Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.49(8) > 1008056

Jo, Lee, and Lee: Late-onset Migrated Inflammatory Granuloma After Collagen-Containing Filler Injection

Abstract

Purpose

To report a case of inflammatory granuloma in the right medial canthal area which occurred seven years after a cosmetic collagen-containing dermal filler injection in the forehead.

Case summary

A-47-year-old female, who had been treated with collagen-containing filler 7 years earlier, presented with a mass in the right medial canthal area discovered 20 days previously. There was mild tenderness and the mass was firm and not fixed. The patient reported that the size of the mass was slowly increasing. Orbital computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging showed an approximate 1 cm-sized, poorly defined, enhancing nodular thickening without evidence of bony erosion. The mass was removed through a skin incision and unidentified foreign bodies were found around the mass. On histopathologic examination, it was diagnosed as inflammatory granuloma caused by foreign substances.

Conclusions

Collagen-containing fillers are widely used in cosmetic surgery for their lasting effect and few complications. However some complications such as inflammatory granuloma may occur at the injection site or other sites, even several years after operation.

References

1. Lombardi T, Samson J, Plantier F. . Orofacial granulomas after injection of cosmetic fillers. Histopathologic and clinical study of 11 cases. J Oral Pathol Med. 2004; 33:115–20.
2. Zimmermann US, Clerici TJ. The histological aspects of fillers complications. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2004; 23:241–50.
crossref
3. Rohrer TE. Soft tissue filler substances. Current Problems in Dermatology. 2001; 13:54–60.
crossref
4. Bergeret-Galley C. Comparison of resorbable soft tissue fillers. Aesthetic Surg J. 2004; 24:33–46.
crossref
5. Constantinides M, Zimbler MS, Jagirdar J. An unusual late reaction to facial injections. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999; 120:557–60.
crossref
6. Moscona RR, Bergman R, Friedman-Birnbaum R. An unusual late reaction to Zyderm I injections: a challenge for treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 92:331–4.
7. Knapp TR, Kaplan EN, Daniels JR. Injectable collagen for soft tissue augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977; 60:398–405.
crossref
8. Drake LA, Dinehart SM, Farmer ER. . Guidelines of care for soft tissue augmentation: collagen implants. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996; 34:698–702.
9. Lemperle G, Pietz R, Lemperle M. Plastic Surgery. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier;1992:p. 539–41.
10. Lemperle G, Holmes R, Larson FG. Granuloma formation and electrical surface charges after Bioplastique and Arteplast implantation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2000; 24:74–5.
11. Lemperle G, Romano JJ, Busso M. Soft tissue augmentation with artecoll: 10-year history, indications, techniques, and complications. Dermatol Surg. 2003; 29:573–87.
crossref
12. Lowe NJ, Maxwell CA, Patnaik R. Adverse reactions to dermal fillers: review. Dermatol Surg. 2005; 31:1616–25.
crossref
13. Conejo-Mir JS, Sanz Guirado S, Angel Munoz M. Adverse granulomatous reaction to Artecoll treated by intralesional 5-fluorouracil and triamcinolone injections. Dermatol Surg. 2006; 32:1079–81.
crossref
14. Haneke E. Polymethyl methacrylate microspheres in collagen. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2004; 23:227–32.
crossref
15. Kim KJ, Lee HW, Lee MW. . Artecoll granuloma: A rare adverse reaction induced by microimplant in the treatment of neck wrinkles. Dermatol Surg. 2004; 30:545–7.
crossref
16. Rudolph CM, Soyer HP, Schuller-Petrovic S, Kerl H. Foreign body granulomas due to injectable aesthetic microimplants. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999; 23:113–7.
crossref
17. Requena C, Izquierdo MJ, Navarro M. . Adverse reactions to injectable aesthetic microimplants. Am J Dermatopathol. 2001; 23:197–202.
crossref
18. Hanke CW. Tissue Augmentation in Clinical Practice. Procedures and Techniques. 1998. Vol. 1. New York: Marcel Dekker;p. 145–54.
19. Shafir R, Amir A, Gur E. Long-term complications of facial injections with Restylane (injectable hyaluronic acid). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 106:1215–26.
crossref
20. Berqeret-Galley C, Latouche X, Illouz YG. The value of new filler material in corrective and cosmetic surgery: DermaLive and DermaDeep. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2001; 25:249–55.

Figure 1.
Preoperative photograph. The hard, non-fixed and mild tender mass is palpated on the right medial canthal area (arrows).
jkos-49-1330f1.tif
Figure 2.
Preoperative orbital CT scan shows soft tissue swelling without bony erosion in the right medial canthal area (arrow).
jkos-49-1330f2.tif
Figure 3.
Preoperative orbital MRI findings. (A) On T1-weighted axial image, about 1 cm-sized, ill defined mass appears as an isosignal intensity with extraocular muscles in the right medial canthal area (arrow). (B) The mass is well enhanced on post-contrast T1-weighted axial image (arrowhead).
jkos-49-1330f3.tif
Figure 4.
Gross findings of the mass. (A) The mass (14×4 mm) is not encapsulated and has irregular surface. (B) Unidentified 2×1 mm and 1×1 mm sized foreign bodies are found around the mass. These are hard and translucent.
jkos-49-1330f4.tif
Figure 5.
Histopathologic findings of the mass. The mass is consisted of histiocytes, epitheloid cells and multinucleated giant cells (arrow). The mass has also numerous empty vacuoles. The mass was diagnosed as foreign body inflammatory granuloma. (Hematoxylin and eosin stain; original magnification ×400).
jkos-49-1330f5.tif
TOOLS
Similar articles