T, Koch DD. Methods to control astigmatism in cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1996; 7:75–80.
crossref
18. Lever J, Dahan E. Opposite clear corneal incision to correct preexisting astigmatism in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000; 26:803–5.
19. Borasio E, Mehta JS, Maurino V. Torque and flattening effects of clear corneal temporal and on-axis incisions for phacoenul-sification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:2030–8.
20. Dick HB, Schwenn O, Krummenauer F, et al. Inflammation after sclerocorneal versus clear corneal tunnel phacoemulsification. Ophthalmology. 2000; 107:241–7.
crossref
21. Moon SC, Mohamed T, Fine IH. Comparison of surgically induced astigmatisms after clear corneal incisions of different sizes. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2007; 21:1–5.
crossref
22. Pfleger T, Skorpik C, Menapace R, et al. Long-term course of induced astigmatism after clear corneal incision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996; 22:72–7.
crossref
23. Axt JC, McCaffery JM. Reduction of postoperative against-the-rule astigmatism by lateral incision technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993; 19:380–6.
crossref
24. Cillno S, Morreale D, Mauceri A. Temporal versus superior approach phacoemulsification: Short-term postoperative astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997; 23:267–71.
25. Rao SN, Konowal A, Murchison AE, Epstein RJ. Enlargement of the temporal clear corneal cataract incision to treat preexisting astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002; 18:463–67.
crossref
26. Barequet IS, Yu E, Vitale S, Cassard S, et al. Astigmatism outcomes of horizontal temporal versus nasal clear corneal incision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30:418–23.
crossref
27. Masket S. Keratorefractive aspects of the scleral pocket incision and closure method for cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1989; 15:70–7.
crossref
28. Gimbel HV, Sun R. Postoperative astigmatism following phacoemulsification with sutured versus unsutured wound. Can J Ophthalmol. 1993; 28:259–62.
29. Pham DT, Wollensak J, Drosch S. Early postoperative corneal astigmatism. Comparison of various suture techniques. Ophthalmologe. 1992; 89:305–9.

Figure 1.
Sheme of intraocular lens insertion axis of a patient's right eye. Imaginary line of haptic-optic-haptic lying horizontally is defined to be inserted at 180° axis (Left) and vertically is defined to be at 90° axis (Right).
jkos-49-433f1.tif
Figure 2.
The changes of mean astigmatism in suture and no suture groups by topography measurement (A), autorefractor measurement (B). (* P<0.05)
jkos-49-433f2.tif
Figure 3.
The changes of mean astigmatism in 180° axis IOL and 90° axis IOL group by topography measurement (A), autorefractor measurement (B). (* P<0.05)
jkos-49-433f3.tif
Figure 4.
The changes of mean astigmatism in each groups by autorefractor measurement. (* P<0.05) Group I=suture+Haptic 180° group. Group II=suture+Haptic 90° group. Group III=no suture+Haptic 180° group. Group IV=no suture+Haptic 90° group.
jkos-49-433f4.tif
Figure 5.
The changes of mean astigmatism in each group by keratometric measurement. (* P<0.05) Group I=suture+Haptic 180° group. Group II=suture+Haptic 90° group. Group III=no suture+Haptic 180° group. Group IV=no suture+Haptic 90° group.
jkos-49-433f5.tif
Table 1.
Dermographics and preoperative astigmatism of each group
  Group I Group II Group III Group IV P-value
Eye 12 11 12 14  
Age 59.36±11.79 45.60±16.86 55.67±12.32 58.57±13.59 0.319
Gender (F:M) 7:5 5:6 8:4 6:8  
Autorefractor: Cylinder (D) 1.70±1.38 1.43±0.76 0.96±0.91 1.53±1.36 0.461
Topography: Sim K's (D) 1.67±0.52 1.02±0.62 0.88±0.54 1.48±0.26 0.110

Group I=suture+Haptic 180° group; Group II=suture+Haptic 90° group; Group III=no suture+Haptic 180° group; Group IV=no suture+Haptic 90° group.

Table 2.
The change of mean astigmatism in suture and no suture groups by autorefractor and topography measurement (Diopter)
  Suture Group (Group I+II) No suture Group (Group III+IV) P-value
Autorefractor      
 Preoperative 1.54±1.10 1.27±1.13 0.971
 Postoperative 1 day 1.25±0.68 1.40±1.30 0.016
 Postoperative 1 week 1.09±0.69 1.23±1.09 0.026
 Postoperative 1 month 1.20±0.88 1.29±1.06 0.808
 Postoperative 2 months 1.20±0.86 1.33±1.02 0.061
Topography      
 Preoperative 1.55±1.15 1.21±0.79 0.466
 Postoperative 1 week 1.35±0.89 1.53±1.07 0.036
 Postoperative 1 month 1.52±0.93 1.51±1.08 0.585
 Postoperative 2 months 1.44±0.90 1.49±1.11 0.446

Group I=suture+Haptic 180° group; Group II=suture+Haptic 90° group; Group III=no suture+Haptic 180° group; Group IV=no suture+Haptic 90° group.

Table 3.
The change of mean astigmatism in IOL insertion axis groups by autorefractor and topography measurement (Diopter)
  Haptic 180° Group (Group I+III) Haptic 90° Group (Group II+IV) P-value
Autorefractor      
 Preoperative 1.32±1.17 1.46±1.09 0.971
 Postoperative 1 day 1.28±1.00 1.39±1.15 0.621
 Postoperative 1 week 1.00±0.73 1.34±1.09 0.051
 Postoperative 1 month 1.01±0.77 1.49±1.11 0.050
 Postoperative 2 months 1.01±0.81 1.53±1.30 0.048
Topography      
 Preoperative 1.40±1.14 1.30±0.79 0.466
 Postoperative 1 week 1.34±0.88 1.56±1.11 0.537
 Postoperative 1 month 1.42±0.95 1.61±1.07 0.585
 Postoperative 2 months 1.29±0.97 1.65±1.05 0.446

Group I=suture+Haptic 180° group; Group II=suture+Haptic 90° group; Group III=no suture+Haptic 180° group; Group IV=no suture+Haptic 90° group.

TOOLS
Similar articles