Journal List > Korean J Gastroenterol > v.62(1) > 1007181

Ryu, Kim, Lee, Park, Seo, and Lee: Temporary Placement of Fully Covered Self-expandable Metal Stents in Benign Biliary Strictures

Abstract

Background/Aims

Benign biliary strictures (BBSs) have been endoscopically managed with plastic stent placement. However, data regarding fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMSs) in BBS patients remain scarce in Korea.

Methods

Forty-one patients (21 men, 65.9%) with BBSs underwent FCSEMS placement between February 2007 and July 2010 in Asan Medical Center. Efficacy and safety were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were considered to have resolution if they showed evidence of stricture resolution on cholangiography and if an inflated retrieval balloon easily passed through the strictures at FCSEMS removal.

Results

The mean FCSEMS placement time was 3.2 (1.9–6.2) months. Patients were followed for a mean of 10.2 (1.0–32.0) months after FCSEMS removal. The BBS resolution rate was confirmed in 38 of 41 (92.7%) patients who underwent FCSEMS removal. After FCSEMS removal, 6 of 38 (15.8%) patients experienced symptomatic recurrent stricture and repeat stenting was performed. When a breakdown by etiology of stricture was performed, 14 of 15 (93.3%) patients with chronic pancreatitis, 17 of 19 (89.5%) with gall stone-related disease, 4 of 4 (100%) with surgical procedures, and 2 of 2 (100%) with BBSs of other etiology had resolution at FCSEMS removal. Complications related to stent therapy occurred in 12 (29%) patients, including post-ERCP pancreatitis (n=4), proximal migration (n=3), distal migration (n=3), and occlusion (n=2).

Conclusions

Temporary FCSEMS placement in BBS patients offers a potential alternative to plastic stenting. However, because of the significant complications and modest resolution rates, the potential benefits and risks should be evaluated in further investigations.

References

1. Judah JR, Draganov PV. Endoscopic therapy of benign biliary strictures. World J Gastroenterol. 2007; 13:3531–3539.
crossref
2. Warshaw AL, Schapiro RH, Ferrucci JT Jr, Galdabini JJ. Persistent obstructive jaundice, cholangitis, and biliary cirrhosis due to common bile duct stenosis in chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 1976; 70:562–567.
crossref
3. Pitt HA, Kaufman SL, Coleman J, White RI, Cameron JL. Benign postoperative biliary strictures. Operate or dilate? Ann Surg. 1989; 210:417–425.
crossref
4. Nealon WH, Urrutia F. Longterm follow-up after bilioenteric anastomosis for benign bile duct stricture. Ann Surg. 1996; 223:639–645.
crossref
5. Davids PH, Groen AK, Rauws EA, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K. Randomised trial of self-expanding metal stents versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction. Lancet. 1992; 340:1488–1492.
crossref
6. Irving JD, Adam A, Dick R, Dondelinger RF, Lunderquist A, Roche A. Gianturco expandable metallic biliary stents: results of a European clinical trial. Radiology. 1989; 172:321–326.
crossref
7. Berkelhammer C, Kortan P, Haber GB. Endoscopic biliary pros-theses as treatment for benign postoperative bile duct strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 1989; 35:95–101.
crossref
8. Costamagna G, Pandolfi M, Mutignani M, Spada C, Perri V. Longterm results of endoscopic management of postoperative bile duct strictures with increasing numbers of stents. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 54:162–168.
crossref
9. Davids PH, Rauws EA, Coene PP, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K. Endoscopic stenting for post-operative biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992; 38:12–18.
crossref
10. Draganov P, Hoffman B, Marsh W, Cotton P, Cunningham J. Longterm outcome in patients with benign biliary strictures treated endoscopically with multiple stents. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 55:680–686.
crossref
11. Frattaroli FM, Reggio D, Guadalaxara A, Illomei G, Pappalardo G. Benign biliary strictures: a review of 21 years of experience. J Am Coll Surg. 1996; 183:506–513.
12. Deviere J, Cremer M, Baize M, Love J, Sugai B, Vandermeeren A. Management of common bile duct stricture caused by chronic pancreatitis with metal mesh self expandable stents. Gut. 1994; 35:122–126.
crossref
13. Rossi P, Bezzi M, Salvatori FM, Maccioni F, Porcaro ML. Recurrent benign biliary strictures: management with self-expanding metallic stents. Radiology. 1990; 175:661–665.
crossref
14. van Berkel AM, Cahen DL, van Westerloo DJ, Rauws EA, Huibregtse K, Bruno MJ. Self-expanding metal stents in benign biliary strictures due to chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopy. 2004; 36:381–384.
crossref
15. Bezzi M, Zolovkins A, Cantisani V, et al. New ePTFE/FEP-covered stent in the palliative treatment of malignant biliary obstruction. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002; 13:581–589.
crossref
16. Isayama H, Komatsu Y, Tsujino T, et al. A prospective randomised study of "covered" versus "uncovered" diamond stents for the management of distal malignant biliary obstruction. Gut. 2004; 53:729–734.
crossref
17. Matsushita M, Takakuwa H, Nishio A, Kido M, Shimeno N. Open-biopsy-forceps technique for endoscopic removal of distally migrated and impacted biliary metallic stents. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 58:924–927.
crossref
18. Minami A, Fujita R. A new technique for removal of bile duct stones with an expandable metallic stent. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 57:945–948.
crossref
19. Wamsteker EJ, Elta GH. Migration of covered biliary self-expanding metallic stents in two patients with malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 58:792–793.
crossref
20. Cahen DL, Rauws EA, Gouma DJ, Fockens P, Bruno MJ. Removable fully covered self-expandable metal stents in the treatment of common bile duct strictures due to chronic pancreatitis: a case series. Endoscopy. 2008; 40:697–700.
crossref
21. van Boeckel PG, Vleggaar FP, Siersema PD. Plastic or metal stents for benign extrahepatic biliary strictures: a systematic review. BMC Gastroenterol. 2009; 9:96.
crossref
22. Smith MT, Sherman S, Lehman GA. Endoscopic management of benign strictures of the biliary tree. Endoscopy. 1995; 27:253–266.
crossref
23. Yamaguchi T, Ishihara T, Seza K, et al. Longterm outcome of endoscopic metallic stenting for benign biliary stenosis associated with chronic pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2006; 12:426–430.
crossref
24. Cantù P, Hookey LC, Morales A, Le Moine O, Devière J. The treatment of patients with symptomatic common bile duct stenosis secondary to chronic pancreatitis using partially covered metal stents: a pilot study. Endoscopy. 2005; 37:735–739.
crossref
25. Kahaleh M, Behm B, Clarke BW, et al. Temporary placement of covered self-expandable metal stents in benign biliary strictures: a new paradigm? (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67:446–454.
crossref
26. Chaput U, Scatton O, Bichard P, et al. Temporary placement of partially covered self-expandable metal stents for anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 72:1167–1174.
crossref
27. Traina M, Tarantino I, Barresi L, et al. Efficacy and safety of fully covered self-expandable metallic stents in biliary complications after liver transplantation: a preliminary study. Liver Transpl. 2009; 15:1493–1498.
crossref
28. Tarantino I, Mangiavillano B, Di Mitri R, et al. Fully covered self-expandable metallic stents in benign biliary strictures: a multicenter study on efficacy and safety. Endoscopy. 2012; 44:923–927.
crossref
29. Kahaleh M, Brijbassie A, Sethi A, et al. Multicenter trial evaluating the use of covered self-expanding metal stents in benign biliary strictures: time to revisit our therapeutic options? J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013. [Epub ahead of print].
30. Coté GA, Kumar N, Ansstas M, et al. Risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis with placement of self-expandable metallic stents. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 72:748–754.
crossref
31. Mahajan A, Ho H, Sauer B, et al. Temporary placement of fully covered self-expandable metal stents in benign biliary strictures: midterm evaluation (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 70:303–309.
crossref
32. Park do H, Lee SS, Lee TH, et al. Anchoring flap versus flared end, fully covered self-expandable metal stents to prevent migration in patients with benign biliary strictures: a multicenter, prospective, comparative pilot study (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73:64–70.

