Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/fonts/TeX/fontdata.js

Journal List > Korean J Gastroenterol > v.60(4) > 1007005

Jeong, Park, Kim, Park, and Moon: The Natural Course of Early Gastric Cancer

Abstract

Background/Aims

Early gastric cancer (EGC) has a relatively long natural course compared to advanced gastric cancer (AGC). But, few studies about the natural course of EGC are currently available in the literature. In this study we investigated the natural course of EGC in patients who did not receive any treatment.

Methods

All patients diagnosed with gastric cancer on endoscopy at Kosin University Gospel Hospital between January 2001 and December 2010 were reviewed. Those among them who had EGC and did not receive any treatment were enrolled, and an analysis was performed.

Results

Twenty seven patients were enrolled. Nine of the enrolled patients were women and the median age was 73 years (range, 38-95). Initial endoscopic findings revealed 11 cases of protruded type, 16 cases of flat and depressed type. Histopathologic analysis indicated that there were 14 cases of well and moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, 6 cases of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and signet ring cell carcinoma. Twelve patients underwent follow-up endoscopy and three of them developed AGC within a mean of 9.6 months (range, 5-12 months). Overall median survival time was 40 months and the 5-year survival rate was 45%.

Conclusions

Although there were some differences in EGC progression, patients who did not receive any treatment progressed eventually. We were unable to identify specific factors predictive of median survival time in these patients.

Figures and Tables

kjg-60-224-g001
Fig. 1
Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival rates in early gastric cancer.

Download Figure

Table 1
Characteristics of 27 Patients Who Did Not Receive Any Treatment after Diagnosed Early Gastric Cancer
kjg-60-224-i001

Values are presented as n (range) or n (%).

Download Table

Table 2
Changes in Endoscopic Finding
kjg-60-224-i002

Unclassified, unclassified adenocarcinoma; Signet ring cell, signet ring cell type adenocarcinoma; EGC, early gastric cancer.

Download Table

Table 3
Clinical, Endoscopic, and Histopathologic Characteristics Associated with Overall Survival in Early Gastric Cancer
kjg-60-224-i003

Signet ring cell, signet ring cell type adenocarcinoma.

Download Table

Notes

Financial support: None.

Conflict of interest: None.

References

1. Korean National Statistical Office. Annual report on the cause of death statistics. 2007. Daejeon: Korea National Statistical Office.
2. Fukutomi H, Sakita T. Analysis of early gastric cancer cases collected from major hospitals and institutes in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1984. 14:169–179.
3. Itoh H, Oohata Y, Nakamura K, Nagata T, Mibu R, Nakayama F. Complete ten-year postgastrectomy follow-up of early gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 1989. 158:14–16.
4. Ewing J. The beginnings of gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 1936. 31:204.
5. Mallory TB. Carcinoma in situ of the stomach and its bearing on histogenesis of malignant ulcers. Arch Pathol. 1940. 30:348.
6. Tsukuma H, Oshima A, Narahara H, Morii T. Natural history of early gastric cancer: a non-concurrent, long term, follow up study. Gut. 2000. 47:618–621.
7. Sue-Ling HM, Martin I, Griffith J, et al. Early gastric cancer: 46 cases treated in one surgical department. Gut. 1992. 33:1318–1322.
8. Fujita S. Biology of early gastric carcinoma. Pathol Res Pract. 1978. 163:297–309.
9. Tsukuma H, Ioka A, Iishi H, Yamazaki H. Prospective study of early gastric cancer with considerations concerning clinical practice for gastric cancer. Stomach Intest. 2008. 43:1375–1381.
10. Tsukuma H, Mishima T, Oshima A. Prospective study of "early" gastric cancer. Int J Cancer. 1983. 31:421–426.
11. Axon A. Natural history of early gastric cancer. Gut. 2000. 47:609.
12. Matsui T, Yao T. Natural history of gastric cancer. Nihon Rinsho. 2001. 59:Suppl 4. 583–588.
13. Matsui T, Nagahama T, Chonan A, Imamura A, Kobayashi H, Yoshino J. Natural history of early gastric cancer-multicenter follow up study. Stomach Intest. 2008. 43:1396–1407.
TOOLS
Similar articles