Journal List > Korean J Gastroenterol > v.61(5) > 1007085

Gundes, Kucukkartallar, Çolak, Cakir, and Aksoy: Ischemic Necrosis of the Cecum: A Single Center Experience

Abstract

Background/Aims

Isolated cecal necrosis is a rare cause of the surgical abdomen. Its manifestation is similar to that of acute appendicitis. Thirteen cases, who were pre-diagnosed with acute abdomen and were finally diagnosed with isolated cecal necrosis after operation have been evaluated alongside with literature.

Methods

The records of 13 patients, who had isolated cecal necroses between 1995 and 2011 at Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Medical School's General Surgery Clinic (Turkey), were retrospectively evaluated.

Results

Eight of the patients were male, whereas 5 were female. Their mean age was 68.0±11.7 (range 51–84) years. All the patients had at least one accompanying disease the most frequent of which were heart failure and chronic renal failure. Ten patients had right hemicolectomy and ileotransversostomy, two had right hemicolectomy and ileostomy, and one had wedge resection to the cecum by the help of linear stapler. Mortality was seen in 5 patients (38%) in the early postoperative period. Conclusions: Isolated cecal necrosis should be considered in elderly patients with chronic diseases presenting with sudden right lower quadrant pains in the differential diagnosis. Isolated cecal necrosis may have a bad prognosis since it is seen in elderly patients with accompanying problems. Therefore, early diagnosis and immediate surgical management if necessary is important to reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality.

References

1. Beck DE, de Aguilar-Nascimento JE. Surgical management and outcome in acute ischemic colitis. Ochsner J. 2011; 11:282–285.
2. Yasuhara H. Acute mesenteric ischemia: the challenge of gastroenterology. Surg Today. 2005; 35:185–195.
crossref
3. Dirican A, Unal B, Bassulu N, Tatlı F, Aydin C, Kayaalp C. Isolated cecal necrosis mimicking acute appendicitis: a case series. J Med Case Rep. 2009; 3:7443–7447.
crossref
4. Borra S, Kleinfield M. Ischemic necrosis of the cecum: Findings in three dialysis patients. Geriatr Nephrol Urol. 1995; 5:15–19.
crossref
5. Kiyak G, Ozgün Y, Sarikaya SM, Korukluoğ lu B. Isolated cecal necrosis mimicking acute appendicitis. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2008; 19:71–72.
6. Wiesner W, Mortelé KJ, Glickman JN, Ros PR. "Cecal gangrene": a rare cause of right-sided inferior abdominal quadrant pain, fever, and leukocytosis. Emerg Radiol. 2002; 9:292–295.
crossref
7. Rist CB, Watts JC, Lucas RJ. Isolated ischemic necrosis of the cecum in patients with chronic heart disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 1984; 27:548–551.
crossref
8. Hargrove WC 3rd, Rosato EF, Hicks RE, Mullen JL. Cecal necrosis after open-heart operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1978; 25:71–73.
crossref
9. Schuler JG, Hudlin MM. Cecal necrosis: infrequent variant of ischemic colitis. Report of five cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000; 43:708–712.
10. Simon AM, Birnbaum BA, Jacobs JE. Isolated infarction of the cecum: CT findings in two patients. Radiology. 2000; 214:513–516.
crossref
11. Friedell ML. Cecal necrosis in the dialysis-dependent patient. Am Surg. 1985; 51:621–622.
12. Margovsky A, Grieve DA. Cocaine-induced isolated caecum necrosis. ANZ J Surg. 2001; 71:321–322.
crossref
13. Perko Z, Bilan K, Vilović K, et al. Partial cecal necrosis treated by laparoscopic partial cecal resection. Coll Antropol. 2006; 30:937–939.
14. Hoeffel C, Crema MD, Belkacem A, et al. Multidetector row CT: spectrum of diseases involving the ileocecal area. Radiographics. 2006; 26:1373–1390.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Ischemic field (3×5 cm) on the cecal lateral wall.
kjg-61-265f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Ischemic outlook covering almost the entire cecum.
kjg-61-265f2.tif
Fig. 4.
(A) Ischemic field (2×2 cm) on the cecal anterior wall. (B) Cecal wedge resection material by the help of stapler. (C) The outlook of the cecum following resection with stapler.
kjg-61-265f3.tif
Fig. 3.
Right hemicolectomy was performed because of cecal necrosis.
kjg-61-265f4.tif
Table 1.
Symptoms and Signs of Patients with Isolated Cecal Necrosis
Symptom and sign Data
Abdominal pain or tenderness 13 (100)
Distention Vomiting 8 (61.0)8 (61.0)
Muscular defense or rebound tenderness 13 (100)
Fever 7 (53.0)
Hypokinetic/akinetic bowel 6 (46.1)

Values are presented as n (%).

Table 2.
Comorbid Diseases of Patients (n=13)
Comorbid disease Case
Heart failure 6 (46.1)
Chronic kidney disease 5 (38.4)
Hypertension 3 (23.0)
Atrial fibrillation 2 (15.3)
Diabetes mellitus 2 (15.3)
COPD 1 (7.6)
FMF 1 (7.6)
Atherosclerotic heart disease 1 (7.6)
Cerebrovascular disease 1 (7.6)

Values are presented as n (%).

COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; FMF, familial mediterranean fever.

Table 3.
Laboratory Findings and Treatment Modality
Age (yr) Gender WBC (/μ L) LDH (U/L) CK (U/L) CRP (mg/L) Treatment Complication Perioperative mortality
51 M 16,300 418 100 90 Right hemicolectomy    
80 M 18,000 880 350 15 Right hemicolectomy+ Ileostomy   Yes
51 M 18,000 400 330 120 Right hemicolectomy    
69 F 13,400 317 55 84 Right hemicolectomy Wound infection  
53 F 14,100 546 435 10 Right hemicolectomy    
68 F 9,900 413 10 76 Right hemicolectomy    
74 M 29,000 734 659 130 Right hemicolectomy    
83 M 20,000 213 20 40 Right hemicolectomy+ Ileostomy Evisceration Yes
67 M 18,000 256 328 65 Right hemicolectomy    
64 M 13,200 174 564 90 Partial cecal resection    
72 F 21,300 756 46 60 Right hemicolectomy Anastomotic leak Yes
84 F 8,700 428 54 73 Right hemicolectomy Wound infection Yes
68 M 13,100 678 73 105 Right hemicolectomy   Yes

WBC, white blood cell count.

Table 4.
Factors Affecting Postoperative Mortality
Parameter n Mortality, n (%) p-value
Age (yr)      
<65 5 0 0.024
>65 8 5 (62.0)  
Sex      
Male 8 3 (37.0) 0.928
Female 5 2 (40.0)  
Complaints start time (hour)      
>24 4 4 (100.0) 0.010
<24 9 1 (11.0)  
Leukocyte      
<15,000 4 1 (25.0) 0.506
>15,000 9 4 (44.0)  
CRP      
<10 1 0 0.410
>10 12 5 (41.0)  
Comorbid diseases      
<2 5 0 0.024
≥2 8 5 (62.5)  
TOOLS
Similar articles