Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/fonts/TeX/fontdata.js

Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.49(9) > 1008066

Park, Jung, Lee, and Jang: Pseudotumor : Distribution, Clinical Features, Treatment Outcomes

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical characteristics and results of outcomes in different types of orbital pseudotumor.

Methods

This study included 62 patients diagnosed with orbital pseudotumor between 2002 and 2007, who were followed-up for more than 6 months. The pseudotumor was classified into anterior, diffuse, apical, myositic, or lacrimal types according to computed tomography (CT) findings. All patients were initially treated with corticosteroids and checked for symptom improvement and response to the corticosteroids.

Results

Lacrimal type pseudotumor (61%, 39/62) showed the highest incidence, and lid swelling (97%, 60/62) was the most common symptom. Response rate to corticosteroid treatment was 84%, and the recurrence rate was 29%.

Conclusions

The orbital pseudotumors were localized by computed tomography and classified to compare the symptoms, treatment efficacy and recurrence rates between the different types. The orbital pseudotumor is most commonly diagnosed based on clinical symptomsand radiologic features without biopsy. The orbital pseudotumor showed a good treatment response but also a high recurrence rate. Therefore, when starting treatment, it is important to consider differential diagnosis. It is recommended to carefully examine patients who have lid swelling for a few weeks with computed tomography before using corticosteroid treatment.

Go to : Goto

References

1. Günalp I, Gündüz K, Yazar Z. Idiopathic orbital inflammatory disease. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1996; 74:191–3.
crossref
2. Cervellini P, Volpin L, Curri D. . Sclerosing Orbital Pseudotumor. Ophthalmologica. 1986; 193:39–44.
crossref
3. Weber AL, Romo LV, Sabates NR. Pseudotumor of the orbit. Clinical, pathologic, and radiologic evaluation. Radiol Clin North Am. 1999; 37:151–68.
4. Nugent RA, Rootman J, Robertson WK. . Acute orbital pseudotumors, classification and CT features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1981; 137:957–62.
crossref
5. Bencherif B, Zouaoui A, Chedid G. . Intracranial Extension of an Idiopathic Orbital Inflammatory Pseudotumor. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1993; 14:181–4.
6. Blodi FC, Gass JD. Inflammatory pseudotumor of the orbit. Br J Ophthalmol. 1968; 52:79–93.
7. Blodi FC, Gass JD. Inflammatory pseudotumor of the orbit Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1967; 71:303–23.
8. Scott I, Siatkowski RM. Idiopathic orbital myositis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1997; 9:504–12.
crossref
9. Char DH, Miller T. Orbital Pseudotumor, Fine-needle Aspiration Biopsy and Response to Therapy. Ophthalmology. 1993; 100:1702–10.
10. Mombaerts I, Goldschmeding R, Schlingemann RO, Koornneef L. What is orbital Pseudotumor? Surv Ophthalmol. 1996; 41:66–78.
11. Mannor GE, Rose GE, Moseley IF, Wright JE. Outcome of orbital myositis: clinical features associated with recurrence. Ophthalmology. 1997; 104:409–13.
12. Mombaerts I, Koornneef L. Current status in the treatment of orbital myositis. Ophthalmology. 1997; 104:402–8.
crossref
13. Mombaerts I, Schlingemann RO, Goldschmeding R, Koornneff L. Are systemic corticosteroids useful in the management of orbital pseudotumor? Ophthalmology. 1996; 103:521–8.
14. Moseley IF, Wright JE. Orbital pseudotumor. Clin Radiol. 1992; 45:67.
15. Yuen SJ, Rubin PA. Idiopathic orbital inflammation: distribution, clinical features, and treatment outcome. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003; 121:491–9.
16. Lee H, Kim SJ. Lee SY Classification and treatment efficacy of orbital psedotumor. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2001; 42:1647–54.
17. Henderson JW. Orbital Tumors, 2nd ed. New York: Decker/Thieme. Stratton. 1980; 512.
18. Klein BR, Hedges TR, Dayal Y. . Orbital myositis and giant cell myocarditis. Neurology. 1989; 39:988–90.
crossref
19. Seidenberg KB, Leid ML. Orbital myositis with Lyme disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 1990; 109:13–6.
crossref
20. Volpe NJ, Shore JW. Orbital myositis associated with herpes zoster. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991; 109:471–2.
crossref
21. Orssaud C, Poisson M, Gaddeur D. Orbital myositis, recurrence of Whipple’s disease. J Fr Ophthalmol. 1992; 15:205–8.
22. Maurer I, Zierz S. Recurrent orbital myosistis: report of a familial incidence. Arch Neurol. 1999; 56:1407–9.
23. Lee JS, Yum BS, Choi CH, Kim HJ. Clinical study of the idiopatic orbital myositis. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1999; 40:1109–15.
Go to : Goto

jkos-49-1379f1.tif
Figure 1.
Anterior type, CT image shows a ragged infiltration involvingthe anterior soft tissue of the right orbit and surrounding the right globe.
undefined
jkos-49-1379f2.tif
Figure 2.
Diffuse type, CT scan shows soft tissue infiltration involving the entire orbit, extending from the apex to the posterior margin of the right globe.
undefined
jkos-49-1379f3.tif
Figure 3.
Apical type, CT scan shows a mass of the apex of the right orbit with extension along the posterior portion of the extraocular muscles and the optic nerve.
undefined
jkos-49-1379f4.tif
Figure 4.
Myositic type, CT scan shows enlargement of the right medial rectus muscle with involvement of the tendon sheath..
undefined
jkos-49-1379f5.tif
Figure 5.
Lacrimaltype, CT scan shows right lacrimal gland enlargement.
undefined
Table 1.
Demographics of 62 patients
Age (M:F) (years) 45.5±1.1 (47.1±0.9:42.1±1.1)*
Gender (M:F) (%) 23 (37.1):39 (62.9)
No. of Unilateral : Bilateral involvement (%) 53 (85.5):9 (14.5)
Follow-up time (months) 7.2±0.7*
Duration for recurrence (months) 6.1±2.7*

Mean±standard deviation.

Table 2.
Frequency and mean age of different subtypes
Subtype No. of patients Age (year)
Lacrimal 39 (61%) 44±15.3
Myositic 8 (13%) 43±10.0
Anterior 8 (13%) 48±13.7
Diffuse 6 (11%) 52±14.3
Apical 1 (2%) 67
Total 62 (100%) 45.5±13.2

Mean±standard deviation.

Table 3.
The chief complaints in 62 patients with orbital pseudotumor
Subtype No. Lid swelling Ocular pain chemosis diplopia
Lacrimal 39 39 (100%) 12 (31%) 15 (39%) 4 (10%)
Myositic 8 6 (75%) 4 (50%) 1 (12%) 7 (88%)
Anterior 8 8 (100%) 2 (25%) 2 (28%) 0 (0%)
Diffuse 6 6 (100%) 4 (50%) 2 (33%) 2 (33%)
Apical 1 1 (100%) 1 (100%) 1 (100%) 1 (100%)
Total 62 60 (97%) 23 (37%) 21 (34%) 14 (22%)
Table 4.
The characteristics of steroid effectiveness
Subtype Onset and treatment interval (days) Effectiveness Recurrence Duration for recurrence (months)
Lacrimal 49.2±47.1 32/39 (82%) 8/32 (25%) 9.3±20.5
Myositic 2.6±3.6 8/8 (100%) 2/8 (25%) 2.5±0.7
Anterior 63.3±2.1 6/8 (75%) 5/6 (83%) 3.2±2.3
Diffuse 27.6±63.3 5/6 (83%) 2/5 (40%) 2.8±3.2
Apical 37.5±0.0 1/1 (100%) 1/1 (100%) 2.5±0.7
Total 45.6±33.6 52/62 (84%) 18/62(29%) 6.1±2.7

Mean±standard deviation.

Table 5.
The characteristics of orbital myositis patients
Age (years) Sex Onset &treatment interval Involved muscle* Steroid effectiveness recurrence
31 F 1 day IR yes no
44 M 0 day LR yes no
33 F 0 day LR yes no
57 F 0 day SR, MR§, IR yes recurrence
40 M 0 day MR yes recurrence
53 F 0 day SR yes no
60 M 10 days SR yes no
40 M 10 days SR yes no

IR=inferior rectus muscle

LR=lateral rectus muscle

SR=superior rectus muscle

§ MR=medial rectus muscle.

Table 6.
Frequency of steroid pulse therapy
Subtype No. steroid pulse therapy
Lacriamal 7/12 (58.3%)
Myositic 1/12 (8.3%)
Anterior 1/12 (8.3%)
Diffuse 2/12 (16.6%)
Apical 1/12 (8.3%)
TOOLS
Similar articles