PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
Background/Aims
Recent studies suggest that the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is increasing in Korea. However, studies on risk factors for GERD have yielded inconsistent results. The aims of this study were to compare clinical features between symptomatic syndromes without esophageal injury (=non-erosive disease [NED]) and syndromes with esophageal injury (=erosive disease [ED]), and to determine risk factors associated ED.
Methods
A total of 450 subjects who visited gastroenterology clinics of six training hospitals in Daegu from March 2008 to April 2010 were consecutively enrolled. The subjects were asked to complete a questionnaire which inquired about gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. The questionnaire also included questions about smoking, alcohol drinking, consumption of coffee, use of drugs, exercise, and other medical history. The subjects were subdivided into NED and ED groups.
Results
The proportion of subjects in each NED and ED group was 172 (38.2%) and 278 (61.8%). Male gender, smoking, alcohol drinking, consumption of coffee, large waist circumference, infrequent medication of antacids, aspirin and NSAIDs, infrequent and mild GERD symptoms were all significantly associated with ED on univariate analysis. Age, hiatal hernia, diabetes mellitus, body mass index, change in weight during 1 year, and number of typical GERD symptoms were not independent risk factors for ED. However, the association between ED and alcohol drinking, infrequent medication of antacids, mild typical GERD symptoms remained as strong risk factors after adjustments on multivariate logistic analysis.
Go to : 
References
1. An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease manage-ment–the Genval Workshop Report. Gut. 1999; 44(Suppl 2):S1–S16.
2. Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R. Global Consensus Group. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101:1900–1920.
3. Dent J, El-Serag HB, Wallander MA, Johansson S. Epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut. 2005; 54:710–717.
4. Shah A, Uribe J, Katz PO. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and obesity. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2005; 34:35–43.
5. Kang HS, Nam SW, Lee SE, et al. The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease associated with age and body mass index in healthy Koreans. J Korean Geriatr Soc. 2008; 12:201–206.
6. Yang SY, Lee OY, Bak YT, et al. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and uninvestigated dyspepsia in Korea: a population-based study. Dig Dis Sci. 2008; 53:188–193.
7. Cho YS, Choi MG, Jeong JJ, et al. Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Asan-si, Korea. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005; 100:747–753.
8. Oh JH, Choi MG, Kim HR, et al. Clinical spectrum of endoscopic reflux esophagitis in routine check-up subjects in Korea. Korean J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2006; 12:12–18.
9. Kim N, Lee SW, Cho SI, et al. The prevalence of and risk factors for erosive oesophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease: a nationwide multicentre prospective study in Korea. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008; 27:173–185.
10. Youn YH, Kang YW, Ahn SH, Park SK. Prevalence alteration of reflux esophagitis in recent years. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 23:144–148.
11. Lee JY, Hong WK, Sohn KM, et al. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of gastroesophageal reflux disease and reflux esophagitis in chuncheon city-Health care examination study. Korean J Med. 2008; 74:385–390.
12. Jung SA, Jung HY, Kim KR, Min YI. The prevalence of reflux esophagitis of Korean adults for 10 years of 1990's. Korean J Gastrointest Motil. 2001; 7:161–167.
13. Friedenberg FK, Xanthopoulos M, Foster GD, Richter JE. The association between gastroesophageal reflux disease and obesity. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008; 103:2111–2122.
14. Jacobson BC, Somers SC, Fuchs CS, Kelly CP, Camargo CA Jr. Body-mass index and symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux in women. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354:2340–2348.
15. Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, et al. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut. 1999; 45:172–180.
16. El-Serag HB, Graham DY, Satia JA, Rabeneck L. Obesity is an independent risk factor for GERD symptoms and erosive esophagitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005; 100:1243–1250.
17. Nocon M, Labenz J, Willich SN. Lifestyle factors and symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux – a population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006; 23:169–174.
18. Lagergren J, Bergström R, Nyrén O. No relation between body mass and gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms in a Swedish population based study. Gut. 2000; 47:26–29.
19. Lundell L, Ruth M, Sandberg N, Bove-Nielsen M. Does massive obesity promote abnormal gastroesophageal reflux? Dig Dis Sci. 1995; 40:1632–1635.
20. Kang MS, Park DI, Oh SY, et al. Abdominal obesity is an independent risk factor for erosive esophagitis in a Korean population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007; 22:1656–1661.
21. Nam SY, Choi IJ, Nam BH, Park KW, Kim CG. Obesity and weight gain as risk factors for erosive oesophagitis in men. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009; 29:1042–1052.
22. Rey E, Moreno-Elola-Olaso C, Artalejo FR, Locke GR 3rd, Diaz-Rubio M. Association between weight gain and symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux in the general population. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101:229–233.
23. Jeon SG, Rhee PL, Shin MH, et al. The prevalence and risk factors of reflux esophagitis in routine check-up subjects. Korean J Gastroenterol. 1998; 32:701–708.
24. Hwang JK, Kim JH, Hong SG, et al. A prospective multicenter study on the prevalence and symptoms of erosive reflux esophagitis in secondary and tertiary hospitals in Korea. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2009; 53:283–291.
