Journal List > Korean J Gastroenterol > v.55(6) > 1006676

Lee, Ryu, Park, You, Lee, Kim, Kim, Heo, Kim, Song, Kim, and Park: The Usefulness of In Vitro Interferon-γ Assay for Differential Diagnosis between Intestinal Tuberculosis and Crohn's Disease

Abstract

Background/Aims

It is difficult to clinically and endoscopically differentiate intestinal tuberculosis (ITB) and Crohn's disease (CD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of in vitro interferon-gamma (INF-γ) assay for differential diagnosis between ITB and CD.

Methods

Sixty patients for whom differential diagnosis between ITB and CD was difficult were enrolled between January 2007 and January 2009. The INF-γ-producing T-cell response to early secreted antigenic target 6 and culture filtrate protein 10 were measured by T-SPOT.TB blood test in vitro. We evaluated the usefulness of T-SPOT.TB blood test by comparing its results with the final diagnosis.

Results

Twenty and forty patients were revealed to be positive and negative in T-SPOT.TB blood test, respectively. Of the 20 patients found to be positive, 12 patients (60%) were finally diagnosed as ITB, 6 patients as CD, and 2 patients as Behcet's enterocolitis. Of the 40 patients with negative results, 38 patients (95%) were diagnosed as CD; one as Behcet's enterocolitis; one as nonspecific colitis; none as ITB. The sensitivity and specificity of T-SPOT.TB blood test for ITB were 100% and 83.3%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values of T-SPOT.TB blood test for ITB were 60.0% and 100%, respectively.

Conclusions

When differential diagnosis between ITB and CD is difficult, T-SPOT.TB blood test may be a helpful and rapid diagnostic tool to exclude ITB. Prospective large-scaled studies are required for further evaluation of the usefulness of T-SPOT.TB blood test for differential diagnosis between ITB and CD.

