Journal List > Korean J Gastroenterol > v.64(6) > 1007312

An, Kim, Song, and Jang: Prognostic Factors in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Gemcitabine Chemotherapy: Clinical Characteristics of Long-term Survivors

Abstract

Background/Aims

Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy has been used as a standard treatment in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. However, the clinical outcomes of this regimen are still unsatisfactory in prolonging survival. We retrospectively analyzed clinical characteristics of patients with advanced pancreatic cancers who received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy and showed long-term survival.

Methods

We enrolled 49 patients who underwent treatment with more than three cycles of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Long-term survivor was defined as patient who has survived more than 12 months after diagnosis. The clinical characteristics were analyzed to compare the differences between long-term and short-term survivors. Univariate or multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors associated with chemo-responses.

Results

Twenty patients (41%) survived more than 12 months. Long-term survivors had smaller tumor size (OR 2.190, p=0.049, 95% CI 1.005-4.773) and higher serum BUN level (OR 0.833, p=0.039, 95% CI 0.701-0.990) compared to short-term survivors. Overall median and progression-free survivals were 11 and 4 months, respectively. Presence of distant metastasis (hazard ratio 1.441, p=0.035, 95% CI 1.002-2.908) was a significant independent predictor of progression-free survival. Tumor size (hazard ratio 1.534, p=0.004, 95% CI 1.150-2.045) was associated with overall survival.

Conclusions

Gemcitabine chemotherapy may be more effective and allow longer survivals in patients with clinical characters of smaller tumor size and normal serum BUN level at diagnosis. We suggest a well-designed large controlled study to evaluate the prognostic factors such as clinical characteristics and molecular biological features in patients with advanced pancreatic cancers who receive gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.

References

1. Annual report on the cause of death statistics. [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea [cited 2014 Sep 11]. Available from:. http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_ko/5/2/index.board?bmode=read&aSeq=308628=read&aSeq=308628.
2. Fernández-del Castillo C, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL. Standards for pancreatic resection in the 1990s. Arch Surg. 1995; 130:295–299.
crossref
3. DiMagno EP, Reber HA, Tempero MA. AGA technical review on the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. American Gastroenterological Association. Gastroenterology. 1999; 117:1464–1484.
4. Burris HA 3rd, Moore MJ, Andersen J, et al. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1997; 15:2403–2413.
crossref
5. Jo JH, Chung MJ, Park JY, et al. Clinical characteristics of long-term survivors of inoperable pancreatic cancer: an 8-year cohort analysis in Korea. Pancreas. 2014; 43:1022–1031.
6. Kim YJ, Seo DW, Pack KM, et al. The prognostic factors of pancreatic cancer can be different according to clinical stages. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2008; 51:181–189.
7. Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J, et al. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25:1960–1966.
crossref
8. Herrmann R, Bodoky G, Ruhstaller T, et al. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research; Central European Cooperative Oncology Group. Gemcitabine plus capecitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized, multicenter, phase III trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research and the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25:2212–2217.
crossref
9. Carmichael J, Fink U, Russell RC, et al. Phase II study of gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 1996; 73:101–105.
crossref
10. Casper ES, Green MR, Kelsen DP, et al. Phase II trial of gemcitabine (2,2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Invest New Drugs. 1994; 12:29–34.
11. Park JK, Yoon YB, Kim YT, Ryu JK, Yoon WJ, Lee SH. Survival and prognostic factors of unresectable pancreatic cancer. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008; 42:86–91.
crossref
12. Ikeda M, Okada S, Tokuuye K, Ueno H, Okusaka T. Prognostic factors in patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma receiving chemoradiotherapy. Cancer. 2001; 91:490–495.
crossref
13. Krishnan S, Rana V, Janjan NA, et al. Prognostic factors in patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with chemoradiation. Cancer. 2006; 107:2589–2596.
crossref
14. Papadoniou N, Kosmas C, Gennatas K, et al. Prognostic factors in patients with locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a retrospective analysis. Anticancer Res. 2008; 28:543–549.
15. Weber A, Kehl V, Mittermeyer T, et al. Prognostic factors for survival in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 2010; 39:1247–1253.
crossref
16. Yi JH, Lee J, Park SH, et al. A prognostic model to predict clinical outcomes with first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer. Oncology. 2011; 80:175–180.
crossref
17. Furukawa K, Uwagawa T, Iwase R, et al. Prognostic factors of unresectable pancreatic cancer treated with nafamostat mesilate combined with gemcitabine chemotherapy. Anticancer Res. 2012; 32:5121–5126.
18. Saad ED, Machado MC, Wajsbrot D, et al. Pretreatment CA 19-9 level as a prognostic factor in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine. Int J Gastrointest Cancer. 2002; 32:35–41.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Consort algorithm of patient selection. We enrolled 49 patients who underwent more than three cycles of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy without radiation therapy and received regular follow up. CTx, chemotheraphy.
kjg-64-356f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Progression free survival (PFS) curves according to the presence of distant metastasis (A) and overall survival (OS) curves according to the tumor size (B) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancers who received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Distant metastasis (hazard ratio 1.441, p=0.035, 95% CI 1.002-2.908) and tumor size (hazard ratio 1.534, p=0.004, 95% CI 1.150-2.045) were related to PFS and OS, respectively.
kjg-64-356f2.tif
Table 1.
Baseline Characteristics of Patients with Pancreatic Cancer
Characteristic Value
Age (yr) 61.3±9.6
Male 29 (59)
Laboratory findings  
 WBC (103/µL) 6,580 (4,935-7,565)
 Hemoglobin (g/dL) 12.2 (11.0-13.75)
 Platelet (103/µL) 204 (154–271)
 Albumin (mg/dL) 3.9 (3.5-4.2)
 BUN (mg/dL) 12.1 (9.4-15.3)
 Creatinine (mg/dL) 0.78 (0.62-0.90)
 Total bilirubin (mg/dL) 0.94 (0.56-1.48)
Tumor markers  
 CEA (ng/mL) 8.56 (0.30-86.65)
 CA 19-9 (U/mL) 291 (52.6-3,234.0)
Tumor size (cm) 3.8±1.4
Chemotherapy regimen  
 Gemcitabine mono 29 (59.2)
 Combination 20 (40.8)
  With cisplatin 2 (4.1)
  With erlotinib 10 (20.4)
  With capecitabine 8 (16.3)
Location of tumor  
 Head 27 (55.1)
 Body-tail 22 (44.9)
Calcinomatosis peritonei 4 (8.2)
Distant metastasis 25 (51.0)
Response at 12 weeks after chemotherapy  
 PD 23 (46.9)
 SD 23 (46.9)
 PR 3 (6.1)
CA 19-9 (U/mL) at 12 weeks after chemotherapy 400 (29.5-4,126.0)
Initial CA 19-9/CA 19-9 at 12 weeks after chemotherapy 1.35±1.70
Survival (mo)  
 Progression free survival 4 (3.0-7.5)
 Overall survival 11 (5.7-15.3)

