The Antimydriatic Effect of Brimonidine 0.15% on the Dark-adapted Pupil in Dark Brown Irides

Seung Soo Rho; Hong Seok Yang; Ho Min Lew; Jae Hong Ahn

doi:10.3341/jkos.2008.49.10.1649

Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.49(10) > 1008108

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Soo Rho, Seok Yang, Min Lew, and Hong Ahn: The Antimydriatic Effect of Brimonidine 0.15% on the Dark-adapted Pupil in Dark Brown Irides

Original Article

Pediatr Emerg Med J 2008;49(10):1649-1657.

Published online: 7 September 2008

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2008.49.10.1649

The Antimydriatic Effect of Brimonidine 0.15% on the Dark-adapted Pupil in Dark Brown Irides

Seung Soo Rho, M.D, Hong Seok Yang, M.D, Ho Min Lew, M.D, Jae Hong Ahn, M.D

Department of Ophthalmology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea

Address reprint requests to Jae Hong Ahn, M.D. Department of Ophthalmology, Ajou University School of Medicine #San 5 Wonchon-dong, Youngtong-gu, Suwon 442-721 Korea Tel: 82-31-219-567, Fax: 82-31-219-5259, E-mail: chrisahn@ajou.ac.kr

Received 10 July 2008 Accepted 17 October 2007

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze the effect of the daily use of brimonidine tartrate 0.15% on the dark-adapted pupil diameter in dark brown irides.

Methods

Twenty-five healthy volunteers administered brimonidine tartrate 0.15% to their right eyes once daily for 3 weeks. Infrared digital photographs of the pupil were taken before administration and 1 hour and 4 hours after administration after dark adaptation (at <0.1 lux ambient illumination for 5 minutes). The diameters of both pupils were measured on the first day, on administration days 7 and 21, and on washout day 7.

Results

Four hours after the first administration, pupils showed a decrease of 0.95±0.74 mm, 1.03±0.94 mm, 0.61±0.85 mm on the first day, administration day 7, and administration day 21, respectively ( p<0.01), compared with baseline data. The anti-mydriatic effect of brimonidine was sustained for 3 weeks, but the proportions of the eyes showing a reduction in pupil diameter by 0.5 mm or more were 84%, 76%, 68%, and 52% at 4 hours on the first day, administration days 7 and 21, and washout day 7, respectively.

Conclusions

The anti-mydriatic effect of the daily use of brimonidine 0.15% on dark brown irides in a scotopic condition is maintained during the instillation period but has a tendency to fade over time. This point should be considered when using this compound as a miotic agent.

Go to :

Keywords: Anti-mydriatic effect, Brimonidine tartrate 0.15%, Brown iris, Dark-adapted pupil

References

1. Lackner B, Pieh S, Schmidinger G. . Glare and halo phenomena after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29:444–50.

2. O`Brart DP, Lohmann CP, Fitzke FW. . Disturbance in night vision after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Eye. 1994; 8:46–51.

3. Schmidt GW, Yoon M, McGwin G. . Evaluation of the relationship between ablation diameter, pupil size, and visual function with vision-specific quality-of-life measures after laser in situ keratomileusis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007; 125:1037–42.

4. Martinez CE, Applegate RA, Klyce SD. . Effect of pupillary dilation on corneal optical aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998; 116:1053–62.

5. Marchini G, Babighian S, Tosi R, Bonomi L. Effects of 0.2% brimonidine on ocular anterior structures. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 1999; 15:337–44.

6. Brogliatti B, Bogetto C, Prandi B, Boles Carenini B.Pupillographic, tonographic and refractive parameter changes after topical instillation of Brimonidine tartrate 0.2% in healthy subjects. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998; 227:S34–5.

7. Derick RJ, Robin AL, Walters TR. . Brimonidine tartrate: a one-month dose response study. Ophthalmology. 1997; 104:131–6.

8. Schuman JS, Horwitz B, Choplin NT. . A 1-year study of brimonidine twice daily in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. A controlled, randomized, multicenter clinical trial. Chronic Brimonidine Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997; 115:847–52.

9. McDonald JE II, El-moatassem Kotb AM, Decker BB. Effect of brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution 0.2% on pupil size in normal eyes under different luminance conditions. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001; 27:560–4.

10. Krummenauer F, Dick B, Pfeiffer N.Brimonidine versus dapiprazole: Influence on pupil size at various illumination levels. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31:1372–6.

11. Thorden JE, Bower KS, Warren BB, Stutzman R. Miotic effect of brimonidine tartrate 0.15% ophthalmic solution in normal eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30:1702–6.

