Journal List > Korean J Gastroenterol > v.70(3) > 1007685

Park, Park, Ahn, and Kim: Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy as a Surgical Treatment for Upper Third Early Gastric Cancer

Abstract

Recently, the incidence of upper third gastric cancer has increased, and with it the number of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedures performed has been increasing. However, if ESD is not indicated or non-curable, surgical treatment may be necessary. In the case of lower third gastric cancer, it is possible to preserve the upper part of the stomach; however, in the case of upper third gastric cancer, total gastrectomy is still the standard treatment option, regardless of the stage. This is due to the complications associated with upper third gastric cancer, such as gastroesophageal reflux after proximal gastrectomy rather than oncologic problems. Recently, the introduction of the double tract reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy has become one of the surgical treatment methods for upper third early gastric cancer. However, since there has not been a prospective comparative study evaluating its efficacy, the ongoing multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (KLASS-05) comparing laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction and laparoscopic total gastrectomy is expected to be important for determining the future of treatment of upper third early gastric cancer.

References

1. Kim JP, Lee JH, Kim SJ, Yu HJ, Yang HK. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors in 10 783 patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 1998; 1:125–133.
crossref
2. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer. 2011; 14:113–123.
3. Jeong O, Park YK. Clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea: the results of 2009 nationwide survey on surgically treated gastric cancer patients. J Gastric Cancer. 2011; 11:69–77.
crossref
4. Information Committee of Korean Gastric Cancer Association. Korean Gastric Cancer Association Nationwide Survey on gastric gancer in 2014. J Gastric Cancer. 2016; 16:131–140.
5. Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, et al. Longterm results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale casecontrol and case-matched Korean multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32:627–633.
crossref
6. Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial (phase III) to comparing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with open distal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma (KLASS 01). J Korean Surg Soc. 2013; 84:123–130.
crossref
7. Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, et al. Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg. 2016; 263:28–35.
8. Lee CM, Jee YS, Lee JH, et al. Length of negative resection margin does not affect local recurrence and survival in the patients with gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20:10518–10524.
crossref
9. Nishizawa T, Yahagi N. Longterm outcomes of using endoscopic submucosal dissection to treat early gastric cancer. Gut Liver. 2017 Jul 5. [Epub ahead of print].
crossref
10. Gotoda T, Yanagisawa A, Sasako M, et al. Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centers. Gastric Cancer. 2000; 3:219–225.
crossref
11. Abe S, Oda I, Suzuki H, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for undifferentiated early gastric cancer. Endoscopy. 2013; 45:703–707.
crossref
12. Jee YS, Hwang SH, Rao J, et al. Safety of extended endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection following the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association treatment guidelines. Br J Surg. 2009; 96:1157–1161.
crossref
13. Ahn JY, Jung HY, Choi KD, et al. Endoscopic and oncologic outcomes after endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer:1370 cases of absolute and extended indications. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74:485–493.
14. Oh SY, Lee KG, Suh YS, et al. Lymph node metastasis in mucosal gastric cancer: reappraisal of expanded indication of endoscopic submucosal dissection. Ann Surg. 2017; 265:137–142.
15. Chung IK, Lee JH, Lee SH, et al. Therapeutic outcomes in 1000 cases of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms: Korean ESD study group multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69:1228–1235.
crossref
16. Ahn JY, Choi KD, Choi JY, et al. Procedure time of endoscopic submucosal dissection according to the size and location of early gastric cancers: analysis of 916 dissections performed by 4 experts. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73:911–916.
crossref
17. Song KY, Hyung WJ, Kim HH, et al. Is gastrectomy mandatory for all residual or recurrent gastric cancer following endoscopic resection? A large-scale Korean multicenter study. J Surg Oncol. 2008; 98:6–10.
crossref
18. Hasuike N, Ono H, Boku N, et al. A non-randomized confirmatory trial of an expanded indication for endoscopic submucosal dissection for intestinal-type gastric cancer (cT1a): the Japan Clinical Oncology Group study (JCOG0607). Gastric Cancer. 2017 Feb 21. [Epub ahead of print].
crossref
19. Park JW, Ahn S, Lee H, et al. Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer with lymphatic invasion after endoscopic resection. Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr 4. [Epub ahead of print].
crossref
20. Suzuki H, Oda I, Abe S, et al. Clinical outcomes of early gastric cancer patients after noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection in a large consecutive patient series. Gastric Cancer. 2017; 20:679–689.
crossref
21. Park DJ, Lee HK, Lee HJ, et al. Lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer with submucosal invasion: feasibility of minimally invasive surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 2004; 10:3549–3552.
crossref
22. Kitamura K, Yamaguchi T, Nishida S, et al. The operative indications for proximal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Surg Today. 1997; 27:993–998.
crossref
23. Kong SH, Kim JW, Lee HJ, Kim WH, Lee KU, Yang HK. Reverse double-stapling end-to-end esophagogastrostomy in proximal gastrectomy. Dig Surg. 2010; 27:170–174.
