Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/fonts/TeX/fontdata.js

Journal List > Korean J Gastroenterol > v.63(1) > 1007192

Seo: The Correlation between Polyp Detection Rate and Adenoma Detection Rate: Mainly Determined by the Colon Segment

Abstract

Article

Usefulness of Polyp and Adenoma Detection Rate in the Proximal and Distal Colon

Go to : Goto

References

1. Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC, Schoenfeld PS, Burke CA, Inadomi JM. American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected]. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009; 104:739–750.
2. Rabeneck L, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Stukel TA. Association between colonoscopy rates and colorectal cancer mortality. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010; 105:1627–1632.
crossref
3. Manser CN, Bachmann LM, Brunner J, Hunold F, Bauerfeind P, Marbet UA. Colonoscopy screening markedly reduces the occurrence of colon carcinomas and carcinoma-related death: a closed cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 76:110–117.
crossref
4. Qaseem A, Denberg TD, Hopkins RH Jr, et al. Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Screening for colorectal cancer: a guidance statement from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 156:378–386.
crossref
5. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 63(4 Suppl):S16–S28.
crossref
6. Millan MS, Gross P, Manilich E, Church JM. Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008; 51:1217–1220.
crossref
7. Boroff ES, Gurudu SR, Hentz JG, Leighton JA, Ramirez FC. Polyp and adenoma detection rates in the proximal and distal colon. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013; 108:993–999.
crossref
8. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. ASGE/ACG Taskforce on Quality in Endoscopy. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101:873–885.
crossref
9. Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Variation of adenoma prevalence by age, sex, race, and colon location in a large population: implications for screening and quality programs. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 11:172–180.
crossref
10. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362:1795–1803.
crossref
11. Rogal SS, Pinsky PF, Schoen RE. Relationship between detection of adenomas by flexible sigmoidoscopy and interval distal colorectal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 11:73–78.
crossref
12. Lee SH, Park DI, Sung JM, et al. Usefulness of polyp detection rate as a quality indicator in colonoscopy. Intest Res. 2011; 9:105–111.
crossref
13. Denis B, Sauleau EA, Gendre I, Piette C, Bretagne JF, Perrin P. Measurement of adenoma detection and discrimination during colonoscopy in routine practice: an exploratory study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74:1325–1336.
crossref
14. Francis DL, Rodriguez-Correa DT, Buchner A, Harewood GC, Wallace M. Application of a conversion factor to estimate the adenoma detection rate from the polyp detection rate. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73:493–497.
crossref
15. Singh H, Nugent Z, Demers AA, Kliewer EV, Mahmud SM, Bernstein CN. The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after colonoscopy varies by site of the cancer. Gastroenterology. 2010; 139:1128–1137.
crossref
16. Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, Rickert A, Hoffmeister M. Protection from colorectal cancer after colonoscopy: a population-based, case-control study. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 154:22–30.
17. Choi SY, Park DI, Lee CK, et al. Usefulness of polyp and adenoma detection rate in the proximal and distal colon. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2014; 63:11–17.
crossref
Go to : Goto
TOOLS
Similar articles