PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the usefulness of Jones tube fixation using a purse-string suture, and to minimize postoperative conjunctival incarceration into the collar opening of the tube and extrusion or intrusion of the tube in the early postoperative period.
Methods
Thirty-five conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy (CDCR) with tube fixation by purse-string suture were performed over the period of 1 year with a mean follow-up of 8.3 months. At the end of endoscopic CDCR procedure, to secure the tube in both the surrounding conjunctiva and tissues in the canthus, a 5-0 Vicryl suture was passed through the conjunctiva and Tenon’s capsule just lateral to the collar of the tube and then tied around the collar of the tube in the fashion of a purse string. Finally, it was externalized to the skin of the canthal area where it was fixed. The suture was left alone if it did not cause problems postoperatively.
Results
Of 35 cases, there were no cases of intrusion of the tube or clogging of the tube with the conjunctiva at 6 months postoperatively. Partially extrusion was found in only two cases at 6 and 9 months postoperatively. One case of inadvertent tube retrieval was noted while irrigating the tube at postoperative 1 month.
References
1. Jones LT. Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalm ol. 1965; 59:773–83.
2. Lee TS, Kim SW, Lee JK. Comparison of surgical results between endoscopic and conventional conjunctivodacryocystor hinostomy. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2000; 41:314–9.
3. Trotter WL, Meyer DR. Endoscopic conjunctivodacryocystor hinostomy with Jones tube placement. Ophthalmology. 2000; 107:1206–9.
4. Sekhar GC, Dortzbach RK, Gonnering RS, Lemke BN. Problems associated with conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991; 112:502–6.
5. Steinsapir KD, Glatt HJ, Putterman AM. A 16-year study of conjunctival dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1990; 109:387–93.
6. Glastone GJ, Putterman AM. A modified glass tube for conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985; 103:1229–30.
7. Lee TS, Oh IK, Kim JS. The clinical outcome of endoscopic transnasal conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy using MEDPOR® Coated Tear Drain. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2004; 45:1420–1426.
8. Burger D. Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy: curse or cure. Trans Ophthalmol Soc NZ. 1984; 36:59–65.
9. Nissen JN, Sorensen T. Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy. A study of 21 cases. Acta Ophthalmol. 1987; 65:30–7.
10. Jones LT, Wobig JL. Surgery of the eyelid and lacrimal 1225 system. Burmingham, Alabama: Aesculapius Publishing Co. 1976; 214–6.
11. Yoo JR, Choi WC. A Survey of Post-Operative Satisfaction in Patients with Canalicular Obstruction after Jones Tube Intubation. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2002; 43:2081–8.
12. Rose GE, Welham RA. Jones' lacrimal canalicular bypass tubes: Twenty-five years' experience. Eye. 1991; 5:13–9.
13. Kim YS, Lee TS. Clinical study of conjunctivodacryocystor hinostomy with Jones tube. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1991; 32129–33.
14. Olver J. Color atlas of lacrimal surgery. Oxford: Butterworth- Heinermann. 2001; 162–74.
15. Lamping K, Levin MR. Jones' tube. How good are they? Arch Ophthalmol. 1983; 101:260–1.
16. Putterman AM. Fixation of Pyrex tubes in conjunctivodacryo cystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1974; 78:1026–7.
17. Ma'luf RN, Bashshur ZF, Noureddin BN. Modified technique for tube fixation in conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 20:240–59.
Figure 1.
(A) A double-armed 5-0 Vicryl suture was passed through the conjunctiva and Tenon’s capsule just lateral to the collar of the tube, which was repeated with 3 bites. (B) Each arm of the 5-0 Vicryl was tied together around the collar of the tube at the medial side of the tube in the fashion of purse string. (C) Then each arm was externalized to the skin of the canthal area to secure.
XML Download