crossref
24. Harrison LE, Karpeh MS, Brennan MF. Total gastrectomy is not necessary for proximal gastric cancer. Surgery. 1998; 123:127–130.
crossref
25. Nozaki I, Hato S, Kobatake T, Ohta K, Kubo Y, Kurita A. Longterm outcome after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for gastric cancer compared with total gastrectomy. World J Surg. 2013; 37:558–564.
crossref
26. An JY, Youn HG, Choi MG, Noh JH, Sohn TS, Kim S. The difficult choice between total and proximal gastrectomy in proximal early gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 2008; 196:587–591.
crossref
27. Ichikawa D, Komatsu S, Kubota T, et al. Longterm outcomes of patients who underwent limited proximal gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer. 2014; 17:141–145.
crossref
28. Yoo CH, Sohn BH, Han WK, Pae WK. Longterm results of proximal and total gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the upper third of the stomach. Cancer Res Treat. 2004; 36:50–55.
crossref
29. Ahn SH, Lee JH, Park DJ, Kim HH. Comparative study of clinical outcomes between laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy (LAPG) and laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) for proximal gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2013; 16:282–289.
crossref
30. Ahn SH, Lee JH, Park DJ, Kim HH. Laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer is an ugly duckling with un-solved concerns: oncological safety, late complications, and functional benefit. Gastric Cancer. 2013; 16:448–450.
crossref
31. Adachi Y, Katsuta T, Aramaki M, Morimoto A, Shiraishi N, Kitano S. Proximal gastrectomy and gastric tube reconstruction for early cancer of the gastric cardia. Dig Surg. 1999; 16:468–470.
crossref
32. Yasuda A, Yasuda T, Imamoto H, et al. A newly modified esophagogastrostomy with a reliable angle of his by placing a gastric tube in the lower mediastinum in laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer. 2015; 18:850–858.
crossref
33. Ronellenfitsch U, Najmeh S, Andalib A, et al. Functional outcomes and quality of life after proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy using a narrow gastric conduit. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 22:772–779.
crossref
34. Kim DJ, Lee JH, Kim W. Lower esophageal sphincter-preserving laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy in patients with early gastric cancer: a method for the prevention of reflux esophagitis. Gastric Cancer. 2013; 16:440–444.
crossref
35. Kondoh Y, Ishii A, Ishizu K, et al. Esophagogastrostomy before proximal gastrectomy in patients with early gastric cancers in the upper third of the stomach. Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 2006; 31:146–149.
36. Ishigami S, Uenosono Y, Arigami T, et al. Novel fundoplication for esophagogastrostomy after proximal gastrectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2013; 60:1814–1816.
37. Sakuramoto S, Yamashita K, Kikuchi S, et al. Clinical experience of laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with toupet-like partial fundoplication in early gastric cancer for preventing reflux esophagitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 209:344–351.
crossref
38. Katai H, Morita S, Saka M, Taniguchi H, Fukagawa T. Longterm outcome after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for suspected early cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Br J Surg. 2010; 97:558–562.
crossref
39. Nakamura M, Nakamori M, Ojima T, et al. Reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach: an analysis of our 13-year experience. Surgery. 2014; 156:57–63.
crossref
40. Shiraishi N, Adachi Y, Kitano S, Kakisako K, Inomata M, Yasuda K. Clinical outcome of proximal versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer. World J Surg. 2002; 26:1150–1154.
crossref
41. Kinoshita T, Gotohda N, Kato Y, Takahashi S, Konishi M, Kinoshita T. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for gastric cancer in the proximal third of the stomach: a retrospective comparison with open surgery. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27:146–153.
crossref
42. Ahn SH, Jung DH, Son SY, Lee CM, Park DJ, Kim HH. Laparoscopic double-tract proximal gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2014; 17:562–570.
crossref
43. Park DJ, Lee Y, Ahn SH, Kim HH. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for upper third early gastric cancer. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg. 2017; 2:80.
crossref
44. Masuzawa T, Takiguchi S, Hirao M, et al. Comparison of perioperative and long-term outcomes of total and proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective study. World J Surg. 2014; 38:1100–1106.
crossref
45. Hinoshita E, Takahashi I, Onohara T, et al. The nutritional advantages of proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2001; 48:1513–1516.
46. Takiguchi N, Takahashi M, Ikeda M, et al. Longterm quality-of-life comparison of total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy by postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale (PGSAS-45): a nationwide multi-institutional study. Gastric Cancer. 2015; 18:407–416.
crossref
47. Kim EM, Jeong HY, Lee ES, et al. Comparision between proximal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy in early gastric cancer. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2009; 54:212–219.
crossref
48. Ichikawa D, Komatsu S, Okamoto K, Shiozaki A, Fujiwara H, Otsuji E. Evaluation of symptoms related to reflux esophagitis in patients with esophagogastrostomy after proximal gastrectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013; 398:697–701.
crossref
49. Uyama I, Ogiwara H, Takahara T, Kikuchi K, Iida S. Laparoscopic and minilaparotomy proximal gastrectomy and esophagogastrostomy: technique and case report. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1995; 5:487–491.
50. Jung DH, Lee Y, Kim DW, et al. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction is superior to laparoscopic total gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar 24. [Epub ahead of print].
crossref

