Journal List > Korean J Gastroenterol > v.71(1) > 1007749

Kang, Lee, Kwon, Kim, Park, Yoon, Shin, and Choi: The Prevalence of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease with orwithout Reflux Esophagitis

Abstract

Background/Aims

Gastrointestinal reflux disease (GERD) is defined as ‘a condition that develops when the reflux of stomach contents causes troublesome symptoms and/or complications’. It is associated with various lung diseases, including bronchial asthma, chronic bronchitis, and bronchiectasis. GERD may also affect nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) lung disease. We presumed that the normal mucosal barrier of the bronchial epithelium is broken due to the aspiration of gastric juice and consequent chronic bronchial inflammation. This study investigated the prevalence of GERD in accordance with the presence or absence of NTM lung disease and analyzed the difference.

Methods

We screened patients with NTM lung disease in this hospital between January 2011 and December 2015. Among these patients, gastroscopic examinations as a health check-up were performed on 93 patients. We obtained the prevalence of Reflux esophagitis (RE) in patients with NTM and compared it with the prevalence of RE in the normal control subjects.

Results

Among 93 patients with NTM, patients without RE was 66.7% (62/93). RE-minimal change was diagnosed in 29.0% (27/93), and RE LA-A was diagnosed in 4.3% (4/93). Comparing the prevalence of RE minimal change, 29.0% (27/93) had NTM and 11.9% (3043/25536) did not have NTM. This was statistically significant.

Conclusions

We showed a greater prevalence of RE minimal change in patients with NTM than those without NTM with statistical significance.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Study flowchart of nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease with or without reflux esophagitis. NTM, nontuberculous mycobacteria.

kjg-71-18-g001
Table 1

Baseline Characteristics for 93 Patients with Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease as a Health Check-up according to Gender

kjg-71-18-i001
Table 2

Differences in the Prevalence between Patients with NTM Pulmonary Disease and Control Subjects

kjg-71-18-i002

Values are presented as n (%).

NTM, nontuberculous mycobacteria; RE, reflux esophagitis; mc, minimal change; LA, Los Angeles classification; HS, health screening.

aAll NTM patients who underwent gastroscopy at our hospital; bPatients with NTM who underwent gastroscopy for the purpose of health screening; cThe general control group in this study (Lee et al. 2008, J Gastroenterol Hepatol)8; dTotal reflux esophagitis including LA A-D and mc.

Table 3

Differences in the Types of NTM between Patients with Reflux Esophagitis and Those without Reflux Esophagitis

kjg-71-18-i003

Values are presented as n (%).

NTM, nontuberculous mycobacteria; HS, health screening; MAC, Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex; M.abscessus, Mycobacterium abscessus; M.kansasii, Mycobacterium Kansasii.

aPatients with NTM who underwent gastroscopy for the purpose of health screening; bMAC complex.

Table 4

Differences in the Location of Lung Lesions between Patients with Reflux Esophagitis and Those without Reflux Esophagitis

kjg-71-18-i004

Values are presented as n (%).

NTM, nontuberculous mycobacteria; HS, health screening; RUL, right upper lobe; RML, right middle lobe; RLL, right lower lobe; LUL, left upper lobe; LLL, left lower lobe.

aPatients with NTM who underwent gastroscopy for the purpose of health screening.

Notes

Financial support This work was supported by Korea Institute of Planning and Evalution for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (IPET) through (High Value-added Food Technology Development Program), funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (No. 116017032HD030).

Conflict of interest None.

References

1. Morehead RS. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and non-asthma lung disease. Eur Respir Rev. 2009; 18:233–243.
2. Mirsaeidi M, Hadid W, Ericsoussi B, Rodgers D, Sadikot RT. Non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease is common in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Int J Infect Dis. 2013; 17:e1000–e1004.
crossref
3. Koh WJ, Kwon OJ, Lee KS. Diagnosis and treatment of non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary diseases: a Korean perspective. J Korean Med Sci. 2005; 20:913–925.
crossref
4. Koh WJ, Lee JH, Kwon YS, et al. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease. Chest. 2007; 131:1825–1830.
crossref
5. Thomson RM, Armstrong JG, Looke DF. Gastroesophageal reflux disease, acid suppression, and Mycobacterial avium complex pulmonary disease. Chest. 2007; 131:1166–1172.
6. Griffith DE, Aksamit T, Brown-Elliott BA, et al. An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007; 175:367–416.
crossref
7. Kim BJ, Hong SK, Lee KH, et al. Differential identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and nontuberculous mycobacteria by duplex PCR assay using the RNA polymerase gene (rpoB). J Clin Microbiol. 2004; 42:1308–1312.
8. Lee JH, Kim N, Chung IK, et al. Clinical significance of minimal change lesions of the esophagus in a healthy Korean population: a nationwide multi-center prospective study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008; 23(7 Pt 1):1153–1157.
crossref
9. Dent J. Endoscopic grading of reflux oesophagitis: the past, present and future. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008; 22:585–599.
crossref
10. Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, et al. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut. 1999; 45:172–180.
crossref
11. Varghese G, Shepherd R, Watt P, Bruce JH. Fatal infection with Mycobacterium fortuitum associated with oesophageal achalasia. Thorax. 1988; 43:151–152.
crossref
12. Hadjiliadis D, Adlakha A, Prakash UB. Rapidly growing mycobacterial lung infection in association with esophageal disorders. Mayo Clin Proc. 1999; 74:45–51.
13. Griffith DE, Girard WM, Wallace RJ Jr. Clinical features of pulmonary disease caused by rapidly growing mycobacteria. An analysis of 154 patients. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993; 147:1271–1278.
crossref
14. Winthrop KL, McNelley E, Kendall B, et al. Pulmonary non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease prevalence and clinical features: an emerging public health disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010; 182:977–982.
15. Koh WJ, Kwon OJ, Kim EJ, Lee KS, Ki CS, Kim JW. NRAMP1 gene polymorphism and susceptibility to nontuberculous mycobacterial lung diseases. Chest. 2005; 128:94–101.
crossref
16. Linden SK, Sutton P, Karlsson NG, Korolik V, McGuckin MA. Mucins in the mucosal barrier to infection. Mucosal Immunol. 2008; 1:183–197.
crossref
17. Werther JL. The gastric mucosal barrier. Mt Sinai J Med. 2000; 67:41–53.
18. Mercer RR, Russell ML, Crapo JD. Mucous lining layers in human and rat airways. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992; 145:355.
19. Strugala V, Allen A, Dettmar PW, Pearson JP. Colonic mucin: methods of measuring mucus thickness. Proc Nutr Soc. 2003; 62:237–243.
crossref
20. Jordan N, Newton J, Pearson J, Allen A. A novel method for the visualization of the in situ mucus layer in rat and man. Clin Sci (Lond). 1998; 95:97–106.
crossref
21. Atuma C, Strugala V, Allen A, Holm L. The adherent gastrointestinal mucus gel layer: thickness and physical state in vivo. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001; 280:G922–G929.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles