Journal List > Korean J Gastroenterol > v.63(5) > 1007227

Kim, Park, Park, Moon, Park, Kim, Lim, Yoo, and Kang: Differential Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps with Narrow Band Imaging Colonoscopy without Magnification

Abstract

Background/Aims

Narrow band imaging (NBI) endoscopy can be used for gross differentiation between the types of colonic polyps. This study was conducted as a retrospective study for estimation of the interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the pit pattern of the mucosal surface and the accuracy of histology prediction.

Methods

A total of 159 patients underwent complete colonoscopy and 219 polyps examined by NBI endoscopy without magnification were assessed. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement were calculated by investigators in each group for determination of the surface pattern and prediction of histology based on the modified Kudo's classification using intraclass correlation coefficient.

Results

Interobserver agreement for the surface pit pattern and prediction of polyp type was 0.84 and 0.73 in experienced endoscopists, and 0.86 and 0.62 in trainees, respectively. Intra-observer agreement for the surface pit patterns and prediction of polyp type was 0.81, 0.83, 0.85, 0.83, 0.56, 0.84, 0.51, 0.83, and 0.71; and 0.71, 0.70, 0.82, 0.54, 0.72, 0.37, 0.51, 0.34, and 0.30, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy for prediction of polyp type was 69.4% for experienced endoscopists and 72.9% for trainees.

Conclusions

NBI endoscopy without magnification showed fairly good inter and intraobserver agreement for the pit pattern of the mucosal surface and the accuracy of histology prediction; however, it had some limitation for differentiation of colon polyp histologic type. Training and experience with NBI is needed for improvement of accuracy.

References

1. Huang Q, Fukami N, Kashida H, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver consistency in the endoscopic assessment of colonic pit patterns. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 60:520–526.
crossref
2. Muto M, Horimatsu T, Ezoe Y, et al. Narrow-band imaging of the gastrointestinal tract. J Gastroenterol. 2009; 44:13–25.
crossref
3. Larghi A, Lecca PG, Costamagna G. High-resolution narrow band imaging endoscopy. Gut. 2008; 57:976–986.
crossref
4. Su MY, Hsu CM, Ho YP, Chen PC, Lin CJ, Chiu CT. Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and nar-row-band imaging systems in differential diagnosis of neoplastic and nonneoplastic colonic polyps. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101:2711–2716.
crossref
5. Machida H, Sano Y, Hamamoto Y, et al. Narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of colorectal mucosal lesions: a pilot study. Endoscopy. 2004; 36:1094–1098.
crossref
6. East JE, Suzuki N, Saunders BP. Comparison of magnified pit pattern interpretation with narrow band imaging versus chromoendoscopy for diminutive colonic polyps: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 66:310–316.
crossref
7. Rastogi A, Pondugula K, Bansal A, et al. Recognition of surface mucosal and vascular patterns of colon polyps by using nar-row-band imaging: interobserver and intraobserver agreement and prediction of polyp histology. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69:716–722.
crossref
8. Tischendorf JJ, Wasmuth HE, Koch A, Hecker H, Trautwein C, Winograd R. Value of magnifying chromoendoscopy and narrow band imaging (NBI) in classifying colorectal polyps: a prospective controlled study. Endoscopy. 2007; 39:1092–1096.
crossref
9. Kudo S, Hirota S, Nakajima T, et al. Colorectal tumours and pit pattern. J Clin Pathol. 1994; 47:880–885.
crossref
10. Kudo S, Tamura S, Nakajima T, Yamano H, Kusaka H, Watanabe H. Diagnosis of colorectal tumorous lesions by magnifying endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996; 44:8–14.
crossref
11. Singh R, Owen V, Shonde A, Kaye P, Hawkey C, Ragunath K. White light endoscopy, narrow band imaging and chromoendoscopy with magnification in diagnosing colorectal neoplasia. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 1:45–50.
crossref
12. Singh R, Nordeen N, Mei SL, Kaffes A, Tam W, Saito Y. West meets East: preliminary results of narrow band imaging with optical magnification in the diagnosis of colorectal lesions: a multicenter Australian study using the modified Sano's classification. Dig Endosc. 2011; 23(Suppl 1):126–130.
crossref
13. Wada Y, Kashida H, Kudo SE, Misawa M, Ikehara N, Hamatani S. Diagnostic accuracy of pit pattern and vascular pattern analyses in colorectal lesions. Dig Endosc. 2010; 22:192–199.
crossref
14. Wada Y, Kudo SE, Kashida H, et al. Diagnosis of colorectal lesions with the magnifying narrow-band imaging system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 70:522–531.
crossref
15. East JE, Suzuki N, Bassett P, et al. Narrow band imaging with magnification for the characterization of small and diminutive colonic polyps: pit pattern and vascular pattern intensity. Endoscopy. 2008; 40:811–817.
crossref
16. Rastogi A, Bansal A, Wani S, et al. Narrow-band imaging colonoscopy–a pilot feasibility study for the detection of polyps and correlation of surface patterns with polyp histologic diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67:280–286.
17. Uraoka T, Saito Y, Matsuda T, et al. Detectability of colorectal neoplastic lesions using a narrow-band imaging system: a pilot study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008; 23:1810–1815.
crossref
18. Mayinger B, Oezturk Y, Stolte M, et al. Evaluation of sensitivity and inter- and intraobserver variability in the detection of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus with enhanced magnification endoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006; 41:349–356.
crossref
19. Endo T, Awakawa T, Takahashi H, et al. Classification of Barrett's epithelium by magnifying endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 55:641–647.
crossref
20. Matsumoto T, Kudo T, Jo Y, Esaki M, Yao T, Iida M. Magnifying colonoscopy with narrow band imaging system for the diagnosis of dysplasia in ulcerative colitis: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 66:957–965.
21. Yao K, Anagnostopoulos GK, Jawhari AU, Kaye PV, Hawkey CJ, Ragunath K. Optical microangiography: high-definition magnification colonoscopy with narrow band imaging (NBI) for visualizing mucosal capillaries and red blood cells in the large intestine. Gut Liver. 2008; 2:14–18.
crossref
22. Sakamoto T, Saito Y, Nakajima T, Matsuda T. Comparison of magnifying chromoendoscopy and narrow-band imaging in estimation of early colorectal cancer invasion depth: a pilot study. Dig Endosc. 2011; 23:118–123.
crossref
23. Zhou QJ, Yang JM, Fei BY, Xu QS, Wu WQ, Ruan HJ. Narrow-band imaging endoscopy with and without magnification in diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. World J Gastroenterol. 2011; 17:666–670.
crossref
24. Higashi R, Uraoka T, Kato J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of nar-row-band imaging and pit pattern analysis significantly improved for less-experienced endoscopists after an expanded training program. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 72:127–135.
crossref
25. Ignjatovic A, Thomas-Gibson S, East JE, et al. Development and validation of a training module on the use of narrow-band imaging in differentiation of small adenomas from hyperplastic colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73:128–133.
crossref
26. Rogart JN, Jain D, Siddiqui UD, et al. Narrow-band imaging without high magnification to differentiate polyps during real-time colonoscopy: improvement with experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 68:1136–1145.
crossref
27. Raghavendra M, Hewett DG, Rex DK. Differentiating adenomas from hyperplastic colorectal polyps: narrow-band imaging can be learned in 20 minutes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 72:572–576.
crossref
28. Ng SC, Lau JY. Narrow-band imaging in the colon: limitations and potentials. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011; 26:1589–1596.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Polyp pattern on narrow banding imaging (whitish color). (A) Circular pattern with dots. (B) Round-oval pattern. (C) Tubulogyrus pattern.(D) Irregular pattern.
kjg-63-276f1.tif
Table 1.
Polyp Patterns by Narrow Banding Imaging Colonoscopy7
  Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 Type 5
Pattern type Circular pattern with dots Round/oval Tubulogyrus Irregular/ sparse
Histology Hyperplasia Adenoma Adenoma Adenocar cinoma

