Journal List > Korean J Gastroenterol > v.68(3) > 1007555

Shim, Yang, Cho, Woo, Kim, Park, Lee, Lee, Hwang, Rim, and Park: Hepatic Infarction Caused by Portal Vein Thrombophlebitis Misdiagnosed as Infiltrative Hepatic Malignancy with Neoplastic Thrombus

Abstract

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a form of venous thrombosis that usually presents in chronic form without any sequalae in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or liver cirrhosis. Accurate differential diagnosis of bland PVT from neoplastic PVT is an important step for planning treatment options, but the acute form can be challenging. Here we present a case of acute hepatic infarction caused by acute bland PVT combined with pylephlebitis, which was misdiagnosed as infiltrative hepatic malignancy with neoplastic PVT owing to the perplexing imaging results and elevated tumor markers.

References

1. Bauer W, Dale HH, Poulsson LT, Richards DW. The control of circulation through the liver. J Physiol. 1932; 74:343–375.
crossref
2. Ponziani FR, Zocco MA, Campanale C, et al. Portal vein thrombosis: insight into physiopathology, diagnosis, and treatment. World J Gastroenterol. 2010; 16:143–155.
crossref
3. Li C, Hu J, Zhou D, et al. Differentiation of bland from neoplastic thrombus of the portal vein in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: application of susceptibility-weighted MR imaging. BMC Cancer. 2014; 14:590.
crossref
4. Lang SA, Loss M, Wohlgemuth WA, Schlitt HJ. Clinical management of acute portal/mesenteric vein thrombosis. Viszeralmedizin. 2014; 30:394–400.
crossref
5. Chawla YK, Bodh V. Portal vein thrombosis. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015; 5:22–40.
crossref
6. Shah V. Molecular mechanisms of increased intrahepatic resistance in portal hypertension. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007; 41(Suppl 3):S259–S261.
crossref
7. Harding DJ, Perera MT, Chen F, Olliff S, Tripathi D. Portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: controversies and latest developments. World J Gastroenterol. 2015; 21:6769–6784.
crossref
8. Plessier A, Darwish-Murad S, Hernandez-Guerra M, et al. Acute portal vein thrombosis unrelated to cirrhosis: a prospective multicenter follow-up study. Hepatology. 2010; 51:210–218.
crossref
9. Takizawa D, Kakizaki S, Sohara N, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: clinical characteristics, prognosis, and patient survival analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2007; 52:3290–3295.
crossref
10. Jelic S, Sotiropoulos GC. ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Hepatocellular carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2010; 21(Suppl 5):v59–v64.
crossref
11. Engelbrecht M, Akin O, Dixit D, Schwartz L. Bland and tumor thrombi in abdominal malignancies: magnetic resonance imaging assessment in a large oncologic patient population. Abdom Imaging. 2011; 36:62–68.
crossref
12. Tublin ME, Dodd GD 3rd, Baron RL. Benign and malignant portal vein thrombosis: differentiation by CT characteristics. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 168:719–723.
crossref
13. Lee HK, Park SJ, Yi BH, Yeon EK, Kim JH, Hong HS. Portal vein thrombosis: CT features. Abdom Imaging. 2008; 33:72–79.
crossref
14. Kanellopoulou T, Alexopoulou A, Theodossiades G, Koskinas J, Archimandritis AJ. Pylephlebitis: an overview of non-cirrhotic cases and factors related to outcome. Scand J Infect Dis. 2010; 42:804–811.
crossref
15. Wong K, Weisman DS, Patrice KA. Pylephlebitis: a rare complication of an intraabdominal infection. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2013; 3:DOI: doi:10.3402/jchimp.v312.20732.
crossref
16. DeLeve LD, Valla DC, Garcia-Tsao G. Vascular disorders of the liver. Hepatology. 2009; 49:1729–1764.
crossref
17. Lee YY, Tee HP, Mahadeva S. Role of prophylactic antibiotics in cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20:1790–1796.
crossref
18. Albert MB, Steinberg WM, Henry JP. Elevated serum levels of tumor marker CA19–9 in acute cholangitis. Dig Dis Sci. 1988; 33:1223–1225.
crossref
19. Pavai S, Yap SF. The clinical significance of elevated levels of serum CA 19–9. Med J Malaysia. 2003; 58:667–672.
20. Singhal A, Lander E, Karachristos A, et al. Elevation of CA 125 and CA 19–9 in patients with end-stage liver disease. Int J Biol Markers. 2012; 27:e147–e151.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Portal vein (PV) thrombosis on imaging studies. Suspiciously infiltrative and hypovascular hepatocellular carcinoma on S8 of markedly shrunken liver parenchyma with enhanced thrombosis (arrows) at right PV and main PV on CT scans. (A) Liver MRI revealed portal vein thrombosis on contrast enhanced fat suppression T1 portal phase (B), enhancement on early arterial phase of dynamic enhanced study (C), and on hepatobiliary phase (D).
kjg-68-156f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Acute hepatic infarction on liver MRI. Liver MRI at first visit showed ill-defined and slightly T2 high signal intensity lesion (arrows) on S8 of liver (A) and sustained high signal intensity on diffusion weighted imaging. (B) The lesion was not demarcated well on enhanced early arterial phase of dynamic study (C) or on hepatobiliary phase because of markedly decreased liver function (D).
kjg-68-156f2.tif
Fig. 3.
Liver tumor CT after 12 months showed a remaining wedge-shaped non-enhanced low attenuated lesion (arrow) on S8 of liver (A) and chronic partial thrombi (benign thrombi) (arrow) at anterior branch of right portal vein (PV) and main PV with arterioportal shunts (B).
kjg-68-156f3.tif
Fig. 4.
Serial changes of serum CA 19–9 and AFP levels.
kjg-68-156f4.tif
TOOLS
Similar articles