12. Kesler A, Shemesh G, Rothkoff L, Lazar M. Effect of brimonidine tartrate 0.2% ophthalmic solution on pupil size. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30:1707–10.

13. Brown SM, Khanani AM, McCartney DL. The effect of daily use of brimonidine tartrate on the dark-adapted pupil diameter. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004; 138:149–51.

14. Bergamin O, Schoetzau A, Sugimoto K, Zulauf M. The influence of iris color on the pupillary light reflex. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998; 236:567–70.

15. Yang HS, Lee MV, Kim JB, Ahn JH. Burst-shot infrared digital photography to determine scotopic pupil diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:2113–7.

16. Mastropasqua L, Carpineto P, Ciancaglini M. Brimonidine and pupillary diameter. Ophthalmology. 1998; 105:1352–3.

17. Douglas DK, Steven WS, Elizabeth AH, Lawrence MM.Pupillary size and responsiveness. Ophthalmology. 1991; 98:1030–5.

18. Duffin RM, Pettit TH, Straatsma BR. 2.5% vs 10% phenylephrine in maintaining mydriasis during cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983; 101:1903–6.

19. Patil PM, Jacobowitz D. Unequal accumulation of adrenergic drugs by pigmented and nonpigmented iris. Am J Ophthalmol. 1974; 78:470–7.

20. de Sousa JL, Malhotra R. Brimonidine for anisocoria. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114:1419.

21. Brown SM, Khanani AM. Effect of brimonidine on pupil diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31:1686–7.

22. Morales J, Brown SM, Abdul-Rahim AS, Crosson CE. Ocular effects of apraclonidine in Horner syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000; 118:951–4.

23. Brown SM, Khanani AM, Xu KT. Day to day variability of the dark-adapted pupil diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30:639–44.

24. Abdulrazik M, Tamilvanan S, Benita S. Non-systemic delivery of topical brimonidine to the brain: a neuro-ocular tissue distribution study. J Drug Target. 2006; 14:670–9.

25. Faulkner W. Miotic effect of alphagan P. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29:423.

26. Yuen NS, Cheung P, Hui SP. Comparing brimonidine 0.2% to apraclonidine 1.0% in the prevention of intraocular pressure elevation and their pupillary effects following laser peripheral iridotomy. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2005; 49:89–92.

Go to :

Figure 1.

The effect of brimonidine tartrate 0.15% on the pupil size under scotopic condition. Infrared digital photography was taken under scotopic condition (less than 0.1 lux) before (left column) and 1 hour and 4 hour (right column) after instillation of brimonidine on start day, administration days 7, 21, and washout day 7. The pupil diameter was decreased after instillation of brimonidine compared to before adminstration on each day. The pre-administration diameter of pupil on administration days 7 (6.33±0.73 mm) and 21 (6.18±1.07 mm) was also decreased compared to the baseline pupil diameter of start day(6.66±0.92mm). Note that the pre-administration diameter of pupil on washout day 7 was increased when compared to the baseline of start day.

undefined

Table 1.

Comparison of scotopic pupil diameter (PD) of the right eye in the order of time

Measure time		PD (range)	^Δ PD* ( p-value)	^Δ PD^† ( p-value)
	before	6.66±0.92 mm (4.32~8.28)
Start day	1 hr	5.76±1.10 mm (2.48~7.36)	0.90±0.75 mm (<0.001)	0.90±0.75 mm (<0.001)
	4 hr	5.72±1.07 mm (3.16~7.14)	0.95±0.74 mm (<0.001)	0.95±0.74 mm (<0.001)
	before	6.33±0.73 mm (5.07~7.43)		0.33±0.72 mm (0.029)
Administration day 7	1 hr	5.57±0.92 mm (4.14~7.16)	0.76±0.56 mm (<0.001)	1.09±0.79 mm (<0.001)
	4 hr	5.63±1.05 mm (3.30~7.50)	0.70±0.63 mm (<0.001)	1.03±0.94 mm (<0.001)
	before	6.18±1.07 mm (3.39~7.97)		0.48±0.88 mm (0.011)
Administration day 21	1 hr	5.98±1.25 mm (2.99~7.98)	0.20±1.12 mm (0.384)	0.68±0.73 mm (<0.001)
	4 hr	6.06±0.99 mm (3.79~8.10)	0.12±0.70 mm (0.392)	0.61±0.85 mm (0.002)
	before	6.72±0.95 mm (4.33~8.13)		-0.06±0.64 mm (0.672)
Washout day 7	1 hr	5.93±1.28 mm (2.72~7.97)	0.79±0.79 mm (<0.001)	0.74±0.78 mm (<0.001)
	4 hr	6.00±1.06 mm (3.68~8.13)	0.71±0.67 mm (<0.001)	0.66±0.71 mm (<0.001)

^Δ PD=baseline PD-PD after instillation of brimonidine

^* Each data was compared with the data before administration at respective day

^† Each data was compared with the data before administration at start day.