Table 1.
Patient Characteristics and Indications for FCSEMS Placement
Characteristic Data
Patient (n) 41 (100)
Sex (male/female) 24/14 (65.9/34.1)
Mean age (yr) 55 (21–79)
Etiology of BBSs  
Gall stone-related disease 19 (46.3)
Chronic pancreatitis 15 (36.6)
Postsurgical complication 4 (9.8)
PSC 1 (2.4)
Other 2 (4.9)
FCSEMS length (mm)  
40 13 (31.7)
50 19 (46.3)
60 6 (14.6)
70/80/90 1/1/1 (2.4/2.4/2.4)
Stent time (mo) 3.2 (1.9–6.2)
Follow-up period after stent removal (mo) 10.2 (1.0–32.0)
First-line treatment 17 (41.5)
Second-line treatment 24 (58.5)
Previous cholecystectomy 19 (46.3)

Values are presented as n (%) or median (range).

FCSEMS, fully covered self-expandable metal stents; BBS, benign biliary stricture; PSC, primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Table 2.
Results from Use of FCSMS to Treat BBS
Overall rate Stricture resolution Recurrence Migration
Etiologies 38/41 (92.7) 6/38 (15.8) 6/41 (14.6)
Gall stone-related disease 17/19 (89.5) 2/17 (11.8) 4/19 (21.8)
Chronic pancreatitis 14/15 (93.3) 2/14 (14.3) 0/15 (0)
Postsurgical complication 4/4 (100) 2/4 (50.0) 1/4 (2.4)
PSC 1/1 (100) 0 (0) 1/1 (100)
Other etiology 2/2 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Previous treatments
No 16/17 (94.1) 1/16 (6.3) 2/17(11.8)
Yes 22/24 (91.7) 5/22 (22.7) 4/24 (16.7)
Length of stricture (cm)
1.0 1/2 (50.0) 0 (0) 0/2 (0)
1.5 7/7 (100) 2/7 (28.6) 1/7 (14.3)
2.0 15/16 (93.8) 1/15 (6.7) 1/16 (6.3)
2.5 7/8 (87.5) 1/7 (14.3) 2/8 (25.0)
3.0 4/4 (100) 1/4 (25.0) 2/4 (50.0)
3.5 4/4 (100) 1/4 (25.0) 0/4 (0)
Length of FCSEMS (cm)
4 11/13 (84.6) 3/11 (27.3) 1/13 (7.7)
5 19/19 (100) 0 (0) 3/19 (15.8)
6 5/6 (83.3) 1/5 (20.0) 1/6 (16.7)
7/8/9 3/3 (100) 2/3 (66.6) 1/3 (33.3)

Values are presented as n (%).

FCSEMS, fully covered self-expandable metal stents; BBS, benign biliary stricture; PSC, primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Table 3.
Complications Related to the Procedure and Stent
Complication n (%)
Placement complication 6 (14.6)
Post-ERCP pancreatitis 4 (9.8)
Pain 2 (4.9)
Removal complication 2 (2.4)
Pain 2 (2.4)
Stent complication 8 (19.6)
Proximal migration 3 (7.3)
Distal migration 3 (7.3)
Occlusion 2 (4.9)
TOOLS
Similar articles