Revised from the article of Rastogi et al. (Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:716–722).7

Table 2.
Characteristics of Colon Polyps Assessed by Narrow Band Imaging
Investigator Size (mm)
<5 6–10 >11 Total
Hyperplasia 3 3 1 7
Adenoma (serrated adenoma) 50 (1) 111 (6) 46 (1) 205 (8)
Carcinoma 0 0 7 7
Total 53 114 54 219
Table 3.
Interobserver Agreement for Pit Pattern and Differentiation of Polyp Type
Investigator Intraclass correlation coefficient
Pit pattern Polyp histologic type
Experienced (n=3) 0.84 0.73
Trainees (n=6) 0.86 0.62
Table 4.
Intra-observer Agreement for Pit Pattern and Differentiation of Polyp Type
Investigator Intraclass correlation coefficient
Pit pattern Polyp histologic type
E1 0.81 0.71
E2 0.83 0.70
E3 0.85 0.82
T1 0.83 0.54
T2 0.56 0.72
T3 0.84 0.37
T4 0.51 0.51
T5 0.83 0.34
T6 0.71 0.30
Table 5.
Diagnostic Accuracy for Differentiation of Polyp Type Based on Pit Pattern
Investigator Accuracy (%)
1st reading 2nd reading Mean
E1 75.0 71.7 73.4
E2 63.2 71.2 67.2
E3 66.5 68.9 67.7
T1 82.5 78.8 80.7
T2 73.1 83.0 78.1
T3 61.3 86.3 73.8
T4 50.5 40.1 45.3
T5 66.5 83.0 74.8
T6 75.9 92.9 84.4
Mean 68.3 75.1 71.7
Table 6.
Diagnostic Accuracy for Differentiation of Polyp Type according to Size
Investigator Size of polyp (mm)
<5 6–10 >11
1st 2nd 1st 2nd 1st 2nd
E1 52.8 32.1 79.5 82.1 89.4 91.5
E2 39.6 39.6 63.4 75.9 89.4 95.7
E3 43.4 49.1 70.5 68.8 83.0 91.5
T1 75.5 66.0 81.3 78.6 93.6 93.6
T2 47.2 62.3 81.3 87.5 83.0 95.7
T3 47.2 73.6 63.4 89.3 72.3 93.6
T4 32.1 11.3 54.5 39.3 61.7 74.5
T5 54.7 83.0 69.6 80.4 72.3 89.4
T6 73.6 90.6 82.1 96.4 63.8 87.2
Mean 51.8 56.4 71.7 77.6 78.7 90.3
TOOLS
Similar articles