25. O'Leary C, McCarthy J, Humphries M, Shanahan F, Quigley E. The prophylactic use of a proton pump inhibitor before food and alcohol. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003; 17:683–686.
26. Kim HY, Kim NY, Kim SM, et al. Clinical spectrum and risk factors of erosive and non-erosive GERD in health check-up subjects. Korean J Med. 2006; 71:491–500.
27. Nilsson M, Johnsen R, Ye W, Hveem K, Lagergren J. Lifestyle related risk factors in the aetiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Gut. 2004; 53:1730–1735.
28. Zheng Z, Nordenstedt H, Pedersen NL, Lagergren J, Ye W. Lifestyle factors and risk for symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux in monozygotic twins. Gastroenterology. 2007; 132:87–95.
29. Shapiro M, Green C, Bautista JM, et al. Assessment of dietary nutrients that influence perception of intra-oesophageal acid reflux events in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007; 25:93–101.
30. Price SF, Smithson KW, Castell DO. Food sensitivity in reflux esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 1978; 75:240–243.
31. Wang JH, Luo JY, Dong L, Gong J, Tong M. Epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a general population-based study in Xi'an of Northwest China. World J Gastroenterol. 2004; 10:1647–1651.
32. Stanghellini V. Relationship between upper gastrointestinal symptoms and lifestyle, psychosocial factors and comorbidity in the general population: results from the Domestic/International Gastroenterology Surveillance Study (DIGEST). Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1999; 231:29–37.
33. Boekema PJ, Samsom M, Smout AJ. Effect of coffee on gas-tro-oesophageal reflux in patients with reflux disease and healthy controls. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999; 11:1271–1276.
34. Dennish GW, Castell DO. Inhibitory effect of smoking on the lower esophageal sphincter. N Engl J Med. 1971; 284:1136–1137.
35. Kahrilas PJ, Gupta RR. The effect of cigarette smoking on salivation and esophageal acid clearance. J Lab Clin Med. 1989; 114:431–438.
36. Kahrilas PJ, Gupta RR. Mechanisms of acid reflux associated with cigarette smoking. Gut. 1990; 31:4–10.
37. Pehl C, Pfeiffer A, Wendl B, Nagy I, Kaess H. Effect of smoking on the results of esophageal pH measurement in clinical routine. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1997; 25:503–506.
Go to :
Table 1.
Patient Characteristics (n=450)
Table 2.
Factors Associated with Erosive Disease
Table 3.
Symptoms Associated with Erosive Disease
| Variable | NED (%) | ED (%) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of typical GERS a | 0.953 | ||
| 1 | 74/172 (43.0) | 97/227 (42.7) | |
| 2 | 98/172 (57.0) | 130/227 (57.3) | |
| Frequency of typical GERS b | 0.002 | ||
| 1/week | 39/172 (22.7) | 55/163 (33.7) | |
| ≥2/week | 67/172 (39.0) | 70/163 (42.9) | |
| Daily | 66/172 (38.4) | 38/163 (23.3) | |
| Severity of typical GERS | 0.001 | ||
| Mild | 6/172 (3.5) | 25/228 (11.0) | |
| Moderate | 109/172 (63.4) | 153/228 (67.1) | |
| Severe | 57/172 (33.1) | 50/228 (21.9) | |
| Atypical symptoms | |||
| Globus sensation | 54/172 (31.4) | 56/278 (20.1) | 0.007 |
| Dysphagia | 72/170 (42.4) | 82/276 (29.7) | 0.006 |
| Belching | 95/172 (55.2) | 104/278 (37.4) | ＜0.001 |
| Coughing | 45/172 (26.2) | 78/278 (28.1) | 0.661 |
| Wheezing | 35/172 (20.3) | 65/276 (23.6) | 0.429 |
| Dyspnea on exertion | 36/172 (20.9) | 53/278 (19.1) | 0.629 |
| Hoarseness | 56/172 (32.6) | 80/278 (28.8) | 0.396 |
Table 4.
Risk Factors for Erosive Disease
| Risk factor | Inivariate analysis, R OR (95% CI) | Multivariate analysis, OR a (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Male vs. female gender | 2.95 (1.98–4.38) | − |
| Alcohol users vs. non-users | 2.57 (1.75–3.78) | 1.83 (1.07–3.12) |
| Smokers vs. non-smokers | 2.36 (1.56–3.59) | − |
| Coffee users vs. non-users | 1.51 (1.02–2.24) | − |
| Antacids medication | 0.46 (0.32–0.68) | 0.61 (0.38–0.97) |
| Aspirin or NSAIDs medication | 0.50 (0.31–0.82) | − |
| Waist circumference (cm) | ||
| ＜80 vs. 80.0–89.9 | 1.76 (1.14–2.72) | − |
| ＜80 vs. 90.0–99.9 | 1.91 (1.11–3.30) | − |
| ＜80 vs. ≥100 | 3.65 (1.28–10.44) | − |
| Severity of typical GERS | ||
| Mild vs. Moderate | 0.34 (0.13–0.85) | − |
| Mild vs. Severe | 0.21 (0.08–0.56) | 0.27 (0.09–0.81) |
XML Download