Fig. 1.
Upper third early gastric cancer.
kjg-70-134f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gas-trectomy.
kjg-70-134f2.tif
Fig. 3.
Direct esophagogastrostomy after laparoscopic proximal gas-trectomy.
kjg-70-134f3.tif
Fig. 4.
Double tract reconstruction after laparoscopic proximal gas-trectomy.
kjg-70-134f4.tif
Table 1.
Key Articles for Therapeutic Options of Upper Third Early Gastric Cancer
  Key articles
Author Year Title Journal
Endoscopic submucosal dissection Chung et al.15 2009 Therapeutic outcomes in 1000 cases of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms: Korean ESD Study Group multicenter study Gastrointest Endosc
  Ahn et al.16 2011 Procedure time of endoscopic submucosal dissection according to the size and location of early gastric cancers: analysis of 916 dissections performed by 4 experts Gastrointest Endosc
Oncologic outcomes of proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer Harrison et al.24 1998 Total gastrectomy is not necessary for proximal gastric cancer Surgery
  Nozaki et al.25 2013 Long-term outcome after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for gastric cancer compared with total gastrectomy World J Surg
  Ichikawa et al.27 2014 Long-term outcomes of patients who underwent limited proximal gastrectomy Am J Surg
Proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction vs. Total gastrectomy Jung et al.50 2017 Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction is superior to laparoscopic total gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer Surg Endosc
Table 2.
Studies of Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy for Upper Third Early Gastric Cancer
Anastomosis Author Patients Operation time (min) Blood loss (mL) Complication (%) Reflux (%) Survival (%)
Esophagogastrostomy Ahn et al.29 50 216.3 115.8 24.0 32.0 >95
Gastric tube Yasuda et al.32 25 286.4 294.2 16.0 4.4  
Fundoplication Sakuramoto et al.37 26 293.0 119.0 7.7 20.0 >95
Jejunal Interposition Kinoshita et al.41 22 233.0 20.0 27.0 0  
  Yasuda et al.32 21 268.8 307.4 28.6 5.0  
Double Tract Reconstruction Sakuramoto et al.37 10 269.0 107.0 20.0 25.0 >95
  Ahn et al.42 43 180.7 120.4 11.6 4.6 100
TOOLS
Similar articles