REFERENCES

1. Mori T, Sakatani M, Yamagishi F, et al. Specific detection of tuberculosis infection: an interferon-gamma-based assay using new antigens. Am J Repair Crit Care Med. 2004; 170:59–64.
2. Ribera E, Martí nez Vásquez JM, Ocañ a I, et al. Diagnostic value of ascites gamma interferon levels in tuberculous peritonitis. Comparison with adenosine deaminase activity. Tubercle. 1991; 72:193–197.
crossref
3. Shimamoto H, Hamada K, Higuchi I, et al. Abdominal tuberculosis: peritoneal involvement shown by F-18 FDG PET. Clin Nucl Med. 2007; 32:716–718.
crossref
4. Kirsch R, Pentecost M, Hall Pde M, Epstein DP, Watermeyer G, Friederich PW. Role of colonoscopic biopsy in dis-tinguishing between Crohn's disease and intestinal tuberculosis. J Clin Pathol. 2006; 59:840–844.
crossref
5. Chung KM, Kim HS, Park SY, et al. The changes in incidence of Crohn's disease and intestinal tuberculosis in Korea. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2008; 52:351–358.
6. Kim SH, Choi SJ, Kim HB, Kim NJ, Oh MD, Choe KW. Diagnostic usefulness of a T-cell based assay for extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Arch Intern Med. 2007; 167:2255–2259.
7. Madariaga MG, Jalali Z, Swindells S. Clinical utility of interferon gamma assay in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. J Am Board Fam Med. 2007; 20:540–547.
crossref
8. Marshall JB. Tuberculosis of the gastrointestinal tract and peritoneum. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993; 88:989–999.
crossref
9. Stange EF, Travis SP, Vermeire S, et al. European evidence based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease. definitions and diagnosis. Gut. 2006; 55(suppl 1):i1–i15.
crossref
10. Park JB, Yang SK, Myung SJ, et al. Clinical characteristics at diagnosis and course of Korean patients with Crohn's disease. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2004; 43:8–17.
11. Kobayashi K, Ueno F, Bito S, et al. Development of consensus statements for the diagnosis and management of intestinal Behç et's disease using a modified Delphi approach. J Gastroenterol. 2007; 42:737–745.
12. Bradbury AW, Milne AA, Murie JA. Surgical aspects of Behç et's disease. Br J Surg. 1994; 81:1712–1721.
13. Sharma SK, Tahir M, Mohan A, Smith-Rohrberg D, Mishra HK, Pandey RM. Diagnostic accuracy of ascitic fluid IFN- gamma and adenosine deaminase assays in the diagnosis of tuberculous ascites. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2006; 26:484–488.
14. Sharma MP, Bhatia V. Abdominal tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res. 2004; 120:305–315.
15. Kim HA, Chung SS, Kim KH, Lee RA. The change of the clinical features that Crohn's disease treated by surgery. J Korean Surg Soc. 2005; 69:135–138.
16. Baumgart DC. The diagnosis and treatment of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009; 106:123–133.
crossref
17. Almadi MA, Ghosh S, Aljebreen AM. Differentiating intestinal tuberculosis from Crohn's disease: a diagnostic challenge. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009; 104:1003–1012.
crossref
18. Gan HT, Chen YQ, Ouyang Q, Bu H, Yang XY. Differentiation between intestinal tuberculosis and Crohn's disease in endoscopic biopsy specimens by polymerase chain reaction. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002; 97:1446–1451.
crossref
19. Nos P, Domenech E. Postoperative Crohn's disease recurrence: a practical approach. World J Gastroenterol. 2008; 14:5540–5548.
crossref
20. Benito Garcí a P, Prieto Vicente V, Geijo Martí nez F, et al. Intestinal tuberculosis: a diagnostic challenge. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2008; 100:109–110.
21. Amarapurkar DN, Patel ND, Amarapurkar AD, Agal S, Baigal R, Gupte P. Tissue polymerase chain reaction in diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis and Crohn's disease. J Assoc Physicians India. 2004; 52:863–867.
22. Gerhardt T, Wolff M, Fischer HP, Sauerbruch T, Reichel C. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis: a case report. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005; 40:240–243.
crossref
23. Brock I, Weldingh K, Lillebaek T, Follmann F, Andersen P. Comparison of tuberculin skin test and new specific blood test in tuberculosis contacts. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004; 170:65–69.
crossref
24. Talati NJ, Seybold U, Humphrey B, et al. Poor concordance between interferon-gamma release assays and tuberculin skin tests in diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection among HIV-infected individuals. BMC Infect Dis. 2009; 9:15.
crossref
25. Kwon CI, Park PW, Kang H, et al. The usefulness of angio-tensin converting enzyme in the differential diagnosis of Crohn's disease and intestinal tuberculosis. Korean J Intern Med. 2007; 22:1–7.
crossref
26. Ak O, Dabak G, Ozer S, Saygi A, Dabak R. The evaluation of the Quantiferon-TB Gold test in pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2009; 62:149–151.
27. Connell TG, Ritz N, Paxton GA, Buttery JP, Curtis N, Ranganathan SC. A three-way comparison of tuberculin skin testing, QuantiFERON-TB gold and T-SPOT.TB in children. PLoS One. 2008; 3:e2624.
crossref
28. Mantegani P, Piana F, Codecasa L, et al. Comparison of an in-house and a commercial RD1-based ELISPOT-IFN-gamma assay for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Clin Med Res. 2006; 4:266–272.
29. Kobashi Y, Sugiu T, Shimizu H, et al. Clinical evaluation of the T-SPOT.TB test for patients with indeterminate results on the QuantiFERON TB-2G test. Intern Med. 2009; 48:137–142.
crossref

