PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
Background/Aims
As the population ages, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) is being used increasingly as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool for elderly patients with pancreatobiliary disease. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes, safety and complications associated with ERCP performed in the elderly patients.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the medical record of 596 patients who were 50 years of age or older and underwent ERCP from January 2005 to September 2010. The patients were classified into two groups according to the age: non-elderly, 50–74 years old and elderly, ≥75 years old. Comparisons were made between two groups.
Results
Five hundred and ninety-six patients (132 elderly and 464 non-elderly patients) were enrolled. The success rate of ERCP was 89.4% in the elderly and 91.9% in the non-elderly. The major complications were occurred in 11 patients of the elderly and 16 of the non-elderly, and the complication rate was significantly higher in the elderly compared to the non-elderly (8.3% vs. 3.4%, p=0.011). Pancreatitis occurred in 2 elderly patients and 10 non-elderly patients (1.5% vs. 2.1%, p=1.0). There was a higher rate of bleeding in the elderly patients (4.5% vs. 1.3%, p=0.01).
Conclusions
ERCP is effective and safe even in elderly patients. Outcomes of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP in the elderly patients were similar to those in non-elderly patients. Elderly patients undergoing ERCP carried similar risk of pancreatitis but a higher risk of bleeding and perforation compared to non-elderly patients.
Go to : 
References
1. Sivak MV Jr. EUS for bile duct stones: how does it compare with ERCP? Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 56(6 Suppl):S175–S177.
2. Hacker KA, Schultz CC, Helling TS. Choledochotomy for calcu-lous disease in the elderly. Am J Surg. 1990; 160:610–612.
3. Gelb AM. Clinical gastroenterology in the elderly. New York: Marcel Dekker;1996.
4. Sullivan DM, Hood TR, Griffen WO Jr. Biliary tract surgery in the elderly. Am J Surg. 1982; 143:218–220.
5. Cotton PB. Endoscopic management of bile duct stones; (apples and oranges). Gut. 1984; 25:587–597.
6. Siegel JH, Kasmin FE. Biliary tract diseases in the elderly: management and outcomes. Gut. 1997; 41:433–435.
7. Ashton CE, McNabb WR, Wilkinson ML, Lewis RR. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in elderly patients. Age Ageing. 1998; 27:683–688.
8. MacMahon M, Walsh TN, Brennan P, Osborne H, Courtney MG. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the elderly: a single unit audit. Gerontology. 1993; 39:28–32.
9. Clarke GA, Jacobson BC, Hammett RJ, Carr-Locke DL. The indications, utilization and safety of gastrointestinal endoscopy in an extremely elderly patient cohort. Endoscopy. 2001; 33:580–584.
10. Bergman JJ, Rauws EA, Tijssen JG, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K. Biliary endoprostheses in elderly patients with endoscopically irretrievable common bile duct stones: report on 117 patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995; 42:195–201.
11. Mitchell RM, O'Connor F, Dickey W. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is safe and effective in patients 90 years of age and older. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003; 36:72–74.
12. Lukens FJ, Howell DA, Upender S, Sheth SG, Jafri SM. ERCP in the very elderly: outcomes among patients older than eighty. Dig Dis Sci. 2010; 55:847–851.
13. Benson ME, Byrne S, Brust DJ, et al. EUS and ERCP complication rates are not increased in elderly patients. Dig Dis Sci. 2010; 55:3278–3283.
14. Köklü S, Parlak E, Yüksel O, Sahin B. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the elderly: a prospective and comparative study. Age Ageing. 2005; 34:572–577.
15. Chong VH, Yim HB, Lim CC. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the elderly: outcomes, safety and complications. Singapore Med J. 2005; 46:621–626.
16. Sugiyama M, Atomi Y. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in patients 90 years of age and older. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000; 52:187–191.
17. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991; 37:383–393.
18. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998; 48:1–10.
19. Rácz I, Rejchrt S, Hassan M. Complications of ERCP: ethical obligations and legal consequences. Dig Dis. 2008; 26:49–55.
20. Christensen M, Matzen P, Schulze S, Rosenberg J. Complications of ERCP: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 60:721–731.
21. Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TC, et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 56:652–656.
22. Cocking JB, Ferguson A, Mukherjee SK, Giancola G. Short-acting general anaesthesia facilitates therapeutic ERCP in frail elderly patients with benign extra-hepatic biliary disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000; 12:451–454.
Go to :
Table 1.
Baseline Characteristics of Patients
XML Download