Journal List > Korean J Gastroenterol > v.56(5) > 1006737

Yang, Kim, Park, Lim, Lee, Kim, Han, and Kim: A Case of Primary Extragastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Presenting as Peritoneal Dissemination

Abstract

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract, but also occurs at a lower frequency in extragastrointestinal regions such as omentum, mesentery, retroperitoneum and undefined abdominal sites. This tumor is called extragastrointestinal stromal tumor (EGIST). EGIST is mostly diagnosed as a cystic mass, but rarely occurs as a disseminated abdominal tumor. We experienced a 70-year-old man with primary EGIST presenting as peritoneal dissemination. Abdominal CT showed diffuse peritoneal thickening with a large amount of ascites, but no definite mass lesion. Laparoscopic biopsy was performed and histologic findings showed tumor composed of epithelioid cells. In the results of immunohistochemical stains, the tumor showed positive reactivity with CD117 (c-kit), CD34, vimentin and actin, but negative reactivity with desmin and S-100 protein. On account of unresectability and histologic parameters of malignant behavior, he was started on imatinib.

REFERENCES

1. Choi KU, Kim JY, Park DY, et al. Primary extragastrointestinal stromal tumor (EGIST) of the greater omentum. Korean J Pathol. 2001; 35:347–350.
2. Ko ES, Bae K, Jeon KN, et al. Extragastrointestinal stromal tumor presenting a large multilocular cystic mass arising from the greater omentum: a case report. J Korean Radiol Soc. 2004; 51:533–536.
crossref
3. Hwang KT, Chung JK, Jung IM, et al. Primary retroperitoneal malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumor mimicking adrenal mass. J Korean Surg Soc. 2009; 77:357–361.
crossref
4. Mazur MT, Clark HB. Gastric stromal tumors. Reappraisal of histogenesis. Am J Surg Pathol. 1983; 7:507–519.
crossref
5. Kindblom LG, Remotti HE, Aldenborg F, Meis-Kindblom JM. Gastrointestinal pacemaker cell tumor (GIPACT): gastrointestinal stromal tumors show phenotypic characteristics of the interstitial cells of Cajal. Am J Pathol. 1998; 152:1259–1269.
6. Sircar K, Hewlett BR, Huizinga JD, Chorneyko K, Berezin I, Riddell RH. Interstitial cells of Cajal as precursors of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999; 23:377–389.
crossref
7. Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, et al. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A consensus approach. Hum Pathol. 2002; 33:459–465.
crossref
8. Reith JD, Goldblum JR, Lyles RH, Weiss SW. Extragastrointestinal (soft tissue) stromal tumors: an analysis of 48 cases with emphasis on histologic predictors of outcome. Mod Pathol. 2000; 13:577–585.
crossref
9. Takahashi T, Kuwao S, Yanagihara M, Kakita A. A primary solitary tumor of the lesser omentum with immunohistochemical features of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998; 93:2269–2273.
crossref
10. Sakurai S, Hishima T, Takazawa Y, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors and KIT-positive mesenchymal cells in the omentum. Pathol Int. 2001; 51:524–531.
crossref
11. Miettinen M, Monihan JM, Sarlomo-Rikala M, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors/smooth muscle tumors (GISTs) primary in the omentum and mesentery: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 26 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999; 23:1109–1118.
12. Miettinen M, Sobin LH, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors presenting as omental masses–a clinicopathologic analysis of 95 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009; 33:1267–1275.
crossref
13. Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: review on morphology, molecular pathology, prognosis, and differential diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006; 130:1466–1478.
crossref
14. Liegl-Atzwanger B, Fletcher JA, Fletcher CD. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Virchows Arch. 2010; 456:111–127.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Abdominal CT finding. Diffuse peritoneal wall thickening was noted with a large amount of ascites. This finding was prominent in the greater omentum.
kjg-56-319f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Small bowel series and PET-CT findings. (A) Small bowel series showed a normal contour without evidence of extrinsic compression. (B) Diffuse FDG uptake along the peritoneal surface was noted. This finding was consistent with peritoneal carcinomatosis.
kjg-56-319f2.tif
Fig. 3.
Laparoscopic finding. Multiple tumor nodules were scat-tered on the peritoneal surface.
kjg-56-319f3.tif
Fig. 4.
Microscopic findings. (A) The tumor was composed of epithelioid cells (H&E stain, ×100). (B) The tumor cells showed high cel-lularity, but no necrosis (H&E stain, ×400).
kjg-56-319f4.tif
Fig. 5.
Immunohistochemical findings. Tumor cells were positive for CD117(c-kit) (A), CD34 (B), vimentin (C), and actin (D). However, tumor cells were negative for desmin (E) and S-100 protein (F) (×200).
kjg-56-319f5.tif
TOOLS
Similar articles