Table 1.
Baseline Characteristics of Intestinal Tuberculosis and Crohn's Disease
Intestinal tuberculosis (n=12) Crohn's disease (n=44) p-value
Male/Female 6/6 31/13 0.302
Age, years 48.5 (29-78) 24.0 (17-65) <0.001
Symtoms or signs
   Abdominal pain 9 (75.0%) 39 (88.6%) 0.348
   Fever/≥38 o C 5/2 (41.7/16.7%) 0 (0%) <0.001
   Weight loss 5 (41.7%) 26 (59.1%) 0.338
   Diarrhea 7 (58.3%) 35 (79.5%) 0.151
   Intestinal obstruction 1 (8.3%) 5 (11.4%) 0.619
   Fistula (enteroenteric/enterovesical) 0 (0%) 4/1 (9.1/2.3%) 0.574
   Perianal disease 0 (0%) 12 (27.3%) 0.038
Radiologic findings
   Intestinal wall thickening 10 (83.3%) 41 (93.2%) 0.289
   Abdominal lump 0 (0%) 3 (6.8%) 0.478
   Mesenteric thickening 3 (25.0%) 4 (9.1%) 0.160
   Ascites 2 (16.7%) 5 (11.4%) 0.635
   Abdominal
   lymphadenopathy 7 (58.3%) 25 (56.8%) 0.596
Colonoscopic findings
   Ulcerations 12 (100%) 42 (95.5%) 0.614
   Transverse/longitudinal/combined 8/2/2 (66.7/16.7/16.7%) 8/26/8 (19.0/61.9/19.0%)
   Pseudopolyps 8 (66.7%) 31 (70.5%) 0.529
   Strictures 2 (16.7%) 9 (20.5%) 0.566
Localization of lesions
   Pancolits 1 (8.3%) 13 (29.5%) 0.127
   Ileocecum 7 (58.3%) 26 (59.1%) 0.607
   Ascending colon 3 (25.0%) 1 (2.3%) 0.028
   Transverse colon 1 (8.3%) 0 (0%) 0.214
   Descending colon or sigmoid colon 0 (0%) 3 (6.8%) 0.478
   Rectum 0 (0%) 1 (2.3%) 0.786
Histologic findings
   Granuloma 3 (25.0%) 5 (11.4%) 0.348
   Caseating 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
   Non-caseating 3 (25.0%) 5 (11.4%)
   Ulceration of surface epithelium 8 (66.7%) 21 (47.7%) 0.329
   Lymphoid aggregates or follicle 3 (25.0%) 16 (36.4%) 0.732
   Chronic inflammation 5 (41.7%) 29 (65.9%) 0.184

p, predictive. Statistical analysis was performed by chi-square test and

Mann Whitney U-test.

Table 2.
Results of PCR in Biopsy Specimens and INF-γ in Whole Blood from Patients with Intestinal Tuberculosis and Crohn's Disease
Group Granuloma (+) Granuloma (−)g a Total
Caseating Non-caseatin
Intestinal TB
PCR 0 1/3 0/9 1/12
(0%) (33.3%) (0%) (8.3%)
INF-γ 0 3/3 9/9 12/12
(0%) (100%) (100%) (100%)
CD
PCR 0 0/5 0/39 0/44
(0%) (0%) (0%) (0%)
INF-γ 0 1/5 5/39 6/44
(0%) (20.0%) (12.8%) (13.6%)

PCR, polymerase chain reaction; TB, tuberculosis; CD, Crohn's disease.

Table 3.
Results of T-SPOT.TB Blood Tests for Differential Diagnosis between Intestinal Tuberculosis and Other Diseases
TB. colitis Non-TB. colitis Total 95% CI
Positive 12 8 20
Negative 0 40 40
Sensitivity (%) 12/12 (100) 0.70-1.00
Specificity (%) 40/48 (83.3) 0.69-0.92
P(+) value (%) 12/20 (60.0) 0.36-0.80
P(−) value (%) 40/40 (100) 0.89-1.00

TB, tuberculosis; P, predictive; CI, confidence interval.

TOOLS
Similar articles