Values are presented as mean±SD, n (%), or median (interquartile range). WBC, white blood cell; PD, progressive disease; SD, stable disease; PR, partial response.

Table 2.
Factors Influencing Survival at One Year on Univariate Analysis
Variable Below one year on overall survival (n=29) More than one year on overall survival (n=20) p-value
Overall survival (mo) 10.57±1.96 60.35±3.18 0.569
Sex (male) 17 (58.6) 12 (60.0) 0.923
Laboratory finding      
 Hemoglobin (g/dL) 1.80±0.33 1.67±0.37 0.416
 Albumin (mg/dL) 3.73±0.56 3.97±0.61 0.171
 INR (prothrombin time ratio) 1.04±0.08 1.03±0.08 0.791
 BUN (mg/dL) 11.42±5.26 15.29±7.17 0.034
 Creatinine (mg/dL) 0.76±0.28 0.84±0.18 0.270
 Total bilirubin (mg/dL) 3.60±6.15 1.57±2.30 0.113
 CEA (ng/mL) 11.82±20.97 4.61±4.21 0.120
 CA 19-9 (U/mL) 6,534.77±12,908.96 832.52±1,351.72 0.034
Tumor size (cm) 4.169±1.503 3.3±1.103 0.044
Tumor location (body or tail) 11 (38) 11 (55) 0.238
Carcinomatosis peritonei (yes) 4 (14) 0 0.083
Distant metastasis (yes) 18 (62) 7 (35) 0.062
Chemotherapy regimen (combination) 10 (35) 10 (50) 0.277
Response at 12 weeks after chemotherapy      
 PD 14 (58) 4 (20) 0.036
 SD 9 (38) 14 (70)  
 PR 1 (4) 2 (10)  
CA 19-9 (U/mL) at 12 weeks after chemotherapy 11,476.13±23,988.02 1,998.23±3,206.16 0.151
Initial CA 19-9/CA 19-9 at 12 weeks after chemotherapy 0.96±0.89 1.77±2.23 0.202

Values are presented as mean±SD or n (%).