Table 2.

The proportion of significant anti-mydriasis and mydriasis

Measure time		Right eye		Left eye
		Significant	Significant	Significant	Significant
		anti-mydriasis*	mydriasis^†	anti-mydriasis*	mydriasis^†
start day	1 hr	64% (16)	0% (0)	20% (5)	0% (0)
	4 hr	84% (21)	4% (1)	12% (3)	8% (2)
	before	36% (9	8% (2)	12% (3)16% (4)
administration day 7	1 hr	76% (19	0% (0)	40% (10	8% (2)
	4 hr	76% (19	8% (2)	28% (7)	12% (3)
	before	36% (9)	12% (3)	24% (6)	16% (4)
administration day 21	1 hr	68% (17	8% (2)	16% (4	0% (0)
	4 hr	68% (17)	12% (3)	20% (5)	12% (3)
	before	12% (3)	24% (6)	28% (7)	12% (3)
washout day 7	1 hr	52% (13)	4% (1)	24% (6	0% (0)
	4 hr	52% (13)	4% (1)	24% (6	8% (2)

( )=number of eyes

^* pupil size is 0.5 mm smaller than baseline data of start day

^† pupil size is 0.5 mm larger than baseline data of start day.

Table 3.

Comparison of scotopic pupil diameter (PD) of the left eye in the order of time

Measure time		PD (range)	^Δ PD* ( p-value)	^Δ PD^† ( p-value)
	before	6.73±0.97 mm (3.96~8.16)
Start day	1 hr	6.51±1.10 mm (3.46~8.61)	0.22±0.41 mm (0.014)	0.22±0.41 mm (0.014)
	4 hr	6.61±0.86 mm (3.58~8.10)	0.12±0.44 mm (0.173)	0.12±0.44 mm (0.173)
	before	6.80±0.67 mm (5.23~7.95)		-0.07±0.55 mm (0.546)
Administration day 7	1 hr	6.39±0.91 mm (4.31~7.83)	0.41±0.54 mm (0.001)	0.34±0.49 mm (0.002)
	4 hr	6.59±0.77 mm (4.08~7.88)	0.21±0.47 mm (0.034)	0.15±0.75 mm (0.343)
	before	6.61±0.92 mm (3.60~8.28)		0.13±0.64 mm (0.340)
Administration day 21	1 hr	6.49±1.07 mm (3.61~8.26)	0.11±0.76 mm (0.464)	0.24±0.40 mm (0.007)
	4 hr	6.67±0.70 mm (4.45~7.94)	-0.06±0.56 mm (0.589)	0.06±0.79 mm (0.691)
	before	6.66±0.78 mm (4.99~8.16)		0.07±0.65 mm (0.590)
Washout day 7	1 hr	6.47±1.16 mm (3.28~8.10)	0.19±0.65 mm (0.155)	0.26±0.53 mm (0.021)
	4 hr	6.56±0.83 mm (4.15~7.89)	0.10±0.44 mm (0.258)	0.17±0.74 mm (0.259)

^Δ PD=baseline PD-PD after instillation of brimonidine

^* Each data was compared with the data before administration at respective day

^† Each data was compared with the data before administration at start day.

Table 4.

Comparison with other articles about brimonidine effect on pupil size

Author	Pupil	Check	Baseline	Age	Measure	Brown
	change	time	pupil (mm)	(mean age, years)	equipment	iris ratio
McDonald (2001)^*	-1.78 mm	4 hr	5.8±0.7	34.6	Colvard	n-c
Brown (2004)	-1.63 mm	4-6 hr	n-c	31.0	Digital cam	n-c
Kesler (2004)^*	-1.65 mm	4 hr	6.22±0.73	30.2	Colvard	55.6%
Thordsen (2004)	-1.50 mm	4 hr	7.0±0.2	29.0	Colvard	n-c
Marx-Gross (2005)	-2.24 mm	3 hr	6.74	n-c	Procyon	n-c
Current study	-0.95 mm^†	4 hr	6.66±0.92	24.8	Digital cam	100%

^* Brimonidine 0.2% (all others 0.15%)

^† On start day, at 4 hours after first administration; n-c=not commented; Colvard pupillometer (Oasismedical, Glendora, California, USA); Procyon pupillometer (Haag-Streit, UK).

TOOLS

Similar articles