PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
Background/Aims
The miss rate of colon polyps and its related factors have not been clearly identified yet. This study aims to review the miss rate of polyps both on the patient-level and on the polyp-level and to analyze the factors affecting the miss rate such as those related to the endoscopist, procedure, patient, and polyp.
Methods
From August 2011 to August 2013, patients who underwent elective second colonoscopy for resection of polyps, the sizes of which were not small enough to be resected by biopsy forceps alone at first colonoscopy, were enrolled retrospectively. Results: The miss rate on the patient-level was 59.2% (234/395) and on the polyp-level was 27.9% (578/2,068). There was no significant difference in the miss rate depending on the experience of the endoscopists or characteristics of the patients. In terms of the procedure, the miss rate was higher when the colonoscopy was performed in the afternoon (OR 1.632, p=0.046). It was found that the miss rate of polyps increased when the polyps were small (OR 4.595, p<0.001 in <5 mm/OR 3.447, p<0.001 in 5–10 mm), flat or sessile (OR 2.406, p<0.001 in flat/OR 1.768, p=0.002 in sessile), and located in the left colon (OR 1.391, p=0.007).
Conclusions
The experience of endoscopists did not have influence on the accuracy of polyp detection. However, the fatigue of endoscopists in the afternoon is considered to render polyp detection less accurate. Also, the large curves and folds of the sigmoid colon are regarded as a reason for the higher miss rate of polyps in the left colon.
References
1. Ahn SB, Han DS, Bae JH, Byun TJ, Kim JP, Eun CS. The miss rate for colorectal adenoma determined by quality-adjusted, backto-back colonoscopies. Gut Liver. 2012; 6:64–70.
2. Hong SN, Sung IK, Kim JH, et al. The effect of the bowel preparation status on the risk of missing polyp and adenoma during screening colonoscopy: a tandem colonoscopic study. Clin Endosc. 2012; 45:404–411.
3. Park SY, Moon W, Park SJ, et al. The colonoscopic miss rates of colorectal polyps as determined by a polypectomy. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 36:132–137.
4. Leufkens AM, van Oijen MG, Vleggaar FP, Siersema PD. Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study. Endoscopy. 2012; 44:470–475.
5. Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG, et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy. 2008; 40:284–290.
6. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology. 1997; 112:24–28.
7. van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM, van Deventer SJ, Dekker E. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101:343–350.
8. Choi KY, Lee BI, Lee SY, et al. Colonoscopic miss-rate of colorectal polyp and adenoma. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 26:199–204.
9. Ricci E, Hassan C, Petruzziello L, Bazzoli F, Repici A, Di Giulio E. Inter-centre variability of the adenoma detection rate: a prospective, multicentre study. Dig Liver Dis. 2013; 45:1022–1027.
10. Boroff ES, Gurudu SR, Hentz JG, Leighton JA, Ramirez FC. Polyp and adenoma detection rates in the proximal and distal colon. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013; 108:993–999.
11. Greenspan M, Rajan KB, Baig A, Beck T, Mobarhan S, Melson J. Advanced adenoma detection rate is independent of non-advanced adenoma detection rate. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013; 108:1286–1292.
12. Adler A, Wegscheider K, Lieberman D, et al. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12,134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3). Gut. 2013; 62:236–241.
13. Yang MH, Cho J, Rampal S, et al. The association between cecal insertion time and colorectal neoplasm detection. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013; 13:124.
14. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, Johanson JF, Greenlaw RL. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355:2533–2541.
15. de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, Bossuyt PM, et al. Differences in proximal serrated polyp detection among endoscopists are associated with variability in withdrawal time. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013; 77:617–623.
16. Chan MY, Cohen H, Spiegel BM. Fewer polyps detected by colonoscopy as the day progresses at a Veteran's administration teaching hospital. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009; 7:1217–1223.
17. Bensen S, Mott LA, Dain B, Rothstein R, Baron J. Polyp Prevention Study Group. The colonoscopic miss rate and true one-year recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999; 94:194–199.
18. Laiyemo AO, Doubeni C, Sanderson AK 2nd, et al. Likelihood of missed and recurrent adenomas in the proximal versus the distal colon. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74:253–261.
19. Stock C, Pulte D, Haug U, Brenner H. Subsite-specific colorectal cancer risk in the colorectal endoscopy era. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75:621–630.
20. Singh H, Nugent Z, Demers AA, Kliewer EV, Mahmud SM, Bernstein CN. The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after colonoscopy varies by site of the cancer. Gastroenterology. 2010; 139:1128–1137.
21. Waye JD. Retroview colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2013; 42:491–505.
Table 1.
Univariate and Multivariate Anaylsis of 395 Patients on the Association of Procedure-related Variables and Miss Rate of Polyps
Table 2.
Univariate and Multivariate Anaylsis in 395 Patients for the Association of Patient-related Variables and Miss Rate of Polyps
Table 3.
Univariate and Multivariate Anaylsis of 2,068 Polyps on the Association of Polyp-related Variables and Miss Rate of Polyps
XML Download