PD, progressive disease; SD, stable disease; PR, partial response.

Table 3.
Factors Influencing Overall Survival More than One Year on Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis
Variable OR p-value 95% CI
Age (≥65 yr vs. <65 yr) 2.615 0.295 0.432-15.824
Laboratory finding      
 BUN 0.833 0.039 0.701-0.990
 CA 19-9 (>291 vs. ≤291) 0.637 0.635 0.099-4.094
Tumor size 2.190 0.049 1.005-4.773
Response after first 3 cycles      
 PD 6.271 0.228 0.175-25.060
 SD 1.322 0.315 0.048-36.445
 PR 1.000 0.869 -

PD, progressive disease; SD, stable disease; PR, partial response.

Table 4.
Factors Influencing Disease Progression Free Survival
Variable Hazard ratio p-value 95% CI
Univariate analysis      
 Age (≥65 yr vs. <65 yr) 1.202 0.578 0.629-2.298
 Sex (male vs. female) 0.824 0.566 0.425-1.597
 Laboratory finding      
  Hemoglobin 0.944 0.550 0.780-1.142
  Albumin 1.074 0.783 0.646-1.786
  INR 0.028 0.115 0.000-2.377
  BUN 0.969 0.249 0.918-1.022
  Creatinine 0.314 0.172 0.059-1.656
  Total bilirubin 1.025 0.376 0.970-1.083
  CEA (>8.56 vs. ≤8.56) 1.777 0.182 0.764-4.136
  CA 19-9 (>291 vs. ≤291) 1.470 0.267 0.744-2.905
 Tumor size 1.237 0.091 0.967-1.582
 Tumor location (body or tail vs. head) 0.598 0.128 0.308-1.159
 Carcinomatosis peritonei (yes vs. no) 2.468 0.096 0.852-7.148
 Distant metastasis (yes vs. no) 2.529 0.010 1.253-5.103
 Chemotherapy regimen (combination vs. mono) 0.633 0.168 0.330-1.213
Multivariate analysis      
 Age (≥65 yr vs. <65 yr) 1.506 0.278 0.718-3.168
 Tumor size 1.437 0.211 0.867-7.682
 Carcinomatosis peritonei (yes vs. no) 1.348 0.186 1.152-5.448
 Distant metastasis (yes vs. no) 1.441 0.035 1.002-2.908
Table 5.
Factors Influencing Overall Survival
Variable Hazard ratio p-value 95% CI
Univariate analysis      
 Age (≥65 yr vs. <65 yr) 1.080 0.810 0.577-2.020
 Sex (male vs. female) 0.769 0.400 0.417-1.418
 Laboratory finding      
  Hemoglobin 0.911 0.315 0.76-1.092
  Albumin 1.018 0.944 0.618-1.677
  INR 0.615 0.811 0.011-3.147
  BUN 0.963 0.159 0.915-1.015
  Creatinine 0.298 0.145 0.058-1.518
  Total bilirubin 1.033 0.219 0.981-1.087
  CEA (>8.56 vs. ≤8.56) 1.723 0.209 0.737-4.024
  CA 19-9 (>291 vs. ≤291) 1.807 0.070 0.953-3.425
 Tumor size 1.513 0.001 1.179-1.943
 Tumor location (body or tail vs. head) 0.730 0.315 0.394-1.350
 Carcinomatosis peritonei (yes vs. no) 3.124 0.036 1.079-9.046
 Distant metastasis (yes vs. no) 2.271 0.009 1.233-4.184
 Chemotherapy regimen (combination vs. mono) 0.731 0.319 0.395-1.354
 Response at 12 weeks after chemotherapy      
  PD 4.041 0.010 0.924-17.674
  SD 1.564 0.064 0.363-6.743
  PR 1.000 0.549 -
 Initial CA 19-9/CA 19-9 at 12 weeks after chemotherapy 0.598 0.045 0.361-0.990
 Multivariate analysis      
 Age (≥65 yr vs. <65 yr) 1.476 0.366 0.634-3.439
 Tumor size 1.534 0.004 1.150-2.045
 Carcinomatosis peritonei (yes vs. no) 2.194 0.330 0.452-10.659
 Distant metastasis (yes vs. no) 2.143 0.065 0.953-4.819
 Response at 12 weeks after chemotherapy      
  PD 3.788 0.208 0.428-33.532
  SD 1.946 0.231 0.218-17.405
  PR 1.000 0.551 -

PD, progressive disease; SD, stable disease; PR, partial response.

TOOLS
Similar articles