Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.49(9) > 1008064

Bae, Ha, Lee, Kim, and Jang: Results of Conjunctiva-Müller Muscle Resection in Mild Eyelid Ptosis

Abstract

Purpose

To assess surgical outcomes after adjusting the amount of resection of the conjunctiva and the Müller muscle according to 10% phenylephrine test results.

Methods

The charts of 32 patients (32 eyes) with mild upper eyelid ptosis were reviewed retrospectively. They all had conjunctiva-Müller muscle resections. A preoperative 10% phenylephrine test was performed to determine the resection amount of the Müller muscle and conjunctiva. An 8 mm resection was performed when phenylephrine raised the ptotic lid to the same level as that of the contralateral lid. A 7 mm resection was performed when the ptotic lid was raised to a level higher than that of the contralateral lid. A 9 mm resection was performed when the ptotic lid was raised to a level not quite to the level of the contralateral lid.

Results

Of the 32 patients, 28 were female and 4 were male. The mean age of the patients was 30.8±10.2 years. Patients were followed up for an average of 40.2±36.8 days, postoperatively. Postoperative upper lid positions were exactly symmetrical in 26 of the 32 patients. Five patients showed undercorrection, and 1 patient showed overcorrection.

Conclusions

Excellent results were obtained by resecting the conjunctiva and Müller muscle according to the phenylephrine reaction of a ptotic eyelid.

References

1. Fasanella RM, Servat J. Levator resection for minimal ptosis: another simplified operation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1961; 65:493–6.
crossref
2. Putterman AM, Urist MJ. Müller muscle-conjunctiva resection: technique for treatment of blepharoptosis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1975; 93:619–23.
3. Putterman AM, Urist MJ. Müller’s muscle-conjunctival resection ptosis procedure. Ophthalmic Surg. 1978; 9:27–32.
4. Weinstein GS, Buerger GF Jr. Modifications of the Müller’s muscle-conjunctival resection operation for blepharoptosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982; 93:647–51.
crossref
5. Putterman AM, Fett DR. Müller’s muscle in the treatment of upper eyelid ptosis: a ten-year study. Ophthalmic Surg. 1986; 17:354–60.
crossref
6. Glatt HJ, Putterman AM, Fett DR. Müller’s muscle- conjunctival resection procedure in the treatment of ptosis in Horner’s syndrome. Ophthalmic Surg. 1990; 21:93–6.
7. Song WS, Kim YH, Lee SJ. Morphologic study of upper eyelid contour and functional evaluation of levator palpebrae. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2001; 42:1523–9.
8. Whitnall SE. The anatomy of the human orbit. 2nd. Vol. 1. London: Oxford University Press;1932. p. 145.
9. Dutton JJ. Atlas of clinical and surgical orbital anatomy. Philadelphia: WB Saunders co;1994. p. 113–38.
10. Obear MF, Smith B. Tarsal grafting to elevate the lower eyelid margin. Am J Ophthalmol. 1965; 59:1088–90.
11. Guyron B, Davies B. Experience with the modified Putterman procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988; 82:775–80.
12. Dresner SC. Further modifications of the Müller’s muscle- conjunctival resection procedure for blepharoptosis. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991; 7:114–22.
13. Mercandetti M, Putterman AM, Cohen ME. . Internal levator advancement by Müller’s muscle-conjunctival resection. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2001; 3:104–10.
crossref
14. Kanski JJ. Clinical ophthalmology. 6th. Vol. 1. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann;2007. p. 134.
15. Kim SY, Chung WS. Analysis of the causes of ptosis. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1995; 36:1649–54.
16. Jeong SK, Lemke BN, Dortzbach RK. . The Asian upper eyelid: an anatomical study with comparison to the Caucasian eyelid. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999; 117:907–12.

Figure 1.
Before 10% phenylephrine test (A) and after the test (B).
jkos-49-1365f1.tif
Figure 2.
The preoperative (A) and postoperative (B) photographs of a symmetrically corrected patient.
jkos-49-1365f2.tif
Figure 3.
The preoperative (A) and postoperative (B) photographs of an undercorrected patient.
jkos-49-1365f3.tif
Figure 4.
The preoperative (A) and postoperative (B) photographs of an overcorrected patient.
jkos-49-1365f4.tif
Table 1.
Marginal reflex distance 1 (MRD1, mm) and resection amount (mm) of ptotic patients whose ptotic eyelids became same level as contralateral eyelid after the phenylephrine test
Variables Value (mm) (n=15)
Contralateral eyelid preoperative MRD1 2.9±0.8
Ptotic eyelid 1.7±0.8
Post-phenylephrine test MRD1 2.9±0.8
Postoperative MRD1 2.8±0.8
Postoperative MRD1 difference -0.1±0.2
Table 2.
Marginal reflex distance 1 (MRD1, mm) and resection amount (mm) of ptotic patients whose ptotic eyelids were raised lower than the contralateral eyelid after the phenylephrine test
Variables Value (mm)(n=9)
Contralateral eyelid 2.8±0.4
Preoperative MRD1 Ptotic eyelid 0.9±0.8
Post-phenylephrine test MRD1 2.2±0.4
Postoperative MRD1 2.6±0.5
Postoperative MRD1 difference -0.2±0.4
Table 3.
Marginal reflex distance 1 (MRD1, mm) and resection amount (mm) of ptotic patients whose ptotic eyelids were raised higher than the contralateral eyelid after the phenylephrine test
Variables Value (mm) (n=8)
Contralateral eyelid Preoperative MRD1 2.5±0.8
Ptotic eyelid 1.0±0.8
Post-phenylephrine test MRD1 3.3±0.9
Postoperative MRD1 2.6±0.7
Postoperative MRD1 difference 0.1±0.2
Table 4.
Surgical outcomes of conjunctiva-Müller muscle resection
Surgical outcomes No. of eyelids (n=32)
Surgical Success 26 (81%)
Undercorrection 5 (16%)
Overcorrection 1 (3%)
Table 5.
Comparison of amounts of resection to amounts of elevation
Amount of elevation, mm
Amount of resection, mm This study Dresner12 Mercandetti13
7 1.2 1.75 2.24
8 1.4 2.0 2.56
9 1.8 2.25 2.88
TOOLS
Similar articles